Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Full-Mouth X-Rays - How Often?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John K. - 10 Apr 2006 22:42 GMT
I'd like a considered opinion on how often you should have full-mouth X-rays,
especially if one has had numerous root canals in the past.

In my case, it was coming up on 5 years and an infection was discovered along
side #4, an endo-tooth, treated back in 1989. I have had no symptoms to
report, except those of a healing root canal which lasted about 3 months.
I've been chewing on it, unaware of any problem; nothing showed up on the X-
rays of 12/2000.

I'm scheduled for surgery next week.

Is 5 years the norm, or is it one of those "it depends" situations?  The area
of infection looked large enough to me, but the endodontist claimed it is not
an emergency... yet.  That was back in January.

I think I need to be better prepared in the future. :-)

Signature

john

Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 11 Apr 2006 00:46 GMT
> I'd like a considered opinion on how often you should have full-mouth X-rays,
> especially if one has had numerous root canals in the past.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> I think I need to be better prepared in the future. :-)

    It's one of those "it depends" situations.  Generally, the greater the
quantity and complexity of dental treatment a patient has had in the
past, the more likely something will crop up that will show up on a full
series of x-rays.  Root canal failures are one of the events;
periodontal breakdown is another.
    Many root canal failures present on x-ray as a dark area surrounding
one or more roots.  Sometimes there will be a gum boil, sometimes not.
Perhaps not intuitively, some of these teeth with large dark areas are
less likely to turn into an acute toothache, because there is no bone
overlying the root and if the infection flares it will drain through the
gum, rather than building up pressure within the bone.
    Good that you're dealing with the situation.  These kinds of things
happen; don't know how you'd prepare better, except to understand that
these things happen and get checked periodically.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Packrat® - 11 Apr 2006 01:23 GMT
>> I'd like a considered opinion on how often you should have full-mouth
>> X-rays, especially if one has had numerous root canals in the past.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Steve

Steve, thanks for the follow-up. I wondered about the size and why there
was no pain. From what I remember, it was a rather large "teardrop" shaped
area, distal(?) from the tooth itself. The narrow top portion appeared to
be touching the root at an angle, like a baloon hanging down on the right
side toward #3.  No gum abscess is present. My regular dentist told me it
would probably take 6 months for the bone to grow back. (ouch!) No one is
talking about antibiotics - I would assume they'd be necessary after the
Apico..(?) I think I would welcome them at this point. <g>

Thanks again.

Signature

john

Steven Bornfeld - 11 Apr 2006 03:38 GMT
>>>I'd like a considered opinion on how often you should have full-mouth
>>>X-rays, especially if one has had numerous root canals in the past.
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Thanks again.

    My guess (only a guess) is that you will be on antibiotics for a week
or so after the surgery.  Yes, the bone takes a long time to grow back,
but the infection presumably will be gone shortly after the surgery--the
bone just takes time to grow.

Steve
John K. - 11 Apr 2006 03:55 GMT
<snip>
>>John K. wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Steve

Got it! :-)

Signature

john

Joel344 - 12 Apr 2006 03:06 GMT
Depends but in general its no problemo. We expose
at 0.3 seconds ..... years ago it was 3.0 seconds!

Joel

John K. Wrote:
> I'd like a considered opinion on how often you should have full-mout
> X-rays,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> --
> joh

--
Joel34
Packrat® - 12 Apr 2006 14:57 GMT
> Depends but in general its no problemo. We expose
> at 0.3 seconds ..... years ago it was 3.0 seconds!
>
> Joel

Yes, I am aware of the exposure times - thanks - but it was not my concern.

All things considered, I would rather have them more often, especially if
there is/has been extensive endo-therapy, and 5 years seems a bit long.
I'm looking to shorten that to a max of 3!

Signature

john

Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 12 Apr 2006 15:26 GMT
>>Depends but in general its no problemo. We expose
>>at 0.3 seconds ..... years ago it was 3.0 seconds!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> there is/has been extensive endo-therapy, and 5 years seems a bit long.
> I'm looking to shorten that to a max of 3!

    This seems to be the default interval of periodontists (3 years).
Whether there should be a "default" interval is another story entirely.
    In any case, I wouldn't consider it unusual if things aren't well
controlled (caries, perio, etc.).

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Joel344 - 13 Apr 2006 00:25 GMT
We agree .... in fact every other year is okay too.

Joel

Packrat? Wrote:

> > Depends but in general its no problemo. We expose
> > at 0.3 seconds ..... years ago it was 3.0 seconds!
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> --
> joh

--
Joel34
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.