> Is the ONLY reason that fish have lots of mercury in them because of
> humans? I mean, a million years ago, did they still have some because
> of just the tendency to accumulate whatever was naturally occuring? Or
> does mercury basically not occur in nature without humans?
I'm sure that most of it is due to humans. I know that a lot of Hg is
built
up in San Fransico Bay for example. They had a lot of gold mining
which used Hg and ran off into the bay, probably contaminating the
seafood from there. I also heard that some Indian tribes in Canada
have gotten people poisoned with Hg from fishing so much, never
heard of that happening 100 years ago.
Joel344 - 27 Mar 2006 00:07 GMT
This is true. The alchemists finally succeeded. They eventually
got silver to get into liquid state and called it quicksilver. Do
you think English Springer Spaniels could have accomplished
this? Of course not. Its the humans.
Joel
Clinton Wrote:
> > Is the ONLY reason that fish have lots of mercury in them because of
> > humans? I mean, a million years ago, did they still have some
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> have gotten people poisoned with Hg from fishing so much, never
> heard of that happening 100 years ago.

Signature
Joel344
> Is the ONLY reason that fish have lots of mercury in them because of
> humans? I mean, a million years ago, did they still have some because
> of just the tendency to accumulate whatever was naturally occuring? Or
> does mercury basically not occur in nature without humans?
Apparently, "mercury is present in rocks, soil, and ores and can be
washed into creeks and rivers by storms. Mercury can also become
dispersed throughout the atmosphere from forest fires and volcanic
activity."
Chuck - 27 Mar 2006 11:06 GMT
>Apparently, "mercury is present in rocks, soil, and ores and can be
>washed into creeks and rivers by storms. Mercury can also become
>dispersed throughout the atmosphere from forest fires and volcanic
>activity."
By far the largest contributor of mercury into lakes, rivers, oceans
---> fish, is from coal burning power plants. Approximately 40 tons /
year, globally. CB
Clinton - 27 Mar 2006 11:15 GMT
> Apparently, "mercury is present in rocks, soil, and ores and can be
> washed into creeks and rivers by storms. Mercury can also become
> dispersed throughout the atmosphere from forest fires and volcanic
> activity."
How can there still be volcanic activity? After all, doesn't all that
lava cool down after a few billion years? Doesn't seem to make much
sense does it!
letsconnect - 27 Mar 2006 16:39 GMT
> How can there still be volcanic activity? After all, doesn't all that
> lava cool down after a few billion years? Doesn't seem to make much
> sense does it!
LOL - are you being serious?
Clinton - 27 Mar 2006 16:47 GMT
> > How can there still be volcanic activity? After all, doesn't all that
> > lava cool down after a few billion years? Doesn't seem to make much
> > sense does it!
>
> LOL - are you being serious?
Yep, why doesn't the earth cool off..? 4 billion years is a long time!
letsconnect - 28 Mar 2006 13:56 GMT
> > > How can there still be volcanic activity? After all, doesn't all that
> > > lava cool down after a few billion years? Doesn't seem to make much
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Yep, why doesn't the earth cool off..? 4 billion years is a long time!
You could try and see if there are any geology nightclasses available
in your area.
Clinton - 28 Mar 2006 14:53 GMT
> > > > How can there still be volcanic activity? After all, doesn't all that
> > > > lava cool down after a few billion years? Doesn't seem to make much
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> You could try and see if there are any geology nightclasses available
> in your area.
Someone asked me this recently, I thought about it about 15 seconds and
said I couldn't come up with an answer. But it is a good example of how
we blindly accept what we are told (Ahem!, the thread topic is
amalgam).
Turns out the Earths core is RADIOACTIVE! Otherwise how could the
heat of the molten core remain insultated for Billions of years?
letsconnect - 30 Mar 2006 01:27 GMT
> Turns out the Earths core is RADIOACTIVE! Otherwise how could the
> heat of the molten core remain insultated for Billions of years?
Wow. I would never have guessed.
Joel344 - 01 Apr 2006 02:29 GMT
Clinton Wrote:
> > > How can there still be volcanic activity? After all, doesn't al
> that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Yep, why doesn't the earth cool off..? 4 billion years is a long time!
Yup, it seems longer if its just before Christmas ..
--
Joel34