Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / February 2006
Root Canal??
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Shells - 06 Jan 2006 18:36 GMT My dentist says I need a root canal. I am in my twenties and have pretty good teeth and a very good diet.
A filling fell out and, since it didn't hurt, I took my time in getting it filled. Even though I have no pain, this dentist says I need a root canal. It would be my first.
I know it's difficult to know what's going on without seeing for yourself. But is it usual to get a root canal for a tooth that has no pain. I'm tempted to just let it go with a simple filling, whether it falls our or not, and wait for the pain to happen.
Is that a foolish decision?
Thanks Shells
JimSocal - 06 Jan 2006 21:46 GMT >My dentist says I need a root canal. I am in my twenties and have >pretty good teeth and a very good diet. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >Thanks >Shells Speaking from a patient's point of view, one who's done some research on this, and whose wife once left a root canal go too long (not her fault; the idiot dentist did not diagnose it when she went to him with the beginnings of pain)... I can tell you that, sometimes a root canal is required even when there is no pain yet.
That said, do you trust this dentist? Is he an "insurance dentist" for which you get "free check ups" etc.? Is this dentist an endodontist (root canal specialist) or is he referring you to one?
I will never again let a non-endodontist dentist do a root canal on me. I apologize to those dentists who do root canals adn do them well. But twice bitten, thrice shy...
You may want to get another opinion if you feel this tooth may not really need a root canal. On the other hand if you trust the dentist, he is well respected, etc., and he is referring you out to an endodontist, I'd tend to want to believe him.
The one thing you don't want to do is wait too long if you DO need a root canal. This can cause further infection and lead to a more difficult root canal, and possible complications, not to mention MUCHO pain.
Hope this helps.
Joel - 07 Jan 2006 01:37 GMT Good question Dude (or Dudette).
There is too much unnecessary root canal therapy goin' on. Besides, then you need a crown. How about questioning the doc ..... and tell him to send a digital x-ray to joeleichen@yahoo.com -> -> aggressive I know, but so is doing unneeded root canal therapy.
Joely
> My dentist says I need a root canal. I am in my twenties and have > pretty good teeth and a very good diet. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Thanks > Shells USC95 - 07 Jan 2006 09:05 GMT you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you nuts????
InterestedPatient - 08 Jan 2006 09:51 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? To USC95, Joel likes to joke around sometimes.
Is it possible that the tooth is aready dead and therefore, no pain? Can the dentist tell for sure when a tooth is dead?
Thanks, Sue (nondentist)
PS Here is a link to that may be of interest to Shells:
http://www.hottooth.com/root_canal_therapy.html#nopain
(excerpt):
"I don't have any pain, but my dentist says I need a root canal. Why?
There can be a prior history of damage to the pulpal tissue as a result of a deep filling, or other trauma, which may go undetected for months or even years, e.g., you have no pain. Many times you have had prior pain in the area of concern, but because the pain episode was brief you may have forgotten.
Absence of pain does not necessarily mean that a problem doesn't exist. During a dental exam, your dentist may see a particular tooth that is discolored in comparison to the others. This is not a normal situation and indicates an unhealthy pulp. In this instance it would be advisable to have root canal therapy. However, the approach to treatment may involve both surgical and non-surgical therapies ..."
JanD - 10 Jan 2006 02:01 GMT >> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you >> nuts???? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Is it possible that the tooth is aready dead and therefore, no pain? > Can the dentist tell for sure when a tooth is dead? YES
http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html
http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root
ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the body causing potential harm. An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems. Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as localised problems.
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm
http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm
http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html
http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html
http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm
http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm
http://www.cfsn.com/maz/
http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html
http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm
http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html
http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html
http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html
http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm
http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html
Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A dead or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of removing the bacteria once they are in there.
http://www.toothwisdom.net/
Toxicity from Root Canals
The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source of toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful; however, the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the flow of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation is from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many more reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you want? Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are said to be the cadavers of the body.
I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to their decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.
The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at the root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject. Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable substitution for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out against root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the patient make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be >required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental >fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for >the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.
>The warning will read as follows:
>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:
>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure >to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth >defects or other reproductive harm.
>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and >bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.
>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and >approved for use all dental restorative materials.
>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your >treatment.
>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before >Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA >dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.
>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn >Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to >advocacy and activism in the public interest.
>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a >potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only >problem is that it's about 100 years too late."
>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits >filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most >widely used substance in dental fillings today.
>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source >of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.
>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the >Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and >private dental schools and training programs with more than nine >employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking >Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].
>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to >persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or >reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental >amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit >was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam >restorative materials in dental offices.
>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more >than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental >fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to >$2,500 per day.
>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at >415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.
>### Jan
[snip]
Robert Morien - 10 Jan 2006 05:52 GMT > YES spam noted and reported
Sue - 08 Jan 2006 10:17 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? Joel likes to joke around sometimes.
Is it possible that the tooth is aready dead and therefore, no pain? Can the dentist tell for sure when a tooth is dead?
Thanks, Sue (nondentist)
PS Here is a link to that may be of interest to Shells:
http://www.hottooth.com/root_canal_therapy.html#nopain
(excerpt):
"I don't have any pain, but my dentist says I need a root canal. Why?
There can be a prior history of damage to the pulpal tissue as a result of a deep filling, or other trauma, which may go undetected for months or even years, e.g., you have no pain. Many times you have had prior pain in the area of concern, but because the pain episode was brief you may have forgotten.
Absence of pain does not necessarily mean that a problem doesn't exist. During a dental exam, your dentist may see a particular tooth that is discolored in comparison to the others. This is not a normal situation and indicates an unhealthy pulp. In this instance it would be advisable to have root canal therapy. However, the approach to treatment may involve both surgical and non-surgical therapies ..."
JanD - 10 Jan 2006 02:04 GMT >> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you >> nuts???? > > Joel likes to joke around sometimes. Joel is noted for giving MISLEADING and FALSE information.
> Is it possible that the tooth is aready dead and therefore, no pain? > Can the dentist tell for sure when a tooth is dead? YES
http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html
http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root
ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the body causing potential harm. An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems. Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as localised problems.
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm
http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm
http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html
http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html
http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm
http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm
http://www.cfsn.com/maz/
http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html
http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm
http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html
http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html
http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html
http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm
http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html
Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A dead or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of removing the bacteria once they are in there.
http://www.toothwisdom.net/
Toxicity from Root Canals
The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source of toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful; however, the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the flow of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation is from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many more reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you want? Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are said to be the cadavers of the body.
I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to their decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.
The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at the root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject. Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable substitution for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out against root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the patient make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be >required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental >fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for >the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.
>The warning will read as follows:
>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:
>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure >to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth >defects or other reproductive harm.
>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and >bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.
>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and >approved for use all dental restorative materials.
>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your >treatment.
>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before >Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA >dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.
>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn >Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to >advocacy and activism in the public interest.
>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a >potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only >problem is that it's about 100 years too late."
>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits >filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most >widely used substance in dental fillings today.
>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source >of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.
>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the >Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and >private dental schools and training programs with more than nine >employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking >Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].
>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to >persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or >reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental >amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit >was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam >restorative materials in dental offices.
>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more >than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental >fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to >$2,500 per day.
>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at >415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.
>### Jan
[snip]
Robert Morien - 10 Jan 2006 05:53 GMT > YES spam noted and reported
Peter Bowditch - 10 Jan 2006 13:17 GMT >Joel is noted for giving MISLEADING and FALSE information. Irony alert! Irony alert!
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
JanD - 11 Jan 2006 01:38 GMT "Peter Bowditch"
is cyberstalking, his does this to post his LYING websites, which are snipped
>>Joel is noted for giving MISLEADING and FALSE information. Peter Bowditch - 11 Jan 2006 03:18 GMT >"Peter Bowditch" > >is cyberstalking, his does this to post his LYING websites, which are >snipped > >>>Joel is noted for giving MISLEADING and FALSE information. Have you been drinking again, Jan?
Time for that song again.
They say there is a secret place Where Jannie D gets off her face And she don't use that light beer to get higher. It goes like this, a snort, a fifth, A minor fall, a Jim Beam lift, The baffled dame is screeching "Liar, liar".
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
JanD - 11 Jan 2006 04:34 GMT "Peter Bowdit
>>"Peter Bowditch" >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Have you been drinking again, Jan? I do NOT drink ANY alcohol, UNLIKE YOU!
[snip]
Peter Bowditch - 11 Jan 2006 08:39 GMT >"Peter Bowdit >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >[snip] How do you know I drink, Jan?
And what is wrong with drinking alcohol? I remember a story about a party where the booze ran out and a highly-respected person was able to get a fresh supply. You can read about it in John 2:1-12.
Why did you snip the song? Was it because the writer of the original was named "Cohen" and therefore might have been a bit, how can I put this, Jewish? Or was it because he was a Buddhist and therefore some sort of heathen?
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
JanD - 12 Jan 2006 04:10 GMT >>"Peter Bowdit >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > How do you know I drink, Jan? Why are you asking silly questions, Peter?
The title of this thread is Root Canal?
Peter Bowditch - 12 Jan 2006 04:45 GMT >>>"Peter Bowdit >>>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Why are you asking silly questions, Peter? You used the words "unlike you", and I was interested in knowing how you are aware of my private habits.
>The title of this thread is Root Canal? I assume that you meant that to be a statement rather than a question, but just in case I will answer "Yes".
I drink water. Canals have water.
(Australian anecdote: When I was a young fellow our local lovers' lane was by the stream and was called Root Canal.)
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Robert Morien - 11 Jan 2006 23:24 GMT > I do NOT drink ANY alcohol You and everyone around you would benefit greatly if you would
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 02:32 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? ___________________________
True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.
However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image, it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send it along.
It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of their records and do anything they want with them.
Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another thread.
- dentaldoc
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 03:07 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? ___________________________
True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.
However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image, it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send it along.
It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of their records and do anything they want with them.
Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another thread.
- dentaldoc
cardiocare - 09 Jan 2006 03:09 GMT > > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > > nuts???? [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > - dentaldoc Could this tooth be dead and therefore not showing symptoms?
(not a dentist)
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 03:49 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? ___________________________
True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.
However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image, it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send it along.
It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of their records and do anything they want with them.
Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another thread.
- dentaldoc
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 03:59 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? ___________________________
True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.
However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image, it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send it along.
It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of their records and do anything they want with them.
Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another thread.
- dentaldoc
Bill - 09 Jan 2006 05:00 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? ___________________________
True, most doctors would not be too happy about sending a digital image to another dentist that the patient met on the Internet.
However, since the patient already has a right to copies of the image, it would be an easy matter for the patient to obtain the copy and send it along.
It's just a fact of modern life that the patients can get copies of their records and do anything they want with them.
Of course it would be easier on patients and dentists both, if the patients would seek out a trusted dentist in the first place -- but that has more to do with the increased commoditization of dental services by the big-money "dental plans," and that's really another thread.
- dentaldoc
Sue - 09 Jan 2006 05:16 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? USC95 & Shells,
Joel likes to joke around sometimes. He gets particularly nutty when Jan is around too. So please excuse that request. I think he was joking.
JMHO, Sue (nondentist)
Joel, USC95 & other dentists,
Do some dentists think it is good to do preventive RCT on a "dead tooth" ... or to let it go. I guess I am wondering if there is more danger of infection when the tooth is no longer viable.
(serious question... because I am wondering if shell's tooth may already be dead... and therefore no pain?)
Thanks, Sue (nondentist, & Shell, Please excuse any naive assumptions.. I have no idea if your tooth is dead or not!)
JanD - 09 Jan 2006 06:18 GMT >> you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you >> nuts???? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > JMHO, > Sue (nondentist) Do NOT excuse Joel's joking around. Joel gives MISLEADING and FALSE information!
> Joel, USC95 & other dentists, > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Sue (nondentist, & Shell, Please excuse any naive assumptions.. I have > no idea if your tooth is dead or not!) YES, it is DEAD!
Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A dead or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of removing the bacteria once they are in there.
http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm#treatment
Q: What is the worst treatment done by dentists?
A: While mercury is toxic and can do terrible things to nerve tissue, it does it slowly over decades. The treatment that can have the biggest and fastest impact on the body is root canal therapy. The idea of keeping a dead, infected organ in the body is only thought to be a good idea by dentists. A root canal-treated tooth always negatively affects your immune system.
Robert Morien - 09 Jan 2006 08:44 GMT > The idea of keeping a > dead, infected organ in the body So your teeth are organs? exactly what biochemical process do they perform?
InterestedPatient - 09 Jan 2006 14:44 GMT Robert Morien wrote:
> > The idea of keeping a > > dead, infected organ in the body > > So your teeth are organs? exactly what biochemical process do they > perform? Robert,
Actually teeth are organs. Ask any dentist. Needles to say, some (unamed) dentists at another forum continually tell other dentists that teeth are are not vital organs and not necessary for life. Personally I do not care for that message, as I think teeth are very important and necessary for quality of life.
(cut and paste from wikipedia): Definition of organ In biology, an organ (Latin: organum, "instrument, tool") is a group of tissues, which perform a specific function or group of functions. Common animal organs include the heart, lungs, brain, eye, stomach, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, liver, intestines, skin, uterus, bladder, bone, etc. A group of related organs is an organ system.
-Sue
letsconnect - 09 Jan 2006 15:38 GMT >Needles to say, some > (unamed) dentists at another forum continually tell other dentists that > teeth are are not vital organs and not necessary for life. Personally > I do not care for that message, as I think teeth are very important > and necessary for quality of life. Actually... teeth are not "vital organs" (as opposed to "vital" organs). The expression "vital organs" refers to the internal organs of the human body necessary to maintain life. Teeth or lack thereof may influence quality of life, but having no teeth doesn't result in death.
InterestedPatient - 09 Jan 2006 18:51 GMT > >Needles to say, some > > (unamed) dentists at another forum continually tell other dentists that [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > the human body necessary to maintain life. Teeth or lack thereof may > influence quality of life, but having no teeth doesn't result in death. Yes, this is a true statement. Teeth are not vital organs. Teeth are not necessary for life. I was not saying that it is not a true statement. I am saying it is a *message* that I do not care for.
Explanation: From a public health standpoint, this is not the greatest message to convey to patients, IMHO. I am not sure it should be at the forefront of dentists minds as they treat patients either.
This is just my own personal bias of course. I can only speak only as a patient and as a person that is involved in community health projects working with gradeschool kids.
I like to convey the message that if you take care of your teeth, you can keep them forever. I do not like to convey a message that... well, if your lose your teeth, its ok, they are only dispensible non-vital organs... and you can always get implants.
(That was the only point I was trying to make)
Again.. it is just a personal bias and a mindset that I like to keep.
:-) -Sue
letsconnect - 09 Jan 2006 23:10 GMT It's a matter of semantics, I suppose :-)
> > >Needles to say, some > > > (unamed) dentists at another forum continually tell other dentists that [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > -Sue InterestedPatient - 10 Jan 2006 02:00 GMT > It's a matter of semantics, I suppose :-) > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > > > -Sue Amber,
Semantics are interesting.
I prefer to emphasize the importance of healthy teeth, rather than the insignificance of teeth.
However if one's teeth are diseased and causing a perons harm, then converying the message "teeth are not necessary for life," might be an emphasis that the dentist may take when talking to a patient about removing a diseased tooth.
So I guess it is a matter of circumstances as well.
Guess it is not really an issue for me to be hung up about!! I am sure dentists and other dental professionals educating patients on how insignificant teeth are!
-Sue
InterestedPatient - 10 Jan 2006 02:02 GMT TYpo. I am sure dentists and other dental professionals are NOT educating patients on how insignificant teeth are! -Sue
Robert Morien - 10 Jan 2006 05:55 GMT > Robert Morien wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > -Sue I see nothing that makes me think teeth are organs. by this logic a fart is an an organ as it performs a specific function
InterestedPatient - 10 Jan 2006 15:20 GMT Robert Morien wrote:
> > Robert Morien wrote: > > > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > > > -Sue
> I see nothing that makes me think teeth are organs. by this logic a fart > is an an organ as it performs a specific function LOL. Good one.
But I believe a "fart" is a symptom of semi-digested SPAM, myself.
-Sue
JanD - 11 Jan 2006 01:47 GMT > Robert Morien wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> > > So your teeth are organs? exactly what biochemical process do they >> > > perform? Robert is long on asking questions, but short on answering them.
STILL has not answered these questions!
What is your interest here on the dental newsgroup?
What is*your* position on the safety of amalgams, Robert?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of a typical dental amalgams, Robert?
>> > Robert, >> > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > -Sue Robert Morien - 11 Jan 2006 23:20 GMT > Robert is long on asking questions, but short on answering them. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > What is*your* position on the safety of amalgams, Robert? what is your position on tampons? you still refuse to answer this.
> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of a typical > dental amalgams, Robert? As I've told you before, I've done the research...if you will make arrangements for the transfer of a no obligation gratuitity to cover my time and effort, I will gladly post the results of my research.
Robert Morien - 11 Jan 2006 23:22 GMT > > Robert Morien wrote: > >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >> > > So your teeth are organs? exactly what biochemical process do they > >> > > perform? So lolly, exactly what biochemical process do teeth perform perform?
Sue - 09 Jan 2006 06:49 GMT > you expect his/her doctor to send you digital x-ray to you? are you > nuts???? USC95 & Shells,
Joel likes to joke around sometimes. Ignore that request.
JMHO, -Sue (nondentist)
Sue - 08 Jan 2006 22:05 GMT > Good question Dude (or Dudette). > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Thanks > > Shells Joel and other dentists,
Do some dentists think it is good to do preventive RCT on a "dead tooth" ... or to let it go. I guess I am wondering if there is more danger of infection when the tooth is no longer viable.
(serious question... because I am wondering if shell's tooth may already be dead... and therefore no pain?)
Thanks, Sue (nondentist, & Shell, Please excuse any naive assumptions.. I have no idea if your tooth is dead or not!)
JanD - 10 Jan 2006 02:05 GMT >> Good question Dude (or Dudette). >> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > Sue (nondentist, & Shell, Please excuse any naive assumptions.. I have > no idea if your tooth is dead or not!) YES
http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html
http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root
ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the body causing potential harm. An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems. Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as localised problems.
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm
http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm
http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html
http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html
http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm
http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm
http://www.cfsn.com/maz/
http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html
http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm
http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html
http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html
http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html
http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm
http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html
Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A dead or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of removing the bacteria once they are in there.
http://www.toothwisdom.net/
Toxicity from Root Canals
The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source of toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful; however, the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the flow of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation is from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many more reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you want? Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are said to be the cadavers of the body.
I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to their decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.
The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at the root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject. Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable substitution for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out against root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the patient make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be >required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental >fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for >the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.
>The warning will read as follows:
>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:
>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure >to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth >defects or other reproductive harm.
>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and >bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.
>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and >approved for use all dental restorative materials.
>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your >treatment.
>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before >Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA >dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.
>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn >Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to >advocacy and activism in the public interest.
>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a >potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only >problem is that it's about 100 years too late."
>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits >filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most >widely used substance in dental fillings today.
>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source >of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.
>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the >Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and >private dental schools and training programs with more than nine >employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking >Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].
>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to >persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or >reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental >amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit >was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam >restorative materials in dental offices.
>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more >than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental >fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to >$2,500 per day.
>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at >415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.
>### Jan
Robert Morien - 10 Jan 2006 05:53 GMT > YES spam noted and reported
InterestedPatient - 10 Jan 2006 15:29 GMT > >> Good question Dude (or Dudette). > >> [quoted text clipped - 223 lines] > > Jan Jan,
I really cannot comment on all of this... because I really do not know.
The only thing I can say is, many people have had RCTs without any of the health complications (myself included). I do not want to sit aorund and worry about these things either, as it would drive me crazy. I am not going to run out and have all teeth that have RCs extracted. ( I have 2 anterior teeth with RCs and one molar with RC).
If there others that wish to have their teeth extracted... well I guess that is their business.. but I think they might have a difficult time finding a dentist that would do that.
JMO,
Sue PS What fluid is this exactly?
"These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the tooth."
JanD - 11 Jan 2006 02:11 GMT JanD wrote:
> > Joel wrote: > >> Good question Dude (or Dudette). [quoted text clipped - 247 lines] > > Jan Jan,
I really cannot comment on all of this... because I really do not know.
It is very evident, you did not read all the information.
The only thing I can say is, many people have had RCTs without any of the health complications (myself included). I do not want to sit aorund and worry about these things either, as it would drive me crazy. I am not going to run out and have all teeth that have RCs extracted. ( I have 2 anterior teeth with RCs and one molar with RC).
Yes, many people have no problems.
One NEVER knows who will!
Neither is one advised to run out and get all teeth with RC's extracted!
However EVERYONE should know of the risks.
If there others that wish to have their teeth extracted... well I guess that is their business.. but I think they might have a difficult time finding a dentist that would do that.
Which means you did NOT read what I posted!!
There IS a page of people WHO found their health problem to be coming from ROOT CANALS!!
JMO,
Sue PS What fluid is this exactly?
"These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the tooth."
READ, SUE!
http://www.toothwisdom.net/
Toxicity from Root Canals
The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source of toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful; however, the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the flow of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation is from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many more reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you want? Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are said to be the cadavers of the body.
Robert Morien - 11 Jan 2006 23:21 GMT > JanD spam noted and reported
Robert Morien - 11 Jan 2006 07:59 GMT > YES spam noted and reported
JanD - 07 Jan 2006 02:07 GMT > My dentist says I need a root canal. I am in my twenties and have > pretty good teeth and a very good diet. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Thanks > Shells http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html
http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root
ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the body causing potential harm. An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems. Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as localised problems.
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm
http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm
http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html
http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html
http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm
http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm
http://www.cfsn.com/maz/
http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html
http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm
http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html
http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html
http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html
http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm
http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html
Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A dead or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of removing the bacteria once they are in there.
http://www.toothwisdom.net/
Toxicity from Root Canals
The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source of toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful; however, the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the flow of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation is from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many more reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you want? Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are said to be the cadavers of the body.
I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to their decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.
The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at the root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject. Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable substitution for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out against root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the patient make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be >required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental >fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for >the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.
>The warning will read as follows:
>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:
>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure >to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth >defects or other reproductive harm.
>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and >bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.
>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and >approved for use all dental restorative materials.
>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your >treatment.
>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before >Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA >dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.
>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn >Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to >advocacy and activism in the public interest.
>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a >potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only >problem is that it's about 100 years too late."
>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits >filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most >widely used substance in dental fillings today.
>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source >of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.
>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the >Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and >private dental schools and training programs with more than nine >employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking >Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].
>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to >persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or >reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental >amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit >was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam >restorative materials in dental offices.
>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more >than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental >fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to >$2,500 per day.
>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at >415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.
>### Jan
USC95 - 07 Jan 2006 07:52 GMT wackjob...
> > My dentist says I need a root canal. I am in my twenties and have > > pretty good teeth and a very good diet. [quoted text clipped - 198 lines] > > Jan InterestedPatient - 08 Jan 2006 09:42 GMT > My dentist says I need a root canal. I am in my twenties and have > pretty good teeth and a very good diet. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Thanks > Shells Shells,
I am not a dentist and I cannot tell you for certain what is best for you to do, but I do know that it is possible to need RCT, even when you have no pain.
If you think your dentist is honest and competent, I would listen to him/her. If you are unsure, then you might want to seek a second opinion.
Best wishes, Sue (nondentist)
PS Here is a link to that may be of interest to check:
http://www.hottooth.com/root_canal_therapy.html#nopain
(excerpt):
"I don't have any pain, but my dentist says I need a root canal. Why?
There can be a prior history of damage to the pulpal tissue as a result of a deep filling, or other trauma, which may go undetected for months or even years, e.g., you have no pain. Many times you have had prior pain in the area of concern, but because the pain episode was brief you may have forgotten.
Absence of pain does not necessarily mean that a problem doesn't exist. During a dental exam, your dentist may see a particular tooth that is discolored in comparison to the others. This is not a normal situation and indicates an unhealthy pulp. In this instance it would be advisable to have root canal therapy. However, the approach to treatment may involve both surgical and non-surgical therapies ..."
Meneer Maurits - 13 Jan 2006 20:57 GMT Shells schreef:
> My dentist says I need a root canal. I am in my twenties and have > pretty good teeth and a very good diet. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > pain. I'm tempted to just let it go with a simple filling, whether it > falls our or not, and wait for the pain to happen. Well, I think no one can say...
When the pulp is necrotic, you don't feel any pain. Later on, there will be a periapical infection and the tooth will hurt when bitten on.
Perhaps there's not enough retention nor room for parapulpar posts and perhaps he wants to look retention in the pulpal chamber or uses a pulpar post.
Perhaps there is just a pulp exposion on the X-ray, but this does not show clinically, or it is hidden under a lot of caries.
So, I do not know and no one will unless he sees your teeth AND has an X-ray and even then we might use pulp tests...
If you are in doubt: take a second opinion. My suggestion: don't be so suspicious...
Gabe - 08 Feb 2006 09:05 GMT I am an Endodontist. Teeth ARE organs. period. RTC intends NOT TO leave bacteria inside the root cannal, we use a BIOLOGICAL approach by phisically AND chemically removing/killing bacteria, if you need it then have it done, the one who decides if needed it or not is NOT the patient but the dental professional, if the patient's not sure... he/she has a right to other opinions. Jan should stop giving dental advise without being a dental professional, therefore confusing people, Jan has a LONG HISTORY on that (as far as I know from year 2000).
Cheers!
Gabe
JanD - 08 Feb 2006 16:53 GMT >I am an Endodontist. > Teeth ARE organs. period. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Gabe FACT: Jan has given NO dental advice.
People have a right to know.
http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html
http://www.integratedhealthpractice.com/treatment.asp#Root
ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health. This is because, althought the nerve has been removed, bacteria still colonise in the minute tubules of a tooth. These bacteria produce toxins which enter the body causing potential harm. An area of residual infection which is left under the gum, usually following, but sometimes a long time after an extraction can cause problems. Symptoms can be coincided with the energetic links to the body as well as localised problems.
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm
http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm
http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html
http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html
http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm
http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm
http://www.cfsn.com/maz/
http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html
http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm
http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html
http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html
http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html
http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm
http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html
Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A dead or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of removing the bacteria once they are in there.
http://www.toothwisdom.net/
Toxicity from Root Canals
The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source of toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful; however, the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the flow of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation is from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many more reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you want? Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are said to be the cadavers of the body.
I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to their decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.
The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at the root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject. Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable substitution for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out against root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the patient make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be >required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental >fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for >the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.
>The warning will read as follows:
>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:
>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure >to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth >defects or other reproductive harm.
>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and >bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.
>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and >approved for use all dental restorative materials.
>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your >treatment.
>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before >Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA >dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.
>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn >Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to >advocacy and activism in the public interest.
>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a >potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only >problem is that it's about 100 years too late."
>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits >filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most >widely used substance in dental fillings today.
>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source >of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.
>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the >Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and >private dental schools and training programs with more than nine >employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking >Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].
>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to >persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or >reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental >amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit >was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam >restorative materials in dental offices.
>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more >than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental >fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to >$2,500 per day.
>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at >415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.
>### Gabe - 09 Feb 2006 13:51 GMT NO NO NO Jan
Gabe
>>I am an Endodontist. >> Teeth ARE organs. period. [quoted text clipped - 207 lines] > >>###
|
|
|