Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / February 2006
Why does my crown hurt to tap it?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
JimSocal - 30 Jan 2006 08:22 GMT I had a crown made, had it temporarily cemented, then had a root canal on that tooth (#30).
Over a month since the root canal (done by an endodontist), and while I would not say it "hurts" per se, I will say that it is sensitive to touch. If I tap on it, with my finger or fingernail, especially from the side, it hurts ever so slightly. None of my other teeth feel like that when I tap them. I have waited to have it perm. cemented until I am SURE the root canal was done right and there will be no further need for opeing it up.
It also is sensitive - ever so slightly - to cold, or to chewing at times.
I had my USC dentist (not the endo) take an xray of it when I went there for a filling on another tooth, and she and her prof said it looked like the root canal was fine.
I called the endo. and described the above symptoms and he said it was fine, go ahead and cement the crown.
So once again, I am in a position of wondering: Am I being told the truth or am I a victim of a lazy endo who doesn't want to face the idea that he might have left some nerve in there?
IF it IS normal that a crown have some sensitivity to touch in some cases, then I am willing to move forward, have it cemented permanently on, and live with the sensitivity.
But if it's not then it would seem the endo HAS to go back in there.
How do I proceed? The endo. has basically told me he isn't worried about it, that it's fine (although he has not looked at it after I left the office; though he DID take a post-endo. xray, right after the endo., and declare that it was fine based on that)
Do I INSIST he take yet another xray , or whatever it takes, and look at it again before I have the crown cemented?
This latter idea is my inclination, but if it is normal that a crown can be sensitive like this, then I will accept that.
(All sincere, non-abusive comments are welcome. I didn't come here to be called names and be drawn into a fight with anyone.)
kite@execpc.com - 30 Jan 2006 21:13 GMT I'm not a dental professional; I'm just a patient who's had a few root canals and crowns. My root-canalled teeth have always had sensitivity, often for quite some time after the procedure. As far as I can tell, the reason for this is a certain degree of irritation/inflammation of the gum tissue around the roots of the tooth. In my experiences it has taken anywhere from several weeks to over six months to resolve -- but it always has gone away in the end. The tooth never simply hurt or throbbed when I wasn't touching it, but was often sensitive to a sideways tap or to chewing, as you said. I'm not so sure about cold sensitivity, not (luckily) having any recent root canals at the moment! With x-rays that show nothing wrong, I would personally get the crown cemented. But a word of warning -- DEFINITELY get the tooth numbed before they do the cementing! Cementing a crown on a tooth with that kind of sensitivity without anaesthesia is awfully painful.
JimSocal - 30 Jan 2006 22:21 GMT >I'm not a dental professional; I'm just a patient who's had a few root >canals and crowns. My root-canalled teeth have always had sensitivity, [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >before they do the cementing! Cementing a crown on a tooth with that >kind of sensitivity without anaesthesia is awfully painful. Thanks a lot. That makes me think that maybe the endo was telling me the truth, that it is "normal". It's a shame that one cannot trust one's dentist, but in these days of greedy medical/dental providers and insurance plans that force dentists to cut corners, it has been my experience that it is to my own benefit to be skeptical about some of the things they tell me.
Sue - 31 Jan 2006 03:00 GMT > I had a crown made, had it temporarily cemented, then had a root canal > on that tooth (#30). [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > (All sincere, non-abusive comments are welcome. I didn't come here to > be called names and be drawn into a fight with anyone.) Hi Jim, If your endo thinks it is ok, then hopefully it is ok. Here is a similar question, however it sounds like the pain this patient felt was slightly worse your pain.
http://www.dental--health.com/rootcanals2.html
Good luck,
Sue (nondentist)
Harleygyrl A Bikerchyck - 31 Jan 2006 03:29 GMT that is pure T bullshit, sue.
JimSocal wrote: > I had a crown made, had it temporarily cemented, then had a root canal > on that tooth (#30). > > Over a month since the root canal (done by an endodontist), and while > I would not say it "hurts" per se, I will say that it is sensitive to > touch. If I tap on it, with my finger or fingernail, especially from > the side, it hurts ever so slightly. None of my other teeth feel like > that when I tap them. I have waited to have it perm. cemented until I > am SURE the root canal was done right and there will be no further > need for opeing it up. > > It also is sensitive - ever so slightly - to cold, or to chewing at > times. > > I had my USC dentist (not the endo) take an xray of it when I went > there for a filling on another tooth, and she and her prof said it > looked like the root canal was fine. > > I called the endo. and described the above symptoms and he said it was > fine, go ahead and cement the crown. > > So once again, I am in a position of wondering: Am I being told the > truth or am I a victim of a lazy endo who doesn't want to face the > idea that he might have left some nerve in there? > > IF it IS normal that a crown have some sensitivity to touch in some > cases, then I am willing to move forward, have it cemented permanently > on, and live with the sensitivity. > > But if it's not then it would seem the endo HAS to go back in there. > > How do I proceed? The endo. has basically told me he isn't worried > about it, that it's fine (although he has not looked at it after I > left the office; though he DID take a post-endo. xray, right after the > endo., and declare that it was fine based on that) > > Do I INSIST he take yet another xray , or whatever it takes, and look > at it again before I have the crown cemented? > > This latter idea is my inclination, but if it is normal that a crown > can be sensitive like this, then I will accept that. > > (All sincere, non-abusive comments are welcome. I didn't come here to > be called names and be drawn into a fight with anyone.)
Hi Jim, If your endo thinks it is ok, then hopefully it is ok. Here is a similar question, however it sounds like the pain this patient felt was slightly worse your pain.
http://www.dental--health.com/rootcanals2.html
Good luck,
Sue (nondentist)
Sue - 31 Jan 2006 04:13 GMT > that is pure T bullshit, sue. > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > Sue (nondentist) Harley of course it is BS.
Any person with half a brain knows Jim should have #30 yanked immediately since he now has a dead tooth with a root canal.
The endo is just seeing how much money the industry can get out of Jim and the ins co ($500 RCT), ($600+ for a permanent crown), followed by an apioectomy at least $800), another crown ($600+), before they end up yanking the tooth anyway.
Once they yank it ($100), then they can place an implant for $1000+. Let this puppy rot, place a permanent crown.... and then rack up another 2-4K of dentistry... or perhaps just let Jim get endocarditis and die of an infection steming from this tooth. I am sure those are the thoughts going through this endo's mind.
-Sue
P.S. Just kidding Jim.
Parker - 31 Jan 2006 04:33 GMT > I had a crown made, had it temporarily cemented, then had a root canal > on that tooth (#30). [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > cases, then I am willing to move forward, have it cemented permanently > on, and live with the sensitivity. I had two root canals about three years ago, and they've been a little sensitive to pressure, flossing and brushing ever since.
The endodontist mentioned doing an apicoectomy if it got worse, but it never did, so I've been ignoring it. I guess it's never going to get better, though... Like I said, it's been three years. (A little over three years, actually.)
JimSocal - 31 Jan 2006 05:34 GMT >> I had a crown made, had it temporarily cemented, then had a root canal >> on that tooth (#30). [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] >better, though... Like I said, it's been three years. (A little over >three years, actually.) Thanks for the feedback. At least it seems SOMEtimes these problems go away on their own.... I hope mine is one of those! Meanwhile I think I am going to TRY to insist the endo look at it again, if I can.
Sue - 31 Jan 2006 22:44 GMT > >> I had a crown made, had it temporarily cemented, then had a root canal > >> on that tooth (#30). [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > away on their own.... I hope mine is one of those! Meanwhile I think I > am going to TRY to insist the endo look at it again, if I can. Jim,
How did the professionals on the moderated forum answer your question? It does not seem right that a root canalled tooth should remain sensitive for 3 years (like Parker's has).
If I was in your shoes, I would ask the endo what s/he thinks may be causing the sensitivity. For example is this it not an infection, then what is causing the sensitivity?
I would to know if I was in your shoes.
Best of luck,
-Sue
JimSocal - 01 Feb 2006 08:54 GMT >Jim, > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >-Sue Thanks Sue. To answer your questions:
Basically the dentists over on the new forum said that it could be just a root canal that is going to be sensitive for awhile. One comment was that sometimes the tissue around the tooth may have been traumatized by the rct itself or the infection. Or it could be from a fractured tooth. The root could be broken, and biting on it puts stress on tissues surrounding the tooth, which are very much alive.
Someone else said it could be from heavy nighttime clenching, which I know nothing about. How do I find out if I am clenching at night, and if I am, what do I do about it? (I doubt I clench my teeth at night; I'm a light sleeper and I think if I did this, I'd be aware of it. But who knows?)
The consensus - including what the endo's assistant told me today - is that the tooth could well still be traumatized from the RCT itself and the sensitivity could go away with some more time... or not.. But the endo and his assistant seem to think it's normal.
I had to get very pushy with the endo's office to get them to give me a followup appointment. I don't know if it's because it's on my old dental insurance, or if it's just that they feel it's a waste of time, or what. But in any case I figured if I have to, I'll pay for it out of my pocket, I just need to KNOW what is going on with this tooth before I have the crown cemented permanently next week (I have an appointment to have that done.)
So I'll let you all know what the endo says after I get back tomorrow afternoon.
DocGabeS D.M.D. - 01 Feb 2006 09:49 GMT I mostly do Endo, 95 % of my work is that if a rtc I did is sensitive I'd wait for, and no more than, 6 months, if after 6 months it is still sensitive, then I gotta go back in, an try a redo, if a redo doesn't work after another 6 months, then I suggests an apicectomy, which means I try to start less aggressive and then go further, only if necessary, always remember that every tooth/case/treatment/patient has it's OWN background, and that has to be taken into consideration.
Smile, be Happy! Gabriel
 Signature Please if you resend this message (1) Erase the e-mail address from the person that sent it to you and anyone else that appears (2) Protect the addresses of destination by placing them on the BBC (Blind Copy). Thank You
> >>Jim, [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > So I'll let you all know what the endo says after I get back tomorrow > afternoon. JimSocal - 01 Feb 2006 20:10 GMT >I mostly do Endo, 95 % of my work is that >if a rtc I did is sensitive I'd wait for, and no more than, 6 months, if [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Smile, be Happy! >Gabriel Thank you. Mine has only been a month, so I guess I'll probably have to go ahead and cement the crown permanently and hope for the best. I have an appointment for the endo. to look at it today, though.
Sue - 02 Feb 2006 01:08 GMT > >I mostly do Endo, 95 % of my work is that > >if a rtc I did is sensitive I'd wait for, and no more than, 6 months, if [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > to go ahead and cement the crown permanently and hope for the best. I > have an appointment for the endo. to look at it today, though. Thanks for your updates Jim.
Sharing all of your questions throughout this process helps others. Your questions, the responses here and you relaying your interpretion of the professional responses, are very helpful to other patients, laypeople and professionals alike, IMHO.
(BTW, I hope you do not get chastized for paraphrasing what the dentists on the other forum said to you).
I am going to read through this thread in its entireity again, so it sinks in.
Thanks again,
-Sue
JimSocal - 02 Feb 2006 04:35 GMT >Thanks for your updates Jim. No problem.
>Sharing all of your questions throughout this process helps others. >Your questions, the responses here and you relaying your interpretion >of the professional responses, are very helpful to other patients, >laypeople and professionals alike, IMHO. Yes, that's my main motivation for getting back here with what I find out from people I talk with.
>(BTW, I hope you do not get chastized for paraphrasing what the >dentists on the other forum said to you). I hope not, too. No reason why it should be a problem, in my mind. They did not want to deal with this group, and I can understand why, with all the fighting that was going on, and the contstant b.s. from Jan and so on. But I see no reason why they should care if I post what I learn from them, or anyone else, here. If they do have a problem with it then I'll cross that bridge when I get to it.
By the way, I think Jan has a RIGHT to post her anti-rtc stuff here. BUT, if you post and post the same stuff over and over to the same people who don't want to hear it, then it becomes more like spamming or trolling... Who knows what is "right" as far as the healthfulness of RCT? All I know is, I see that RCT often works out well for people and beats losing a tooth. She disagrees. So be it. But I have kill- filed her because I've made my decision to believe in the validity of RCT and I don't need to read her posts over and over again, telling me it's not healthy. We just disagree; so be it. I don't wish to discuss it or argue about it.
>I am going to read through this thread in its entireity again, so it >sinks in. > >Thanks again, > >-Sue pdurant - 02 Feb 2006 14:48 GMT I've had both experiences....root canals that have lasted for decades and one that failed after 5 years (recurrent infections). This bottom molar had rct, two full crowns (one pre-rct and one post rct), an apicoectomy which failed, was extracted last summer and now I will be getting an implant - final cost on treatment of this one tooth is hovering around $6,500 - not counting the fillings/problems that led to the original rct. But it is the only molar I have on that side of my lower jaw, so I need it - having done everything to save it, I must now do what it takes to replace it and hope that works.
JimSocal - 02 Feb 2006 20:44 GMT >I've had both experiences....root canals that have lasted for decades >and one that failed after 5 years (recurrent infections). This bottom [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >lower jaw, so I need it - having done everything to save it, I must >now do what it takes to replace it and hope that works. I understand. I had problems with my one back molar (#18) too, and I did everything I could to save it, but now it's gone and I have to get an implant. I'm actually getting FIVE implants - yikes! - due to having had 9 or so pulled when I was a kid, and never having anything done to replace them. Now that problem has finally come home to roost (after I lost #18 I had NOTHING left to chew with). Good luck with your implant!
pdurant - 03 Feb 2006 14:36 GMT Wow - we have similar situations! I just had 4 implants and a bone graft two weeks ago to replace top-front teeth lost in my early teens. My mother had taken tetracycline while pregnant with me which I am told caused the enamel to not form correctly on my top front 6 teeth. Alas, 3 of those teeth ended up getting abscessed after numerous fillings failed to halt their deterioration. I don't know if there was any other treatment available back then (early 60's) but my parents couldn't afford much so the decision was made to pull them.
I had a partial plate from age 12 to 24....then had my own income to be able to afford a bridge. That lasted for 20 years, the second bridge lasted for 12 years before the anchor eye tooth on one side broke off near the gum line last October. The remedy was either to do another bridge - going from a 6 unit to 8 unit bridge....or pull the broken eye tooth, do a bone graft and 4 implants to replace the teeth. I opted for the latter, and am hoping for a permanent fix this time. I don't want to go through this again - the expense over the years of remedying the ill-advised tetracycline prescription has been enormous!
Good luck to you also - hope the sensitivity goes away and you can proceed with the rest of your treatment uneventfully.
JimSocal - 03 Feb 2006 21:17 GMT Hi, I'll respond paragraph by paragraph below:
>Wow - we have similar situations! I just had 4 implants and a bone >graft two weeks ago to replace top-front teeth lost in my early teens. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >other treatment available back then (early 60's) but my parents >couldn't afford much so the decision was made to pull them. I don't know WHAT caused my teeth problems and what is weird is that my parents don't remember why I had them pulled, either. All I know is, I went to a hospital like environment in 1968 or so and they gave me a general anesthesia and I came out with a bunch of teeth missing.
>I had a partial plate from age 12 to 24....then had my own income to be >able to afford a bridge. That lasted for 20 years, the second bridge [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >want to go through this again - the expense over the years of >remedying the ill-advised tetracycline prescription has been enormous! At least you had a bridge and partial over the years; I had nothing. I have no idea why my parents thought I "didn't need" some kind of bridge or something. They were upper middle class and COULD have afforded it. I am a bit pissed at them, that they didn't do anything for me, but I don't say anything. They're old, and there is no point in bumming them out.
Over the years I got used to not having the teeth (all molars) and chewed with my front teeth, and gums against molars, and everything seemed okay. As I got older the dentists would suggest bridge work and partials but in my earlier years I could not afford them, and in later years I said "Why? I'm fine the way I am." I was so used to it, it seemed normal to me.
However I did not see the truth of the matter which was that the extra stress on my other teeth would break them down and so now I have 2 chipped front teeth, had #18 extracted recently, and #30 with a crown and root canal. I plan to get veneers on my front teeth too if my money holds out. (Credit, actually.)
>Good luck to you also - hope the sensitivity goes away and you can >proceed with the rest of your treatment uneventfully. Me too! Please report back here with any problems or just to update me on your progress and experiences with these implants. I don't go in for the actual implant surgery for another month or two, so I'm a bit apprehensive. If you have any problems, your telling me, here, could help me avoid similar problems. Feedback is always good.
Good luck to you!
bykerchyck@yahoo.com - 01 Feb 2006 16:13 GMT i had the same problem years ago. they did exactly that procedure. in fact, it hurt on it's own, too. they gave me antibiotics, so apparently (and this is what i suspected) there was an aerobic infection in it. later on, the root canal caused a cavitation, as all root canals eventually do. those r then, anaerobic bacteria. anyway, we pull root canals nearly every day. it is the only solution. below, see a patient's problem w/ a root canal. for more info also see: http://www.bikerchick.freehomepage.com/custom2.html
Torrie here is an email b/t a patient and i on their root canal: THE FOLLOWING IS AN EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE THAT I THOUGHT MITE HELP SOME OF U Torrie
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 Subject: Re: unreachable canals
Dear Dr. Morales,
I just underwent root canal therapy on a rear, lower molar. Prior to treatment I had experienced acute pain in that tooth as well as the jaw underneath for a number of days. Penicillin had been prescribed (which didn't seem to have a noticeable beneficial effect) and on the third day of penicillin therapy, the root canal procedure was completed. The tooth was hemoragic (not sure of spelling) in that liquid escaped from the tooth as soon as the hole was made in the crown. At the end of the procedure, the endodondist let me know that there are many lateral canals that he couldn't reach and that therefore he was not totally optimistic this time that there will be a successful result. I have another day of antibiotics left and intend to take them (total was 25 (500 mg.) PVK pills for this past week). This was the first time that he had mentioned to me about lateral canals. Do all molars have such lateral canals? Do you have any recommendations? Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
they can. george menig wrote the root canal cover-up. i have spoken to him personally. this is what he has to say about lateral canals:
...I was brought up was to know that if the patient had a good looking root canal, but was having a health problem afterwards, and particularly if you're not having any symptoms in the tooth, that you should suspect that the infection was coming from what are known as the lateral canals. These are accessory canals that come from the root of the tooth, not right at the end of the root of the tooth, and these do not show up on X-ray pictures, they are not easy to see, and it's impossible to treat them properly. Why so many endodontists today are assuring patients that there's nothing wrong - they've got to know that those accessory canals can become infected - and the only reason I can think is that they're afraid that they're going to be criticized for doing the root canal and it didn't work and maybe the patient might want their money back or that maybe they might get sued or something like that because so many of them today are telling the patient there's absolutely nothing wrong, maybe you'd better go see a psychiatrist. http://www.mizar5.com/LauraLeeshow.htm
the only thing we do w/ root canals is pull the tooth; it is all that can b done in order to b healthy. Torrie, Consultant
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Torrie,
Thank you for your timely response. Would you recommend extending the Penicillin therapy for another week in order to fight whatever infection may still be in the lateral canals? Would the additional penicillin likely have a beneficial effect?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
well, a better choice would prolly b a broad-spectrum antibiotic, but if u get results from the penicillin, u could take it. i would follow your dr's advice on it, since he gave it to u. typically, what they do is do the root canal over again until the person stops complaining of pain. i know because i have been thru this and so has my dad. eventually, u end up spending over $2,000 on one tooth and r still having problems. it sounds as tho u have an aerobic infection, which has to b treated by antibiotics (or pull the tooth and clean out the cavitation). the latter will cure it, the antibiotics will mask the real over-all problem. when dentists cannot get the infection out, they will put in a drainage tube and sometimes make hole inside the gum where they can go in and access it whenever they need to drain off infection. getting them to solve the problem and pull the tooth, is like, well, pulling teeth, so as to speak. often, they stick a crown on it, making it worse and spending more of your money. some ppl end up w/ both an aerobic(needs oxygen) infection and anaerobic(needs oxygen-free envionment). usually, it is the former which causes the most pain and infection we can drain easily, but anaerobic ones can do this as well.
ok, let's go over the root canal process. u have to get rid of the mentality that dentists impose on us, that root canals r a normal natural medical procedure w/ scientific studies to support it. it is actually the opposite. it is pretty easy to conceive that if u have a broken bone, that u go to the dr, he sets it, the bone grows back together and heals. it has all the nutrients and oxygen from the blood to do so. ok, so we take this tooth, we take some of the roots out, only 1/3 of what it actually has, but enough to kill it. so, it no longer has any life support. and, it is, in fact, the only place in the body drs will keep something dead that once was alive. for one, let's look at how an extraction heals. if the dentist (mainly, only biologic dentists r taught to do this) takes out the periodontal ligament, the bone on one side tries to reach the bone on the other side. it uses the nutrients and oxygen in the blood in order to do this. but, w/ a root canaled tooth, we have shoved gutta percha in there, making this healing impossible. on top of that, scientifically, in every case, when a living thing dies, there is bacteria. these anaerobic bacteria need a place to go. the dentists tell u that they seal all the roots so no bacteria can get into the body. for one, there r 3 miles of roots (the 2/3 of roots left behind after a root canal) in a tooth and they cannot possibly seal all of them because they r far too small for bicalyx (formerly called endocal). also, some dentists use Calcium Hydroxide dressings. i would not want that stuff in me, see http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002910.htm . they try to kill the bacteria, but the bacteria r going to win in the end. what happens is, when a root canal is done and we use antibiotics or the other methods used to try and curtail the leaching of this bacteria into the jaw, the body is also helping us kill those bacteria by launching an immune response. well, this is not good. u want your immune system concentrating on protecting u against other illnesses rather than an infection, caused by a dr, that is unnecessary and unscientific. but, this is the most important aspect of a root canal; it is what keeps dentists doing them and patients coming back for more. our immune system goes into high gear and tries to prevent us from dying. in most cases, it does a very good job of keeping bacteria at bay; hence, what the dentists term as a "successful" root canal, but what is scientifically, an oxymoron. well, eventually, the outcome is obvious, the body will break down. u may go to your grave w/ a root canal in tact, w/ no pain or apparent infection, but your immune system simply couldn't spare enough energy over time to ward off heart disease or alzheimer's or whatever other malady came it's way. so, i guess it is a matter of picking your battles. is keeping a tooth more important than health is the question ppl have to answer for themselves. some ppl will only notice perhaps rheumatoid arthritis. is it worth it to them to live in pain and take meds every day, but having their smile not reflect any missing natural teeth? hmm. Torrie
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Torrie,
I am very pleased with the thoroughness of your response. My dentist (who filled the hole in the existing crown as a result of the root canal) told me that the endodontist told him that my tooth was very infected. I told the dentist that I was experiencing some fairly mild (but of concern) jaw pain in the area of the tooth. He said that because there was actually an abcess on the jaw, this was to be expected. I asked if I should have an additional course of antibiotics, and he said that my immune system would eventually resolve the jaw discomfort. He said that the blood (with white blood cells) could more easily reach the jaw than the tooth itself (because the tooth is a closed system),. He expressed confidence that the jaw would heal. I asked him about a wider spectrum antibiotic (because it seemed to me that the penicillin didn't really have a beneficial effect at all. He said that if penicillin can be tolerated it is usually the best choice for tooth type bacteria. Anyway, my jaw still throbs (fairly mildly though) now 6 days after the root canal. I guess it may take a little more time. If you have additional thoughts, I would be interested. Thank you again for your timely and comprehensive response to my inquiry.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------well, i don't know if u can muddle thru all this http://www.ratsteachmicro.com/Anaerobic_Bacteria_Notes/HCOE_CAI_Review_Notes_Ana erobic_Bacteria.htm. but the bacteria r often broader, so that is y penicillin does not always do the trick. if the antibiotics work, of course it will b just a bandaid approach, something your dentist cannot see the "forest 'fore the trees" on.
Torrie
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
oh yes, i do have one additional question. after these root canal teeth are pulled, do you then recommend implants, dentures or what? to take the place of these missing teeth. i would appreciate a response to this last question. thank you very very much.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
implants r bad. see below for something i wrote about them. if the teeth r bridgeable, u can get bridges. or, u can get partials. we have a temporary partial ready the same day and u have to wear it 2 to 3 months b4 getting permanent work.
Torrie
titanium implants are putting metal and a high milliamperage close to the brain, which is not good. i have seen a woman measure nearly 400 milliamps positive charge and 30 neg charge while having these in her mouth. we removed them. our body runs on electrical impulses, so this can disrupt those. also, dentists and drs will tell u that bone grows to titanium implants. well, it will grow around it. but, it is a foreign object and the body will build up antibodies to it. over time, it will pull away from the bone and can become loose. if u will notice, they say implants last about 15 years or so. they are working on an implant made of diamond, supposed to b available in 5 yrs. but, it will still b a foreign object, so i don't think it will be a good idea either.
|
|
|