Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why is Tim Dixon Obsessed with Sue?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sue - 23 Dec 2005 20:17 GMT
What is wrong with this person?

All he ever does here is stalk Sue and perpetuate wars with Jan Drew.
So what is his purpose here?  Does he just sit home on his computer all
day... hooked up to an SMD IV line?  Does he have a job?

I understand he and Webby wrote some book on an iatroepidemic ... ( I
am guessing this relates to TMJ)

...but I have never once seen Tim put any technical information on
these boards.

All he does is attempt to pick fights.

Geesh.  It is getting REALLY annoying. ... for everyone.

-Sue
The Webby - 23 Dec 2005 20:20 GMT
> What is wrong with this person?
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> -Sue

Oh, I don't think you're so smart, Sue.  It's only annoying for people
like you.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 20:38 GMT
> In article <1135369067.6265399.69750@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,

>> Geesh.  It is getting REALLY annoying. ... for everyone.

Who is 'everyone' Sue?
pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 23 Dec 2005 21:15 GMT
> > What is wrong with this person?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Oh, I don't think you're so smart, Sue.  It's only annoying for people
> like you.

Well, perhaps we could get a clear, complete and concise definition of
"like you" that is comprehensible to people besides Sabra and Tim. Not
likely, I suppose. Code is all that is spoken there.

Sue, just ignore the paranoia and fighting. Take what you can get from
this forum and, as much as possible, let the rest go. Yes, the paranoia
and fighting bother "everyone." Some of us just don't have the time or
energy to respond regularly. Aside from that, responding is a waste of
time.

Tim and Sabra have had experiences which, if they really happened,
caused predictable trauma and distrust in each of them. I don't and
don't have to understand why the two siblings haven't been able to let
go of their conviction that everyone who doesn't agree with them is
part of some vast conspiracy. Fact is, that's where they're coming from
and that's what you're getting. It has nothing to do with you and
everything to do with them. Trying to argue sense into them
accomplishes nothing for anybody. While I do not see Sabra and Tim as
pigs, discussions with them (especially with Tim) are much like
teaching a pig to sing: It frustrates you and annoys the pig.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 21:22 GMT
<pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135372506.876175.162030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

cut the dribble
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:27 GMT
> <pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1135372506.876175.162030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> cut the dribble

restore what Tim can't handle.

Well, perhaps we could get a clear, complete and concise definition of
"like you" that is comprehensible to people besides Sabra and Tim. Not
likely, I suppose. Code is all that is spoken there.

Sue, just ignore the paranoia and fighting. Take what you can get from
this forum and, as much as possible, let the rest go. Yes, the paranoia
and fighting bother "everyone." Some of us just don't have the time or
energy to respond regularly. Aside from that, responding is a waste of
time.

Tim and Sabra have had experiences which, if they really happened,
caused predictable trauma and distrust in each of them. I don't and
don't have to understand why the two siblings haven't been able to let
go of their conviction that everyone who doesn't agree with them is
part of some vast conspiracy. Fact is, that's where they're coming from
and that's what you're getting. It has nothing to do with you and
everything to do with them. Trying to argue sense into them
accomplishes nothing for anybody. While I do not see Sabra and Tim as
pigs, discussions with them (especially with Tim) are much like
teaching a pig to sing: It frustrates you and annoys the pig.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:29 GMT
>> <pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1135372506.876175.162030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

poor jan, even pell mell doesn't like you, in fact she said she hates you..

your sick you old hag and you should see a doctor,
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 21:29 GMT
<pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135372506.8726175.62030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

isn't your latest soap opera about to start?  and whats wrong with you this
week?
pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 23 Dec 2005 21:34 GMT
> <pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1135372506.8726175.62030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> isn't your latest soap opera about to start?  and whats wrong with you this
> week?

See what I mean, Sue? The fighting has nothing to do with you. Some of
us have read this forum for years. This kind of behavior is typical.
Just ignore it.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 21:32 GMT
another jan drew the jew hater fan, who apparently is into some odd stuff..
pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 23 Dec 2005 21:35 GMT
Nah, we all hate Jan.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 21:38 GMT
<pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135373736.9717268.71390@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Nah, we all hate Jan.

why because she isn't your type
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:13 GMT
> Nah, we all hate Jan.

Your reason would be?
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:17 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:vE_qf.4239267$084.25762@attbi_s22...

> <pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1135373736.971768.71390@g49g21000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Nah, we all hate Jan.
>
> Your reason would be?

Isn't it obvious?
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:29 GMT
> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:vE_qf.4239267$084.25762@attbi_s22...
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Isn't it obvious?

I wasn't asking YOU.

Butt out.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:31 GMT
>> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>> news:vE_qf.4239267$084.25762@attbi_s22...
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Butt out.

What more do you need, she said she HATES you, in fact she said "we all hate
Jan".
pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 24 Dec 2005 17:23 GMT
> Nah, we all hate Jan.

Jan, I apologize. There isn't anybody on this board I hate. Because I
needed to get back to house guests, I posted quickly and without
thinking through what I would write. I should have waited to post, as I
did (for several weeks) to let Sue know that others are reading who
don't find Webby and Chang appropriate with their dealings on Usenet.

There is no more excuse for posting publicly in "code" than there is to
speak a foreign language when other people around you do not speak that
language. If you want to share something useful, you have to tell your
story in a straightforward manner with language that everyone can
understand, instead of expecting people to research your posting
history (which doesn't seem doable on Google previous to 1997) or ask
the right questions, to which they might still get coded answers. But
this topic has been broached before in this forum. The private language
of the clique continues to show up, as do the coded language and
attacks against people who are part of no conspiracy at all.

There is also no excuse for fighting on the board; calling people
liars, other names, or attacking them in other ways; and repeatedly
posting long abstracts and sets of links (which -- no -- I don't
believe are efforts to collect my private information; I believe you
are sincere in your efforts to communicate your fears about amalgam)
without engaging (or being able to engage?) in any intelligible
discussion of the ideas presented in those abstracts. Persistently
refusing to enter into real discussion of ideas loses readers on any
intelligent forum.

Some guy named Iron Justice constantly posts abstracts and links on
several newsgroup I read. In the best of those groups, the only
response to him is a post with instructions for how to killfile. No one
even mentions his name. However sincerely he believes that too much
iron causes every human ill, readers perceive him as a lunatic. As in
your case and Webby/Chang's, his behavior on newsgroups has undermined
any credibility his cause might have had.

I do not expect this statement to change anyone's behavior except my
own, which is what I can control. And since I insulted publicly, I
wanted to apologize publicly. I hope my true opinion is clearer than
when I acted rashly.
Tim Dixon - 24 Dec 2005 17:32 GMT
>> Nah, we all hate Jan.
>
> Jan, I apologize. There isn't anybody on this board I hate.

Well you said it and now you say something else, guess we can't really tell
where you stand, except to say you must have a mouth full of amalgams too.
Do what Jan did, get them out right away and you will feel so much better
that you can then spend all your time calling everyone you run into on
usenet a LIAR.

Look out fellas, the kooks have taken over the asylum.
Robert  Morien - 25 Dec 2005 01:09 GMT
Re: Jan love Tim Dixon   Thread Hijacking in progress

> >> Nah, we all hate Jan.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Look out fellas, the kooks have taken over the asylum.
Whamatus_B - 30 Dec 2005 19:44 GMT
>Look out fellas, the kooks have taken over the asylum.

Who said they weren't in charge to begin with ?

--
Whamatus
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
JanD - 24 Dec 2005 20:23 GMT
Apology accepted and very much appreciated. I understand most everything you
have said here. A real pity one's sincerely meant message, only posted in
the hopes of helping others to never, ever have to suffer as I did, gets
lost in all the terrible arguments that are far from me in real life.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to All.

Sincerely,

Jan

>> Nah, we all hate Jan.
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> wanted to apologize publicly. I hope my true opinion is clearer than
> when I acted rashly.
Tim Dixon - 24 Dec 2005 20:41 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:m7irf.6512417$_o.187516@attbi_s71...

cut the dribble from the old hag
Robert  Morien - 25 Dec 2005 01:10 GMT
Re: Jan love Tim Dixon   Thread Hijacking in progress

> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:m7irf.6512417$_o.187516@attbi_s71...
>
> cut the dribble from the old hag
Tim Dixon - 24 Dec 2005 20:45 GMT
> Apology accepted and very much appreciated. I understand most everything
> you have said here. A real pity one's sincerely meant message, only posted
> in the hopes of helping others to never, ever have to suffer as I did,
> gets lost in all the terrible arguments that are far from me in real life.

this is Jan Drews message

"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:LF4rf.651030$_o.526423@attbi_s71...

> "Tony Bad" <spamspamspam@bakedbeans.spam> wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
>
> NOT one word was pulled out of context!
JanD - 25 Dec 2005 00:30 GMT
Your point, Tim?

My point was:

Tony Falsely accused Chuck of pulling his words out of context.

Chuck in fact did not.

Tony owes Chuck an apology.

>> Apology accepted and very much appreciated. I understand most everything
>> you have said here. A real pity one's sincerely meant message, only
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>>
>> NOT one word was pulled out of context!
Robert  Morien - 25 Dec 2005 01:12 GMT
Re: Jan love Tim Dixon   Thread Hijacking in progress

> Your point, Tim?
Robert  Morien - 25 Dec 2005 01:11 GMT
Re: Jan love Tim Dixon   Thread Hijacking in progress

> this is Jan Drews message
Tim Dixon - 24 Dec 2005 20:46 GMT
> I do not expect this statement to change anyone's behavior except my
> own, which is what I can control. And since I insulted publicly, I
> wanted to apologize publicly. I hope my true opinion is clearer than
> when I acted rashly.

Here is the message of Jan Drew:

> "Tony Bad" <spamspamspam@bakedbeans.spam> wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
>
> NOT one word was pulled out of context!
Robert  Morien - 25 Dec 2005 01:11 GMT
Re: Jan love Tim Dixon   Thread Hijacking in progress

> Here is the message of Jan Drew:
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:28 GMT
> another jan drew the jew hater fan, who apparently is into some odd
> stuff..

Guess what, Timmy this isn't about Jan Drew, OR YOUR LIES?
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:33 GMT
>> another jan drew the jew hater fan, who apparently is into some odd
>> stuff..
>
> Guess what, Timmy this isn't about Jan Drew, OR YOUR LIES?

Oh I think it is about Jan Drew, the sicko who desperately needs attention
because her husband gave up on her long ago for the arm chair, and now you
sit alone in a cold room, with no friends, and no one thats interested in
you, and so you come out here to make everyone miserable because you are
miserable.

If you are so proud of what you do Jan, why don't you print it all out,
every single word of it, and give it all who know you and see what they
think about you.  You are sick lady and in need of serious psychiatric care.
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:50 GMT
>>> another jan drew the jew hater fan, who apparently is into some odd
>>> stuff..
>>
>> Guess what, Timmy this isn't about Jan Drew, OR YOUR LIES?
>
> Oh I think

Guess what?

You thinking is LIES.

Well, perhaps we could get a clear, complete and concise definition of
"like you" that is comprehensible to people besides Sabra and Tim. Not
likely, I suppose. Code is all that is spoken there.

Sue, just ignore the paranoia and fighting. Take what you can get from
this forum and, as much as possible, let the rest go. Yes, the paranoia
and fighting bother "everyone." Some of us just don't have the time or
energy to respond regularly. Aside from that, responding is a waste of
time.

Tim and Sabra have had experiences which, if they really happened,
caused predictable trauma and distrust in each of them. I don't and
don't have to understand why the two siblings haven't been able to let
go of their conviction that everyone who doesn't agree with them is
part of some vast conspiracy. Fact is, that's where they're coming from
and that's what you're getting. It has nothing to do with you and
everything to do with them. Trying to argue sense into them
accomplishes nothing for anybody. While I do not see Sabra and Tim as
pigs, discussions with them (especially with Tim) are much like
teaching a pig to sing: It frustrates you and annoys the pig.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 23:00 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:Ba%qf.2671340$xm3.469334@attbi_s21...

ignore the lonely old hag chester
The Webby - 23 Dec 2005 21:33 GMT
> Tim and Sabra have had experiences which, if they really happened,

There is nothing to be learned from the experiences of others.  So we
should all just close our eyes and go to sleep now.
Sue - 23 Dec 2005 21:35 GMT
pellmellwillyni...@hotmail.com wrote:

> > > What is wrong with this person?
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> pigs, discussions with them (especially with Tim) are much like
> teaching a pig to sing: It frustrates you and annoys the pig.

Thank you Pellmell.

I thought they were joking at first.  Now I realize why they act the
way they do.  I do feel sorry that their lives have been affected so,
but their behavior toward me is something I cannot accept regardless of
their current or past sufferrings.

I will do what I can to ignore them and to remain civil on the boards.
When I have time to figure out RSS feed, I will just k-file them.

Best regards,
-Sue
The Webby - 23 Dec 2005 21:39 GMT
> When I have time to figure out RSS feed, I will just k-file them.
>
> Best regards,
> -Sue

Okay.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 21:40 GMT
"Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1135373754.1161564.138820@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

> I will do what I can to ignore them and to remain civil on the boards.
> When I have time to figure out RSS feed, I will just k-file them.

Get busy and kill away, doesn't mean we will be going anywhere, and just
because you can't see it doesn't mean its not there for others to see.  The
archives are a funny thing really, who actually has a complete record is not
known, but whats left over is usually enough.
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:15 GMT
> "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1135373754.1161564.138820@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The archives are a funny thing really, who actually has a complete record
> is not known, but whats left over is usually enough.

Like this:

It IS also called LIES.

> Poor Timmy, got a auto reply. One that he got some time ago.

oh really

Return-Path: <a...@insightbb.com>
Received: from fed1rmgxi07.cox.net ([12.1.241.201]) by fed1rmmtai07.cox.net
         (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
         id
<20051221223219.XQGR3056.fed1rmmtai07.cox....@fed1rmgxi07.cox.net>
         for <timgdixonnos...@cox.net>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:32:19 -0500
Received: from abuse-att.net ([12.1.241.201]) by fed1rmgxi07.cox.net
         (InterMail vG.1.00.00.00 201-2136-104-20040331) with ESMTP
         id <20051221222952.QXMJ19145.fed1rmgxi07.cox....@abuse-att.net>
         for <timgdixonnos...@cox.net>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:29:52 -0500
Received: (qmail 13410 invoked by uid 204); 21 Dec 2005 17:33:18 -0500
Received: from a...@insightbb.com by mailwallout.sgi.int by uid 201 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
( Clear:.
Processed in 1.042357 secs); 21 Dec 2005 22:33:18 -0000
Received: from mamabear.sgi.int (127.0.0.1)
 by mailwallout.sgi.int with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Dec 2005
17:33:17 -0500
Received: (qmail 13900 invoked by uid 1197); 21 Dec 2005 17:33:17 -0500
Date: 21 Dec 2005 17:33:17 -0500
Message-ID: <20051221223317.7456.qmail@mamabear.sgi.int>
X-Orig-OID: 121605-152811-20007
X-OID: 122105-173317-12327-114
To: timgdixonnos...@cox.net (by way of Abuse <a...@insightbb.com>) (by way
of abuse <a...@insightbb.com>)
From: a...@insightbb.com
Subject: Re: Fw: What the *Webby* Busy Body Bitch Does
  [122105-173317-12327-114]

Thank you for contacting the Insight Internet Investigations and Security
Services Team. The IIISS team has investigated the abuse that you reported
and
has taken the appropriate action. Please continue to let us know when such
instances
occur.

If you have any other questions or concerns, please E-mail us at:

a...@insightbb.com

Thank you for contacting the Insight IISS team.

(DISHONEST Timmy goes the all the trouble to change the dates, DUMBER than a
box of rocks didn't change the subject title)

JanD" <J...@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>> news:IUmqf.667203$xm3.454350@attbi_s21...
>>> Poor Timmy, got a auto reply. One that he got some time ago.
>> oh really
> Yes, oh really, dumber than a box of rocks, Timmy Subject: Re: Fw: What
> the *Webby* Busy Body Bitch Does
>>   [122105-173317-12327-114]
Tim Dixon" <timgdixon-no-s...@cox.net> wrote in message

(THAT'S BOTH MISINFORMATION AND A LIE!)

how long do you think it will take with all of us reporting Jan to her ISP
before they get tired of having to hear about her and cut her off?  Not long
I hope.  Thats what happened at AOL by the way.

> "Jan" <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1135216684.0203050.234110@g44g2000cwa.googslegroups.com... cut and
> reported

Poor Timmy.

What did you say?

how long do you think it will take with all of us reporting Jan to her ISP
before they get tired of having to hear about her and cut her off?  Not long
I hope.  Thats what happened at AOL by the way.

(THAT'S BOTH MISINFORMATION AND LIE NUMBER TWO!)

ALL THAT WISH TO KEEP RIGHT ON SIDING WITH TIM DIXON ARE GUILTY OF CONDONING
BOTH POSTING MISINFORMATION AND LYING.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:17 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:bG_qf.6721231$xm3.469576@attbi_s21...

ignore the old hag chester
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:31 GMT
> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:bG_qf.6721231$xm3.469576@attbi_s21...
>
> ignore the old hag chester

Poor Timmy, you were speaking of what was in the archives.

Like this:

It IS also called LIES.

> Poor Timmy, got a auto reply. One that he got some time ago.

oh really

Return-Path: <a...@insightbb.com>
Received: from fed1rmgxi07.cox.net ([12.1.241.201]) by fed1rmmtai07.cox.net
         (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
         id
<20051221223219.XQGR3056.fed1rmmtai07.cox....@fed1rmgxi07.cox.net>
         for <timgdixonnos...@cox.net>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:32:19 -0500
Received: from abuse-att.net ([12.1.241.201]) by fed1rmgxi07.cox.net
         (InterMail vG.1.00.00.00 201-2136-104-20040331) with ESMTP
         id <20051221222952.QXMJ19145.fed1rmgxi07.cox....@abuse-att.net>
         for <timgdixonnos...@cox.net>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:29:52 -0500
Received: (qmail 13410 invoked by uid 204); 21 Dec 2005 17:33:18 -0500
Received: from a...@insightbb.com by mailwallout.sgi.int by uid 201 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
( Clear:.
Processed in 1.042357 secs); 21 Dec 2005 22:33:18 -0000
Received: from mamabear.sgi.int (127.0.0.1)
 by mailwallout.sgi.int with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Dec 2005
17:33:17 -0500
Received: (qmail 13900 invoked by uid 1197); 21 Dec 2005 17:33:17 -0500
Date: 21 Dec 2005 17:33:17 -0500
Message-ID: <20051221223317.7456.qmail@mamabear.sgi.int>
X-Orig-OID: 121605-152811-20007
X-OID: 122105-173317-12327-114
To: timgdixonnos...@cox.net (by way of Abuse <a...@insightbb.com>) (by way
of abuse <a...@insightbb.com>)
From: a...@insightbb.com
Subject: Re: Fw: What the *Webby* Busy Body Bitch Does
  [122105-173317-12327-114]

Thank you for contacting the Insight Internet Investigations and Security
Services Team. The IIISS team has investigated the abuse that you reported
and
has taken the appropriate action. Please continue to let us know when such
instances
occur.

If you have any other questions or concerns, please E-mail us at:

a...@insightbb.com

Thank you for contacting the Insight IISS team.

(DISHONEST Timmy goes the all the trouble to change the dates, DUMBER than a
box of rocks didn't change the subject title)

JanD" <J...@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>> news:IUmqf.667203$xm3.454350@attbi_s21...
>>> Poor Timmy, got a auto reply. One that he got some time ago.
>> oh really
> Yes, oh really, dumber than a box of rocks, Timmy Subject: Re: Fw: What
> the *Webby* Busy Body Bitch Does
>>   [122105-173317-12327-114]
Tim Dixon" <timgdixon-no-s...@cox.net> wrote in message

(THAT'S BOTH MISINFORMATION AND A LIE!)

how long do you think it will take with all of us reporting Jan to her ISP
before they get tired of having to hear about her and cut her off?  Not long
I hope.  Thats what happened at AOL by the way.

> "Jan" <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1135216684.0203050.234110@g44g2000cwa.googslegroups.com... cut and
> reported

Poor Timmy.

What did you say?

how long do you think it will take with all of us reporting Jan to her ISP
before they get tired of having to hear about her and cut her off?  Not long
I hope.  Thats what happened at AOL by the way.

(THAT'S BOTH MISINFORMATION AND LIE NUMBER TWO!)

ALL THAT WISH TO KEEP RIGHT ON SIDING WITH TIM DIXON ARE GUILTY OF CONDONING
BOTH POSTING MISINFORMATION AND LYING.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:35 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:JU_qf.671291$xm3.5e82248@attbi_s21...

Oh I think it is about Jan Drew, the sicko who desperately needs attention
because her husband gave up on her long ago for the arm chair, and now you
sit alone in a cold room, with no friends, and no one thats interested in
you, and so you come out here to make everyone miserable because you are
miserable.

If you are so proud of what you do Jan, why don't you print it all out,
every single word of it, and give it all who know you and see what they
think about you.  You are sick lady and in need of serious psychiatric care.
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:51 GMT
> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:JU_qf.671291$xm3.5e82248@attbi_s21...

Well, perhaps we could get a clear, complete and concise definition of
"like you" that is comprehensible to people besides Sabra and Tim. Not
likely, I suppose. Code is all that is spoken there.

Sue, just ignore the paranoia and fighting. Take what you can get from
this forum and, as much as possible, let the rest go. Yes, the paranoia
and fighting bother "everyone." Some of us just don't have the time or
energy to respond regularly. Aside from that, responding is a waste of
time.

Tim and Sabra have had experiences which, if they really happened,
caused predictable trauma and distrust in each of them. I don't and
don't have to understand why the two siblings haven't been able to let
go of their conviction that everyone who doesn't agree with them is
part of some vast conspiracy. Fact is, that's where they're coming from
and that's what you're getting. It has nothing to do with you and
everything to do with them. Trying to argue sense into them
accomplishes nothing for anybody. While I do not see Sabra and Tim as
pigs, discussions with them (especially with Tim) are much like
teaching a pig to sing: It frustrates you and annoys the pig.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 23:01 GMT
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:35 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:bG_qf.6e71231$xm3.469576@attbi_s21...

Oh I think it is about Jan Drew, the sicko who desperately needs attention
because her husband gave up on her long ago for the arm chair, and now you
sit alone in a cold room, with no friends, and no one thats interested in
you, and so you come out here to make everyone miserable because you are
miserable.

If you are so proud of what you do Jan, why don't you print it all out,
every single word of it, and give it all who know you and see what they
think about you.  You are sick lady and in need of serious psychiatric care.
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:52 GMT
> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:bG_qf.6e71231$xm3.469576@attbi_s21...

Well, perhaps we could get a clear, complete and concise definition of
"like you" that is comprehensible to people besides Sabra and Tim. Not
likely, I suppose. Code is all that is spoken there.

Sue, just ignore the paranoia and fighting. Take what you can get from
this forum and, as much as possible, let the rest go. Yes, the paranoia
and fighting bother "everyone." Some of us just don't have the time or
energy to respond regularly. Aside from that, responding is a waste of
time.

Tim and Sabra have had experiences which, if they really happened,
caused predictable trauma and distrust in each of them. I don't and
don't have to understand why the two siblings haven't been able to let
go of their conviction that everyone who doesn't agree with them is
part of some vast conspiracy. Fact is, that's where they're coming from
and that's what you're getting. It has nothing to do with you and
everything to do with them. Trying to argue sense into them
accomplishes nothing for anybody. While I do not see Sabra and Tim as
pigs, discussions with them (especially with Tim) are much like
teaching a pig to sing: It frustrates you and annoys the pig.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 23:01 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:vc%qf.6713424$xm3.653562@attbi_s21...

ignore the old tired hag chester
Amatus Cremona - 23 Dec 2005 21:53 GMT
> Oh, I don't think you're so smart, Sue.  It's only annoying for people
> like you.

Actually only annoying to S**

Amatus Cremona
..

>> What is wrong with this person?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Oh, I don't think you're so smart, Sue.  It's only annoying for people
> like you.
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:18 GMT
>> Oh, I don't think you're so smart, Sue.  It's only annoying for people
>> like you.
>
> Actually only annoying to S**
>
> Amatus Cremona

Thanks for confirming *where* that puts you.

It IS also called LIES.

> Poor Timmy, got a auto reply. One that he got some time ago.

oh really

Return-Path: <a...@insightbb.com>
Received: from fed1rmgxi07.cox.net ([12.1.241.201]) by fed1rmmtai07.cox.net
         (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
         id
<20051221223219.XQGR3056.fed1rmmtai07.cox....@fed1rmgxi07.cox.net>
         for <timgdixonnos...@cox.net>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:32:19 -0500
Received: from abuse-att.net ([12.1.241.201]) by fed1rmgxi07.cox.net
         (InterMail vG.1.00.00.00 201-2136-104-20040331) with ESMTP
         id <20051221222952.QXMJ19145.fed1rmgxi07.cox....@abuse-att.net>
         for <timgdixonnos...@cox.net>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:29:52 -0500
Received: (qmail 13410 invoked by uid 204); 21 Dec 2005 17:33:18 -0500
Received: from a...@insightbb.com by mailwallout.sgi.int by uid 201 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
( Clear:.
Processed in 1.042357 secs); 21 Dec 2005 22:33:18 -0000
Received: from mamabear.sgi.int (127.0.0.1)
 by mailwallout.sgi.int with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Dec 2005
17:33:17 -0500
Received: (qmail 13900 invoked by uid 1197); 21 Dec 2005 17:33:17 -0500
Date: 21 Dec 2005 17:33:17 -0500
Message-ID: <20051221223317.7456.qmail@mamabear.sgi.int>
X-Orig-OID: 121605-152811-20007
X-OID: 122105-173317-12327-114
To: timgdixonnos...@cox.net (by way of Abuse <a...@insightbb.com>) (by way
of abuse <a...@insightbb.com>)
From: a...@insightbb.com
Subject: Re: Fw: What the *Webby* Busy Body Bitch Does
  [122105-173317-12327-114]

Thank you for contacting the Insight Internet Investigations and Security
Services Team. The IIISS team has investigated the abuse that you reported
and
has taken the appropriate action. Please continue to let us know when such
instances
occur.

If you have any other questions or concerns, please E-mail us at:

a...@insightbb.com

Thank you for contacting the Insight IISS team.

(DISHONEST Timmy goes the all the trouble to change the dates, DUMBER than a
box of rocks didn't change the subject title)

JanD" <J...@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>> news:IUmqf.667203$xm3.454350@attbi_s21...
>>> Poor Timmy, got a auto reply. One that he got some time ago.
>> oh really
> Yes, oh really, dumber than a box of rocks, Timmy Subject: Re: Fw: What
> the *Webby* Busy Body Bitch Does
>>   [122105-173317-12327-114]
Tim Dixon" <timgdixon-no-s...@cox.net> wrote in message

(THAT'S BOTH MISINFORMATION AND A LIE!)

how long do you think it will take with all of us reporting Jan to her ISP
before they get tired of having to hear about her and cut her off?  Not long
I hope.  Thats what happened at AOL by the way.

> "Jan" <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1135216684.0203050.234110@g44g2000cwa.googslegroups.com... cut and
> reported

Poor Timmy.

What did you say?

how long do you think it will take with all of us reporting Jan to her ISP
before they get tired of having to hear about her and cut her off?  Not long
I hope.  Thats what happened at AOL by the way.

(THAT'S BOTH MISINFORMATION AND LIE NUMBER TWO!)

ALL THAT WISH TO KEEP RIGHT ON SIDING WITH TIM DIXON ARE GUILTY OF CONDONING
BOTH POSTING MISINFORMATION AND LYING.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:22 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:OI1_qf.671240$xm3.618777@attbi_s21...

ignore the old hag chester

oh jan your doggy needs another zap, and so does your hubby and don't forget
to get the little neighbor kids in your shop of horrors
JanD - 23 Dec 2005 22:32 GMT
> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message

Thanks for confirming *where* that puts you.

It IS also called LIES.

> Poor Timmy, got a auto reply. One that he got some time ago.

oh really

Return-Path: <a...@insightbb.com>
Received: from fed1rmgxi07.cox.net ([12.1.241.201]) by fed1rmmtai07.cox.net
         (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
         id
<20051221223219.XQGR3056.fed1rmmtai07.cox....@fed1rmgxi07.cox.net>
         for <timgdixonnos...@cox.net>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:32:19 -0500
Received: from abuse-att.net ([12.1.241.201]) by fed1rmgxi07.cox.net
         (InterMail vG.1.00.00.00 201-2136-104-20040331) with ESMTP
         id <20051221222952.QXMJ19145.fed1rmgxi07.cox....@abuse-att.net>
         for <timgdixonnos...@cox.net>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:29:52 -0500
Received: (qmail 13410 invoked by uid 204); 21 Dec 2005 17:33:18 -0500
Received: from a...@insightbb.com by mailwallout.sgi.int by uid 201 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
( Clear:.
Processed in 1.042357 secs); 21 Dec 2005 22:33:18 -0000
Received: from mamabear.sgi.int (127.0.0.1)
 by mailwallout.sgi.int with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Dec 2005
17:33:17 -0500
Received: (qmail 13900 invoked by uid 1197); 21 Dec 2005 17:33:17 -0500
Date: 21 Dec 2005 17:33:17 -0500
Message-ID: <20051221223317.7456.qmail@mamabear.sgi.int>
X-Orig-OID: 121605-152811-20007
X-OID: 122105-173317-12327-114
To: timgdixonnos...@cox.net (by way of Abuse <a...@insightbb.com>) (by way
of abuse <a...@insightbb.com>)
From: a...@insightbb.com
Subject: Re: Fw: What the *Webby* Busy Body Bitch Does
  [122105-173317-12327-114]

Thank you for contacting the Insight Internet Investigations and Security
Services Team. The IIISS team has investigated the abuse that you reported
and
has taken the appropriate action. Please continue to let us know when such
instances
occur.

If you have any other questions or concerns, please E-mail us at:

a...@insightbb.com

Thank you for contacting the Insight IISS team.

(DISHONEST Timmy goes the all the trouble to change the dates, DUMBER than a
box of rocks didn't change the subject title)

JanD" <J...@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>> news:IUmqf.667203$xm3.454350@attbi_s21...
>>> Poor Timmy, got a auto reply. One that he got some time ago.
>> oh really
> Yes, oh really, dumber than a box of rocks, Timmy Subject: Re: Fw: What
> the *Webby* Busy Body Bitch Does
>>   [122105-173317-12327-114]
Tim Dixon" <timgdixon-no-s...@cox.net> wrote in message

(THAT'S BOTH MISINFORMATION AND A LIE!)

how long do you think it will take with all of us reporting Jan to her ISP
before they get tired of having to hear about her and cut her off?  Not long
I hope.  Thats what happened at AOL by the way.

> "Jan" <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1135216684.0203050.234110@g44g2000cwa.googslegroups.com... cut and
> reported

Poor Timmy.

What did you say?

how long do you think it will take with all of us reporting Jan to her ISP
before they get tired of having to hear about her and cut her off?  Not long
I hope.  Thats what happened at AOL by the way.

(THAT'S BOTH MISINFORMATION AND LIE NUMBER TWO!)

ALL THAT WISH TO KEEP RIGHT ON SIDING WITH TIM DIXON ARE GUILTY OF CONDONING
BOTH POSTING MISINFORMATION AND LYING.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 22:35 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:9W_qf.671296$xm3.7e9538@attbi_s21...

Oh I think it is about Jan Drew, the sicko who desperately needs attention
because her husband gave up on her long ago for the arm chair, and now you
sit alone in a cold room, with no friends, and no one thats interested in
you, and so you come out here to make everyone miserable because you are
miserable.

If you are so proud of what you do Jan, why don't you print it all out,
every single word of it, and give it all who know you and see what they
think about you.  You are sick lady and in need of serious psychiatric care.
The Webby - 23 Dec 2005 20:23 GMT
> I understand he and Webby wrote some book on an iatroepidemic ... ( I
> am guessing this relates to TMJ)

Go ask the TMJ Association.  They know all about it.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 20:37 GMT
> What is wrong with this person?

You.  Satisfied.
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 21:02 GMT
Funny Sue has to go back to the year 2000 to dig something up that Dr. Boyd
wrote over 5 years ago, rather than something a little more recent, like say
last week.  If you think that is the same position Dr. Boyd holds today you
are sadly mistaken Sue, and once again you are attemtpting to cause
disinformation.  There are thousands of documents published by Boyd and yet
you choose some obscure passage he wrote to Wally Davis (a friend of mine by
the way) to try and make some point about this crap you have been posting
here.

We all see what you're doping Sue, and it's just going to get rougher for
you.
Sue - 23 Dec 2005 21:14 GMT
> Funny Sue has to go back to the year 2000 to dig something up that Dr. Boyd
> wrote over 5 years ago, rather than something a little more recent, like say
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> We all see what you're doping Sue, anditsp it's just going to get rougher for
> you.

Is Tim a functioning citizen... or is he sitting in a jail cell
somewhere?  Is he institutionalized somewhere?     Mental hospital or
half-way house?
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 21:22 GMT
"Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1135372477.853957.2624890@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

cut
Sue - 23 Dec 2005 21:14 GMT
> Funny Sue has to go back to the year 2000 to dig something up that Dr. Boyd
> wrote over 5 years ago, rather than something a little more recent, like say
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> We all see what you're doping Sue, anditsp it's just going to get rougher for
> you.

Is Tim a functioning citizen... or is he sitting in a jail cell
somewhere?  Is he institutionalized somewhere?     Mental hospital or
half-way house?
Tim Dixon - 23 Dec 2005 21:23 GMT
"Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1135372477.669463.2732500@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
cut
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.