Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

$1300 for RCT "re-do" - does this sound right?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
azzure@olypen.com - 15 Jun 2006 17:06 GMT
Just wondering why a two hour procedure (by an endodontist, on a molar)
should cost this much.  We can (barely) afford it, but I saw an elderly
woman in the office who could not and had no idea what to do.  Didn't
seem right somehow.
George - 15 Jun 2006 18:06 GMT
> Just wondering why a two hour procedure (by an endodontist, on a molar)
> should cost this much.  We can (barely) afford it, but I saw an elderly
> woman in the office who could not and had no idea what to do.  Didn't
> seem right somehow.

This is the fee that particular professional requires to make the
profit he has set as a target for these two hours. The figure will
contain material and equipment expenses, the cost of the premises and
staff wages. Among other things, this fee will also compensate the
specialist for the 8-10 years he spent studying with only a small
income and the debt his studies incured (which is often close to 1/4 -
1/2 of a million). Depending on the area and their circumstances, other
specialists may have lower or higher prices. Those that are
experienced, respected and recommended, will generally command higher
fees.

Regards,
George
JimSocal - 16 Jun 2006 02:34 GMT
>Just wondering why a two hour procedure (by an endodontist, on a molar)
>should cost this much.  We can (barely) afford it, but I saw an elderly
>woman in the office who could not and had no idea what to do.  Didn't
>seem right somehow.
I'd find another endodontist!
George - 16 Jun 2006 18:35 GMT
> >Just wondering why a two hour procedure (by an endodontist, on a molar)
> >should cost this much.  We can (barely) afford it, but I saw an elderly
> >woman in the office who could not and had no idea what to do.  Didn't
> >seem right somehow.

> I'd find another endodontist!

Care to elaborate why Jim? If you can afford the cost and the guy is
skilled and respected, why not go for it? You can make money in your
life, but you only get one tooth.

Regards,
George
Steven Bornfeld - 16 Jun 2006 22:17 GMT
>>>Just wondering why a two hour procedure (by an endodontist, on a molar)
>>>should cost this much.  We can (barely) afford it, but I saw an elderly
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Regards,
> George

George--

    In the states, fees are a pretty open market.  There are some
lowballers as far as fees.  Nothing wrong with this, but generally these
are the high-volume facilities.  Specialists know generally if they get
a case from me it's not easy--either technically, from a patient
management perspective--whatever.  They know this, and they're
apparently glad to get the referrals.  This is what they're trained for,
and they'd damn well get the job done--or they know I won't continue to
refer.
    My specialists generally get high fees--they deserve every penny.  A
bum job is never a bargain--not at a fraction of the fee.

Steve
JimSocal - 18 Jun 2006 10:19 GMT
>> >Just wondering why a two hour procedure (by an endodontist, on a molar)
>> >should cost this much.  We can (barely) afford it, but I saw an elderly
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Regards,
>George
Guess I am speaking generalities, but that just seems like too much
money to me. So what I was suggesting is that the poster call around
for a qualified endodontist who might offer a better price.

If one has unlimited funds, then sure, go with whoever can do it well.
But if money is an issue, it might pay to call around. I've had a
number of root canals and none of them were anywhere near this price.
rick - 18 Jun 2006 11:14 GMT
> >> >Just wondering why a two hour procedure (by an endodontist, on a molar)
> >> >should cost this much.  We can (barely) afford it, but I saw an elderly
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> But if money is an issue, it might pay to call around. I've had a
> number of root canals and none of them were anywhere near this price.

Something has to be done about the way the dental industry is
ripping-off America. The lead post is a good example why. Assuming all
the expenses incurred for  the RCT "re-do" procedure was $500, the
thief wanted to net $400 per hour for the two hours work.

Even John Gotti didn't have that kind of nerve. He killed you before
extracting your money.

Worse still is how dentists are so quick to defend a brother dentist no
matter how degenerate his overcharging as  we saw here with George, a
Brit dentist who the Queen would thrown in the Tower of London, rip out
his entrails and  burn them before his dying eyes were she to catch him
charging a mere 1/4 of what the American crook was trying to pilfer.

These guys use drills instead of guns but the effect is the same --
they rob and steal.

ricland
George - 18 Jun 2006 20:19 GMT
> Guess I am speaking generalities, but that just seems like too much
> money to me. So what I was suggesting is that the poster call around
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> But if money is an issue, it might pay to call around. I've had a
> number of root canals and none of them were anywhere near this price.

Agreed. If you can't really afford something then you will have to shop
around for it. Beware of the real bargains though...
rick - 18 Jun 2006 22:17 GMT
> > Guess I am speaking generalities, but that just seems like too much
> > money to me. So what I was suggesting is that the poster call around
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Agreed. If you can't really afford something then you will have to shop
> around for it. Beware of the real bargains though...

Not to speak for Jim, George, but I'm sure he's no longer interested in
your advice.

Your blind defense of American dentists was not helpful.

We're getting killed with their prices here in the Colonies and the
last thing we need is a Brit telling us to shut up and pay the damn tea
tax.

riclandr
rick - 17 Jun 2006 03:39 GMT
> Just wondering why a two hour procedure (by an endodontist, on a molar)
> should cost this much.  We can (barely) afford it, but I saw an elderly
> woman in the office who could not and had no idea what to do.  Didn't
> seem right somehow.

Don't believe any of the baloney these guys are serving up, azzure. The
prices dentists charge these days have nothing at all to do with
anything except GREED!

Pure greed -- they're taught in dental school that if they're not
millionaires by the time they're 40, they're complete and utter
failures.

Look, by a dentist's  fifth year in business, all his debts are cleared
up -- dental school, equipment, the building, if he owns it. Of course
there's insurance, but that' far less than MDs pay and today's MD's
don't make half as much a dentists are ripping off.

So, after the fifth year, it's "let's see how fast I can retire a
millionaire, baby!"

This explains why if you live in any of the border states, you're a
fool to get your teeth fixed in the states. Take a $15 bus ride to
Mexico and you save 90 cents on the dollar -- seriously.

Oh, and don't believe the hype you'll get here about how all foreign
dentists suck. Most of these stateside  tooth mechanics got their
degrees in Costa Rica and Panama anyway.

Well, maybe not most, but quite a few -- and conversely, quite a few
Mexican doctors went to school here.

But again, the bottom line is this: becoming a millionaire is the Holy
Grail for dentists. This means when you ask them a perfectly reasonable
question like you did, their answer is based on the premise that what
you're being charged is what the tooth jockey requires to retire a
millionaire by 40.

That's the honest answer.

$1300 for two hours work. That's 5200 a day, $26,000 a week, $1,170,000
a year (45 weeks).

Ok, let's see one of these laughing boys crunch the numbers. Let's see
one of them show us how ""expenses" eat up all the boodle they take in.

Don't hold your breath.

ricland
George - 17 Jun 2006 10:27 GMT
Well, I didn't know dentists were required to take an oath of poverty
when they graduated! Have you actually seen or handled any accounts of
dental practices or do these broad figures jump right out of your mind?
Can you actually wrap your mind around the words "gross profit" and
"net profit"?

If dentistry is supposed to make you rich, how come most companies that
run chain dental practices do quite badly? Boots had over 60 private
practices in the UK, by your reckoning they should be millionaires by
now. Instead, their dental sector went bankrupt and closed down a year
ago. IDH generated a gross profit of £67m, but their actual profit
after expenses was just £2.5m (that's a profit margin of 4%). Its
share lost over 300% of its value before it was taken off the market.

Of course I doubt you'll be convinced no matter how much evidence is
thrown at your face. You strike me as one of these people that are
absolutely certain they're right. Your use of derogatory terms like
"tooth jockeys" for people you don't know but provided you with advice
just shows that you feel envy for the amounts they can earn.
rick - 17 Jun 2006 14:51 GMT
> Well, I didn't know dentists were required to take an oath of poverty
> when they graduated! Have you actually seen or handled any accounts of
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> "tooth jockeys" for people you don't know but provided you with advice
> just shows that you feel envy for the amounts they can earn.

Nice Fouth of July speech, but I challenged you to crunch the numbers.
You guys don't ever do that. Instead, you all start singing the blues
about how even though you gross about $1000 an hour, you still have to
brown bag it every day.

Give me a break.

Are you a tooth jockey?

What did you take home last year?

Give it a number.

ric
George - 17 Jun 2006 16:03 GMT
> > Well, I didn't know dentists were required to take an oath of poverty
> > when they graduated! Have you actually seen or handled any accounts of
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Give it a number.

I took home £30,000 last year. Maybe I'm not one of the "greedy" ones.
rick - 17 Jun 2006 16:54 GMT
> > > Well, I didn't know dentists were required to take an oath of poverty
> > > when they graduated! Have you actually seen or handled any accounts of
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> I took home £30,000 last year. Maybe I'm not one of the "greedy" ones.

Oh, you're a Brit?

That's different. When I said GREED I was talking about American
dentists.

ric
rick - 17 Jun 2006 16:12 GMT
And another thing ...

These guys are raking in  $3000 to $5000 a week.

The average worker in America earns $650 a week.

So, c'mon, George, tell us why you deserve $2350 more a
week to live off than the policeman, fireman or school teacher you're
ripping off for a thousand bucks a visit.

Break it down for us, dude.

ricland
George - 17 Jun 2006 17:25 GMT
> And another thing ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> ricland

They didn't have to pay $250,000 and spend 8 years of their life
training.
What can I tell you Rick? It's an unfair world. A premiership
footballer will make in one year more than I'll make in my whole life.
The same for a CEO of one of the biggies. Do they do something more
important than I do?
I am professionally qualified, I run a business and take risks. I
expect to be compensated accordingly and I will take the steps
necessary to ensure that. I don't believe anyone would say no to higher
wages if they were offered to them.
rick - 17 Jun 2006 18:20 GMT
> > And another thing ...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> necessary to ensure that. I don't believe anyone would say no to higher
> wages if they were offered to them.

What does any of that have to do with over-charging patients?

And it should be pointed out, you're defending dentists who make three
times more than you -- dentists who won't dare enter this debate
because they know what I say about them is true and what you say is
false.

The story of dentistry in America is one of Greed.

Period.
ric
George - 17 Jun 2006 18:31 GMT
> What does any of that have to do with over-charging patients?

Nobody's overcharging anyone. It's a professional service. They give
you an estimate of the cost and you agree to pay it or not. Same thing
with a lawyer/car mechanic/plumber/electrician. Overcharging would be
to give you a quote and then charge you more than that.

> And it should be pointed out, you're defending dentists who make three
> times more than you -- dentists who won't dare enter this debate
> because they know what I say about them is true and what you say is
> false.

Dude, I'm in the beginning of my career. I have less than 3 years of
active dentistry under my belt. I don't expect to charge/earn the same
amount after I get more experience and a few postgraduate
qualifications.

Regards,
George
rick - 17 Jun 2006 21:08 GMT
> > What does any of that have to do with over-charging patients?
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Regards,
> George

You know, George, earning a dental degree doesn't give you license to
make up definitions on the fly.

We all know what over-charging is, but since you're having difficulty
with the concept, let me help you -- it's charging three times what
every other dentist (including you)  in the world does for the same
service.

Now why don't you sit down and have a cup of tea and stop sticking up
for crooks who are obviously too ashamed to stick up for themselves.

ricland
Joel344 - 18 Jun 2006 04:24 GMT
No way! Is this the guy you were telling us
who sells used cars on the side

--
Joel34
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.