> [It is noted there is no mention about Line Dancing]
or 350mV - obviously flawed studies
carabelli
> [It is noted there is no mention about Line Dancing]
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> DeRouen, a University of Washington professor of biostatistics and
> dental public health sciences,
I wouldn't trust a study led by a professr of "dental public health
sciences". Are they allergic to having real scientists lead these
studies...
who led a study of 507 children, ages 8
> to 10, in Portugal to determine if mercury fillings had any
> neurological effects. "And we tested them repeatedly over seven
> years."
Except they used inaccurate urine and Hg testing. Fact is those with
the most exposure, corrosion etc might not be those with the most
fillings.
In fact , using this methodology, if some fillings did give off
elevated levels
in kids with fewer "amalgam surfaces" it would actually prove fillings
improved
health. Though the tubigen study clearly said saliva tests showed no
clear correlation between amalgam surface # and Hg release, the false
assumption drives the methodology and provides a cheaply done outdated
study the dentists can trumpet in the media. That's why we use saliva
testing, because even those with industrial exposed have modest
elevations of hg in their blood, and some fillings give off a lot more
than Hg than others..but (whisper) don't tell the dentists who lead
these studies without actually learning HOW to test for Hg or the
journalists who publish them that.
> The other study, led by Sonja McKinlay of the New England Research
> Institutes, looked at the effect on intelligence, memory and other
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> children in this age group, largely because the youngsters got far more
> amalgam than the average American child gets.
But how did she actually determine which fillings gave off the most
Hg, since even quackwatch says blood HG testing is bogus and urine
testing is similarly flawed according to the environemntal bulletin
of toxicology...
> She also said that, while the study revealed that children with mercury
> fillings had higher mercury levels in their urine, there was no evidence
> they had a higher incidence of kidney damage.
Right, so mercury is safe or the measurement methods are bogus?....
I guess high levels of Hg is good for your kidneys....
Maybe instead of spending a billion dollars to rebuild railroads in
Texas they should fund a real study which uses up to date measures
of Hg body burden, looks at effects for more than a few years, it might
even cost a couple million dollars!
> Neither study examined autism. David Bellinger, an author of the New
> England study, said any children with autism would have been eliminated
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research funded the
> studies.
Wow, these are the same people who publish 1 study every 10 years and
DON'T publish most of their amalgam research. Why doesn't the media
ask what happened to all those unpublished "nonincrimminating" studies
and all that research money at the dentally run NIDCR??? I guess the
media doesn't like to think too much but wil gladly run after every
handpicked bone the NIDCR tosses them.
> The authors acknowledged the limitations of the studies. For example,
> in the study of the New England children, the authors said the
> "possibility of very small adverse effects of amalgam on IQ score
> cannot be completely ruled out."
You lose 1 iq point every 2.5 years, thats 10 SAT points every 2.5
years!
For reference a 30 point difference on the SAT is "highly
significant"!!!
> Charlie Brown, counsel for Consumers for Dental Choice, an advocacy
> group pushing to end the use of mercury in dental fillings, said both
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Brown blasted both studies as unethical, saying that children or
> guardians were never told of potential risks from fillings.
What do expect from a study done in Peru?
Tony Bad - 20 Apr 2006 00:32 GMT
> I wouldn't trust a study led by a professr of "dental public health
> sciences". Are they allergic to having real scientists lead these
> studies...
How about medical studies led by a chemist?
T
I wouldn't trust a study led by a professr of "dental public health
sciences". Are they allergic to having real scientists lead these
studies...
Y E A H .......
Its not credible ..... I often look to nursery
school teachers to give us the right kind of advice .....
--
Joel34
There are less reports of amalgamitis as time goes on ......
--
Joel34