Thanks, that makes me feel a little better. Should i be concerned about
this "very weak scatter radiation"? Should i be concerned because it
wasn't like a millisecond xray but one that lasted 5-10 seconds
because its a panorama one?
to be honest i don't know if his walls are even lead.
thanks
> As far as any form of risk, unless you are exposed to this on a daily basis,
> do not worry. That being said, you should not have been in the same room as
> the panorex machine. The room should be isolated with lead walls. The
> exposure you might have received was in the form of a very weak scatter
> radiation...but I am not making excuses for the dentist...I just want to
> reassure you.
George - 21 Oct 2006 23:10 GMT
1 panoral radiograph = the amount of background radiation you get in a
2-hour flight from London to Barcelona
1 small dental radiograph = the amount of background radiation you get
going about your daily business
Don't sweat it. People who should worry about radiation are those
exposed to it frequently (dentist, radiologist, nuclear plant worker)
or those undergoing radiotherapy. That said, your dentist should be
more responsible with radiography devices.
Regards,
George
Steven Bornfeld - 22 Oct 2006 01:33 GMT
> Thanks, that makes me feel a little better. Should i be concerned about
> this "very weak scatter radiation"? Should i be concerned because it
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> thanks
Panoramic machines are almost certainly better shielded for scatter
radiation than conventional machines. Because the x-ray head rotates
around the patient, you are only exposed through a thin slot in the head
for the moment that the head is pointed in your direction. Even at 7-8
feet, your exposure will be greatly attenuated. You shouldn't worry
about this.
This does not excuse the dentist, who should know better.
Steve
>> As far as any form of risk, unless you are exposed to this on a daily basis,
>> do not worry. That being said, you should not have been in the same room as
>> the panorex machine. The room should be isolated with lead walls. The
>> exposure you might have received was in the form of a very weak scatter
>> radiation...but I am not making excuses for the dentist...I just want to
>> reassure you.
> As far as any form of risk, unless you are exposed to this on a daily basis,
> do not worry. That being said, you should not have been in the same room as
> the panorex machine. The room should be isolated with lead walls. The
> exposure you might have received was in the form of a very weak scatter
> radiation...but I am not making excuses for the dentist...I just want to
> reassure you.
Interesting--usually this kind of open floor plan I thought was used
primarily in ortho offices. And then, there's usually a separate room
for pans.
I agree--the risk is minimal. But it shouldn't have happened.
Steve
C.J. Thomas - 22 Oct 2006 02:07 GMT
I must be naive...everytime I ever saw a panorex machine in a dental/ortho
office, it was in a room all its own...even at the school, the pans are in a
separate room. This just sounds too weird. :)
>> As far as any form of risk, unless you are exposed to this on a daily
>> basis, do not worry. That being said, you should not have been in the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Steve
Mark A - 22 Oct 2006 02:12 GMT
>I must be naive...everytime I ever saw a panorex machine in a dental/ortho
>office, it was in a room all its own...even at the school, the pans are in
>a separate room. This just sounds too weird. :)
I have seen panorex machines out in the open at several dentist's offices.