> Is this technique reputedly as claimed here ?
No, it's a quack site. Though it may be effective as far as placebo
effects go.
> Is it something that would be taken seriously for example by medical
> authority , organisation here in the uk as evidence of cranial damage
> or lesions such as this Doctor describes ?
Nope.
> http://www.icnr.com/articles/craniodontics.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> 33