Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why Not Full Dentures?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Supermax - 02 May 2006 08:24 GMT
I'm the one that had the earlier question about who pays to re-cement a
bridge. I've spendt some time reading on this site, and all I really see
looking forward about my teeth is more of the same. More money that will go
down the drain. Money I really can't afford. So, why not just have whats left
pulled and have dentures?. Every time I say this to anyone they are horrified
that I would even think of doing that....but when you read some of the
problems that people have had with their teeth and the huge expense, with no
real results...what could possibly be worse? I've just had it. I don't trust
any dentists anymore. Could someone please explain what would be so awful
about doing that? I"m beginning to think that the dentists say it's a
terrible thing to do, because then they can't count on me to pay their
absolutely ridiculous fees for work that always fails.
Joel344 - 02 May 2006 14:06 GMT
Depends whose fault it is ..... usally a bridge
STAYS PUT ...... some as long as 68 years and counting!

YUP one of my patients although not my bridgework.

Joe

--
Joel34
George - 02 May 2006 19:00 GMT
A valid question from a layman, but unfortunately things aren't always
as simple as they seem.
To give you the short version, extracting all your teeth and having
full dentures will give you a life of trouble and you'll probably spend
the rest of your time on earth regretting what you did.
And now the slightly longer version:
Dentures are not a substitute for teeth. They are a substitute for not
having any teeth. Which means that a denture is much better than not
having anything at all to chew with, but they really suck when compared
to your natural "gnashers". Because they are essentially two big pieces
of acrylic floating in your mouth and not actually anchored to it, your
masticatory ability will be severely limited. Soups, mashed potatoes
and shakes will generally be ok for you, but stakes, chops and the
really good stuff might become a bit too hard, especially as time goes
by.
When teeth are no longer present in your jawbone, your body begins to
resorb the bone present to hold them in place (I guess it feels it
doesn't need it anymore). This same bone however, is critical for
denture retention. If you do this while you are still relatively young
you will end up with no bone there at all and dentures that will be so
loose as to be useless for eating, or even talking. I've seen quite a
few patients in their 60s, and some younger ones, with that kind of
problem, especially for the lower denture. My attempts to construct an
adequate conventional denture for them have invariably failed. Such
people usually need implant-retained dentures, which brings as back to
the "huge expense" category you mentioned.
My advice is don't even think about it and try to find a good dentist
(perhaps through recommendations of your friends)

George
ryan - 31 Jul 2006 12:10 GMT
George
Your's is the standard response of s dentist to the prospect o
dentures for a patient. Obviously no-one would want dentures if the
have healthy teeth. In my case I did not have healthy teeth or gums an
over a twenty or so year period had all sorts of treatments. Thes
delayed matters but did not in the end prevent the loss of all m
teeth. So for the last two years I have been wearing full dentures
They are not as bad as you say. I can eat much more than just mashe
food. My appearance has improved and so I feel has my health. In fact
felt healthier almost as soon as my last tooth left my mouth. Had
known what dentures were like and had been given the option, I woul
have chosen dentures over years of unsatisfactory teeth. I think man
other people would do the same

--
rya
George - 31 Jul 2006 21:42 GMT
> George:
> Your's is the standard response of s dentist to the prospect of
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> have chosen dentures over years of unsatisfactory teeth. I think many
> other people would do the same.

Dear Ryan,
Teeth are important to me because I'm a dentist, but I understand that
every person has a threshold of teeth trouble when he finally says
"enough is enough!". My advice to try to keep your natural teeth as
long as possible (especially the lower ones) comes from my experience
with my patients. I have several patients in their 60s who have lost
their teeth at a young age and have been denture users for a long time.
The top ones aren't bad, but all the bone in the lower jaw is gone and
their dentures are so loose they're lucky if they can eat mashed food
(most of the time they go by with soup). I tried again and again to
provide them with satisfactory replacements and it's impossible -
there's nothing there for the dentures to anchor on. Most of these
patients now face thousands of pounds of implants and some will require
additional corrective surgery before they can have a viable denture.

Regards,
George
Jacob - 01 Aug 2006 00:41 GMT
You are happy with full dentures now -- you don't state your age.  However,
as time goes by, the alveolar ridges will start to resorb [slowly fade away]
and it will become increasingly difficult to wear/eat with your lower
denture.  I've seen NUMEROUS patients with problems with their teeth and
they ultimately get dentures and are happy for a while, but sooner or later
become extremely frustrated with their lower denture moving around too much.

> George:
> Your's is the standard response of s dentist to the prospect of
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> have chosen dentures over years of unsatisfactory teeth. I think many
> other people would do the same.
ryan - 01 Aug 2006 04:15 GMT
George

Obviously nobody is going to go to the dentist and say pull out m
healthy teeth. I wish I had had healthy teeth but I did not. It was
matter of time until I lost them

I agree that it is a question of the patient's threshold for retainin
teeth. In this I was never consulted. I was always given the answe
which you have given: You'll regret getting dentures, bone loss, poo
artificial substitutes, etc. Had I been asked I would have had th
extractions much earlier. As it is I have suffered a certain amount o
bone loss that could of been avoided. Also I would of been younger an
adapting to dentures may of been quicker, I don't know

Bone support is an issue with dentures, I know. The support for min
is adequate now and I hope it will remain so even though there will b
more strinkage. Regular check-ups will help. Ironic really. I hav
regular check-ups now when I neglected them for years when I had teeth
So my problems were part my own fault and part genetics - gum diseas
started quite early

One of the factors that made me less fearful of dentures were m
parents' experience of dentures, particularly my father's. Both wor
dentures from a young age. I guess before they were thirty. The
continued to have a full diet until the end. Yes they were difficul
things; crusty bread, hard and sticky food and a greater reliance o
cutting things up small but they didn't exist on soup and mashed food
Also they recommended that their friends get dentures when teet
troubles arose. For my father, teeth were more trouble thatn they wer
worth. While my mother warned me about the risks of not cleaning m
teeth before going to bed because otherwise I would get dentures lik
her, it was obvious she didn't mind the fact of dentures herself

My point is this. In my parent's time dentists were too quick I thin
to extract teeth; now they are probably too slow. Dentures ar
described giving only the negative and not of the positive. Patient
are not given a choice

Jacob

I am now 60. I would have to say, if asked, I prefer dentures to th
state of my teeth when they were extracted. Also I would have preferre
to have avoided the efforts to save my teeth which turned out (and
think always were) futile - and expensive

I know there is a risk of excessive bone loss but I also expect that
will have many years of reasonably satisfactory denture wear an
probably for the rest of my life if my parent's are any guide

Yes, the lower denture presents greater difficulties than the uppe
but I have learned unconsciously to keep it in place

--
rya
Jacob - 01 Aug 2006 17:16 GMT
I certainly hope that you continue to be satisfied with your new dentures.
Considering your specific situation, apparently, you made the best choice.
I would not, however, want the general public to believe that dentures are
some fantastic solution to dental problems.  I certainly wish you good luck
with yours, and am happy that you are very satisfied!

> George:
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> Yes, the lower denture presents greater difficulties than the upper
> but I have learned unconsciously to keep it in place.
George - 01 Aug 2006 18:56 GMT
Hi Ryan,

60 is not a bad age to have a denture. On contrast, I have a 30-year
old patient with almost full dentures (drug abuse problem) that will
have to go through 30 years of bone resorption before he reaches your
age. I also saw a 22-year old patient last year who asked me to remove
all of his teeth and replace them with dentures. I declined of course.
ryan - 02 Aug 2006 04:11 GMT
Jacob

You mentioned that I had made the best choice, apparently. My point i
that it was not my choice. Had it been my choice and the situation ha
been fully expained to me, I would have made the choice of ful
dentures much earlier, based on what I know now. The treatment for gu
disease was expensive and ultimately ineffective and I wished I coul
of avoided the discomfort and cost of it and bowed to the inevitabl
earlier

Nobody would want to go through the process of losing there teeth an
adapting to dentures if this could be avoided, rather than deferred. I
is painful at times, frustrating, inconvenient and embarrassing. Th
patient should know what to expect with dentures, there limitations fo
eating, difficulties with the lower denture and the long term shrinkin
of your gums. That needs to be balanced with ability to adjust t
dentures and the long term outlook for retaining teeth and bone, th
cost and disomfort and the enthusiasm of the patient

My experience is that dentists delay that decision, often for too long
when there patient's health and well being would be improved b
dentures. The attitude is that dentures should be avoided at all costs
I disagree I think that many patients would be better off being fitte
with dentures sooner rather than later. This is something that dentist
seldom if ever do. I know this is a difficult area of judgement bu
there is a reluctance to exercise it

--
rya
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.