Dr. Harry,
I'm not sure how to react to your posts. You've arrived in a newsgroup
--
which you admit is a new situation to you -- and you immediately begin
attacking patients who have posted.
One reason several of us have been relieved for a week or so is that
the clique of dental professionals (and two patients) who were posting
in
this group for some years finally created a private group that they can
control and
left this one for the rest of us who want to read real questions and
answers from a variety of people -- professionals and patients alike.
I find it disillusioning that a new dentist has arrived who seems more
interested in picking fights than in using his education and experience
to be helpful. My first reaction to your unfriendly posts was to ask
your name and
state, so that I don't accidentally end up in your office. I don't want
to be exposed to any professional who treats me the way you've treated
posters here. I most certainly won't pay for that kind of treatment!
Being pleasant goes two ways. You may not want patients who question
you in any way. Personally, I prefer health professionals who treat me
with respect and recognize that I have not only the right but the
responsibility to make choices about my body. After all, the patient --
not the doctor -- is the one who lives with the consequences!
If your initial posts have somehow presented you in a light that you
didn't intend, I would encourage you change your presentation to the
kind of
character that you do wish to convey. Otherwise, expect serious readers
to ignore your posts and people just here for a fight to flame you.
Pell
> To Tony (with a Y)
>
> Obviously long standing scientific investigation of the safety vs
risk of
> radiographs can be thrown out the window due to your anecdotal
reference of
> your childs pediatrician. She obviously knows better than all of
the
> research done over the last quarter century.
>
> As for my signing your radiograph warning I'd happily sign all
except
for
> the last part about enhancing my legal position. The type of
patient
who
> would require that part is the same one who will turn around and
happily use
> my lack of a preoperative radiograph to sue me.
>
> Are you aware Tony with a Y , that many insurance companies (Aetna
> Prudential etc) REQUIRE a pre operative radiograpgh before you, the
patient
> ,are entitled to any benefits? Why aren't you complaining to your
benefit
> manager about that procedure? Are you willing to pay for a
procedure
fully
> without insurance benefits because you won't let the dentist take a
> radiograph beforehand. Basically I'm asking you (no pun intended)
to put
> your money where your mouth is.
>
> Obviously your salivary calcification disappearing by prescription
proves
> that radiographs and surgery is useless in all cases.
>
> And your desire to sue immediately your potential employer shows
that
you
> will always seem to go for the legal remedy to correct situations
you
find
> not acceptible to your opinions. To be honest I feel better for
that
> potential lost employer because I have a feeling your desire for
legal
> remedy would have eventually found him in a courtroom defending
himself
> against one of your frivolous lawsuits.
>
> By the way being informed is good for all patients. However one who
is
> constantly questioning everything because their Aunt Fanny (or their
childs
> pediatrician) told them the opposite is nothing but a pain in the
a.s
who
> belongs in the dentist across town's record base. I will happily
refer you
> there so I can take care of patients who appreciate my hard work
>
> drHarry
> Why JD are you telling Sue to get lost? Oh I understand because her opinion
> is different than yours.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> drharry
letsconnect - 20 Jan 2006 07:17 GMT
How true...
For some reason, the Quantity Theory of Insanity springs to mind :-)
> Dr. Harry,
>
[quoted text clipped - 121 lines]
> >
> > drharry
Sue - 20 Jan 2006 15:57 GMT
> Dr. Harry,
>
[quoted text clipped - 121 lines]
> >
> > drharry
Hi Pellmell,
Thanks for the interjection. I think in general, people are more
outspoken (and abrupt) on an internet forum than they might be in face
to face interaction. This is epsecially more evident when most of us
remain anonymous, IMHO.
Still there is no excuse to start flaming one another.. on either side.
So let's all settle down and do our best to start over.
Sincerely,
Sue
Hm. Hope this doesn't post twice.
Dear Dr. Harry,
I'm not sure how to react to your posts. You've arrived in a newsgroup
--
which you admit is a new situation to you -- and you immediately begin
attacking patients who have posted.
One reason several of us have been relieved for a week or so is that
the clique of dental professionals (and two patients) who were posting
in
this group for some years finally created a private group that they can
control and
left this one for the rest of us who want to read real questions and
answers from a variety of people -- professionals and patients alike.
I find it disillusioning that a new dentist has arrived who seems more
interested in picking fights than in using his education and experience
to be helpful. My first reaction to your unfriendly posts was to ask
your name and
state, so that I don't accidentally end up in your office. I don't want
to be exposed to any professional who treats me the way you've treated
posters here. I most certainly won't pay for that kind of treatment!
Being pleasant goes two ways. You may not want patients who question
you in any way. Personally, I prefer health professionals who treat me
with respect and recognize that I have not only the right but the
responsibility to make choices about my body. After all, the patient --
not the doctor -- is the one who lives with the consequences!
If your initial posts have somehow presented you in a light that you
didn't intend, I would encourage you change your presentation to the
kind of
character that you do wish to convey. Otherwise, expect serious readers
to ignore your posts and people just here for a fight to flame you.
Pell
> To Tony (with a Y)
>
> Obviously long standing scientific investigation of the safety vs
risk of
> radiographs can be thrown out the window due to your anecdotal
reference of
> your childs pediatrician. She obviously knows better than all of
the
> research done over the last quarter century.
>
> As for my signing your radiograph warning I'd happily sign all
except
for
> the last part about enhancing my legal position. The type of
patient
who
> would require that part is the same one who will turn around and
happily use
> my lack of a preoperative radiograph to sue me.
>
> Are you aware Tony with a Y , that many insurance companies (Aetna
> Prudential etc) REQUIRE a pre operative radiograpgh before you, the
patient
> ,are entitled to any benefits? Why aren't you complaining to your
benefit
> manager about that procedure? Are you willing to pay for a
procedure
fully
> without insurance benefits because you won't let the dentist take a
> radiograph beforehand. Basically I'm asking you (no pun intended)
to put
> your money where your mouth is.
>
> Obviously your salivary calcification disappearing by prescription
proves
> that radiographs and surgery is useless in all cases.
>
> And your desire to sue immediately your potential employer shows
that
you
> will always seem to go for the legal remedy to correct situations
you
find
> not acceptible to your opinions. To be honest I feel better for
that
> potential lost employer because I have a feeling your desire for
legal
> remedy would have eventually found him in a courtroom defending
himself
> against one of your frivolous lawsuits.
>
> By the way being informed is good for all patients. However one who
is
> constantly questioning everything because their Aunt Fanny (or their
childs
> pediatrician) told them the opposite is nothing but a pain in the
a.s
who
> belongs in the dentist across town's record base. I will happily
refer you
> there so I can take care of patients who appreciate my hard work
>
> drHarry
> Why JD are you telling Sue to get lost? Oh I understand because her opinion
> is different than yours.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> drharry
Sue - 20 Jan 2006 16:33 GMT
Dear Pellmell,
You wrote:
"I find it disillusioning that a new dentist has arrived who seems more
interested in picking fights than in using his education and experience
to be helpful"
With all due respect to you as a fellow patient, I can understand why
a dentist would get defensive when a patient, unhappy with one
dentist's work, seems to conclude that the dental profession as whole
"pushes" crowns to make more money.
In Dr Harry's defense (not that he is on trial by any means).
But I think you should read Dr Harry's contributions in full. Dr. Harry
is not just picking fights. He has provided some very educational and
non-judgemental material about how long crowns last. He has the
expertise to share this and is sharing it. I am thankful that he has
taken the time to share his knowledge.
BTW, most patients come here, take advice and leave. If they are
unhappy with their care, they do not hesitate to throw daggers at the
profession, make judgements about treatments etc... yell and scream and
then leave. Kind of like a hit, "take" and run.
Professionals that care, stick around, but in all hoensty, they do not
deserve to be disrespected as a profession here either (IMHO). Lets
try to make this work.
-Sue
(just trying to see both sides)