>Maybe paying them an actual visit would have helped (or still could).
Unfortunately I did. As stated above, I returned immediately after
the tooth broke and Grayson x-rayed the tooth. They even had the
nerve to charge me for the x-ray. Grayson also said the tooth could
not be saved and must be extracted. This was false advice. Two
other dentists said it could be saved. .. and don't think for a second
Grayson Dental wouldn't have charged for the extraction. These
guys are awful.
As far as a revisit, no thank you. If they were to resurrect the
tooth for free I'd decline. I simply want a refund, even a partial
refund. I've already paid for everything. I agree to pay for the root
canal they did.
>900 for a cleaning is ridiculous and I'm not even a dentist.
I agree, but of course Grayson didn't. They claim "it's not a cleaning,
it's a DEEEEP cleaning."
But nonetheless, 20 minutes is 20 minutes - that's all the time they
took to bill me $880 .. which I paid.
Also you'd think they'd at least have the decency to inform patients
of the costs before the work. Think about it, this is borderline
fraudulent.
You rarely have a service done outside of dentistry in which you are
not at least given an estimate.
>Then use that for action in Small Claims Court
I thought about it, but is $1105 worth all the hassle and what if the
judge sides with them? You never know. Personally, I'd sooner not
ever see their faces again. I've had bad dentists before, but these
guys are nasty.
I've recently called "Washington Dental" down in Tijuana and they
said they can do all the work I still need for under 1/8 th the cost!!
They said they are walking distance from the US border and will
even pay for parking so I've found some airline tickets for $150
return. They said two visits is all that's needed
I've read online nothing but good experiences from WD patients.
If anyone has ANYTHING bad to say about WASHINGTON DENTAL
please inform me.
Bill - 10 May 2006 18:44 GMT
This is what happens when a dentist is not carefully selected by the
patient before any treatment is undertaken.
In the past, people would inquire amongst their family and friends to
obtain the names of the best dentists in their area. They would ask
about fees, how "nice" the doctor was, and how satisfied their friends
were with their treatment over a period of years.
More recently, we see too many cases where the patient does not even
select a dentist, but only a "dental office" -- as if the quality of
the care is determined by an office building, instead of by an
individual, repsonsible dentist.
Too often the choice is made by promises cheap prices, instead of
quality considerations.
We often see the result of that choice here on the SMD newsgroup.
This sort of experience should be reported to the California Dental
Board, and if insurance was involved, also to the California Department
of Managed Health Care.
Far too often, problem dentistry continues when patients don't bother
to report the problems, don't bother to go to small claims, and don't
even bother to follow up with the appropriate state agencies.
Then when other potential patients check up on these practices, they
are told there is a "clean record" and "no complaints filed" because
the earlier patients don't even bother to file the simple complaints!
Then the problems continue for patient after patient, ad infinitum.
Going to Tijuana for dental care is like jumping from the frying pan
into the fire. You will get a very expensive education, but don't say I
didn't warn you first.
- dentaldoc