Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

No Harm From Dental Fillings .....

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joel344 - 19 Apr 2006 13:36 GMT
[It is noted there is no mention about Line Dancing]

**

Posted on Wed, Apr. 19, 2006

email thisprint this

No harm from dental fillings with mercury, 2 studies find
By Don Babwin
Associated Press

CHICAGO - Two long-awaited, government-funded studies found no evidenc
that dental fillings containing mercury can cause IQ-lowering brai
damage or other neurological problems in children.

Children with such fillings were no more likely than other youngster
to suffer such problems, the researchers found.

Some experts found the findings powerfully reassuring. But the studie
are unlikely to end debate over the long-term effects of what are know
as amalgam fillings, and some advocates accused the researchers of doin
unethical experiments on children.

Amalgam fillings, also called silver fillings, are made of mercury an
other metals, and have been used by dentists for more than a century
But their use has dropped in recent years as more doctors switch t
resin composite fillings, which are considered more appealing becaus
they are white.

Some advocacy groups and dentists have long contended that the mercur
in fillings can leach into the body and cause harmful neurologica
effects, including autism.

The latest studies were published in today's Journal of the America
Medical Association.

"We didn't see any indications of harm to these kids," said Timoth
DeRouen, a University of Washington professor of biostatistics an
dental public health sciences, who led a study of 507 children, ages
to 10, in Portugal to determine if mercury fillings had an
neurological effects. "And we tested them repeatedly over seve
years."

The other study, led by Sonja McKinlay of the New England Researc
Institutes, looked at the effect on intelligence, memory and othe
mental functions, and kidney function. It involved 534 children in Ne
England, ages 6 to 10.

McKinlay said she was confident that such fillings were safe fo
children in this age group, largely because the youngsters got far mor
amalgam than the average American child gets.

She also said that, while the study revealed that children with mercur
fillings had higher mercury levels in their urine, there was no evidenc
they had a higher incidence of kidney damage.

Neither study examined autism. David Bellinger, an author of the Ne
England study, said any children with autism would have been eliminate
from the study, as would other children with prior neurologica
disorders.

The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research funded th
studies.

The authors acknowledged the limitations of the studies. For example
in the study of the New England children, the authors said th
"possibility of very small adverse effects of amalgam on IQ scor
cannot be completely ruled out."

Charlie Brown, counsel for Consumers for Dental Choice, an advocac
group pushing to end the use of mercury in dental fillings, said bot
studies ignored research that indicates mercury causes many physica
and mental problems.

Brown blasted both studies as unethical, saying that children o
guardians were never told of potential risks from fillings.

Authors of both studies disputed that, saying they disclosed what the
were doing and why

--
Joel34
carabelli - 19 Apr 2006 13:50 GMT
> [It is noted there is no mention about Line Dancing]

or  350mV - obviously flawed studies

carabelli
Clinton - 19 Apr 2006 22:11 GMT
> [It is noted there is no mention about Line Dancing]
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> DeRouen, a University of Washington professor of biostatistics and
> dental public health sciences,

I wouldn't trust a study led by a professr of "dental public health
sciences". Are they allergic to having real scientists lead these
studies...

who led a study of 507 children, ages 8
> to 10, in Portugal to determine if mercury fillings had any
> neurological effects. "And we tested them repeatedly over seven
> years."

Except they used inaccurate urine and Hg testing. Fact is those with
the most exposure, corrosion etc might not be those with the most
fillings.
In fact , using this methodology, if some fillings did give off
elevated levels
in kids with fewer "amalgam surfaces" it would actually prove fillings
improved
health. Though the tubigen study clearly said saliva tests showed no
clear correlation between amalgam surface # and Hg release, the false
assumption drives the methodology and provides a cheaply done outdated
study the dentists can trumpet in the media. That's why we use saliva
testing, because even those with industrial exposed have modest
elevations of hg in their blood, and some fillings give off a lot more
than Hg than others..but (whisper) don't tell the dentists who lead
these studies without actually learning HOW to test for Hg or the
journalists who publish them that.

> The other study, led by Sonja McKinlay of the New England Research
> Institutes, looked at the effect on intelligence, memory and other
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> children in this age group, largely because the youngsters got far more
> amalgam than the average American child gets.

But how did she actually determine which fillings gave off the most
Hg, since even quackwatch says blood HG testing is bogus and urine
testing is similarly flawed according to the environemntal bulletin
of toxicology...

> She also said that, while the study revealed that children with mercury
> fillings had higher mercury levels in their urine, there was no evidence
> they had a higher incidence of kidney damage.

Right, so mercury is safe or the measurement methods are bogus?....
I guess high levels of Hg is good for your kidneys....
Maybe instead of spending a billion dollars to rebuild railroads in
Texas they should fund a real study which uses up to date measures
of Hg body burden, looks at effects for more than a few years, it might
even cost a couple million dollars!

> Neither study examined autism. David Bellinger, an author of the New
> England study, said any children with autism would have been eliminated
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research funded the
> studies.

Wow, these are the same people who publish 1 study every 10 years and
DON'T publish most of their amalgam research. Why doesn't the media
ask what happened to all those unpublished "nonincrimminating" studies
and all that research money at the dentally run NIDCR??? I guess the
media doesn't like to think too much but wil gladly run after every
handpicked bone the NIDCR tosses them.

> The authors acknowledged the limitations of the studies. For example,
> in the study of the New England children, the authors said the
> "possibility of very small adverse effects of amalgam on IQ score
> cannot be completely ruled out."

You lose 1 iq point every 2.5 years, thats 10 SAT points every 2.5
years!
For reference a 30 point difference on the SAT is  "highly
significant"!!!

> Charlie Brown, counsel for Consumers for Dental Choice, an advocacy
> group pushing to end the use of mercury in dental fillings, said both
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Brown blasted both studies as unethical, saying that children or
> guardians were never told of potential risks from fillings.

What do expect from a study done in Peru?
Tony Bad - 20 Apr 2006 00:32 GMT
> I wouldn't trust a study led by a professr of "dental public health
> sciences". Are they allergic to having real scientists lead these
> studies...

How about medical studies led by a chemist?

T
Joel344 - 21 Apr 2006 15:11 GMT
I wouldn't trust a study led by a professr of "dental public health
sciences". Are they allergic to having real scientists lead these
studies...

Y E A H .......

Its not credible ..... I often look to nursery
school teachers to give us the right kind of advice .....

--
Joel34
Joel344 - 22 Apr 2006 13:13 GMT
There are less reports of amalgamitis as time goes on ......

--
Joel34
Joel344 - 22 Apr 2006 13:13 GMT
errrrr....... FEWER reports not LESS reports ....

--
Joel34
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.