Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Implant -- Do I choose Oral Surgeon or Periodontist?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com - 26 Aug 2006 22:48 GMT
I had tooth #18 extracted and am scheduled for evaluation in a month
with the  oral surgeon to see how the bone has healed. If there is bone
loss, bone graft will be required (I am not sure if the oral surgeon
does bone grafts -- I will need to go to periodontist -- but I will
have to check on that).

But I do know that both the oral surgeon and the periodontist that
previously treated my infection, perform implants.

In the case that I go for implant, does it make much difference which
one of them I select?

Is experience very important or are implants a routine procedure that
any experienced dentist could do?
JimSocal - 27 Aug 2006 00:20 GMT
>I had tooth #18 extracted and am scheduled for evaluation in a month
>with the  oral surgeon to see how the bone has healed. If there is bone
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Is experience very important or are implants a routine procedure that
>any experienced dentist could do?
I'm not a dentist or oral surgeon, but a patient who did a lot of
research before getting implants.

I think the #1 factor you should look at is EXPERIENCE; and secondly
if that experience has led to good results.

I don't care what anyone says, implants are NOT "routine"; there is
much room for them to go wrong, if not done properly, or simply if
your body rejects them. Seems to me that if a bone graft is used,
chances for failures go up, but that's just my anecdotal observation,
not medical fact.

I'd question both as to how many they have done, ask if you can talk
to patients; how many have failed, and why?  how much each is going to
charge? And make your decision based on these answers.
mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com - 27 Aug 2006 09:37 GMT
> I'm not a dentist or oral surgeon, but a patient who did a lot of
> research before getting implants.
>
> I think the #1 factor you should look at is EXPERIENCE; and secondly
> if that experience has led to good results.

Thanks for the reply.

I believe that you are the same poster that went to a university for
implant.

Even though the dental schools are supervised by dentists, aren't you
taking a risk by having students (without the important experience you
mentioned) perform transplants on you?

And is it  difficult to get an appointment, i.e., long waiting lists,
at these dental schools?
JimSocal - 28 Aug 2006 21:20 GMT
>> I'm not a dentist or oral surgeon, but a patient who did a lot of
>> research before getting implants.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>And is it  difficult to get an appointment, i.e., long waiting lists,
>at these dental schools?
Yes, it is a risk going to a dental school, but probably not a lot
more risk than going to any dentist you don't really KNOW. At least at
the dental school, there is SOME supervision. I have had my mouth and
my wife's mouth majorly damaged by private practice dentists! I am
saying that IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY, get an oral surgeon with a lot of
experience and excellent reputation! But in my case I could not afford
the best, so I opted for the University.

It depends on the school, and the time you apply, as to whether there
is a waiting list. It sometimes helps if you get a recommendation from
a dentist who went to that school. That's what I did, and I got in
right away. Not sure if it was "who I knew" or just coincidence, but I
was surprised that I got in right away. You should know that getting
implants is a LONG process though! In my case, they started out by
taking xrays, then they spent months and several appointments building
a model of my mouth which served as a way to implant the implants
exactly in the right place. That took a month or two to get it done
and back from the lab, making sure it fit right, etc.

Then I had to have a CT scan of my jaws.

All this took many months and at least 8 appointments BEFORE we got to
the oral surgery. He did the bottoms (4 implants) in one session. It
was pretty painful just due to the amount of time I was in the chair
and having 4 at once. The surgery itself was not as painful as the
taking photos after spending hours with my mouth open. I could hardly
open my mouth at all after that, and they insisted I open "wider" to
take more photos.

All this is stuff that may not be done in a private office. Certainly
you would - I think - have the CHOICE to not have photos taken in a
private practice, and I certainly would have exercised that option if
I could have.

Now I am waiting for my sinus allergies to clear up some, before
having a lateral, crestal maxillary sinus lift, and 3 more implants.
At least, so far, it seems a bone graft is not going to be necessary.
And all the prep work (ct scans, modeling, etc.) has already been
done.

By the way, CT scans are not always necessary either, I think this is
a University thing, to show the "proper" or "best" way to do things...
IN THEIR OPINION...

My friend had 3 implants and did not have ct scans or modeling done.
Abu Khada al Karak - 27 Aug 2006 00:48 GMT
A question, did you have socket grafting done after the extraction of #18?
If not, was it mentioned as an option? The reason I ask, is that socket
grafting done just after extraction, can minimize the loss of bone that
occurs after extraction.

However, I am curious why you would want an implant for #18 at all.  I
rarely place implants in this area unless there is a specific reason.  If
all your other teeth are present, then the only major consideration is to
watch for extrusion of tooth #2 into the space for #18.  Last study I read
mentioned it only happens in about 19% of the general population.

Can you provide more details?

And, as JimSoCal says, EXPERIENCE is the best indicator of competency.  Just
look the Doc straight in the eye and ask him how many of these he has done,
and what your chances of success are with this procedure.  And yes, NO
surgery is routine......

Dr Abu

================================================

> I had tooth #18 extracted and am scheduled for evaluation in a month
> with the  oral surgeon to see how the bone has healed. If there is bone
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Is experience very important or are implants a routine procedure that
> any experienced dentist could do?
mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com - 27 Aug 2006 11:18 GMT
> A question, did you have socket grafting done after the extraction of #18?
> If not, was it mentioned as an option? The reason I ask, is that socket
> grafting done just after extraction, can minimize the loss of bone that
> occurs after extraction.

Socket grafting was not mentioned. There was an infection and bone loss
before the extraction. Maybe that is why it wasn't mentioned.

> However, I am curious why you would want an implant for #18 at all.  I
> rarely place implants in this area unless there is a specific reason.  If
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Can you provide more details?

All the other teeth are present,including wisdom teeth. I think they
are healthy as I have never had any fillings or crowns.  I asked the
surgeon about the "do nothing" option.
He said that he would not recommend that. He said there was a risk of
movement of neighboring teeth, but that the risk was not predictable.

He said that an implant  would be good option for me.

I didn't know thst the risk was only 19%. Even so, that percentage
could still be considered high enough to warrant implant,right?

> And, as JimSoCal says, EXPERIENCE is the best indicator of competency.  Just
> look the Doc straight in the eye and ask him how many of these he has done,
> and what your chances of success are with this procedure.  And yes, NO
> surgery is routine......

Well, not necessarily since that poster got implants through
inexperienced students at dental school.

What is your opinion of implants performed at U.S. dental schools?

> ================================================
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > Is experience very important or are implants a routine procedure that
> > any experienced dentist could do?
pubbievoter@yahoo.com - 28 Aug 2006 20:01 GMT
> However, I am curious why you would want an implant for #18 at all.  I
> rarely place implants in this area unless there is a specific reason.  If
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Dr Abu

Dr. Abu, I'm confused.  Isn't tooth #2 on the upper right and #18 on
the lower left?
How would 2 extrude into 18's space?
JimSocal - 28 Aug 2006 21:38 GMT
>> However, I am curious why you would want an implant for #18 at all.  I
>> rarely place implants in this area unless there is a specific reason.  If
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>the lower left?
>How would 2 extrude into 18's space?
You are correct, I have a chart in front of me:
#2 is on the upper right and #18 is on the lower left. The dr. must
have meant to say #15, not #2.
JimSocal - 28 Aug 2006 21:26 GMT
>A question, did you have socket grafting done after the extraction of #18?
>If not, was it mentioned as an option? The reason I ask, is that socket
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>================================================

Dr. Abu, I was also going to mention about maybe not NEEDING an
implant for #18, but since I'm not a doctor I declined to say it. Now
that you've said it, I will add that one of my dentists at the
University told me that I really did not NEED the implants in the
back, as in #18, that really one does not need those in most cases.
For some reason, they ended up doing one there anyway, but I think
they added it once they got "in there" for some reason.

I also had a powder type bone graft done when #18 was pulled about 6
months previous.

>> I had tooth #18 extracted and am scheduled for evaluation in a month
>> with the  oral surgeon to see how the bone has healed. If there is bone
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> Is experience very important or are implants a routine procedure that
>> any experienced dentist could do?
mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com - 29 Aug 2006 07:51 GMT
> Dr. Abu, I was also going to mention about maybe not NEEDING an
> implant for #18, but since I'm not a doctor I declined to say it. Now
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I also had a powder type bone graft done when #18 was pulled about 6
> months previous.

I am dismayed and confused to hear this because both of the dentists I
consulted said that I I needed an implant or bridge. I was seriously
considering doing nothing as I do not seem to be having any problems
after the extraction. But after consulting with them and hearing about
the problems with movement, I set aside money for FSA to pay for
implant.

Do you think that because they have a vested interest in selling
implants that they  will not give you the straight advice you received
from the university dentist?

I wish I had known this earlier.
JimSocal - 29 Aug 2006 19:49 GMT
>> Dr. Abu, I was also going to mention about maybe not NEEDING an
>> implant for #18, but since I'm not a doctor I declined to say it. Now
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>I wish I had known this earlier.
Maybe one of the dentists will address this question...

I think it may depend on your individual case. It might serve you to
get a 2nd opinion from another oral surgeon or dentist in your area,
maybe one at a University who will give you the straight story, with
no vested interest.

On 2nd thought, I may be mistaken: It may have been #1 which they said
I did not need, and so they are only going to implant #2 (not as far
back as #1). In any case, if you have a tooth back behind #18 (#17),
it may be more necessary to implant it. Again I am only speculating
here, and in fact I think I may be in over my head and maybe I should
not be saying anything.

I do know that many times dentists want to implant teeth or do
bridgework in order to keep the other teeth from SHIFTING, over time.
Shifting can cause problems, and by putting in a bridge or implant it
can be prevented. That may be why they want to implant #18 for you.

I would certainly discuss this with your dentist and let him know if
the expenditure is a hardship for you and you don't want to do it
unless it is really NECESSARY for the health of your mouth.

And yes, I think SOMETIMES dentists/oral surgeons are more interested
in making a good profit than anything else and don't mind giving you
treatment you don't really need, especially if they can justify it by
saying "It IS the BEST (that is, most ideal) treatment plan."
Sometimes we cannot afford the "best" treatment plan and sometimes a
more budget-conscious (YOUR budget, not his!) dentist might say, "I'm
not sure you really NEED an implant there..."

Hope I have not caused you unnecessary confusion. IF it were me, I
think I'd get a 2nd opinion from an impartial dentist, one who stands
to gain nothing. In fact, I would tell the 2nd opinion dentist, up
front, "I am not going to have any work done by you, I only want your
opinion" so that he remains impartial. I would also try not to give
the name of the dentist you are having the work done by, so as not to
prejudice his opinion in case he knows the dentist/surgeon.
C.J. Thomas - 29 Aug 2006 22:56 GMT
Just be prepared to pay a consultation fee.  A second dentist is not going
to waste his/her valuable time on opinion unless summoned to do so by a
court of law...

>>> Dr. Abu, I was also going to mention about maybe not NEEDING an
>>> implant for #18, but since I'm not a doctor I declined to say it. Now
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> the name of the dentist you are having the work done by, so as not to
> prejudice his opinion in case he knows the dentist/surgeon.
Steven Bornfeld - 27 Aug 2006 03:36 GMT
> I had tooth #18 extracted and am scheduled for evaluation in a month
> with the  oral surgeon to see how the bone has healed. If there is bone
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Is experience very important or are implants a routine procedure that
> any experienced dentist could do?

    The level of experience is far more important than the particular
specialty.  Both specialties existed long before the modern age of
osseointegrated implants, and both specialties have fairly equivalent
training with regard to implant placement.
    I may get hung for saying this, but in my experience oral surgeons are
less timid about cases that aren't slam dunks.  This may be because they
generally have more experience in the areas beyond the
alveolus--sinuses, working around inferior alveolar nerves, etc.  OTOH,
periodontists are more acquainted dealing with issues like tissue
contour and esthetics. They have worked longer together with restorative
dentists in designing appropriate fixed prostheses.  For this reason, I
have had fewer problems with periodontists placing implants in areas
that are difficult to restore esthetically.
    These are gross generalizations of course, and not terribly useful in
selecting a surgeon.  But I would talk with your restorative dentist,
who will surely have knowledge of the surgeons available, and can advise
you.

Steve

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.