Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Using teeth from corpses ???

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gerard Mindstep - 19 Dec 2005 08:36 GMT
There are so many dead people every day with teeth which are still in
perfect condition.

Why don't we remove the teeth from corpses and sell them to people who
don't have teeth anymore ???
Sue - 19 Dec 2005 19:54 GMT
> There are so many dead people every day with teeth which are still in
> perfect condition.
>
> Why don't we remove the teeth from corpses and sell them to people who
> don't have teeth anymore ???

Because it is a bad idea.

-Sue
Dr.Braces - 20 Dec 2005 16:11 GMT
>> There are so many dead people every day with teeth which are still in
>> perfect condition.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -Sue

It's the whole antigen/antibody thing again, you know like any organ
transplant, the body will reject the donor with out powerful drugs, In
the end dental implants, will be cheaper and easier.

Dr. Braces
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 17:13 GMT
> >> There are so many dead people every day with teeth which are still in
> >> perfect condition.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Dr. Braces

Dr Braces,

Thanks. That is a much more diplomatic answer than mine.  It is a nice
idea, but not practical.

Implants vs Cadaver teeth are:

-Safer: As you mentioned host vs graft and graft vs host rejection

-More efficacious: a custom-made fit is more functional as far as bite
relations go (IMO) than trying to fit someone else's teeth into an
individual's jaw.  How many of us have the same jaw dimensions?

-And possibly even more aestheically appealing than some dead person's
old teeth, IMO.

***************************************************************************************
BTW, There was someone on another forum that asked whether it is
possible to safely whiten (or bleach) teeth while wearing braces.

There were no dentists around to answer his question. Do you have any
comments? I will not paste your comments over there unless you permit
me to do so.

And FYI the link is:
http://www.dentalcom.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2979

Thank you,

-Sue (nondentist)

(to the forum)

PS My intentions are not to start a flame war, try to  "look"
important,  or to solicit SMDers to join another forum.  I am just
trying to get an answer to someone's question (just in case this person
is real).

PSS I am not sending this person over here because I do not know
whether this person is considered litter here.  I do not want to be
held repsonsible for anyone coming over here and getting flamebroiled.

If this post is not acceptable, please just tell me why (nicely)
instead of having a spasm. I am not cutting and pasting.... so in my
extimation this should be ok.

Thanks for your understanding.
Tim Dixon - 20 Dec 2005 18:09 GMT
CROSS POSTING AGAIN.

>> >> There are so many dead people every day with teeth which are still in
>> >> perfect condition.
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> Thanks for your understanding.
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 18:50 GMT
> CROSS POSTING AGAIN.
>
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> >
> > Thanks for your understanding.

Tim,

Come on.  I have not cross-posted.

I paraphrased this person's question in my own words, as Webby asked me
to do.  Isn't it more honest to say this question comes from someone
else... not me?  I could have just pretended that I wore braces and
asked the question.... but why should I lie?

I am also curious myself.  I would think that bleaching should not be
done while wearing braces... as this might cause some unexpected
results when the braces are removed... but I really do not know.

I would love to hear the answer.

-Sue
The Webby - 20 Dec 2005 18:58 GMT
> > CROSS POSTING AGAIN.
[cut]

> Tim,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> -Sue

Sue, at the top of your page where the newsgroup and subject line
appear, you will see which groups are involved in the post.  In order
not to cross-post inadvertently, you need to remove all groups except
this one otherwise it will go out the same way it came in.

It's an easy oversight even when you understand this.  
Hopefully you can see the info now.  You should only see
sci.med.dentistry after the word "Newsgroups:"

Webby
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 19:11 GMT
> > > CROSS POSTING AGAIN.
> [cut]
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Webby

Webby,

I do not know who or what is.vedur is (as noted in the groups listed on
my earlier post).  I don't know how that got there.

I am replying to your post and I do not see any other group but
sci.med.dentistry listed.

If this gets cross-posted then I am not sure how it is happening.

-Sue
The Webby - 20 Dec 2005 19:16 GMT
> > > > CROSS POSTING AGAIN.
> > [cut]
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> -Sue

It got here with the very first post.  Here is a copy of the header
information:

Path:
g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-f
or-mail
From: "Gerard Mindstep" <piano_ne...@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry,is.vedur
Subject: Using teeth from corpses ???
Date: 19 Dec 2005 00:36:41 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <1134981401.490006.143970@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 222.100.95.238
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1134981406 5431 127.0.0.1 (19 Dec 2005
08:36:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:36:46 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: ERROR ! ERROR ! ERROR !,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=222.100.95.238;
  posting-account=-fMO7g0AAAAdN7xNAcRqRhQUPtBytI12

Now you know to just take a look at the distribution of any given post.
Eliminate the groups other than the one you're reading and you have
contained the spread, so to speak.

Webby
The Webby - 20 Dec 2005 19:20 GMT
[cut]
> -Sue

Also, you can do an author profile (at Google Groups) on the person who
started this thread.  You may decide that the address owner is not a
poster you wish to reply to.  You can perform an author profile search
on anyone, for that matter.

Webby
The Webby - 20 Dec 2005 19:22 GMT
In article
<tmjiatroepidemic-2DBEC6.11203220122005@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com>,

> [cut]
> > -Sue
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Webby

P.S.  You may not get any results or complete results for all authors
though.

Webby
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 20:05 GMT
> In article
> <tmjiatroepidemic-2DBEC6.11203220122005@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Webby

Webby,

Thanks for your patience and for the user information.  I will catch on
eventually. (I hope)

Sue
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 20:13 GMT
I just checked out is.dur.  Now THAT is a very weird usenet group.

Nothing here can compare to the  posts over there.... not even the
flames thrown back and forth ..... at and coming from our local mercury
gal.  

-Sue
The Webby - 20 Dec 2005 20:23 GMT
> I just checked out is.dur.  Now THAT is a very weird usenet group.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> -Sue

I think you meant to type is.vedur ... When "we" show up "posting"
(intentionally or unintentionally) to that sort of newsgroup, it leaves
the intention up to the imagination of the reader.  It's all to easy to
find yourself in places you didn't intend to be ...

Word to the wise, watch for oncoming traffic if you're going to step
into the street.  Failure to look both ways could be hazardous to your
image.

Webby
Tim Dixon - 20 Dec 2005 20:32 GMT
>> In article
>> <tmjiatroepidemic-2DBEC6.11203220122005@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Sue

No need for me to say anything as Webby pointed it out to you.  Just take a
look at what your doing before you do it, we say "look/lurk before you
leap/post".
Tim Dixon - 20 Dec 2005 20:34 GMT
>>> In article
>>> <tmjiatroepidemic-2DBEC6.11203220122005@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> a look at what your doing before you do it, we say "look/lurk before you
> leap/post".

I meant to add that you are obviously catching on, but don't let idle
strangers lead you down the wrong path by their bad habits KWIM?
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 20:53 GMT
> >>> In article
> >>> <tmjiatroepidemic-2DBEC6.11203220122005@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> I meant to add that you are obviously catching on, but don't let idle
> strangers lead you down the wrong path by their bad habits KWIM?

Thank you for the advice Tim.

What is KWIM?

-Sue  "keep whamatus in mind"?  ...isn't he the "school marm" here? (I
think that is what joel said)
Tim Dixon - 20 Dec 2005 21:01 GMT
>> >>> In article
>> >>> <tmjiatroepidemic-2DBEC6.11203220122005@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> What is KWIM?

know what i mean

> -Sue  "keep whamatus in mind"?  ...isn't he the "school marm" here? (I
> think that is what joel said)
Whamatus - 20 Dec 2005 21:17 GMT
>I meant to add that you are obviously catching on, but don't let idle
>strangers lead you down the wrong path by their bad habits KWIM?

Thought it was spelled QUIM.
--

Whamatus
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 21:49 GMT
> >I meant to add that you are obviously catching on, but don't let idle
> >strangers lead you down the wrong path by their bad habits KWIM?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

I think that is the French spelling.  It is pronounced KIM
*******************************************************************
After thought:  Or else this is something derogatory  ... in your
secret language.

W_B,  Do you  believe that I have a genuine interest in dentistry?  I
know that may be difficult to fathom, but everything I have said is
true. Some think I am making it up.

I can get my posts to www.dentistry.com and paste them here if you do
not believe me.

I made them in 2003. The dentists there were helpful, kind and gave
advice online for FREE.

I thought that was a great service.  I gave back by donating my time to
the MDA.  Since then I have held an interest in dentistry (from a
public health education standpoint).

Do I need to keep trying to prove  that  I am not a troll here?

Thanks,

-Sue
I will be much more civil once I know that people are not trying to
scrutinize me. I will also post less as I will no longer feel a need to
"prove" that I am not here to annoy or to create chaos. ... but Maybe I
am speaking to air... this may be a killed file.
Whamatus - 20 Dec 2005 22:43 GMT
>> >I meant to add that you are obviously catching on, but don't let idle
>> >strangers lead you down the wrong path by their bad habits KWIM?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>W_B,  Do you  believe that I have a genuine interest in dentistry?

No I don't.

>  I
>know that may be difficult to fathom, but everything I have said is
>true.

Don't believe you.

>Some think I am making it up.

Yep, that's what we think.

>I can get my posts to www.dimwit.com and paste them here if you do
>not believe me.

Please don't add your clutter to SMD.

>I made them in 2003. The dentists there were helpful, kind and gave
>advice online for FREE.
>
>I thought that was a great service.  I gave back by donating my time to
>the MDA.  Since then I have held an interest in dentistry (from a
>public health education standpoint).

What's Muscular Distrophy have to do with teeth ?

>Do I need to keep trying to prove  that  I am not a troll here?

Nope, you've already proven that you are a troll.

>Thanks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>"prove" that I am not here to annoy or to create chaos. ... but Maybe I
>am speaking to air... this may be a killed file.

--

Whamatus
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 22:51 GMT
> >> >I meant to add that you are obviously catching on, but don't let idle
> >> >strangers lead you down the wrong path by their bad habits KWIM?
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

Whatever.

MDA = Minnesota Dental Association

-Sue
Whamatus_B - 21 Dec 2005 15:31 GMT
>Whatever.

Clever response.

>MDA = Minnesota Dental Association
>
>-Sue

Again exhibiting 'saviour syndrome'...

Get a life.
--

Whamatus
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Dr.Braces - 27 Dec 2005 22:27 GMT
sorry, I don't usually follow the newsgroups, as this is a late reply,
   
    You CAN, bleach teeth under braces, but the results vary, people are
afraid of when they get them off there will be a dark area,  this is
ture to some extent.  It all depends on what kind of bleach, how long
of application, what activation methods, and what kind of resin and
methods the braces were applied to the teeth.
    For me to suggest it, I ussually wait until after I take off the
braces, but I have done it during treatment.  it's harder becuaes it
may interfer with treatment, but I wouldn't recommend the fast in
office tx for a banded patient,.  The patient must have exceptional
perfect oral heath also, I don't want to see any demineralization or
white spot lesions.

Dr. Braces

> BTW, There was someone on another forum that asked whether it is
> possible to safely whiten (or bleach) teeth while wearing braces.
>
> There were no dentists around to answer his question. Do you have any
> comments? I will not paste your comments over there unless you permit
> me to do so.
Amatus Cremona - 27 Dec 2005 22:50 GMT
Dr. Braces,  please ignore the new resident troll.  She harvests what you
say here, re-phrases it, and posts it somewhere else.  Who knows what the
wording will be by the time it gets to the other location.  OR, she may
quote you and paste part of what you say into another discussion completely
out of context.  Better to leave her to her sheep.

Signature

/

Amatus

/

> sorry, I don't usually follow the newsgroups, as this is a late reply,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> comments? I will not paste your comments over there unless you permit
>> me to do so.
Sue - 28 Dec 2005 00:28 GMT
> sorry, I don't usually follow the newsgroups, as this is a late reply,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > comments? I will not paste your comments over there unless you permit
> > me to do so.

Dr Braces,

This is helpful information for those who wear braces.  Thank you for
sharing your expertise.

-Sue
kureforcrohns@sbcglobal.net - 20 Dec 2005 22:53 GMT
It is not only a bad idea, it is an impossible idea.    If it were possible
to use teeth from dead people, crime would escalate.     One would kill to
get a set of teeth.      But common sense says that there is no way to
integrate them into one's bone structure.  I think I read the Egyptians
tried  it way back.
Gail

> >> There are so many dead people every day with teeth which are still in
> >> perfect condition.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Dr. Braces
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 23:04 GMT
<kureforcro...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> It is not only a bad idea, it is an impossible idea.    If it were possible
> to use teeth from dead people, crime would escalate.     One would kill to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> > Dr. Braces

Gail,

I agree that it is a bad idea, but I think we have the technology in
place today to do this if we really wanted to do this.

We could conceivably place a doubled-threaded titantium screw (or peg),
in the cadaver teeth anchoring this with adhesive.

Then these cadaver teeth may be placed in the patient in the same
manner that today's prosthetic implants are placed.

(We have come a long way since the Egyptian days).

Respectfully,
-Sue
Sue - 20 Dec 2005 23:06 GMT
> <kureforcro...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > It is not only a bad idea, it is an impossible idea.    If it were possible
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> Respectfully,
> -Sue

Shoot I accidentally cross-posted again. Sorry.
-Sue
kureforcrohns@sbcglobal.net - 20 Dec 2005 23:36 GMT
But what will give the teeth vitality.     Come to think of it, why  does a
pulled tooth not kept in any liquid to keep it recognizable, deteriorate
very quickly and can be broken like a straw almost, yet root canalled teeth
can remain as in life almost.     Never gave that any thought.
The root canalled tooth is still connected to the nerves and gets it
circulation that
way?

Gail

> Gail,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Respectfully,
> -Sue
Sue - 21 Dec 2005 00:01 GMT
> But what will give the teeth vitality.     Come to think of it, why  does a
> pulled tooth not kept in any liquid to keep it recognizable, deteriorate
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> > Respectfully,
> > -Sue

Excellent point Gail!

Why am I even entertaining the possibility?

These teeth would become brittle and weak, just like root canaled
teeth.

Thanks for the slap upside the head.

:-)

Sue

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.