>On 20 Feb 2005 19:33:16 -0800, "Jan" <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:

>>Then when his lies are exposed, he changes the subject title and insults.

| Report Abuse

> There is, again, not valid proof of harm from amalgam fillings.

> ZZzz

> credible* *real* *convining* *hard* *clear-cut* *significant*
> *substantial* *solid**reasonable**compelling* *copious* * reputable*

> Summary Brief Abstract Citation MEDLINE ASN.1 XML/SGML LinkOut

> Articles Protein Links Nucleotide Links Popset Links Structure Links
> GenomeLinks OMIM Links Structure Domains Links

> 1: Stomatologiia (Mosk) 1997;76(4):9-11 Related Articles, Books [Patterns
> of mercury release from amalgam fillings into the oral cavity].[Article in
> Russian]Motorkina AV, Barer GM, Volozhin AI.

> Seventy-five subjects aged 20 to 57 with 1 to 15 fillings of silver
> amalgam were examined. The level of mercury vapors in the oral cavity was
> assessedusing an AGP-01 device and the method developed by the authors.
> Emission of mercury vapors in the oral cavity increased with the number of
> fillings. The concentration of mercury in the oral

> depends largely on the number

> ofsilver amalgam fillings and less so on these fillings' length of
> service.Adv Dent Res 1992 Sep;6:110-3

> Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Side-effects: mercury contribution

> body burden from dental amalgam.Reinhardt JW.Department of Operative
> Dentistry, University of Iowa College of Dentistry,Iowa City 52242.

> The purpose of this paper is to examine and report on studies that relate
> mercury levels in human tissues to the presence of dental amalgams, giving
> special attention to autopsy studies. Until

> there have been few published studies examining the relationship between
> dental amalgams and tissue mercury levels. Improved and

> sensitive tissue analysis techniques have made it possible to measure
> elements in the concentration range of parts per billion. The fact

> mercury can be absorbed and reach toxic levels in humantissues makes any
> and all exposure to that element of scientific interest.

> Dental amalgams have long been believed to be of little significance

> contributors to the overall body burden of mercury, because the elemental
> form of mercury is rapidly consumed in the setting reaction of the
> restoration.Studies showing measurable elemental mercury vapor release
> from dental amalgams have raised renewed concern about

> safety.

> Mercury vapor absorption occurs through the lungs, with about 80% of the
> inhaled vapor being absorbed by the lungs and rapidly entering

> bloodstream. Following distribution by blood circulation, mercury can
> enter and remain in certain tissues for longer periods of time, since the
> half-life of excretion is prolonged. Two of the primary arget organs of
> concern are the central nervous system and kidneys.

> Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 1292449 [PubMed - indexed
> for MEDLINE] 1: FASEB J 1990 Nov;4(14):3256-60 Related Articles, Books,
> LinkOut

> Comment in: FASEB J. 1991 Feb;5(2):236.

> Whole-body imaging of the distribution of mercury released from

> fillings into monkey tissues.Hahn LJ, Kloiber R, Leininger RW, Vimy

> Lorscheider FL.Department of Radiology, University of Calgary,

> of Medicine, Alberta,Canada.

> The fate of mercury (Hg) released from dental "silver" amalgam tooth
> fillings into human mouth air is uncertain. A previous report about sheep
> revealed uptake routes and distribution of amalgam Hg among

> tissues. The present investigation demonstrates the bodily

> of amalgam Hg in a monkey whose dentition, diet, feeding regimen, and
> chewing pattern closely resemble those of humans.

> When amalgam fillings, which normally contain 50% Hg, are made with a
> tracer of radioactive 203Hg and then placed into monkey teeth, the isotope
> appears in high concentration in various organs and tissues within 4wk.
> Whole-body images of the monkey revealed that the highest levels of Hg
> werel ocated in the kidney, gastrointestinal tract, and jaw.

> http://tinyurl.com/2jvx7

> http://www.algonet.se/~leif/FUSCIFCT.html

> http://www.lichtenberg.dk/mercury_vapour_in_the_oral_cavit.htm

> http://www.altcorp.com/dentalinformation/amalgam.htm

> http://tinyurl.com/5h7dk

> Mercury-amalgam dental fillings have never been subjected to the kind of
> regulatory scrutiny and approval process demanded of all modern drugs and
> medical devices to prove safety.

> Until this day dentistry has used marketing, political influence, and
> control of regulatory boards at all levels to impose its self-serving

> view that mercury-amalgam is completely safe. The science that proves

> is still not forthcoming from the ADA, nor from dental schools, nor from
> mercury-amalgam manufacturers. Science has not been the driving force
> behind the ADA's public information on mercury release. When asked about
> the safety of mercury amalgam the response one always heard previously,
> and can still hear today in many dental offices is: "once set, the mercury
> becomes completely stable and locked up,

> doesn't leak out". After it was unequivocally demonstrated that mercury
> vapor continuously escapes from mercury-amalgam fillings the ADA

> itself and now claims: "the small amount of mercury released from amalgam
> restorations, especially during placement and removal, has not been shown
> to cause any adverse health effects."

> Mercury escapes from amalgam and is taken up by the human as metallic
> vapor, metallic vapor and ionic mercury dissolved in saliva, and as
> unknown mercury species directly through the tooth pulp and root into the
> bloodstream.[3] Ionic mercury in saliva is converted to methylmercury.[4]

> Mercury travels from amalgam fillings into the jaw, gut, liver, kidneys,
> glands and brain, crosses the placenta to the fetus, and is found in

> milk.[18] [19] [20] [21] [22]

> WARNING TO PARENTS:

> "SILVER" FILLINGS ARE REALLY 50% MERCURY!

> THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION SAYS THEY ARE SAFE! CONCERNED PARENTS
> SHOULD KNOW:

> MERCURY has been eliminated from all other uses in the human body,
> including vaccines, disinfectants, and other oral uses.

> All other health care associations support full disclosure, while the
> American Dental Association hides its use of MERCURY.

> The ADA receives money from MERCURY amalgam manufacturers through its Seal
> of Acceptance program, in contrast with the American Medical

> which rejected taking fees for product endorsements.

> The ADA holds patents on amalgam (since expired), furthering its business
> interests by the continued use of MERCURY in dentistry.

> The ADA endorses pre-Civil War medicine, saying amalgam is justified
> because its use began in 1850!

> The ADA says MERCURY dental fillings are safe to use in children's teeth.

> In 1997, MERCURY amalgam filling manufacturer Dentsply stated that MERCURY
> amalgam fillings are "contraindicated" (meaning DO NOT USE) for children
> and pregnant women.

> The American Dental Association is still calling MERCURY amalgam fillings
> "silver" and denies MERCURY fillings can ever be dangerous!

> Federal and most state medical insurance programs only pay for

> fillings because they are the least expensive, so poor people and poor

> are especially at risk.

> U.S. Public Health Service: The largest component of amalgam is MERCURY.
> ADA: Amalgam is "silver" fillings.

> U.S. Public Health Service: For most people, the leading cause of MERCURY
> toxicity is amalgam fillings, not fish. ADA: You only get traces of
> MERCURY vapor in your body.

> U S Public Health Service: MERCURY is a dangerous neuro-toxin; the MERCURY
> in amalgam goes to the brain, and to a fetus through the placenta. ADA:
> MERCURY exposure is like having an "allergy" to dust or pollen!

> American Medical Association: Don't take $$$ for endorsements. ADA:
> Receives fees from MERCURY amalgam manufacturers while calling amalgam
> "safe". For further information on this issue and links to recent

> coverage of the controversy with the ADA and the dangers of Mercury

> dentistry, please read the August 22 Page 1 article in the Chicago
> Tribune:

> news%2Dhed and visit: www.toxicteeth.net

>      Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
>      From: jan_drew@jan_drew_is_a_liar.com - Find messages by this author
>      Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:15:51 GMT
>      Local: Fri, Nov 26 2004 4:15 pm
>      Subject: Jan Drew Knowingly Lied About Having Mercury Poisoning.
>      Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
> original | Report Abuse
>
> On 26 Nov 2004 19:53:23 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>>Subject: Re: Proof of this claim, please
>>>From: Steven Fawks tuthjoc...@earthlink.net
>>>Date: 11/26/2004 6:48 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: <XmHpd.915$u81...@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
>
>>>And I witnessed her story in 1999 myself.  I told her then that it just
>>>proved that mercury poisoning from amalgam was an impossible diagnosis
>>>based upon her own description of symptoms and treatment.
>
>>I see you have no proof of this claim either.
>
>>A pity the many lies told here and not a single bit of proof.
>
>><snip more from the obsessed, who nuked his posts and is a proven liar>
>
> Notice how instead of explaining how she felt better than she had in
> two years BEFORE all her dental work was done she makes a personal
> attack.
>
> Notice how instead of explaining how she was able to go from bedridden
> (dying of mercury poisoning) to line dancing with no foot pain (soon
> to return) a week after eight amalgams were removed when mercury would
> be flooding into her system that Jan makes a personal attack.
>
> Notice how instead of reconciling her statement that the *reason* that
> she knows that it was the mercury is because she did not *begin* to
> regain her health until *after* her mercury level dropped even though
> she went from bedridden to line dancing a week after having eight
> amalgams out when her mercury level would have been HIGHER than when
> she was bedridden, Jan makes a personal attack.
>
> Notice how Jan cannot reconcile her statement that it was *never* in
> dispute that the removal of amalgams results in increased mercury with
> her statement that the removal of eight amalgams (a week earlier) made
> a difference because she was no longer receiving a daily dose of
> mercury even though the removal of eight amalgams resulted in massive
> exposure to mercury vapors.
>
> Jan cannot explain any of the above. Jan knows that I have completely
> debunked her claim of mercury poisoning and even though she reads my
> posts that she cannot rebut my points. She is a despicable liar, bigot
> and anti-semite who can do nothing but attack those who expose her for
> what she is. Sad that.
>
> Aloha,
>
> Rich
>
> PS: If Jan responds to this post it will be to attack me by starting a
> new post if she does not attack me when someone responds to this post.
> She won't be able to refute any of my above points. Just watch.
>
> ========
>
> (of course Richard H Jacobson wasn't *attacking* starting with the addy!,
> oh no, what a total LIAR & HYPOCRITE!)
>
>      Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
>      From: jan_drew@jan_drew_is_a_liar.com - Find messages by this author
>      Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:22:16 GMT
>      Local: Mon, Nov 29 2004 11:22 pm
>      Subject: Re: Once a week?
>      Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
> original | Report Abuse
>
> On 30 Nov 2004 04:05:52 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>despicable one
>
> On 09 May 2004 03:10:30 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>>>I wish for you a good dose of mercury poisoning, peripheral neuropathy
>>>>and
>>>>migraine headaches.
>
> (W R O N G!!!!  see below)
>
> On 03 Jul 2004 01:00:21 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>Your words come back to bite you.
>
>>Jan
>
> Richard H Jacobson can NOT get anything right
>
>      Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
>      From: jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) - Find messages by this author
>      Date: 24 Aug 2004 06:26:22 GMT
>      Local: Tues, Aug 24 2004 1:26 am
>      Subject: Re: Your Words Come Back To Bite You
>      Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
> original | Report Abuse
>
> Date: 2002-05-21 09:45:29 PST
>
> Rich ,@. wrote in news:khcbeusflte8j1bpsr6ltdva9r1s4jd8o8@4ax.com:> On
> Sat, 18
> May 2002 01:29:42 GMT,
>
>>i...@san.rr.com (Ilena Rose) wrote: In
>
> article4t8beu4ufu8n24vblsrpdkubhoj93tt...@4ax.com
>
>>, Rich ,@. wrote:
>>Are you sure my name is Richard Jacobson??
>>>>>Is it or isn't it?
>> > Negative. Does this mean that I don't have to agree to Jan's request to
>
> cease and desist??  Of course her request presumes that I have been
> stalking
> and harassing her.
>
>>It is kind of like asking someone if they have stopped beating their wife.
>
> But I do think that this is a very important lesson for people who post
> here.
> They should not reveal their real name unless they are prepared for
> various net
> loons such as Jan, Debbee, and Ilena who would use such information to
> harass
> people in their private lives.
>
>> Jan has already done so by posting someone's name, address and phone
>> number.
>
> Ilena has also allegedly contacted someone's wife through email. And
> Debbee has
> attempted to find out my real identity by asking  about RM Jacobson.
>
> Hmmmmmm. No mention of Mark Thorson posting a private phone number and
> address,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Rich is certainly selective.
>
>> > I am grateful for one thing; that Richard Jacobson is not my real name.
>
> Unfortunately the Richard Jacobson that DOES live in Hawaii may not be too
> happy with my assuming his name for purposes of the internet especially
> given
> the recent events.  He happens to live on a different island from me. I do
> plan
> to contact him to let him know that someone may try to harass him since he
> is
> listed in the phone book.
>
>> > Aloha,
>> > Rich
>
> ------------------------------------------------>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>> > The best defense to logic is ignorance.
>
> A likely story.--
>
> Bubba"It is arrogant of us as scientists to feel that because we
> cannotprecisely define a problem, it doesn't exist." - Daniel Clauw, M.D.
>
> Uh huh.
>
> Hiking The Kalalau Trail
>
> Richard Jacobson (r...@cris.com)
> Sat, 16 Mar 1996 00:27:34 -0500 (EST)
> Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
> Next message: Jand...@aol.com: "Florida hike"
> Previous message: L. Barry Rinehart: "Se 'Ya"
>
>>Hawaii's premier backpacking trail, the Kalalau Trail on the island of
>
> Kauai still remains closed past Hanakoa due to the reconstruction of
> the trail near "crawler's ridge". Estimated date of completion is Mid May.
> Until then, camping will only be permitted in Hanakapiai and Hanakoa
> Valleys. I for one am anxious to have Kalalau open again. It has to
> be one of the finest trails in the world.
>
> Aloha,
> Rich
> ------------------------
> ------------------------
> Richard H. Jacobson
> Always remember to put Horace before Descarte
>
> I won't even look up what was said to me,
> something you selectively snipped, Rich.
>
> However my behavior does in no way compare to Andrew's and everyone knows
> it.
>
>      Date: 03 Mar 2002 17:20:09 GMT
>      Local: Sun, Mar 3 2002 12:20 pm
>      Subject: Re: Re Why are people turning to alt. medicine?
>
> Yes I said that and it was wrong.
>
>>when she does the exact same thing (see above).
>
> Wrong.
>
>>I pray that something happens that prevents JD from continuing to post
>>in this newsgroup. Perhaps my prayers will be answered for the benefit
>>of all.
>
> That's nice of you Rich,,,,,,
>
> ,,,,,,,,,,,,,perhaps a disability?
>
>>Perhaps a Prayer to Saint Jude, patron saint of lost causes might
>>help.
>
> You are praying to Saint Jude?
>
> You need to read your bible and see WHO is the correct being is in which
> to
> direct your prayers.
>
> Sadly once again you focused on Jan, rather than Andrew.
>
> Wanna talk about his behavior Rich?
>
> Tell us, do you approve of deconstructing others? Foul mouth language?
>
> Ah,  Rich?
>
> Jan
>
> Rich.@.> wrote in message news:ag0me19924oi0s3ojdfh5ij97l3p58jv5o@4ax.com.
>
> If only we could turn the clock back
>
> ..> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:19:08 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
>> <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In January of 1999, I was in fact, bedfast and had never used a
>>>computer
>>
>> Aloha,
>>
>> Rich
>
> "Posting at the top because that's where the cursor happened to be is like
>> sh.tting in your pants because that's where your a.shole happened to be."
>
> ( and after my Dad's death,,,,,,,God rest his soul)
>
> I am glad that you have finished grieving over the tragic loss of your
> father.
> It took me a lot longer than that to finish grieving over the loss of my
> parents. It looks like *you* have not missed a beat.
>
>      Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
>      From: jan_drew@jan_drew_is_a_liar.com - Find messages by this author
>      Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:56:05 GMT
>      Local: Sun, Nov 28 2004 6:56 pm
>      Subject: Re: Open Message to Dental Practitioners who frequent SMD
>      Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
> original | Report Abuse
>
> On 28 Nov 2004 21:18:13 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>W_B is an example as he speaks of the Salt Lake Landfill.
>
> On 09 May 2004 03:10:30 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>>>I wish for you a good dose of mercury poisoning, peripheral neuropathy
>>>>and
>>>>migraine headaches.
>
> WRONG. The date was:
>
>      Date: 25 Jul 2001 17:56:32 GMT
>      Local: Wed, Jul 25 2001 12:56 pm
>
> The date I ******APOLOGIZED*******
>
>      Date: 03 Mar 2002 17:20:09 GMT
>      Local: Sun, Mar 3 2002 12:20 pm
>      Subject: Re: Re Why are people turning to alt. medicine?
>
> Yes, I said that and it was wrong.
>
> *****Richard H Jacobson is STILL repeating it!******
>
> While he OVERLOOK the below from his *BUDDY*
>
>>John
>>I hope that you develop many serious disabilities.
>>I hope that Jan Drew installs 2 dozen amalgams in your molars.
>>I hope that you bathe with a plugged-in hair dryer.
>>I hope that OJ Simpson suspects you of being "the real killer" of Nicole
>>Brown
> & Ron Goldman.
>
>>I hope that Karma continues to run over your dogma.
>>Why, because you are a VILE, SPAMMING, PIECE OF sh.t.
>
> From: Ilsa Nein (ils...@aol.com5554)
> Subject: Re: Zapper Hucksters Get Zapped
> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
> Date: 2001-12-31 16:22:51 PST
>
>>People who make, sell, or use Hulda's products or follow her advice should
>>go
> straight to hell and burn for seven eternities.
>
> From: Ilsa Nein (ils...@aol.com5554)
> Subject: Re: In My Humble Opinion Only
> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
> Date: 2002-01-17 09:11:22 PST
>
>>That is such a self-serving piece of spam that I hope it sticks in your
>>throat,
> forcing Todd Gastaldo to perform an emergency epesiotomy on you.
>
>>Leave MHA.  Stop spamming.  Rot in Hell.
>
> From: Ilsa Nein (ils...@aol.com5554)
> Subject: Re: In My Humble Opinion Only
> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
> Date: 2002-01-18 12:06:51 PST
>
>>F*** you and the horse you rode off on....
>>>> Uh, dumbass,
>>Deconstructing Atlas
>>a.s clown.
>
>>Cher,
>>I apologize for not calling a vile, f.cking spammer as often as you
>>deserve it.
>
> ==========
>
> Richard H Jacobson is OBSESSED.
>
> Transfers his EVERY weakness on to others.
>
> ATTACKS  ATTACKS  ATTACKS  LIES  LIES   LIES