Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Root Canal??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Shells - 06 Jan 2006 18:36 GMT
My dentist says I need a root canal.  I am in my twenties and have
pretty good teeth and a very good diet.

A filling fell out and, since it didn't hurt, I took my time in getting
it filled.  Even though I have no pain, this dentist says I need a root
canal. It would be my first.

I know it's difficult to know what's going on without seeing for
yourself.  But is it usual to get a root canal for a tooth that has no
pain.  I'm tempted to just let it go with a simple filling, whether it
falls our or not, and wait for the pain to happen.

Is that a foolish decision?

Thanks
Shells
JimSocal - 06 Jan 2006 21:46 GMT
>My dentist says I need a root canal.  I am in my twenties and have
>pretty good teeth and a very good diet.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Thanks
>Shells
Speaking from a patient's point of view, one who's done some research
on this, and whose wife once left a root canal go too long (not her
fault; the idiot dentist did not diagnose it when she went to him with
the beginnings of pain)... I can tell you that, sometimes a root canal
is required even when there is no pain yet.

That said, do you trust this dentist? Is he an "insurance dentist" for
which you get "free check ups" etc.? Is this dentist an endodontist
(root canal specialist) or is he referring you to one?

I will never again let a non-endodontist dentist do a root canal on
me. I apologize to those dentists who do root canals adn do them well.
But twice bitten, thrice shy...

You may want to get another opinion if you feel this tooth may not
really need a root canal. On the other hand if you trust the dentist,
he is well respected, etc., and he is referring you out to an
endodontist, I'd tend to want to believe him.

The one thing you don't want to do is wait too long if you DO need a
root canal. This can cause further infection and lead to a more
difficult root canal, and possible complications, not to mention MUCHO
pain.

Hope this helps.
Joel - 07 Jan 2006 01:37 GMT
Good question Dude (or Dudette).

There is too much unnecessary root canal therapy goin' on.
Besides, then you need a crown. How about questioning the doc .....
and tell him to send a digital x-ray to joeleichen@yahoo.com -> ->
aggressive I know, but so is doing unneeded root canal therapy.

Joely

> My dentist says I need a root canal.  I am in my twenties and have
> pretty good teeth and a very good diet.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thanks
> Shells
USC95 - 07 Jan 2006 09:05 GMT
you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
nuts????
InterestedPatient - 08 Jan 2006 09:51 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????

To USC95,
Joel likes to joke around sometimes.

Is it possible that the tooth is aready dead and therefore, no pain?
Can the dentist tell for sure when a tooth is dead?

Thanks,
Sue (nondentist)

PS Here is a link to that may be of interest to Shells:

http://www.hottooth.com/root_canal_therapy.html#nopain

(excerpt):

"I don't have any pain, but my dentist says I need a root canal.  Why?

There can be a prior history of damage to the pulpal tissue as a
result of a deep filling, or other trauma, which may go undetected for
months or even years, e.g., you have no pain.  Many times you have had
prior pain in the area of concern, but because the pain episode was
brief you may have forgotten.

Absence of pain does not necessarily mean that a problem doesn't
exist.  During a dental exam, your dentist may see a particular tooth
that is discolored in comparison to the others.  This is not a normal
situation and indicates an unhealthy pulp.  In this instance it would
be advisable to have root canal therapy.  However, the approach  to
treatment may involve both surgical and non-surgical therapies ..."
JanD - 10 Jan 2006 02:01 GMT
>> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
>> nuts????
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Is it possible that the tooth is aready dead and therefore, no pain?
> Can the dentist tell for sure when a tooth is dead?

YES

http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html

http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root

 ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is
because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in
the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the
body causing potential harm.
An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually
following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems.
Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as
localised problems.

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm

http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm

http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html

http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html

http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm

http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm

http://www.cfsn.com/maz/

http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html

http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm

http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html

http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html

http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html

http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm

http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html

Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A
dead
or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of
removing the bacteria once they are in there.

http://www.toothwisdom.net/

Toxicity from Root Canals

The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source
of
toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal
therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have
abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the
vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to
clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful;
however,
the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic
type
fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of
the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the
flow
of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation
is
from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no
irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many
more
reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal
tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what
happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages
becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now
becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you
want?
Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are
said
to be the cadavers of the body.

I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to
their
decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I
respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.

The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually
sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at
the
root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a
complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject.
Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable
substitution
for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized
dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out
against
root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the
patient
make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.

>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be
>required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental
>fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for
>the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.

>The warning will read as follows:

>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:

>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure
>to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth
>defects or other reproductive harm.

>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and
>bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.

>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and
>approved for use all dental restorative materials.

>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your
>treatment.

>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before
>Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA
>dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.

>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn
>Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to
>advocacy and activism in the public interest.

>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a
>potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only
>problem is that it's about 100 years too late."

>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits
>filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most
>widely used substance in dental fillings today.

>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source
>of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.

>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the
>Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and
>private dental schools and training programs with more than nine
>employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking
>Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].

>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to
>persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or
>reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental
>amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit
>was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam
>restorative materials in dental offices.

>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more
>than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental
>fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to
>$2,500 per day.

>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at
>415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.

>###

Jan

[snip]
Robert  Morien - 10 Jan 2006 05:52 GMT
> YES

spam noted and reported
Sue - 08 Jan 2006 10:17 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????

Joel likes to joke around sometimes.

Is it possible that the tooth is aready dead and therefore, no pain?
Can the dentist tell for sure when a tooth is dead?

Thanks,
Sue (nondentist)

PS Here is a link to that may be of interest to Shells:

http://www.hottooth.com/root_canal_therapy.html#nopain

(excerpt):

"I don't have any pain, but my dentist says I need a root canal.  Why?

There can be a prior history of damage to the pulpal tissue as a
result of a deep filling, or other trauma, which may go undetected for
months or even years, e.g., you have no pain.  Many times you have had
prior pain in the area of concern, but because the pain episode was
brief you may have forgotten.

Absence of pain does not necessarily mean that a problem doesn't
exist.  During a dental exam, your dentist may see a particular tooth
that is discolored in comparison to the others.  This is not a normal
situation and indicates an unhealthy pulp.  In this instance it would
be advisable to have root canal therapy.  However, the approach  to
treatment may involve both surgical and non-surgical therapies ..."
JanD - 10 Jan 2006 02:04 GMT
>> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
>> nuts????
>
> Joel likes to joke around sometimes.

Joel is noted for giving MISLEADING and FALSE information.

> Is it possible that the tooth is aready dead and therefore, no pain?
> Can the dentist tell for sure when a tooth is dead?

YES

http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html

http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root

 ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is
because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in
the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the
body causing potential harm.
An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually
following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems.
Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as
localised problems.

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm

http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm

http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html

http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html

http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm

http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm

http://www.cfsn.com/maz/

http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html

http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm

http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html

http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html

http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html

http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm

http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html

Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A
dead
or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of
removing the bacteria once they are in there.

http://www.toothwisdom.net/

Toxicity from Root Canals

The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source
of
toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal
therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have
abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the
vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to
clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful;
however,
the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic
type
fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of
the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the
flow
of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation
is
from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no
irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many
more
reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal
tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what
happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages
becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now
becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you
want?
Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are
said
to be the cadavers of the body.

I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to
their
decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I
respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.

The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually
sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at
the
root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a
complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject.
Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable
substitution
for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized
dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out
against
root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the
patient
make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.

>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be
>required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental
>fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for
>the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.

>The warning will read as follows:

>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:

>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure
>to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth
>defects or other reproductive harm.

>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and
>bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.

>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and
>approved for use all dental restorative materials.

>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your
>treatment.

>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before
>Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA
>dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.

>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn
>Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to
>advocacy and activism in the public interest.

>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a
>potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only
>problem is that it's about 100 years too late."

>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits
>filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most
>widely used substance in dental fillings today.

>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source
>of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.

>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the
>Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and
>private dental schools and training programs with more than nine
>employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking
>Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].

>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to
>persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or
>reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental
>amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit
>was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam
>restorative materials in dental offices.

>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more
>than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental
>fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to
>$2,500 per day.

>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at
>415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.

>###

Jan

[snip]
Robert  Morien - 10 Jan 2006 05:53 GMT
> YES

spam noted and reported
Peter Bowditch - 10 Jan 2006 13:17 GMT
>Joel is noted for giving MISLEADING and FALSE information.

Irony alert! Irony alert!
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

JanD - 11 Jan 2006 01:38 GMT
"Peter Bowditch"

is cyberstalking, his does this to post his LYING websites, which are
snipped

>>Joel is noted for giving MISLEADING and FALSE information.
Peter Bowditch - 11 Jan 2006 03:18 GMT
>"Peter Bowditch"
>
>is cyberstalking, his does this to post his LYING websites, which are
>snipped
>
>>>Joel is noted for giving MISLEADING and FALSE information.

Have you been drinking again, Jan?

Time for that song again.

They say there is a secret place
Where Jannie D gets off her face
And she don't use that light beer to get higher.
It goes like this, a snort, a fifth,
A minor fall, a Jim Beam lift,
The baffled dame is screeching "Liar, liar".
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

JanD - 11 Jan 2006 04:34 GMT
"Peter Bowdit

>>"Peter Bowditch"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Have you been drinking again, Jan?

I do NOT drink ANY alcohol, UNLIKE YOU!

[snip]
Peter Bowditch - 11 Jan 2006 08:39 GMT
>"Peter Bowdit
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>[snip]

How do you know I drink, Jan?

And what is wrong with drinking alcohol? I remember a story about a
party where the booze ran out and a highly-respected person was able
to get a fresh supply. You can read about it in John 2:1-12.

Why did you snip the song? Was it because the writer of the original
was named "Cohen" and therefore might have been a bit, how can I put
this, Jewish? Or was it because he was a Buddhist and therefore some
sort of heathen?
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

JanD - 12 Jan 2006 04:10 GMT
>>"Peter Bowdit
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> How do you know I drink, Jan?

Why are you asking silly questions, Peter?

The title of this thread is Root Canal?
Peter Bowditch - 12 Jan 2006 04:45 GMT
>>>"Peter Bowdit
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Why are you asking silly questions, Peter?

You used the words "unlike you", and I was interested in knowing how
you are aware of my private habits.

>The title of this thread is Root Canal?

I assume that you meant that to be a statement rather than a question,
but just in case I will answer "Yes".

I drink water. Canals have water.

(Australian anecdote: When I was a young fellow our local lovers' lane
was by the stream and was called Root Canal.)
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Robert  Morien - 11 Jan 2006 23:24 GMT
> I do NOT drink ANY alcohol

You and everyone around you would benefit greatly if you would
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 02:32 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????
___________________________

True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image
to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.

However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image,
it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send
it along.

It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of
their records and do anything they want with them.

Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the
patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but
that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental
services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another
thread.

- dentaldoc
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 03:07 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????
___________________________

True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image
to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.

However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image,
it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send
it along.

It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of
their records and do anything they want with them.

Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the
patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but
that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental
services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another
thread.

- dentaldoc
cardiocare - 09 Jan 2006 03:09 GMT
> > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> > nuts????
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> - dentaldoc

Could this tooth be dead and therefore not showing symptoms?

(not a dentist)
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 03:49 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????
___________________________

True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image
to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.

However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image,
it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send
it along.

It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of
their records and do anything they want with them.

Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the
patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but
that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental
services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another
thread.

- dentaldoc
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 03:59 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????
___________________________

True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image
to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.

However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image,
it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send
it along.

It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of
their records and do anything they want with them.

Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the
patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but
that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental
services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another
thread.

- dentaldoc
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 05:00 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????
___________________________

True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image
to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.

However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image,
it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send
it along.

It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of
their records and do anything they want with them.

Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the
patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but
that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental
services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another
thread.

- dentaldoc
Sue - 09 Jan 2006 05:16 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????

USC95 & Shells,

Joel likes to joke around sometimes.  He gets particularly nutty when
Jan is around too. So please excuse that request. I think he was
joking.

JMHO,
Sue (nondentist)

Joel, USC95 & other dentists,

Do some dentists think it is good to do preventive  RCT on a "dead
tooth" ... or to let it go.
I guess I am wondering if there is more danger of infection when the
tooth is no longer viable.

(serious question... because I am wondering if shell's tooth may
already be dead... and therefore no pain?)

Thanks,
Sue (nondentist, & Shell, Please excuse any naive assumptions.. I have
no idea if your tooth is dead or not!)
JanD - 09 Jan 2006 06:18 GMT
>> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
>> nuts????
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> JMHO,
> Sue (nondentist)

Do NOT excuse Joel's joking around. Joel gives MISLEADING and FALSE
information!

> Joel, USC95 & other dentists,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Sue (nondentist, & Shell, Please excuse any naive assumptions.. I have
> no idea if your tooth is dead or not!)

YES, it is DEAD!

Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A
dead
or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of
removing the bacteria once they are in there.

http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm#treatment

Q: What is the worst treatment done by dentists?

A: While mercury is toxic and can do terrible things to nerve tissue, it
does it slowly over decades. The treatment that can have the biggest and
fastest impact on the body is root canal therapy. The idea of keeping a
dead, infected organ in the body is only thought to be a good idea by
dentists. A root canal-treated tooth always negatively affects your immune
system.
Robert  Morien - 09 Jan 2006 08:44 GMT
> The idea of keeping a
> dead, infected organ in the body

So your teeth are organs? exactly what biochemical process do they
perform?
InterestedPatient - 09 Jan 2006 14:44 GMT
Robert Morien wrote:

> > The idea of keeping a
> > dead, infected organ in the body
>
> So your teeth are organs? exactly what biochemical process do they
> perform?

Robert,

Actually teeth are organs.   Ask any dentist.  Needles to say, some
(unamed) dentists at another forum continually tell other dentists that
teeth are are not vital organs and not necessary for life.  Personally
I do not care for that message, as  I think teeth are very  important
and necessary for quality of life.

(cut and paste from wikipedia):
Definition of organ In biology, an organ (Latin: organum, "instrument,
tool") is a group of tissues, which perform a specific function or
group of functions. Common animal organs include the heart, lungs,
brain, eye, stomach, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, liver, intestines,
skin, uterus, bladder, bone, etc. A group of related organs is an organ
system.

-Sue
letsconnect - 09 Jan 2006 15:38 GMT
>Needles to say, some
> (unamed) dentists at another forum continually tell other dentists that
> teeth are are not vital organs and not necessary for life.  Personally
> I do not care for that message, as  I think teeth are very  important
> and necessary for quality of life.

Actually... teeth are not "vital organs" (as opposed to "vital"
organs). The expression "vital organs" refers to the internal organs of
the human body necessary to maintain life. Teeth or lack thereof may
influence quality of life, but having no teeth doesn't result in death.
InterestedPatient - 09 Jan 2006 18:51 GMT
> >Needles to say, some
> > (unamed) dentists at another forum continually tell other dentists that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the human body necessary to maintain life. Teeth or lack thereof may
> influence quality of life, but having no teeth doesn't result in death.

Yes, this is a true statement. Teeth are not vital organs. Teeth are
not necessary for life.  I was not saying that it is not a true
statement.  I am saying it is a *message* that I do not care for.

Explanation: From a public health standpoint, this is not the greatest
message to convey to patients, IMHO.  I am not sure it should be at the
forefront of dentists minds as they treat patients either.

This is just my own personal bias of course. I can only speak only as a
patient and as a person that is involved in community health projects
working with gradeschool kids.

I like to convey the message that if you take care of your teeth, you
can keep them forever.  I do not like to convey a message that... well,
if your lose your teeth, its ok, they are only dispensible non-vital
organs... and  you can always get implants.

(That was the only point I was trying to make)

Again.. it is just a personal bias and a mindset that I like to keep.

:-)

-Sue
letsconnect - 09 Jan 2006 23:10 GMT
It's a matter of semantics, I suppose :-)

> > >Needles to say, some
> > > (unamed) dentists at another forum continually tell other dentists that
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> -Sue
InterestedPatient - 10 Jan 2006 02:00 GMT
> It's a matter of semantics, I suppose :-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> >
> > -Sue

Amber,

Semantics are interesting.

I prefer to emphasize the importance of healthy teeth, rather than the
insignificance of  teeth.

However if one's teeth are diseased and causing a perons harm, then
converying the message  "teeth are not necessary for life," might be an
emphasis that the dentist may take when talking to a patient  about
removing a diseased tooth.

So I guess it is a matter of circumstances as well.

Guess it is not really an issue for me to be hung up about!!  I am sure
dentists and other dental professionals educating patients on how
insignificant teeth are!

-Sue
InterestedPatient - 10 Jan 2006 02:02 GMT
TYpo.  I am sure dentists and other dental professionals are NOT
educating patients on how insignificant teeth are!  -Sue
Robert  Morien - 10 Jan 2006 05:55 GMT
> Robert Morien wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> -Sue

I see nothing that makes me think teeth are organs. by this logic a fart
is an an organ as it performs a specific function
InterestedPatient - 10 Jan 2006 15:20 GMT
Robert Morien wrote:

> > Robert Morien wrote:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >
> > -Sue

> I see nothing that makes me think teeth are organs. by this logic a fart
> is an an organ as it performs a specific function

LOL.  Good one.

But I believe a  "fart" is a symptom of  semi-digested SPAM, myself.

-Sue
JanD - 11 Jan 2006 01:47 GMT
> Robert Morien wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> > > So your teeth are organs? exactly what biochemical process do they
>> > > perform?

Robert is long on asking questions, but short on answering them.

STILL has not answered these questions!

What is your interest here on the dental newsgroup?

What is*your* position on the safety of amalgams, Robert?

What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of a typical
dental amalgams, Robert?

>> > Robert,
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> -Sue
Robert  Morien - 11 Jan 2006 23:20 GMT
> Robert is long on asking questions, but short on answering them.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What is*your* position on the safety of amalgams, Robert?

what is your position on tampons? you still refuse to answer this.

> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of a typical
> dental amalgams, Robert?

As I've told you before, I've done the research...if you will make
arrangements for the transfer of a no obligation gratuitity to cover my
time and effort, I will gladly post the results of my research.
Robert  Morien - 11 Jan 2006 23:22 GMT
> > Robert Morien wrote:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >> > > So your teeth are organs? exactly what biochemical process do they
> >> > > perform?

So lolly, exactly what biochemical process do teeth perform perform?
Sue - 09 Jan 2006 06:49 GMT
> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you
> nuts????

USC95 & Shells,

Joel likes to joke around sometimes.  Ignore that request.

JMHO,
-Sue (nondentist)
Sue - 08 Jan 2006 22:05 GMT
> Good question Dude (or Dudette).
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> > Thanks
> > Shells

Joel and other dentists,

Do some dentists think it is good to do preventive  RCT on a "dead
tooth" ... or to let it go.
I guess I am wondering if there is more danger of infection when the
tooth is no longer viable.

(serious question... because I am wondering if shell's tooth may
already be dead... and therefore no pain?)

Thanks,
Sue (nondentist, & Shell, Please excuse any naive assumptions.. I have
no idea if your tooth is dead or not!)
JanD - 10 Jan 2006 02:05 GMT
>> Good question Dude (or Dudette).
>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> Sue (nondentist, & Shell, Please excuse any naive assumptions.. I have
> no idea if your tooth is dead or not!)

YES

http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html

http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root

 ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is
because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in
the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the
body causing potential harm.
An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually
following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems.
Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as
localised problems.

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm

http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm

http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html

http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html

http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm

http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm

http://www.cfsn.com/maz/

http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html

http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm

http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html

http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html

http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html

http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm

http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html

Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A
dead
or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of
removing the bacteria once they are in there.

http://www.toothwisdom.net/

Toxicity from Root Canals

The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source
of
toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal
therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have
abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the
vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to
clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful;
however,
the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic
type
fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of
the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the
flow
of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation
is
from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no
irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many
more
reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal
tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what
happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages
becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now
becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you
want?
Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are
said
to be the cadavers of the body.

I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to
their
decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I
respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.

The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually
sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at
the
root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a
complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject.
Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable
substitution
for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized
dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out
against
root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the
patient
make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.

>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be
>required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental
>fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for
>the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.

>The warning will read as follows:

>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:

>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure
>to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth
>defects or other reproductive harm.

>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and
>bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.

>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and
>approved for use all dental restorative materials.

>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your
>treatment.

>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before
>Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA
>dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.

>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn
>Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to
>advocacy and activism in the public interest.

>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a
>potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only
>problem is that it's about 100 years too late."

>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits
>filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most
>widely used substance in dental fillings today.

>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source
>of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.

>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the
>Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and
>private dental schools and training programs with more than nine
>employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking
>Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].

>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to
>persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or
>reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental
>amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit
>was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam
>restorative materials in dental offices.

>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more
>than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental
>fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to
>$2,500 per day.

>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at
>415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.

>###

Jan
Robert  Morien - 10 Jan 2006 05:53 GMT
> YES

spam noted and reported
InterestedPatient - 10 Jan 2006 15:29 GMT
> >> Good question Dude (or Dudette).
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 223 lines]
>
> Jan

Jan,

I really cannot comment on all of this... because I really do not know.

The only thing I can say is, many people have had RCTs without any of
the health complications (myself included).  I do not want to sit
aorund and worry about these things either, as it would drive me crazy.
I am not going to run out and have all teeth that have RCs extracted.
( I have 2 anterior teeth with RCs and one molar with RC).

If there others that wish to have their teeth extracted... well I guess
that is their business.. but I think they might have a difficult time
finding a dentist that would do that.

JMO,

Sue
PS What fluid is this exactly?

"These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to
circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the
tooth."
JanD - 11 Jan 2006 02:11 GMT
JanD wrote:

> > Joel wrote:
> >> Good question Dude (or Dudette).
[quoted text clipped - 247 lines]
>
> Jan

Jan,

I really cannot comment on all of this... because I really do not know.

It is very evident, you did not read all the information.

The only thing I can say is, many people have had RCTs without any of
the health complications (myself included).  I do not want to sit
aorund and worry about these things either, as it would drive me crazy.
I am not going to run out and have all teeth that have RCs extracted.
( I have 2 anterior teeth with RCs and one molar with RC).

Yes, many people have no problems.

One NEVER knows who will!

Neither is one advised to run out and get all teeth with RC's extracted!

However EVERYONE should know of the risks.

If there others that wish to have their teeth extracted... well I guess
that is their business.. but I think they might have a difficult time
finding a dentist that would do that.

Which means you did NOT read what I posted!!

There IS a page of people WHO found their health problem to be coming from
ROOT CANALS!!

JMO,

Sue
PS What fluid is this exactly?

"These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to
circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the
tooth."

READ, SUE!

http://www.toothwisdom.net/

Toxicity from Root Canals

The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source
of
toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal
therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have
abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the
vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to
clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful;
however,
the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic
type
fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of
the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the
flow
of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation
is
from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no
irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many
more
reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal
tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what
happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages
becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now
becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you
want?
Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are
said
to be the cadavers of the body.
Robert  Morien - 11 Jan 2006 23:21 GMT
> JanD

spam noted and reported
Robert  Morien - 11 Jan 2006 07:59 GMT
> YES

spam noted and reported
JanD - 07 Jan 2006 02:07 GMT
> My dentist says I need a root canal.  I am in my twenties and have
> pretty good teeth and a very good diet.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thanks
> Shells

http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html

http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root

 ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is
because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in
the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the
body causing potential harm.
An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually
following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems.
Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as
localised problems.

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm

http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm

http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html

http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html

http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm

http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm

http://www.cfsn.com/maz/

http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html

http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm

http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html

http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html

http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html

http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm

http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html

Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A
dead
or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of
removing the bacteria once they are in there.

http://www.toothwisdom.net/

Toxicity from Root Canals

The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source
of
toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal
therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have
abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the
vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to
clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful;
however,
the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic
type
fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of
the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the
flow
of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation
is
from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no
irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many
more
reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal
tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what
happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages
becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now
becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you
want?
Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are
said
to be the cadavers of the body.

I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to
their
decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I
respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.

The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually
sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at
the
root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a
complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject.
Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable
substitution
for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized
dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out
against
root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the
patient
make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.

>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be
>required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental
>fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for
>the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.

>The warning will read as follows:

>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:

>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure
>to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth
>defects or other reproductive harm.

>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and
>bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.

>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and
>approved for use all dental restorative materials.

>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your
>treatment.

>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before
>Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA
>dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.

>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn
>Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to
>advocacy and activism in the public interest.

>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a
>potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only
>problem is that it's about 100 years too late."

>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits
>filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most
>widely used substance in dental fillings today.

>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source
>of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.

>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the
>Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and
>private dental schools and training programs with more than nine
>employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking
>Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].

>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to
>persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or
>reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental
>amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit
>was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam
>restorative materials in dental offices.

>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more
>than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental
>fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to
>$2,500 per day.

>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at
>415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.

>###

Jan
USC95 - 07 Jan 2006 07:52 GMT
wackjob...

> > My dentist says I need a root canal.  I am in my twenties and have
> > pretty good teeth and a very good diet.
[quoted text clipped - 198 lines]
>
> Jan
InterestedPatient - 08 Jan 2006 09:42 GMT
> My dentist says I need a root canal.  I am in my twenties and have
> pretty good teeth and a very good diet.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thanks
> Shells

Shells,

I am not a dentist and I cannot tell  you for certain what is best for
you to do, but I do know that it is possible to need RCT, even when you
have no pain.

If you think your dentist is honest and competent, I would listen to
him/her.  If you are unsure, then you might want to seek a second
opinion.

Best wishes,
Sue (nondentist)

PS Here is a link to that may be of interest to check:

http://www.hottooth.com/root_canal_therapy.html#nopain

(excerpt):

"I don't have any pain, but my dentist says I need a root canal.  Why?

There can be a prior history of damage to the pulpal tissue as a
result of a deep filling, or other trauma, which may go undetected for
months or even years, e.g., you have no pain.  Many times you have had
prior pain in the area of concern, but because the pain episode was
brief you may have forgotten.

Absence of pain does not necessarily mean that a problem doesn't
exist.  During a dental exam, your dentist may see a particular tooth
that is discolored in comparison to the others.  This is not a normal
situation and indicates an unhealthy pulp.  In this instance it would
be advisable to have root canal therapy.  However, the approach  to
treatment may involve both surgical and non-surgical therapies ..."
Meneer Maurits - 13 Jan 2006 20:57 GMT
Shells schreef:
> My dentist says I need a root canal.  I am in my twenties and have
> pretty good teeth and a very good diet.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> pain.  I'm tempted to just let it go with a simple filling, whether it
> falls our or not, and wait for the pain to happen.

Well, I think no one can say...

When the pulp is necrotic, you don't feel any pain. Later on, there will
be a periapical infection and the tooth will hurt when bitten on.

Perhaps there's not enough retention nor room for parapulpar posts and
perhaps he wants to look retention in the pulpal chamber or uses a
pulpar post.

Perhaps there is just a pulp exposion on the X-ray, but this does not
show clinically, or it is hidden under a lot of caries.

So, I do not know and no one will unless he sees your teeth AND has an
X-ray and even then we might use pulp tests...

If you are in doubt: take a second opinion. My suggestion: don't be so
suspicious...
Gabe - 08 Feb 2006 09:05 GMT
I am an Endodontist.
Teeth ARE organs. period.
RTC intends NOT TO leave bacteria inside the root cannal, we use a
BIOLOGICAL approach by phisically AND chemically removing/killing bacteria,
if you need it then have it done, the one who decides if needed it or not is
NOT the patient but the dental professional, if the patient's not sure...
he/she has a right to other opinions.
Jan should stop giving dental advise without being a dental professional,
therefore confusing people, Jan has a LONG HISTORY on that (as far as I know
from year 2000).

Cheers!

Gabe
JanD - 08 Feb 2006 16:53 GMT
>I am an Endodontist.
> Teeth ARE organs. period.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Gabe

FACT: Jan has given NO dental advice.

People have a right to know.

http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html

http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root

 ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is
because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in
the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the
body causing potential harm.
An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually
following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems.
Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as
localised problems.

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm

http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm

http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html

http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html

http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm

http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm

http://www.cfsn.com/maz/

http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html

http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm

http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm

http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html

http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html

http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html

http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm

http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html

Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A
dead
or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of
removing the bacteria once they are in there.

http://www.toothwisdom.net/

Toxicity from Root Canals

The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source
of
toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal
therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have
abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the
vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to
clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful;
however,
the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic
type
fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of
the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the
flow
of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation
is
from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no
irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many
more
reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal
tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what
happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages
becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now
becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you
want?
Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are
said
to be the cadavers of the body.

I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to
their
decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I
respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.

The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually
sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at
the
root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a
complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject.
Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable
substitution
for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized
dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out
against
root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the
patient
make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.

>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be
>required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental
>fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for
>the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.

>The warning will read as follows:

>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:

>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure
>to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth
>defects or other reproductive harm.

>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and
>bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.

>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and
>approved for use all dental restorative materials.

>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your
>treatment.

>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before
>Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA
>dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.

>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn
>Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to
>advocacy and activism in the public interest.

>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a
>potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only
>problem is that it's about 100 years too late."

>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits
>filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most
>widely used substance in dental fillings today.

>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source
>of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.

>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the
>Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and
>private dental schools and training programs with more than nine
>employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking
>Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].

>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to
>persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or
>reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental
>amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit
>was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam
>restorative materials in dental offices.

>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more
>than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental
>fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to
>$2,500 per day.

>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at
>415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.

>###
Gabe - 09 Feb 2006 13:51 GMT
NO NO NO Jan

Gabe

>>I am an Endodontist.
>> Teeth ARE organs. period.
[quoted text clipped - 207 lines]
>
>>###
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.