Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Are Your Teeth Toxic?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JanD - 25 Dec 2005 17:20 GMT
In November of this year, the ADA's annual convention, held this year, in
Philadelphia was RUINED for the ADA because of the demonstrators outside the
doors, and the media interviews focusing on the "mercury amalgam" issue -
and the ADA's misinformation campaign.

But now it gets worse - for now the media in the ADA's own home town has
seen through the ADA - and is thoroughly lambasting them for their "mercury
amalgam" position.   About time...

The Chicago Tribune newspaper, last week, figuratively used a sledgehammer
on the ADA - and did everything but call for a Federal indictment over the
"mercury amalgam" issue.  The article titled "Are Your Teeth Toxic?"  "The
mercury in 'silver' fillings would be hazardous waste in a river----yet it's
sitting in your mouth," is a "must read."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/health/chi-0512110315dec11,1,45
20800.column?page=1&ctrack=1&cset=true&coll=chi-health-hed


Are your teeth toxic?
The mercury in 'silver' fillings would be hazardous waste in a river----yet
it's sitting in your mouth

Published December 11, 2005

A professional musician from Arlington Heights suffers from mysterious
rashes and lip blisters. A dental hygienist in Hoffman Estates battles
migraines. And a social worker in Prospect Heights is diagnosed with
multiple sclerosis.

All three tried treating their ailments using a controversial method: by
having dentists remove and replace their so-called "silver" amalgam tooth
fillings, which contain about 50 percent mercury. And all three swear they
experienced life-changing health improvements.

Their personal testimonies are part of what makes dental amalgam, the silver
lining for hundreds of millions of American mouths, one of the most divisive
issues in dentistry. Though it's one of the oldest materials in oral health
care--used by people of all ages for the last 150 years--anti-mercury groups
are pushing the startling message that mercury residing in the mouth can
leach into the body and cause illness.

"I thought my career was over," said Arlington Heights' Matt Comerford, now
a trumpet player with the Lyric Opera who was suffering from painful sores
along his gums. He began investigating the metals in his mouth and
eventually had nine silver fillings replaced with a mercury-free
alter-native material.

"Within a week [of having the amalgams replaced], everything healed,"
Comerford said.

Amalgam, most dentists admit, is crude and ugly, but they say it's a
valuable option because it's strong, durable and relatively cheap.

And studies have shown that there is insufficient evidence to link it to
health problems (with the exception of allergic reactions), according to the
American Dental Association and several federal agencies, including the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Regardless, anti-mercury groups are appalled by the notion that the toxic
element, which is considered a hazardous waste by the Environmental
Protection Agency, is safe when it's packed inside a tooth. They argue that
although it was once thought to be inert inside the mouth, studies now show
that mercury can be emitted in minute amounts of vapor and absorbed by the
patient through inhalation and ingestion.

At Doctor's Data, a Chicago lab that specializes in trace-metals analysis,
clinicians have found that the amount of mercury in a person's stool is
highly correlated to the number of amalgams in the mouth.

"What stool testing drives home is that parts of the amalgams don't stay in
the teeth and we're swallowing mercury," said Dean Bass, a chemist at
Doctor's Data and a scientist at Argonne National Laboratories. "But it
doesn't necessarily tell you how much mercury the body absorbs."

A long-running controversy

The debate over silver amalgam dates at least to 1845, when the now-defunct
American Academy of Dental Surgeons asked its members to sign a pledge never
to use it. Though amalgam use has been declining since the 1970s because
more eye-pleasing options are available and cavities are smaller, federal
lawmakers have introduced a bipartisan bill to ban silver/mercury fillings
for children and pregnant and nursing women and to phase them out completely
in three years.

In California, dentists are required by state law to post a warning that
dental amalgams "cause exposure to mercury, a chemical known to the state of
California to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm."

"The ADA is wrong that the issue is `safety.' The issue is `risk,'" said
Charlie Brown, national counsel for Consumers for Dental Choice and
Coalition for Mercury-Free Dentistry. He has filed a petition asking the
Federal Trade Commission to investigate the ADA and the Connecticut State
Dental Association for what the groups claims is making false, deceptive and
unsubstantiated claims in promoting silver/mercury amalgam.

"On this point scientists agree: Mercury is a virulent neurotoxin that can
permanently harm the developing brain of a child or fetus. Yet a recent
Zogby poll shows three in five people don't know that `silver' fillings have
mercury," said Brown, who pointed out that silver fillings are in fact
mainly mercury.

The ADA staunchly defends the safety of amalgam, still used in about 30
percent of restorations. Amalgam, made by mixing elemental liquid mercury
with an alloy powder composed of silver, tin, copper and sometimes smaller
amounts of other metals, hardens quickly and tolerates saliva. This makes it
useful for treating squirmy young children or special-needs patients who
have a hard time sitting still.

Money and ethics

Some dental insurance companies don't cover the more expensive alternatives
to amalgam. And because science doesn't definitively link the silver
fillings to health problems, the ADA considers it unethical for dentists to
tell patients that removing amalgams can improve health.

"Amalgam has the longest history, the most data and the largest number of
studies supporting it. Yet time after time, we have to come back and address
it," said Dr. Fred Eichmiller, director of the ADA Foundation's Paffenbarger
Resource Center, where alternatives to amalgams have been invented.

Critics argue that the issue also is environmental. Mercury is emitted into
the air when bodies with mercury fillings are cremated. It gets into the
water when fillings are removed and leftover material is not disposed of
properly.

"Amalgams don't need to be used in the 21st Century," said Downers Grove
dentist Janet Stopka, who uses composite, porcelain and gold.

For consumers, the decision whether to replace amalgams can be a difficult
one. Urine, hair and feces can all be tested for mercury levels and
chelating agents can pull mercury out of the organs. But the results don't
necessarily tell whether there is enough mercury present to pose a health
risk and an official diagnosis of "mercury poisoning" can be tentative.

Swapping out old fillings can be expensive; each replacement can cost $75 to
$200. And there are no guaranteed benefits.

Nevertheless, Dawn Quast, a dental hygienist for Dr. John Rothchild in
Hoffman Estates, decided to have four small fillings replaced after she
witnessed both small and profound improvements in Rothchild's patients who
had amalgams replaced.

"I had a migraine the night I had the last silver one removed and haven't
had one since [in 12 years]," Quast said.

Rothchild, a mercury-free dentist, said he doesn't push people into having
silver fillings removed.

No guarantees

"I never promise any medical cures because you can't," he said. Instead, he
presents both sides of the issue on his Web site and provides patient
referrals. "If people come in asking about amalgams, I'll tell them," he
said. "If they're there for basic dentistry, I don't say anything."

Linda Brocato of Prospect Heights went to several dentists before she made
the difficult decision to have her 16 silver fillings removed. Her problems
began in 1980, when she looked in the mirror one morning and noticed her
right eye was drooping. Seven years and dozens of health issues later, the
former social worker was crippled, diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.

It wasn't until Brocato heard about the Minneapolis-based group Dental
Amalgam Mercury Syndrome (DAMS), however, that she began to believe she had
mercury poisoning.

Two weeks after she had her last amalgams replaced, Brocato said her slurred
speech began to disappear and her strength and balance improved. She knows
the symptoms of MS come and go, which could explain her improved health, but
she is convinced that removing the silver fillings made a big difference.

"I have five pages of improvements," said Brocato, 56, who is still in a
wheelchair but no longer takes medication for MS. She is now one of the
Illinois coordinators for DAMS. "I don't know how people can say there isn't
evidence."

- - -

Help on the Web

For more information:

The American Dental Association: ada.org.

The International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology: iaomt.org.

Consumers for Dental Choice, www.toxicteeth.org.
Tim Dixon - 25 Dec 2005 17:28 GMT
Why not read that to those alleged children that are coming over to your
house today, because no one here is interested in the least.

"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:pxAr2f.674447$xm3.487341@attbi_s21...
JanD - 25 Dec 2005 19:32 GMT
In November of this year, the ADA's annual convention, held this year, in
Philadelphia was RUINED for the ADA because of the demonstrators outside the
doors, and the media interviews focusing on the "mercury amalgam" issue -
and the ADA's misinformation campaign.

But now it gets worse - for now the media in the ADA's own home town has
seen through the ADA - and is thoroughly lambasting them for their "mercury
amalgam" position.   About time...

The Chicago Tribune newspaper, last week, figuratively used a sledgehammer
on the ADA - and did everything but call for a Federal indictment over the
"mercury amalgam" issue.  The article titled "Are Your Teeth Toxic?"  "The
mercury in 'silver' fillings would be hazardous waste in a river----yet it's
sitting in your mouth," is a "must read."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/health/chi-0512110315dec11,1,45
20800.column?page=1&ctrack=1&cset=true&coll=chi-health-hed


Are your teeth toxic?
The mercury in 'silver' fillings would be hazardous waste in a river----yet
it's sitting in your mouth

Published December 11, 2005

A professional musician from Arlington Heights suffers from mysterious
rashes and lip blisters. A dental hygienist in Hoffman Estates battles
migraines. And a social worker in Prospect Heights is diagnosed with
multiple sclerosis.

All three tried treating their ailments using a controversial method: by
having dentists remove and replace their so-called "silver" amalgam tooth
fillings, which contain about 50 percent mercury. And all three swear they
experienced life-changing health improvements.

Their personal testimonies are part of what makes dental amalgam, the silver
lining for hundreds of millions of American mouths, one of the most divisive
issues in dentistry. Though it's one of the oldest materials in oral health
care--used by people of all ages for the last 150 years--anti-mercury groups
are pushing the startling message that mercury residing in the mouth can
leach into the body and cause illness.

"I thought my career was over," said Arlington Heights' Matt Comerford, now
a trumpet player with the Lyric Opera who was suffering from painful sores
along his gums. He began investigating the metals in his mouth and
eventually had nine silver fillings replaced with a mercury-free
alter-native material.

"Within a week [of having the amalgams replaced], everything healed,"
Comerford said.

Amalgam, most dentists admit, is crude and ugly, but they say it's a
valuable option because it's strong, durable and relatively cheap.

And studies have shown that there is insufficient evidence to link it to
health problems (with the exception of allergic reactions), according to the
American Dental Association and several federal agencies, including the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Regardless, anti-mercury groups are appalled by the notion that the toxic
element, which is considered a hazardous waste by the Environmental
Protection Agency, is safe when it's packed inside a tooth. They argue that
although it was once thought to be inert inside the mouth, studies now show
that mercury can be emitted in minute amounts of vapor and absorbed by the
patient through inhalation and ingestion.

At Doctor's Data, a Chicago lab that specializes in trace-metals analysis,
clinicians have found that the amount of mercury in a person's stool is
highly correlated to the number of amalgams in the mouth.

"What stool testing drives home is that parts of the amalgams don't stay in
the teeth and we're swallowing mercury," said Dean Bass, a chemist at
Doctor's Data and a scientist at Argonne National Laboratories. "But it
doesn't necessarily tell you how much mercury the body absorbs."

A long-running controversy

The debate over silver amalgam dates at least to 1845, when the now-defunct
American Academy of Dental Surgeons asked its members to sign a pledge never
to use it. Though amalgam use has been declining since the 1970s because
more eye-pleasing options are available and cavities are smaller, federal
lawmakers have introduced a bipartisan bill to ban silver/mercury fillings
for children and pregnant and nursing women and to phase them out completely
in three years.

In California, dentists are required by state law to post a warning that
dental amalgams "cause exposure to mercury, a chemical known to the state of
California to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm."

"The ADA is wrong that the issue is `safety.' The issue is `risk,'" said
Charlie Brown, national counsel for Consumers for Dental Choice and
Coalition for Mercury-Free Dentistry. He has filed a petition asking the
Federal Trade Commission to investigate the ADA and the Connecticut State
Dental Association for what the groups claims is making false, deceptive and
unsubstantiated claims in promoting silver/mercury amalgam.

"On this point scientists agree: Mercury is a virulent neurotoxin that can
permanently harm the developing brain of a child or fetus. Yet a recent
Zogby poll shows three in five people don't know that `silver' fillings have
mercury," said Brown, who pointed out that silver fillings are in fact
mainly mercury.

The ADA staunchly defends the safety of amalgam, still used in about 30
percent of restorations. Amalgam, made by mixing elemental liquid mercury
with an alloy powder composed of silver, tin, copper and sometimes smaller
amounts of other metals, hardens quickly and tolerates saliva. This makes it
useful for treating squirmy young children or special-needs patients who
have a hard time sitting still.

Money and ethics

Some dental insurance companies don't cover the more expensive alternatives
to amalgam. And because science doesn't definitively link the silver
fillings to health problems, the ADA considers it unethical for dentists to
tell patients that removing amalgams can improve health.

"Amalgam has the longest history, the most data and the largest number of
studies supporting it. Yet time after time, we have to come back and address
it," said Dr. Fred Eichmiller, director of the ADA Foundation's Paffenbarger
Resource Center, where alternatives to amalgams have been invented.

Critics argue that the issue also is environmental. Mercury is emitted into
the air when bodies with mercury fillings are cremated. It gets into the
water when fillings are removed and leftover material is not disposed of
properly.

"Amalgams don't need to be used in the 21st Century," said Downers Grove
dentist Janet Stopka, who uses composite, porcelain and gold.

For consumers, the decision whether to replace amalgams can be a difficult
one. Urine, hair and feces can all be tested for mercury levels and
chelating agents can pull mercury out of the organs. But the results don't
necessarily tell whether there is enough mercury present to pose a health
risk and an official diagnosis of "mercury poisoning" can be tentative.

Swapping out old fillings can be expensive; each replacement can cost $75 to
$200. And there are no guaranteed benefits.

Nevertheless, Dawn Quast, a dental hygienist for Dr. John Rothchild in
Hoffman Estates, decided to have four small fillings replaced after she
witnessed both small and profound improvements in Rothchild's patients who
had amalgams replaced.

"I had a migraine the night I had the last silver one removed and haven't
had one since [in 12 years]," Quast said.

Rothchild, a mercury-free dentist, said he doesn't push people into having
silver fillings removed.

No guarantees

"I never promise any medical cures because you can't," he said. Instead, he
presents both sides of the issue on his Web site and provides patient
referrals. "If people come in asking about amalgams, I'll tell them," he
said. "If they're there for basic dentistry, I don't say anything."

Linda Brocato of Prospect Heights went to several dentists before she made
the difficult decision to have her 16 silver fillings removed. Her problems
began in 1980, when she looked in the mirror one morning and noticed her
right eye was drooping. Seven years and dozens of health issues later, the
former social worker was crippled, diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.

It wasn't until Brocato heard about the Minneapolis-based group Dental
Amalgam Mercury Syndrome (DAMS), however, that she began to believe she had
mercury poisoning.

Two weeks after she had her last amalgams replaced, Brocato said her slurred
speech began to disappear and her strength and balance improved. She knows
the symptoms of MS come and go, which could explain her improved health, but
she is convinced that removing the silver fillings made a big difference.

"I have five pages of improvements," said Brocato, 56, who is still in a
wheelchair but no longer takes medication for MS. She is now one of the
Illinois coordinators for DAMS. "I don't know how people can say there isn't
evidence."

- - -

Help on the Web

For more information:

The American Dental Association: ada.org.

The International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology: iaomt.org.

Consumers for Dental Choice, www.toxicteeth.org.
Tim Dixon - 25 Dec 2005 19:40 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:5tCrf.6s56201$_o.575387@attbi_s71...

hack
Robert  Morien - 26 Dec 2005 04:45 GMT
re: Jan loves Tim Dixon   Thread Hijacking in progress

> hack
Robert  Morien - 26 Dec 2005 04:45 GMT
> Published December 11, 2005

spam noted and reported
Robert  Morien - 26 Dec 2005 04:44 GMT
re: Jan loves Tim Dixon   Thread Hijacking in progress

> no one here is interested
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.