Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A Strategy to Avoid America's Rip-off Dentists

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rick - 18 Jun 2006 14:13 GMT
First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you
can forget about dental schools which were once a safe-haven for those
seeking reasonable dental fees -- no more. Today even dental schools
which certainly don't need the money, overcharge; possibly to get the
students in the right frame of mind before they graduate.

So what to do?

Here's what I recommend: Get all your dental work done overseas while
on vacation. For example, prices is Mexico City are 20%% -50% less and
the dental work is very good. If you're nervous about being treated by
a Mexican trained dentists, locate one who graduated from an American
school; they've got plenty of them.

And if you bring the kids, that $10,000 worth of dental work the family
needs can drop to $5000 to $2500.

Terrific, no?

ricland
Ann - 18 Jun 2006 15:34 GMT
>First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
>dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Terrific, no?

Wonderful!  "Hey kids, we're off on holiday.. we're all going to the
dentist!"  I don't think so.

Ann
I have dentist tomorrow at 8.30am.. see if he's heard of ITP.. ha!
Bill - 18 Jun 2006 16:29 GMT
> Today even dental schools
> which certainly don't need the money, overcharge;

This is an amazingly ignorant statement.

Even though MORE dental schools are needed in the United States, over
the last fifteen years several schools have CLOSED. Why? Because they
were going broke.

The fees charged by dental schools for their work don't even cover
their costs. An organization that can't even cover its costs is forced
to close -- like Loyola of Chicago, like Nortwestern, like Emory and
like Georgetown.

But of course, it is easier to make up ignorant statements than it is
to check the facts.

> So what to do?
>
> Here's what I recommend: Get all your dental work done overseas while
> on vacation. For example, prices is Mexico City are 20%% -50% less and
> the dental work is very good.

I don't suppose that you are in a position to judge whether "the dental
work is very good." How much of that "dental work" have you personally
examined over the last ten or twenty years? Where did you obtain your
dental education yourself? How many such patients have you examined?

Here in southern California, dentists are in a position to evaluate the
quality of dental treatment from many other countries, as we have so
many immigrants, and are so close to the Mexican border. Most of what
we see would flunk any American licensure exam, period.

> If you're nervous about being treated by
> a Mexican trained dentists, locate one who graduated from an American
> school; they've got plenty of them.

Gee, I can't imagine why anyone would be nervous being treated by
dentists who don't have to maintain American standards because they
operate in a much more lax regulatory environment.

American dentists must maintain strict standards for sterilization and
operating procedures. American dentists are subject to peer review and
have to obey licensicng laws, and are always under the threat of
malpractice actions in American courts.

Just try obtaining a free American-style Peer Review in Mexico. Good
luck.

- dentaldoc
rick - 18 Jun 2006 17:59 GMT
> > Today even dental schools
> > which certainly don't need the money, overcharge;
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> - dentaldoc

I have no idea why the dental schools you named have closed and suspect
you don't either. However, I'd be willing to research the question and
report back if you're willing to go on the record as saying the reason
was money.

Deal ...?

As to your specific charge of "sterilization and operating procedures,"
I, and I'm sure others in this newsgroup, are sadden that you would
stoop to that level.

Implying foreigners are dirty is the kind of comment that I thought we
Americans stopped making decades ago.

Then again, maybe you didn't include British dentists just brown ones.
If so, be sure to let George know, I'm sure he'd appreciate that.

ricland
Clinton - 18 Jun 2006 18:04 GMT
> > If you're nervous about being treated by
> > a Mexican trained dentists, locate one who graduated from an American
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> dentists who don't have to maintain American standards because they
> operate in a much more lax regulatory environment.

LOL-lax regulation, American Dentistry is thy name.
Who regulates a dentists work quality on site?
Who regulates their machines?
Who supervises them or their employess?

The worst that can happen is a slap on the wrist from the dental boards
made up of, you guessed it.. "a board of highly sympathetic supervisory
dentists", years after the fact! But don't the boards spend most of
their time going after people who don't worship RC and amalgam anyway?
or working with legislatures to concoct convoluted "arbitration laws"
and "certificate of expert requirements" so that the fox is practically
guaranteed of guarding the henhouse at all times?

Or perhaps you've confused the American lawsuit system with
"regulation"?
Paying a lawyer $20,000 for a $5,000 botched RC isn't regualtion.

> American dentists must maintain strict standards for sterilization and
> operating procedures. American dentists are subject to peer review and
> have to obey licensicng laws,

LOL, who enforces these strict standards? Operating procedures? Who
superivises the quality of office equipments such as amalgamators? Who
tests the lines for bacterial contamination?

Peer review from dental boards is just a eumphamism for no regulation
at all! Politicians are peer reviewed too and have extensive review
from "ethics committees". And what about  "ethical codes"? Just look at
the ADA, which, my gosh, swears on an Oath of God and country about a
dozen times each year that it is just a trade organizatin with no legal
responsabiity at all!

>and are always under the threat of
> malpractice actions in American courts.

Which they have no concern over at all since their cushy insurance
plans
will pay for the legal judgements and court costs, not to mention you'd
practically have to butcher a patient to violate the "standard of
care". In reality few medical professionals ever pay out of pocket. Not
to mention the astronomical legal costs required to bring a lawsuit
unless a lawyer feel its a slam dunk million dollar bonanza!. But is
the American Legal system your definition of regulation? As i stated
above see tort reform mandatory arbitration laws, consiracy of  silence
and certificate of expert requirements. That's correct , you actually
have to get another dentist to testify to prove the negligene of the
first, with one shining exception (informed consent)! That's Bill's
definition of American justice, unless you have $10,000 to ship in an
expert from the other coast!

> Just try obtaining a free American-style Peer Review in Mexico. Good
> luck.

In mexico who knows what constitues justice?
rick - 18 Jun 2006 19:33 GMT
> > > If you're nervous about being treated by
> > > a Mexican trained dentists, locate one who graduated from an American
> > > school; they've got plenty of them.
> >
> > Gee, I can't imagine why anyone would be nervous being treated by

> > dentists who don't have to maintain American standards because they
> > operate in a much more lax regulatory environment.
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>
> In mexico who knows what constitues justice?

Ha, ha, ha...

Busy writing your snappy comeback, Dr. Bill?

Take your time; we'll wait.

ricland
Steven Bornfeld - 18 Jun 2006 16:52 GMT
> First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
> dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Terrific, no?

Bon Voyage!

Steve

> ricland
DP - 19 Jun 2006 10:30 GMT
> First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
> dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you can
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Terrific, no?

You'd need a flaming long holiday if you tried that in the UK!!!!!!!!!

> ricland
rick - 19 Jun 2006 15:18 GMT
> > First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
> > dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you can
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> > ricland

What the hell are all these Brits doing here?

Somebody giving away free kidney pies and Guinness?

ric
YouGoFirst - 19 Jun 2006 21:38 GMT
> First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
> dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> ricland

What about the emergency, are you going to jump on the next flight to Mexico
and get that chipped tooth taken care of?  What about those yearly exams?
Better yet, how do you handle it if you need more work done than can be done
in a single visit?

Not to drive a Mack Truck through the holes in your theory, but here are
some actual figures for your theory.

From where I live, per person it costs about $500 for roundtrip airfare to
Mexico City, then an additional $70 per night for a hotel, then another $30
for food per person, and $20 for transportation.

That means, for a family of 4 to go to Mexico City and say for 5 days to get
work done and to make sure they are not in pain, and get any adjustments
made, would cost $2600, and to do that 2 times a year would cost $5200.
That price does not include any "fun" activities while in Mexico.  According
to what you say the price difference is between US and Mexican dentists is
50%.  So, unless you are having $10,000 or more worth of dental work done,
it is cheaper to have your work done in the US.  So, for example if you have
dental exams, and a few fillings, you may only spend $5000 in a year
(assuming you don't have dental insurance), in which case you have $5000 for
a vacation.
rick - 20 Jun 2006 01:35 GMT
> > First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
> > dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> (assuming you don't have dental insurance), in which case you have $5000 for
> a vacation.

Move to San Diego.

ric
YouGoFirst - 20 Jun 2006 14:56 GMT
> Move to San Diego.
>
> ric

It is cheaper to just get some good dental insurance.
JimSocal - 24 Jun 2006 04:10 GMT
>> Move to San Diego.
>>
>> ric
>
>It is cheaper to just get some good dental insurance.

There is no such thing as good dental insurance.
First of all it isn't "insurance", it is a pre-pay discounted plan".
Secondly, most of the dentists - not all - who participate in it are
either rip-off artists or incompetents.
I've had plenty of experience to back up my statements.
Tony Bad - 20 Jun 2006 02:57 GMT
> Terrific, no?
>
> ricland

Come back in a few years and let me know how your plan worked out.

T
rick - 20 Jun 2006 09:15 GMT
> > Terrific, no?
> >
> > ricland
>
> Come back in a few years and let me know how your plan worked out.

I'm waiting for some fine fellow to step forward and explain to me why
a crown costs $1000.

ric
Tony Bad - 20 Jun 2006 19:51 GMT
> I'm waiting for some fine fellow to step forward and explain to me why
> a crown costs $1000.
>
> ric

Well, if that fine fellow ever steps up, ask him if he can explain why my
car dealer charges $115/hour for labor, or why my cable bill is closing in
on $100. If he can answer those, I have more.

Keep me posted!

T
rick - 21 Jun 2006 12:37 GMT
> > I'm waiting for some fine fellow to step forward and explain to me why
> > a crown costs $1000.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> T

Look. One of the reasons half the people you see are walking around
with bad smiles is because they can't afford dental prices. By age 40,
most people need serious dental work. I'm talking four unit bridges and
things like that. A four unit bridge can go as high as $4000. This
means if a person doesn't have insurance, he's looking at spending two
months take home pay to get his teeth fixed.

Meanwhile, the typical dentist takes home $4000 in week.

Why couldn't the dentist's take home pay be $2000 a week? Sure, he'd
have to put off the Mercedes for a while and the 1.5 million dollar
home wouldn't come till the end of his career, but if he managed to eke
out an existence on $2000 a week by dropping his prices 50%, wouldn't
that mean more people would get their teeth fixed?

ricland
YouGoFirst - 21 Jun 2006 14:56 GMT
>> > I'm waiting for some fine fellow to step forward and explain to me why
>> > a crown costs $1000.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> ricland

Because we don't live in a Socialist country.

The simple answer is supply and demand.  This applies to dentists and to
fast food workers.  For a given population there few people qualified to be
dentists, but a lot of people qualified to be fast food workers.  Since a
dentist is a rare commodity they can charge more per hour to work than a
person flipping burgers.  Just think about the quality of dental care you
would get if there were as many dentists as people flipping burgers.  I can
hear it now "Welcome to McDental, would you like to supersize your
anesthetic?"

While dropping the price would help more people to go to the dentist, you
still have a lot of people that wouldn't go.

Also, look at what people say about dental care in the UK, where a lot of
that work is paid for by the government.
Ann - 23 Jun 2006 23:15 GMT
>>> > I'm waiting for some fine fellow to step forward and explain to me why
>>> > a crown costs $1000.
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>Also, look at what people say about dental care in the UK, where a lot of
>that work is paid for by the government.

Well it isn't is it?  Paid for by the government I mean, because the
dentists won't take the lower pay that the other guy talked about.
They want high pay, the highest they can get so they won't work at
government prices and we all have to pay them what they ask.

Ann
Tony Bad - 21 Jun 2006 19:19 GMT
> Look. One of the reasons half the people you see are walking around
> with bad smiles is because they can't afford dental prices. By age 40,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> ricland

Cool plan...I'm just wondering how you plan to get the dental supply house,
my dental lab, the electric company, water company, telephone company,
postal service, state licensing board, outdated magazine subscription
service, office supply store, my assistant, my hygienist and everyone else
who makes up my overhead to also accept this 50% decrease?

You see, the average dental office has an overhead that is 50% or higher. If
I drop my fees in half, unless everyone else also drops their charges by the
same 50% I am working for free.

Seems like you have given this a lot of thought...let me know when you iron
out the details.

T
carabelli - 21 Jun 2006 19:31 GMT
>> Look. One of the reasons half the people you see are walking around
>> with bad smiles is because they can't afford dental prices. By age 40,
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> T

Takes less than that to go broke.
Average general dentistry overhead is around 70%

Gross $400,000
Overhead $280,000
Profit 120,000

Cut rates 30%
Gross $280,000
Overhead - guess what? - stays the same $280,000
Profit Nada

Cut rates 50%
Gross $200,000
Overhead $280,000
Profit - go find a second job to subsidize the dental office -$80,000
Tony Bad - 22 Jun 2006 18:15 GMT
> Takes less than that to go broke.
> Average general dentistry overhead is around 70%
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Overhead $280,000
> Profit - go find a second job to subsidize the dental office -$80,000

You are very correct...I just used numbers that were easier to work with for
our deep thinking friend.

Hope you have been well sir...I have lost track of the regular band of merry
makers...good to see your name here.

T
rick - 22 Jun 2006 22:26 GMT
> > Look. One of the reasons half the people you see are walking around
> > with bad smiles is because they can't afford dental prices. By age 40,
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> T

Both you and "YouGoFirst" raised excellent points which will be
addressed forthwith. Of course  neither your nor YouGoFirst wrote
anything particularly original or interesting, but that is another
matter to be addressed at another time.

YouGoFirst described how supply and demand works. He presented a
textbook case of what happens when supply outstrips demand. But his
example has no application here since supply and demand have little to
do with dentals prices as I will show.

You, Tony, approached the question from the other direction -- fixed
costs determine the high prices dentists charge -- that is, dentists
would love to stop squeezing their patients, but can't because people
are squeezing them.

This argument is not as easily dismissed. Yes, dental labs sock it to
you, as do suppliers, and even the lowly dental hygienist thinks she
should share your plunder. A vicious cycle, no doubt about it,  but is
it really as simple as that, Tony? Also, does it really absolve you --
the guy at the top who started squeezing first?

Thirty---years ago Sterling Optical started charging 10 to 20 times
the price of ordinary eye-glass frames. Those reading glasses you see
on the rack at drug stores that retail for $5 are the identical frames
Sterling  (and today everybody else) sells for $125.

It was a bold move and everyone thought Sterling would price itself out
of business, but this did not happen. Instead, Sterling became the
dominant optical retailer in the country, and the little guy who was
charging a mere five bucks for his frames went under.

Adam Smith must have turned  cartwheels in his grave upon hearing this.
It didn't make sense. It took all of the wisdom he had piled into his
Economics Bible "The Wealth of Nations" and stood it on its head.

Of course Smith knew nothing of  today's insurance companies or
high-powered industry lobbying group of which I'll discuss in a moment.

But back to the optical business: in short time all the little guys
were gone to be replaced by Sterling Optical or Sterling Optical
clones. Pricing was identical in each. Pricing has remained identical
in each for the past 25 years. Now, were Adam Smith here, he would say
this is not possible, that the iron law of capitalism would drive one
of these places to lower their prices and this would be the place the
huddled masses would go to buy their eye-glasses.

Nope.

One of the things Smith didn't fully understand is the power politics
have on the market place. In order to practice dentistry in the U.S.
you have to be a member of the club and there are two crucial things
the club does: (1) it makes sure dentists are qualified, (2)  it makes
sure  there are no impediments to squeezing the consumer as much as it
can.

to be continued...
Tony Bad - 22 Jun 2006 22:54 GMT
> You, Tony, approached the question from the other direction -- fixed
> costs determine the high prices dentists charge -- that is, dentists
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> it really as simple as that, Tony? Also, does it really absolve you --
> the guy at the top who started squeezing first?

I don't recall writing that dentists  "would love to stop squeezing their
patients, but can't because people are squeezing them." Your comments
suggest you have some understanding of economics, so I shouldn't have to
clarify things for you. There are fixed costs and flexible costs. Profit is
always a flexible cost and depends on the desires and motives of the
individual. The intent of my comment was to show you that your simplistic
example of dropping charges 50% = a 50% reduction in dentist profit is
flawed. There are fixed costs associated with running a dental practice. If
the practice is even close to being well run, carving 50% out of that
overhead would be impossible. A 50% drop in fees would likely result in an
almost 100% drop in dentist income.

As for the "lowly hygienist" (your term, not mine), there aren't all that
many jobs that offer a high school grad with 2 years of additional schooling
an opportunity to make a darn nice income like hygienists make. In my neck
of the woods they command about $35 to $40/hr and are in short supply. There
are many recent dental school grads working in practices where they would be
happy to have a guaranteed salary like that! Shed no tears for the "lowly
hygienist".

Your comments about Adam Smith suggest you don't need me to explain this to
you, so I won't bother playing along any further.

Good luck in solving this economic concern of yours.

T
Stormin Mormon - 20 Jun 2006 03:18 GMT
I'd suggest use baking soda for a tooth powder, and skip the rest of
this advice. OTOH, if in Meheko, get some dentistry.

Signature

Christopher A. Young
 You can't shout down a troll.
 You have to starve them.
.

First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you
can forget about dental schools which were once a safe-haven for those
seeking reasonable dental fees -- no more. Today even dental schools
which certainly don't need the money, overcharge; possibly to get the
students in the right frame of mind before they graduate.

So what to do?

Here's what I recommend: Get all your dental work done overseas while
on vacation. For example, prices is Mexico City are 20%% -50% less and
the dental work is very good. If you're nervous about being treated by
a Mexican trained dentists, locate one who graduated from an American
school; they've got plenty of them.

And if you bring the kids, that $10,000 worth of dental work the
family
needs can drop to $5000 to $2500.

Terrific, no?

ricland
Dr.Braces - 21 Jun 2006 20:42 GMT
most dental schools are way underfunded!   I disagree, this is totally wrong.

> Today even dental schools
> which certainly don't need the money, o
JimSocal - 24 Jun 2006 04:23 GMT
>First thing: They're  all in it together. From coast to coast American
>dentists have all signed-on to the religion of overcharging. And you
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>ricland
My wife is Mexican so I think I can speak to this issue with some
knowledge.
There are good dentists in Mexico, but you have to be very careful in
looking for them and finding them. Even in the big city where she
lived, and her sister being a dental student, it was difficult for her
sister to get her to a good dentist. She said "Go to this dentist, he
teaches at the University."

She did so. But that dentist was not available so his assistant did
the work. The assistant did less than great work, and she had to have
some of that work re-done.

One other time, a dentist closed up a surgery and left the cotton in
her mouth. She of course had a terrible infection, had horrible
unbearable pain until she went to another dentist who fixed the
problem on an emergency basis.

Another dentist "fixed" the gap she had between her front teeth when
my wife was a teenager. He fixed it by inserting a little tiny tooth
there. She wasn't old enough to know better, and did not realize what
he'd done til it was done.

I could go on with stories of her relatives having problems with
doctors and dentists in Mexico. Her sister's mother in law died while
getting a colon cleansing by some quack who did not know what she was
doing.

I know a guy who saw a doctor in Cancun start to use a dirty needle on
him. Even though he was in pain and had a broken wrist he high-tailed
it out of there and got on a plane to the states.

I would never get major medical care done in Mexico.

I WOULD get dental work done there, but ONLY after being very SURE the
dentist was a good one, by knowing someone who had major work done by
the dentist more than once, etc...

Now, the other side of the coin is that sometimes this stuff happens
here in the U.S., too, and certainly I have had several very bad
dental experiences here in the U.S.; one cost me a tooth which I could
not afford to lose ; now I'm having to get an implant there. My wife
had to have an apicoectomy because of a bad root canal here. And a
dentist here did very bad bridge work on her, too: All were HMO dental
insurance dentists.

I no longer use HMO dental insurance dentists in the U.S.. I also only
use endodontists now, for root canals.

I found that the local University graduate students at the dental
school do excellent work and have close supervision.
Joel344 - 26 Jun 2006 01:08 GMT
You wrote:

One other time, a dentist closed up a surgery and left the cotton in
her mouth. She of course had a terrible infection, had horrible
unbearable pain until she went to another dentist who fixed the
problem on an emergency basis

R E P L Y

Yeah I know. Another guy sewed up an
entire rabbit inside an extraction site. I read
about this on the PETA website

--
Joel34
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.