Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Who is your favourite dentistry guru?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tony Burch - 09 Aug 2006 08:43 GMT
Hi all,

I was just pondering the idea of "gurus" & I thought the following questions
may hopefully make some interesting & entertaining discussion:)

Including people in this newsgroup & others in the field, whom do you
consider to be the present-day "gurus" in dentistry? ...I mean the people
who guide others, are inspirational & highly respected for their work &
contributions in this field.

Who is your favourite guru & why?

Please take the question in a light-hearted way. Maybe this is just a chance
to honour someone you respect. Maybe some readers will check out your "guru"
and also enjoy them.

Tony Burch
Joel344 - 09 Aug 2006 12:09 GMT
excellent question .....

double meaning here ......

--
Joel34
Keith P Walsh - 10 Aug 2006 08:41 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Tony Burch

Tony,

Writing from the experience of a regular correspondent who has been
trying for many years to get rational and scientific answers to some
rational and scientific questions regarding the electrical behavior of
metal amalgam dental fillings, I would say that sci.med.dentistry
attracts a lot of desperately ignorant dentists who have little to
offer but a monotonously juvenile brand of ridicule and sarcasm.

But I don't think you'll find any "gurus" here.

Keith P Walsh

By the way, I've noticed that you have a background in electronics, and
I was wondering if you might be able to help with my enquiries.

If you look at:

http://www.elektrotechnik.hs-magdeburg.de/Mitarbeiter/hinken/news/N6.htm

- you will see a graphical representation of the thermoelectric eddy
current and associated electromagnetic field which are produced
whenever an element of one electrical conductor is enclosed within a
dissimilar conductive material and subjected to a temperature gradient
across its length (figure d is most instructive).

This phenomenon is utilised in the field of non-destructive materials
testing to identify the presence of inclusions or impurities in metals
by detecting the influence of the thermoelectrically generated
electromagnetic field outside the surface of the material using very
accurate sensors.

An important aspect of this phenomenon is that it appears to be
reversible - i.e. an externally applied electromagnetic field of the
appropriate characteristics would have the effect of inducing the eddy
current and corresponding temperature gradient in the dissimilar
materials.

If you now look at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/setting.htm

- you will see that a typical dental amalgam is composed of a great
many elements of electrically conductive material all enclosed within a
matrix of another, dissimilar, electrically conductive material.

Do you know of any reason why it should not be possible to measure the
thermoelectric and/or electromagnetic properties of a typical dental
amalgam?

Further enquiries regarding the electrical properties of dental
amalgams can be found at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/intro.htm
Tony Burch - 10 Aug 2006 12:57 GMT
Hi Keith, thank you for your interesting post.

...

> But I don't think you'll find any "gurus" here.

I don't know, maybe there are some:) Someone might even like to name a
colleague whom they have found to be especially helpful, enlightening &
inspiring?

Regarding your following question, I don't know for sure, but I will tell
you what I think. (I do also have an interest in physics, but I am not a
physicist:) )...
...
> If you look at:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> dissimilar conductive material and subjected to a temperature gradient
> across its length (figure d is most instructive).

Yes, I observe that in this illustration, the enclosed dissimilar material
is in a "single slab" that spans the temperature difference region. I
believe the "single slab" point is the critical one - I will explain below.

> This phenomenon is utilised in the field of non-destructive materials
> testing to identify the presence of inclusions or impurities in metals
> by detecting the influence of the thermoelectrically generated
> electromagnetic field outside the surface of the material using very
> accurate sensors.

I believe in this case that the metal is an alloy, and as such would still
act as a "slab" of homogeneous material with a particular Seebeck
coefficient. I believe that the level of impurity would affect the Seebeck
coefficient, and this can be measured. I don't know for sure - I am guessing
that his is how it's done? If you have a web link, I would be interested to
have a look.

> An important aspect of this phenomenon is that it appears to be
> reversible - i.e. an externally applied electromagnetic field of the
> appropriate characteristics would have the effect of inducing the eddy
> current and corresponding temperature gradient in the dissimilar
> materials.

Yes, in thinking about what the Seebeck and Peltier effects are doing, it is
helpful to consider both the "voltage generation" and  the reverse case of
"temperature difference generation".

> If you now look at:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> thermoelectric and/or electromagnetic properties of a typical dental
> amalgam?

I believe it won't work because even though the dissimilar metals are
enclosed, they are not in a single slab - they are in "micro slabs" or
particles. The eddy currents around each "micro slab" would cancel with
adjacent ones (sum to zero), not enabling an eddy current loop to form, and
hence no generated magetic field.

...I could be wrong but on my first pass it seems like this could be the
case. I'm not sure without thinking about it more deeply.

Tony Burch
George - 11 Aug 2006 18:54 GMT
Hi Tony,

If I had any favourite gurus, it would probably be people who didn't
consider themselves to be "gurus". I am a bit annoyed by dentists
blindly following anything a self-appointed "guru" says, as I would
like to think that dentists are scientists basing their practices on
available evidence rather than who said what.
If you want names, my favourite dental personnas would be Gordon
Christensen, Miles Markley and Angelo Sargenti (don't like his
technique but I am inspired by what he was trying to achieve).

Regards,
George
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.