Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

*IF* You have an *Unanswered* Health Problem, Read This

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JanD - 16 Dec 2005 16:37 GMT
*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!

NOT by a mainstream dentist, but an Alt. dentist who KNOWS the dangers of
metal in the mouth and root canals, and follows correct protocol.

I did, it saved my life

. Mercury is Poisonous. There is NO safe form of Mercury in living tissue.
The
mercury vapor from dental amalgam alone is a bigger source than all the
other
sources together.

U151 identifies mercury as a toxic waste.Mercury is also recovered from
discarded products and wastes such aschlor-alkali wastes, dental amalgams,
fluorescent light tubes, electronicdevices, and others.

The mercury is vaporized in a retort and collected bycondensation. Condensed
mercury is then distilled to remove impurities.*

The Environmental Protection Agency is working to reduce the amount of
mercury
in the environment

http://www.ehs.ucsf.edu/Manuals/CSM/Csm_Chapter9.htm

17. DENTAL AMALGAM Dental amalgams are mixtures of mercury with silver tin
alloy. Cal-EPAregulates them as ***chemical waste.*** Submit Chemical Waste
Removal Form for its disposal.

Scientifically Proven Facts
About Mercury & Dental Amalgam

1. Dental Amalgam contains about 50% Mercury.
2. Mercury has been scientifically demonstrated to be more toxic than Lead,
Cadmium, or even Arsenic.
3. Mercury leaves dental amalgam continuously throughout the lifetime of the
filing.(7)
4. Mercury vapour is the main way that mercury comes out of amalgam.(31)
5. Mercury vapour is absorbed at a rate of 80% through the lungs into the
arterial blood. (31, 55)
6. Mercury is cytotoxic. Ie. It kills cells
7. There is NO harmless level of Mercury Vapour Exposure. (63)
8. Mercury from amalgam binds to -SH (sulphydryl) groups. These exist in
almost every enzymatic process in the body. Mercury from amalgam will thus
have the potential of disturbing all metabolic processes. ( 25, 33,60).
9. Mercury from amalgam is transported freely via the blood.(19,34,35,)
10. Mercury vapour is absorbed directly into the brain. (34, 55a)
11. Mercury from amalgam will result in a slow build up of mercury in body
tissues. (20,26, 34)
12. Mercury crosses the blood brain barrier. (34,55a)
13. Mercury is implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease.
(67,68)
14. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the foetus and infant before the
mother. (20,61)
15. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the breast milk and the foetus up to 8
times more than the mother's tissues. (18,19)
16. Mercury (Mercury Vapour / Methylmercury) crosses the placenta.(18, 31)
17. Mercury Crosses into breast milk.(18,31,61)
18. Mercury will severely reduce reproductive function.(2, 3, 4, 20, 22, 24,
31, 37,38, 39, 40, 41, 49)
19. Mercury rapidly depletes the immune
system.(27,34,35,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,60)
20. Mercury will induce a number of Auto Immune
Diseases.(27,34,35,42,43,44,60)
21. Mercury will cause an increase in number and severity of
allergies.(1,34,60)
22. Mercury from amalgam is stored principally in the kidneys, liver and
brain. (1,20,31)
23. Mercury from amalgam (shown in animal experiments) causes kidney
damage.(59)
24. Mercury from will cause a 50% reduction in Kidney filtration as shown in
a study of sheep after amalgam placement.(59)
25. Methyl Mercury is more toxic than elemental Mercury.
26. Mercury from amalgam is methylated in the mouth.(51,53,54,)
27. After chewing, Mercury Vapour levels will remain raised for at least
another 90 minutes. (1,15,16,18,47)
28. Mercury from amalgam will migrate through the tooth.(25,27,30)
29. This rate of migration is increased if a gold crown is placed over a
tooth filled with amalgam. (27,30)
30. Teeth are living tissue and are a part of our bodies.
31. Teeth have a massive communication via blood, lymph and nerves with the
rest of the body.(34)
32. Mercury from amalgam is absorbed into the body at a rate of 3 to 17 mcg
/ day. ( WHO 1991 Criteria 118)
33. Mercury release is increased by; increases in temperature, friction &
increase in electrical currents.(28,31,56)
34. Mercury from amalgam will enter the body as;
Elemental Mercury, Inorganic Mercury, Vapour, charged Mercury ions.
35. In the Brain, Mercury from amalgam is stored preferentially in the
Pituitary Gland and Hypothalamus. (20,34)
36. Micro-Mercurialism is principally characterised by Neurological
symptoms.(34)
37. Mercury is transported along the axons of nerve fibres.(33,34,50)
38. Mercury from amalgam may be stored in every other cell in the body. Each
area affected will produce its own set of symptoms.
39. Mercury binds to haemoglobin in the red blood cell thus reducing oxygen
carrying capacity.(1,16,17,21,26,35)
40. Mercury damages blood vessel reducing blood supply to the tissues
(micro-angiopathies).(34)
41. Amalgam fillings produce electrical currents which might be injurious to
health. These currents are measurable in Micro Amps. The Central Nervous
System (Brain) operates in the range of Nano-Amps this is One Thousand times
less than a Micro Amp.(28)
41A. Dissimilar metals in the mouth [eg Gold & Amalgam] will produce higher
electrical currents.(19,30)
42. Mercury from amalgam (shown in animal experiments) will induce
Antibiotic Resistance and Mercury resistance in bacteria in the mouth and
Gastrointestinal tract.(58)
43. Brain levels of mercury are in a direct linear proportion to the number
of Surfaces of amalgam fillings in the mouth.(1,19,25)
43A? The level of Mercury, in brain tissue of foetus's, new born, and young
children, is proportional to the number of amalgams in the mother's
mouth.(61)
44. Mercury will cause single strand breaks in DNA.(41,42)
45. Mercury levels in the body can not be assessed by either blood or urine
levels. (26)
46. Mercury from amalgam fillings is the single
greatest source of dietary mercury for the general population. (W.H.O.
Criteria 118., 1991).
47. Dental personnel are severely effected by exposure to mercury. (3,13,49)

References
1 Sandra Denton MD : Proceedings of the First International Conference on
Biocompatibility 1988
2 EPA Mercury Health Effects Update Health Issue Assessment. Final report
1984 EOA-600/8- 84f. USEPA, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
Washington DC 20460
3. Gordon - Pregnancy in Female Dentists- a Mercury hazard. Proceedings of
Intl conference on Mercury Hazards in Dental Practice Sept. 2-4 Glasgow 1981
4 Lee, L.P. and Dixon Effects of Mercury on Spermatogenisis J Pharmacol Exp
Thera 1975: 194(1); 171-181.
5 Anonymous . Mercury in Fish . Bull WHO 64(5) : 634 1986
6 Schulein,T.M.; Reinhardt, J.W. and Chan K.C. Survey of Des Moines area
dental offices for Mercury vapour. Iowa Dent. J. 70(1):35-36 1984
7 JonesDW, Sutton EJ, and Milner EL Survey of Mercury vapour in dental
offices in Atlantic Canada.Can. Dent. Assoc. J. 4906:378-395, 1983
8 Ochoa, R. and Miller RW. Report on independant survey taken of Austin
dental offices for Mercury contamination. Texas Dent. J. 100(1):6-9, 1983
9 Kantor,L. and Woodcock C, Mercury vapour in the dental office- does
carpeting make a difference? JADA103(9):402-407,1981
10 Skuba, A. Survey for Mercury vapour in Manitoba dental offices J Can.
Dent. Assoc. 50(7):517-522, 1984
11 Chop GF. and Kaufman EG. Mercury vapour related to manipulation of
amalgam and to floor surfaces.Oper. Dent. 8(1):23-27,1983
12 RoydhouseRH. FergMR . and Knox RP. Mercury in dental offices J Can Dent
Assoc 51(2):156-158, 1985
13 Butler J. Proceedings from the First International Conference of
Biocompatibility. 1988 14 Magnus Nylander, Mercury concentrations in the
human brain and kidneys in relaton to exposure from dental amalgam fillings.
ICBM 1988
15 Svare CW et.al. The effects of dental amalgam on Mercury levels in
expired air. J. Dent. Res.60(9):1668-1671,1981
16 Ott K et. al. Mercury burden due to amalgam fillings. Dtsch. Zahnarztl Z
39(9):199-205, 1984
17 Abraham J, Svare C , Frank C,. The effects of dental amalgam restorations
on Blood Mercury levels. J. Dent. Res. 63(1):71-73,1984
18 VimyMJ. LorscheiderFL. Intra oral Mercury released from dental amalgams.
J. Dent Res. 64(8):1069-1071.,1985
19 Matts Hanson. Amalgam hazards in your teeth,. Dept of Zoophysiology.,
University of Lund, Sweden.J. Orthomolecular Psychiatry Vo12 No 3 Sept 1983
20 VimyMJ, TakahashiY, LorscheiderFL Maternal -Fetal Distribution of Mercury
Released From Dental Amalgam Fillings. Dept of Medicine and Medical
Physiology , faculty of Medicine, Univ of Calgary, Calgary Alberta Cannada
1990 published in FASEB
21 Goyer RA Toxic effects of metals. Cassarett and Doull's toxicology--The
basic science of poisons , ed3, New York , MacMillan Publ.Co 1986, pp582-609
22 KuhnertP, Kunhert BRR and Erkard P COmparison of Mercury levels in
maternal blood fetal chord blood and placental tissue. Am. J. Obstet and
Gynecol.,139:209-212., 1981
23 Kuntz WD- Maternal and chord blood Mercury background levels;
Longitudinal surveilance. Am J Obstet and Gynecol. 143:440-443., 1982
24 BrodskyJB. Occupational exposure to Mercury in dentistry and pregnancy
outcome. JADA111(11):779- 780., 1985
25 Malmström C., Hansson M., Nylander M., Conference on Trace Elements in
Health and DIsease. Stockholm May 25-1992
26 Lorscheider & Vimy The Lancet Vol 337; may 4, 1991.
27 Matts Hanson. Why is Mercury toxic. Basic chemical and biochemical
properties of Mercury/amalgam in relation to biological effects. ICBM
conference Colorado 1988
28 Sheppard AR and EisenbudM., Biological effects of electric and magnetic
fields of extremely low frequency. New York university press. 1977
29 Mareck and Hockman. Simulated crevice corosion experiment for ph and
solution chemistry determinations. CORROSION 1974:23;1000-1006.
30 Till et al. Zahnarztl. Welt/reform 1978:87;1130-1134.
31 Langan,Fan,Hoos. The use of Mercury in dentistry: a critical review of
the literature. JADA Vol 115 December 1987., 867 Donated by The ADA
32 Jonnes, Suttow and Milner. Survey of Mercury vapour in dental offices in
Atlantic Canada., Canadian Dental Association Journal ., 49(6):378-395.,1983
33 Goyer Toxic effects of metals. Casaret and Doull's toxicology- the basic
science of poisons. ed3 New York. Macmillan Publishing. 1986 pp582-609
34 Patrick Störtebecker Formerly Associate Professor of Neurology,
Karolinska Institute , Stockholm.. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam- a
hazard to the human brain.
35 Hal Huggins. Observations From The Metabolic Fringe. ICBM conf. Collarado
1988
36 Sam Queen; Chronic Mercury Toxicity; New Hope Against an Endemic
Disease.000
37 Mohamed et al. Lazer Light Scatering Study of the Toxic Effects of
MethylMercury on sperm motility. J. Androl.,7(1):11-15.,1986.
38 Ziff S. and Ziff M. Infertility and birth defects.1987
39 Inouye M., Murao K., Kajiwara Y., Behavorial and neuropathological
effects of prenatal methyl Mercury exposure in mice.. Neurobeahv.Toxicol
Teratol. ,1985:7;227-232
40 Koos et al., Mercury toxicity in pregnant women, fetus and newborn
infant. Am J Obstet And Gynecol., 1976:126;390-409
41 Khera et al., Teratogenic and genetic effects of Mercury toxicity. The
biochemistry of Mercury in the environment. Nriagu, J.O.Ed Amsterdam
Elsevier, 503-18,1979
42 Babich et al ., The mediation of mutagenicity and clastogenicity of heavy
metals by physiochemical factors. Environ Res., 1985:37;253-286
43 Hansen K et al A survey of metal induced mutagenicity in vitro and in
vivo J Amer Coll Toxicol ., 1984:3;381-430
44 Verchaeve L et al., Comparitive in vitro cytogenetic studies in Mercury
exposed human lymphocytes Mutation Res., 1985:157; 221-226.
45 PelletierL et al., In -vivo self reactivity of mononuclear cells to T
cells and macrophages exposed to Hg Cl2 Eur. J Immun., 1985: 460-465
46 Veron et al Amalgam Dentaires et allergies J Biol Buccale., 1986 : 14;
83-100
47 Huggins H., Its All In You Head.1990
48 Stortebecker P. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam (Bioprob pub. 1985)
49 Amalgam Hazards - an assesment of research By Irwin Mandel DDS Assoc.
Dean for Research School of dental and Oral Surgery Columbia University New
York Published JADA Vol. 122 August 1991
50 Nylander et al. Fourth international symposium Epidemiology in
Occupational Health. Como Italy Sept 1985
51 Methylation of Mercury from dental amalgam and mercuric chloride by oral
Streptococci. Heintz, Edwardson, Derand, Birkhed Scan. J. Dent. Res. 1983,
91:150-152
52 Bacterial Growth on Dental Restorative Materials in Mucosal Contact.
Orstavic, Arneberg, Valderhaug Acta Odontol. Scand.1981, 39:267-274
53 The Methylation of Mercuric Chloride by Human Intestinal Bacteria.
Rowland, Grasso, Davies Experientia. Basel 1975 ,31: 1064-1065
54 Formation of methyl Mercury Compounds from inorganic Mercury . by
Chlostridium cochlearium Yamada, Tonomura J Ferment Technol1972 50:159-166
55 Hanson J Orthomolecular Psychiatry 1983, 12: 194-201
55a Amalgam Restorations and Mercury Toxicity. Dr P Sheridan, Masters
Thesis, University of Sydney 1991
56 MARXKORS, R.: Korrosionserscheinungen an Amalgamf llungen und Deren
Auswirkungen auf den Menschlichen Organismus. Das Deutsche Zahn rztebl. 24,
53, 117 and 170, 1970.
57 Campbel & M. Godfrey Research into provocation testing of DMPS - urine
samples of Mercury.
58 Summers AO, Wireman J., Vimy MJ., lORSCHEIDER FLy., MARSHAL B., EVY SB.,
Bennet S., Billard L. J. Of Anti-microbial Agents and Chemotherapy
37[4]:825-34 April 1993
59 BOYD, N. D., H. BENEDIKTSSON, M. J. VIMY, D. E. HOOPER, AND F. L.
LORSCHEIDER. Mercury from dental "Silver" tooth fillings impairs sheep
kidney function. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
30): R1010-R1014, 1991.--
60 Vera Stejskal, Sweden "MEMORY LYMPHOCYTE IMMUNO- STIMULATION ASSAY -
MLISA"
61 Dr Gustav Drasch, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Munich.
Public announcement 25 January 1994 Bio Probe March 1994
62 Dr W. Kostler., President of the Austrian Oncology Society. Paper
presented at the World Congress on Cancer. April 1994 Sydney Australia.
63 World Health Organisation Criteria 118 1991 Geneva Switzerland
64 Health damage due to exposure to mercury vapour (Mercury) Szkody
zdrowotne wywolane narazeniem na pary rteci (Mercury). Moszczynski-P Jr;
Moszczynski-P Czas-Stomatol. 1989 Apr; 42(4): 233-81989POLISH;POLAND
65 In vivo mercury and methyl mercury levels in patients at different
intervals after amalgam restorations. Fung-YK; Molvar-MP; Strom-A;
Schneider-NR; Carlson-MP College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Lincoln. Northwest-Dent. 1991 May-Jun; 70(3): 23-6
66 Regional brain trace-element studies in Alzheimer's disease. Thompson CM
Markesbery WR Ehmann WD Mao YX Vance In: Neurotoxicology (1988 Spring)
9(1):1-7
67 A search for longitudinal variations in trace element levels in nails of
Alzheimer's disease patients. Vance DE Ehmann WD Markesbery WR In: Biol
Trace Elem Res (1990 Jul-Dec) 26-27:461-70

Authorised by the Australasian Society of Oral Medicine and Toxicology.
Phone +64 2 867-1111
Mercury is Poisonous.
There is NO safe form of Mercury in living tissue.
Whole amalgam site: [ Amalgam homepage ][ Read the FAQ (Index) ][ Download
the FAQ ][ Extra reading ][ Symposiums /
eetings ][ Contact ][ Why? ][ Miscellaneous (thanks...) ][ Leif´s homepage ]
This site is maintained and copyrighted 1994-1997 by Leif Hedegard. However,
the article above is written and copyrighted by Dr Robert Gammal 1995,
forwarded here after permission. Updated 16 November 1996. The www-address
of this page is:
http://www.algonet.se/~leif/FUSCIFCT.html
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 16:38 GMT
> *IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!

spam
JanD - 16 Dec 2005 20:44 GMT
[snip lie]

> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message

*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!

NOT by a mainstream dentist, but an Alt. dentist who KNOWS the dangers of
metal in the mouth and root canals, and follows correct protocol.

I did, it saved my life

. Mercury is Poisonous. There is NO safe form of Mercury in living tissue.
The
mercury vapor from dental amalgam alone is a bigger source than all the
other
sources together.

U151 identifies mercury as a toxic waste.Mercury is also recovered from
discarded products and wastes such aschlor-alkali wastes, dental amalgams,
fluorescent light tubes, electronicdevices, and others.

The mercury is vaporized in a retort and collected bycondensation. Condensed
mercury is then distilled to remove impurities.*

The Environmental Protection Agency is working to reduce the amount of
mercury
in the environment

http://www.ehs.ucsf.edu/Manuals/CSM/Csm_Chapter9.htm

17. DENTAL AMALGAM Dental amalgams are mixtures of mercury with silver tin
alloy. Cal-EPAregulates them as ***chemical waste.*** Submit Chemical Waste
Removal Form for its disposal.

Scientifically Proven Facts
About Mercury & Dental Amalgam

1. Dental Amalgam contains about 50% Mercury.
2. Mercury has been scientifically demonstrated to be more toxic than Lead,
Cadmium, or even Arsenic.
3. Mercury leaves dental amalgam continuously throughout the lifetime of the
filing.(7)
4. Mercury vapour is the main way that mercury comes out of amalgam.(31)
5. Mercury vapour is absorbed at a rate of 80% through the lungs into the
arterial blood. (31, 55)
6. Mercury is cytotoxic. Ie. It kills cells
7. There is NO harmless level of Mercury Vapour Exposure. (63)
8. Mercury from amalgam binds to -SH (sulphydryl) groups. These exist in
almost every enzymatic process in the body. Mercury from amalgam will thus
have the potential of disturbing all metabolic processes. ( 25, 33,60).
9. Mercury from amalgam is transported freely via the blood.(19,34,35,)
10. Mercury vapour is absorbed directly into the brain. (34, 55a)
11. Mercury from amalgam will result in a slow build up of mercury in body
tissues. (20,26, 34)
12. Mercury crosses the blood brain barrier. (34,55a)
13. Mercury is implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease.
(67,68)
14. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the foetus and infant before the
mother. (20,61)
15. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the breast milk and the foetus up to 8
times more than the mother's tissues. (18,19)
16. Mercury (Mercury Vapour / Methylmercury) crosses the placenta.(18, 31)
17. Mercury Crosses into breast milk.(18,31,61)
18. Mercury will severely reduce reproductive function.(2, 3, 4, 20, 22, 24,
31, 37,38, 39, 40, 41, 49)
19. Mercury rapidly depletes the immune
system.(27,34,35,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,60)
20. Mercury will induce a number of Auto Immune
Diseases.(27,34,35,42,43,44,60)
21. Mercury will cause an increase in number and severity of
allergies.(1,34,60)
22. Mercury from amalgam is stored principally in the kidneys, liver and
brain. (1,20,31)
23. Mercury from amalgam (shown in animal experiments) causes kidney
damage.(59)
24. Mercury from will cause a 50% reduction in Kidney filtration as shown in
a study of sheep after amalgam placement.(59)
25. Methyl Mercury is more toxic than elemental Mercury.
26. Mercury from amalgam is methylated in the mouth.(51,53,54,)
27. After chewing, Mercury Vapour levels will remain raised for at least
another 90 minutes. (1,15,16,18,47)
28. Mercury from amalgam will migrate through the tooth.(25,27,30)
29. This rate of migration is increased if a gold crown is placed over a
tooth filled with amalgam. (27,30)
30. Teeth are living tissue and are a part of our bodies.
31. Teeth have a massive communication via blood, lymph and nerves with the
rest of the body.(34)
32. Mercury from amalgam is absorbed into the body at a rate of 3 to 17 mcg
/ day. ( WHO 1991 Criteria 118)
33. Mercury release is increased by; increases in temperature, friction &
increase in electrical currents.(28,31,56)
34. Mercury from amalgam will enter the body as;
Elemental Mercury, Inorganic Mercury, Vapour, charged Mercury ions.
35. In the Brain, Mercury from amalgam is stored preferentially in the
Pituitary Gland and Hypothalamus. (20,34)
36. Micro-Mercurialism is principally characterised by Neurological
symptoms.(34)
37. Mercury is transported along the axons of nerve fibres.(33,34,50)
38. Mercury from amalgam may be stored in every other cell in the body. Each
area affected will produce its own set of symptoms.
39. Mercury binds to haemoglobin in the red blood cell thus reducing oxygen
carrying capacity.(1,16,17,21,26,35)
40. Mercury damages blood vessel reducing blood supply to the tissues
(micro-angiopathies).(34)
41. Amalgam fillings produce electrical currents which might be injurious to
health. These currents are measurable in Micro Amps. The Central Nervous
System (Brain) operates in the range of Nano-Amps this is One Thousand times
less than a Micro Amp.(28)
41A. Dissimilar metals in the mouth [eg Gold & Amalgam] will produce higher
electrical currents.(19,30)
42. Mercury from amalgam (shown in animal experiments) will induce
Antibiotic Resistance and Mercury resistance in bacteria in the mouth and
Gastrointestinal tract.(58)
43. Brain levels of mercury are in a direct linear proportion to the number
of Surfaces of amalgam fillings in the mouth.(1,19,25)
43A? The level of Mercury, in brain tissue of foetus's, new born, and young
children, is proportional to the number of amalgams in the mother's
mouth.(61)
44. Mercury will cause single strand breaks in DNA.(41,42)
45. Mercury levels in the body can not be assessed by either blood or urine
levels. (26)
46. Mercury from amalgam fillings is the single
greatest source of dietary mercury for the general population. (W.H.O.
Criteria 118., 1991).
47. Dental personnel are severely effected by exposure to mercury. (3,13,49)

References
1 Sandra Denton MD : Proceedings of the First International Conference on
Biocompatibility 1988
2 EPA Mercury Health Effects Update Health Issue Assessment. Final report
1984 EOA-600/8- 84f. USEPA, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
Washington DC 20460
3. Gordon - Pregnancy in Female Dentists- a Mercury hazard. Proceedings of
Intl conference on Mercury Hazards in Dental Practice Sept. 2-4 Glasgow 1981
4 Lee, L.P. and Dixon Effects of Mercury on Spermatogenisis J Pharmacol Exp
Thera 1975: 194(1); 171-181.
5 Anonymous . Mercury in Fish . Bull WHO 64(5) : 634 1986
6 Schulein,T.M.; Reinhardt, J.W. and Chan K.C. Survey of Des Moines area
dental offices for Mercury vapour. Iowa Dent. J. 70(1):35-36 1984
7 JonesDW, Sutton EJ, and Milner EL Survey of Mercury vapour in dental
offices in Atlantic Canada.Can. Dent. Assoc. J. 4906:378-395, 1983
8 Ochoa, R. and Miller RW. Report on independant survey taken of Austin
dental offices for Mercury contamination. Texas Dent. J. 100(1):6-9, 1983
9 Kantor,L. and Woodcock C, Mercury vapour in the dental office- does
carpeting make a difference? JADA103(9):402-407,1981
10 Skuba, A. Survey for Mercury vapour in Manitoba dental offices J Can.
Dent. Assoc. 50(7):517-522, 1984
11 Chop GF. and Kaufman EG. Mercury vapour related to manipulation of
amalgam and to floor surfaces.Oper. Dent. 8(1):23-27,1983
12 RoydhouseRH. FergMR . and Knox RP. Mercury in dental offices J Can Dent
Assoc 51(2):156-158, 1985
13 Butler J. Proceedings from the First International Conference of
Biocompatibility. 1988 14 Magnus Nylander, Mercury concentrations in the
human brain and kidneys in relaton to exposure from dental amalgam fillings.
ICBM 1988
15 Svare CW et.al. The effects of dental amalgam on Mercury levels in
expired air. J. Dent. Res.60(9):1668-1671,1981
16 Ott K et. al. Mercury burden due to amalgam fillings. Dtsch. Zahnarztl Z
39(9):199-205, 1984
17 Abraham J, Svare C , Frank C,. The effects of dental amalgam restorations
on Blood Mercury levels. J. Dent. Res. 63(1):71-73,1984
18 VimyMJ. LorscheiderFL. Intra oral Mercury released from dental amalgams.
J. Dent Res. 64(8):1069-1071.,1985
19 Matts Hanson. Amalgam hazards in your teeth,. Dept of Zoophysiology.,
University of Lund, Sweden.J. Orthomolecular Psychiatry Vo12 No 3 Sept 1983
20 VimyMJ, TakahashiY, LorscheiderFL Maternal -Fetal Distribution of Mercury
Released From Dental Amalgam Fillings. Dept of Medicine and Medical
Physiology , faculty of Medicine, Univ of Calgary, Calgary Alberta Cannada
1990 published in FASEB
21 Goyer RA Toxic effects of metals. Cassarett and Doull's toxicology--The
basic science of poisons , ed3, New York , MacMillan Publ.Co 1986, pp582-609
22 KuhnertP, Kunhert BRR and Erkard P COmparison of Mercury levels in
maternal blood fetal chord blood and placental tissue. Am. J. Obstet and
Gynecol.,139:209-212., 1981
23 Kuntz WD- Maternal and chord blood Mercury background levels;
Longitudinal surveilance. Am J Obstet and Gynecol. 143:440-443., 1982
24 BrodskyJB. Occupational exposure to Mercury in dentistry and pregnancy
outcome. JADA111(11):779- 780., 1985
25 Malmström C., Hansson M., Nylander M., Conference on Trace Elements in
Health and DIsease. Stockholm May 25-1992
26 Lorscheider & Vimy The Lancet Vol 337; may 4, 1991.
27 Matts Hanson. Why is Mercury toxic. Basic chemical and biochemical
properties of Mercury/amalgam in relation to biological effects. ICBM
conference Colorado 1988
28 Sheppard AR and EisenbudM., Biological effects of electric and magnetic
fields of extremely low frequency. New York university press. 1977
29 Mareck and Hockman. Simulated crevice corosion experiment for ph and
solution chemistry determinations. CORROSION 1974:23;1000-1006.
30 Till et al. Zahnarztl. Welt/reform 1978:87;1130-1134.
31 Langan,Fan,Hoos. The use of Mercury in dentistry: a critical review of
the literature. JADA Vol 115 December 1987., 867 Donated by The ADA
32 Jonnes, Suttow and Milner. Survey of Mercury vapour in dental offices in
Atlantic Canada., Canadian Dental Association Journal ., 49(6):378-395.,1983
33 Goyer Toxic effects of metals. Casaret and Doull's toxicology- the basic
science of poisons. ed3 New York. Macmillan Publishing. 1986 pp582-609
34 Patrick Störtebecker Formerly Associate Professor of Neurology,
Karolinska Institute , Stockholm.. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam- a
hazard to the human brain.
35 Hal Huggins. Observations From The Metabolic Fringe. ICBM conf. Collarado
1988
36 Sam Queen; Chronic Mercury Toxicity; New Hope Against an Endemic
Disease.000
37 Mohamed et al. Lazer Light Scatering Study of the Toxic Effects of
MethylMercury on sperm motility. J. Androl.,7(1):11-15.,1986.
38 Ziff S. and Ziff M. Infertility and birth defects.1987
39 Inouye M., Murao K., Kajiwara Y., Behavorial and neuropathological
effects of prenatal methyl Mercury exposure in mice.. Neurobeahv.Toxicol
Teratol. ,1985:7;227-232
40 Koos et al., Mercury toxicity in pregnant women, fetus and newborn
infant. Am J Obstet And Gynecol., 1976:126;390-409
41 Khera et al., Teratogenic and genetic effects of Mercury toxicity. The
biochemistry of Mercury in the environment. Nriagu, J.O.Ed Amsterdam
Elsevier, 503-18,1979
42 Babich et al ., The mediation of mutagenicity and clastogenicity of heavy
metals by physiochemical factors. Environ Res., 1985:37;253-286
43 Hansen K et al A survey of metal induced mutagenicity in vitro and in
vivo J Amer Coll Toxicol ., 1984:3;381-430
44 Verchaeve L et al., Comparitive in vitro cytogenetic studies in Mercury
exposed human lymphocytes Mutation Res., 1985:157; 221-226.
45 PelletierL et al., In -vivo self reactivity of mononuclear cells to T
cells and macrophages exposed to Hg Cl2 Eur. J Immun., 1985: 460-465
46 Veron et al Amalgam Dentaires et allergies J Biol Buccale., 1986 : 14;
83-100
47 Huggins H., Its All In You Head.1990
48 Stortebecker P. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam (Bioprob pub. 1985)
49 Amalgam Hazards - an assesment of research By Irwin Mandel DDS Assoc.
Dean for Research School of dental and Oral Surgery Columbia University New
York Published JADA Vol. 122 August 1991
50 Nylander et al. Fourth international symposium Epidemiology in
Occupational Health. Como Italy Sept 1985
51 Methylation of Mercury from dental amalgam and mercuric chloride by oral
Streptococci. Heintz, Edwardson, Derand, Birkhed Scan. J. Dent. Res. 1983,
91:150-152
52 Bacterial Growth on Dental Restorative Materials in Mucosal Contact.
Orstavic, Arneberg, Valderhaug Acta Odontol. Scand.1981, 39:267-274
53 The Methylation of Mercuric Chloride by Human Intestinal Bacteria.
Rowland, Grasso, Davies Experientia. Basel 1975 ,31: 1064-1065
54 Formation of methyl Mercury Compounds from inorganic Mercury . by
Chlostridium cochlearium Yamada, Tonomura J Ferment Technol1972 50:159-166
55 Hanson J Orthomolecular Psychiatry 1983, 12: 194-201
55a Amalgam Restorations and Mercury Toxicity. Dr P Sheridan, Masters
Thesis, University of Sydney 1991
56 MARXKORS, R.: Korrosionserscheinungen an Amalgamf llungen und Deren
Auswirkungen auf den Menschlichen Organismus. Das Deutsche Zahn rztebl. 24,
53, 117 and 170, 1970.
57 Campbel & M. Godfrey Research into provocation testing of DMPS - urine
samples of Mercury.
58 Summers AO, Wireman J., Vimy MJ., lORSCHEIDER FLy., MARSHAL B., EVY SB.,
Bennet S., Billard L. J. Of Anti-microbial Agents and Chemotherapy
37[4]:825-34 April 1993
59 BOYD, N. D., H. BENEDIKTSSON, M. J. VIMY, D. E. HOOPER, AND F. L.
LORSCHEIDER. Mercury from dental "Silver" tooth fillings impairs sheep
kidney function. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
30): R1010-R1014, 1991.--
60 Vera Stejskal, Sweden "MEMORY LYMPHOCYTE IMMUNO- STIMULATION ASSAY -
MLISA"
61 Dr Gustav Drasch, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Munich.
Public announcement 25 January 1994 Bio Probe March 1994
62 Dr W. Kostler., President of the Austrian Oncology Society. Paper
presented at the World Congress on Cancer. April 1994 Sydney Australia.
63 World Health Organisation Criteria 118 1991 Geneva Switzerland
64 Health damage due to exposure to mercury vapour (Mercury) Szkody
zdrowotne wywolane narazeniem na pary rteci (Mercury). Moszczynski-P Jr;
Moszczynski-P Czas-Stomatol. 1989 Apr; 42(4): 233-81989POLISH;POLAND
65 In vivo mercury and methyl mercury levels in patients at different
intervals after amalgam restorations. Fung-YK; Molvar-MP; Strom-A;
Schneider-NR; Carlson-MP College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Lincoln. Northwest-Dent. 1991 May-Jun; 70(3): 23-6
66 Regional brain trace-element studies in Alzheimer's disease. Thompson CM
Markesbery WR Ehmann WD Mao YX Vance In: Neurotoxicology (1988 Spring)
9(1):1-7
67 A search for longitudinal variations in trace element levels in nails of
Alzheimer's disease patients. Vance DE Ehmann WD Markesbery WR In: Biol
Trace Elem Res (1990 Jul-Dec) 26-27:461-70

Authorised by the Australasian Society of Oral Medicine and Toxicology.
Phone +64 2 867-1111
Mercury is Poisonous.
There is NO safe form of Mercury in living tissue.
Whole amalgam site: [ Amalgam homepage ][ Read the FAQ (Index) ][ Download
the FAQ ][ Extra reading ][ Symposiums /
eetings ][ Contact ][ Why? ][ Miscellaneous (thanks...) ][ Leif´s homepage ]
This site is maintained and copyrighted 1994-1997 by Leif Hedegard. However,
the article above is written and copyrighted by Dr Robert Gammal 1995,
forwarded here after permission. Updated 16 November 1996. The www-address
of this page is:
http://www.algonet.se/~leif/FUSCIFCT.html
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 20:51 GMT
Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
of someone undergoing chelation therapy.
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 21:04 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:yGFof4.633116$_o.382788@attbi_s71...

> [snip lie]

Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
of someone undergoing chelation therapy.

You say this is a lie?
Robert  Morien - 17 Dec 2005 07:25 GMT
spam noted and reported
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 17:07 GMT
> *IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!

Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
of someone undergoing chelation therapy.
Whamatus - 16 Dec 2005 17:14 GMT
>> *IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>
>Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
>of someone undergoing chelation therapy.

Death by acute MI ?
--

Whamatus
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 17:19 GMT
>>> *IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
> Death by acute MI ?

Death by quackery.. the same quackery j..d... promotes everywhere.  She
cannot deny she said that.
JanD - 16 Dec 2005 20:49 GMT
[snip blatant lie]

[snip usual stupidity]

[snip trolling]

"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>>news:D3Cof.632649$_o.217499@attbi_s71...
*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!

NOT by a mainstream dentist, but an Alt. dentist who KNOWS the dangers of
metal in the mouth and root canals, and follows correct protocol.

I did, it saved my life

. Mercury is Poisonous. There is NO safe form of Mercury in living tissue.
The
mercury vapor from dental amalgam alone is a bigger source than all the
other
sources together.

U151 identifies mercury as a toxic waste.Mercury is also recovered from
discarded products and wastes such aschlor-alkali wastes, dental amalgams,
fluorescent light tubes, electronicdevices, and others.

The mercury is vaporized in a retort and collected bycondensation. Condensed
mercury is then distilled to remove impurities.*

The Environmental Protection Agency is working to reduce the amount of
mercury
in the environment

http://www.ehs.ucsf.edu/Manuals/CSM/Csm_Chapter9.htm

17. DENTAL AMALGAM Dental amalgams are mixtures of mercury with silver tin
alloy. Cal-EPAregulates them as ***chemical waste.*** Submit Chemical Waste
Removal Form for its disposal.

Scientifically Proven Facts
About Mercury & Dental Amalgam

1. Dental Amalgam contains about 50% Mercury.
2. Mercury has been scientifically demonstrated to be more toxic than Lead,
Cadmium, or even Arsenic.
3. Mercury leaves dental amalgam continuously throughout the lifetime of the
filing.(7)
4. Mercury vapour is the main way that mercury comes out of amalgam.(31)
5. Mercury vapour is absorbed at a rate of 80% through the lungs into the
arterial blood. (31, 55)
6. Mercury is cytotoxic. Ie. It kills cells
7. There is NO harmless level of Mercury Vapour Exposure. (63)
8. Mercury from amalgam binds to -SH (sulphydryl) groups. These exist in
almost every enzymatic process in the body. Mercury from amalgam will thus
have the potential of disturbing all metabolic processes. ( 25, 33,60).
9. Mercury from amalgam is transported freely via the blood.(19,34,35,)
10. Mercury vapour is absorbed directly into the brain. (34, 55a)
11. Mercury from amalgam will result in a slow build up of mercury in body
tissues. (20,26, 34)
12. Mercury crosses the blood brain barrier. (34,55a)
13. Mercury is implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease.
(67,68)
14. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the foetus and infant before the
mother. (20,61)
15. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the breast milk and the foetus up to 8
times more than the mother's tissues. (18,19)
16. Mercury (Mercury Vapour / Methylmercury) crosses the placenta.(18, 31)
17. Mercury Crosses into breast milk.(18,31,61)
18. Mercury will severely reduce reproductive function.(2, 3, 4, 20, 22, 24,
31, 37,38, 39, 40, 41, 49)
19. Mercury rapidly depletes the immune
system.(27,34,35,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,60)
20. Mercury will induce a number of Auto Immune
Diseases.(27,34,35,42,43,44,60)
21. Mercury will cause an increase in number and severity of
allergies.(1,34,60)
22. Mercury from amalgam is stored principally in the kidneys, liver and
brain. (1,20,31)
23. Mercury from amalgam (shown in animal experiments) causes kidney
damage.(59)
24. Mercury from will cause a 50% reduction in Kidney filtration as shown in
a study of sheep after amalgam placement.(59)
25. Methyl Mercury is more toxic than elemental Mercury.
26. Mercury from amalgam is methylated in the mouth.(51,53,54,)
27. After chewing, Mercury Vapour levels will remain raised for at least
another 90 minutes. (1,15,16,18,47)
28. Mercury from amalgam will migrate through the tooth.(25,27,30)
29. This rate of migration is increased if a gold crown is placed over a
tooth filled with amalgam. (27,30)
30. Teeth are living tissue and are a part of our bodies.
31. Teeth have a massive communication via blood, lymph and nerves with the
rest of the body.(34)
32. Mercury from amalgam is absorbed into the body at a rate of 3 to 17 mcg
/ day. ( WHO 1991 Criteria 118)
33. Mercury release is increased by; increases in temperature, friction &
increase in electrical currents.(28,31,56)
34. Mercury from amalgam will enter the body as;
Elemental Mercury, Inorganic Mercury, Vapour, charged Mercury ions.
35. In the Brain, Mercury from amalgam is stored preferentially in the
Pituitary Gland and Hypothalamus. (20,34)
36. Micro-Mercurialism is principally characterised by Neurological
symptoms.(34)
37. Mercury is transported along the axons of nerve fibres.(33,34,50)
38. Mercury from amalgam may be stored in every other cell in the body. Each
area affected will produce its own set of symptoms.
39. Mercury binds to haemoglobin in the red blood cell thus reducing oxygen
carrying capacity.(1,16,17,21,26,35)
40. Mercury damages blood vessel reducing blood supply to the tissues
(micro-angiopathies).(34)
41. Amalgam fillings produce electrical currents which might be injurious to
health. These currents are measurable in Micro Amps. The Central Nervous
System (Brain) operates in the range of Nano-Amps this is One Thousand times
less than a Micro Amp.(28)
41A. Dissimilar metals in the mouth [eg Gold & Amalgam] will produce higher
electrical currents.(19,30)
42. Mercury from amalgam (shown in animal experiments) will induce
Antibiotic Resistance and Mercury resistance in bacteria in the mouth and
Gastrointestinal tract.(58)
43. Brain levels of mercury are in a direct linear proportion to the number
of Surfaces of amalgam fillings in the mouth.(1,19,25)
43A? The level of Mercury, in brain tissue of foetus's, new born, and young
children, is proportional to the number of amalgams in the mother's
mouth.(61)
44. Mercury will cause single strand breaks in DNA.(41,42)
45. Mercury levels in the body can not be assessed by either blood or urine
levels. (26)
46. Mercury from amalgam fillings is the single
greatest source of dietary mercury for the general population. (W.H.O.
Criteria 118., 1991).
47. Dental personnel are severely effected by exposure to mercury. (3,13,49)

References
1 Sandra Denton MD : Proceedings of the First International Conference on
Biocompatibility 1988
2 EPA Mercury Health Effects Update Health Issue Assessment. Final report
1984 EOA-600/8- 84f. USEPA, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
Washington DC 20460
3. Gordon - Pregnancy in Female Dentists- a Mercury hazard. Proceedings of
Intl conference on Mercury Hazards in Dental Practice Sept. 2-4 Glasgow 1981
4 Lee, L.P. and Dixon Effects of Mercury on Spermatogenisis J Pharmacol Exp
Thera 1975: 194(1); 171-181.
5 Anonymous . Mercury in Fish . Bull WHO 64(5) : 634 1986
6 Schulein,T.M.; Reinhardt, J.W. and Chan K.C. Survey of Des Moines area
dental offices for Mercury vapour. Iowa Dent. J. 70(1):35-36 1984
7 JonesDW, Sutton EJ, and Milner EL Survey of Mercury vapour in dental
offices in Atlantic Canada.Can. Dent. Assoc. J. 4906:378-395, 1983
8 Ochoa, R. and Miller RW. Report on independant survey taken of Austin
dental offices for Mercury contamination. Texas Dent. J. 100(1):6-9, 1983
9 Kantor,L. and Woodcock C, Mercury vapour in the dental office- does
carpeting make a difference? JADA103(9):402-407,1981
10 Skuba, A. Survey for Mercury vapour in Manitoba dental offices J Can.
Dent. Assoc. 50(7):517-522, 1984
11 Chop GF. and Kaufman EG. Mercury vapour related to manipulation of
amalgam and to floor surfaces.Oper. Dent. 8(1):23-27,1983
12 RoydhouseRH. FergMR . and Knox RP. Mercury in dental offices J Can Dent
Assoc 51(2):156-158, 1985
13 Butler J. Proceedings from the First International Conference of
Biocompatibility. 1988 14 Magnus Nylander, Mercury concentrations in the
human brain and kidneys in relaton to exposure from dental amalgam fillings.
ICBM 1988
15 Svare CW et.al. The effects of dental amalgam on Mercury levels in
expired air. J. Dent. Res.60(9):1668-1671,1981
16 Ott K et. al. Mercury burden due to amalgam fillings. Dtsch. Zahnarztl Z
39(9):199-205, 1984
17 Abraham J, Svare C , Frank C,. The effects of dental amalgam restorations
on Blood Mercury levels. J. Dent. Res. 63(1):71-73,1984
18 VimyMJ. LorscheiderFL. Intra oral Mercury released from dental amalgams.
J. Dent Res. 64(8):1069-1071.,1985
19 Matts Hanson. Amalgam hazards in your teeth,. Dept of Zoophysiology.,
University of Lund, Sweden.J. Orthomolecular Psychiatry Vo12 No 3 Sept 1983
20 VimyMJ, TakahashiY, LorscheiderFL Maternal -Fetal Distribution of Mercury
Released From Dental Amalgam Fillings. Dept of Medicine and Medical
Physiology , faculty of Medicine, Univ of Calgary, Calgary Alberta Cannada
1990 published in FASEB
21 Goyer RA Toxic effects of metals. Cassarett and Doull's toxicology--The
basic science of poisons , ed3, New York , MacMillan Publ.Co 1986, pp582-609
22 KuhnertP, Kunhert BRR and Erkard P COmparison of Mercury levels in
maternal blood fetal chord blood and placental tissue. Am. J. Obstet and
Gynecol.,139:209-212., 1981
23 Kuntz WD- Maternal and chord blood Mercury background levels;
Longitudinal surveilance. Am J Obstet and Gynecol. 143:440-443., 1982
24 BrodskyJB. Occupational exposure to Mercury in dentistry and pregnancy
outcome. JADA111(11):779- 780., 1985
25 Malmström C., Hansson M., Nylander M., Conference on Trace Elements in
Health and DIsease. Stockholm May 25-1992
26 Lorscheider & Vimy The Lancet Vol 337; may 4, 1991.
27 Matts Hanson. Why is Mercury toxic. Basic chemical and biochemical
properties of Mercury/amalgam in relation to biological effects. ICBM
conference Colorado 1988
28 Sheppard AR and EisenbudM., Biological effects of electric and magnetic
fields of extremely low frequency. New York university press. 1977
29 Mareck and Hockman. Simulated crevice corosion experiment for ph and
solution chemistry determinations. CORROSION 1974:23;1000-1006.
30 Till et al. Zahnarztl. Welt/reform 1978:87;1130-1134.
31 Langan,Fan,Hoos. The use of Mercury in dentistry: a critical review of
the literature. JADA Vol 115 December 1987., 867 Donated by The ADA
32 Jonnes, Suttow and Milner. Survey of Mercury vapour in dental offices in
Atlantic Canada., Canadian Dental Association Journal ., 49(6):378-395.,1983
33 Goyer Toxic effects of metals. Casaret and Doull's toxicology- the basic
science of poisons. ed3 New York. Macmillan Publishing. 1986 pp582-609
34 Patrick Störtebecker Formerly Associate Professor of Neurology,
Karolinska Institute , Stockholm.. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam- a
hazard to the human brain.
35 Hal Huggins. Observations From The Metabolic Fringe. ICBM conf. Collarado
1988
36 Sam Queen; Chronic Mercury Toxicity; New Hope Against an Endemic
Disease.000
37 Mohamed et al. Lazer Light Scatering Study of the Toxic Effects of
MethylMercury on sperm motility. J. Androl.,7(1):11-15.,1986.
38 Ziff S. and Ziff M. Infertility and birth defects.1987
39 Inouye M., Murao K., Kajiwara Y., Behavorial and neuropathological
effects of prenatal methyl Mercury exposure in mice.. Neurobeahv.Toxicol
Teratol. ,1985:7;227-232
40 Koos et al., Mercury toxicity in pregnant women, fetus and newborn
infant. Am J Obstet And Gynecol., 1976:126;390-409
41 Khera et al., Teratogenic and genetic effects of Mercury toxicity. The
biochemistry of Mercury in the environment. Nriagu, J.O.Ed Amsterdam
Elsevier, 503-18,1979
42 Babich et al ., The mediation of mutagenicity and clastogenicity of heavy
metals by physiochemical factors. Environ Res., 1985:37;253-286
43 Hansen K et al A survey of metal induced mutagenicity in vitro and in
vivo J Amer Coll Toxicol ., 1984:3;381-430
44 Verchaeve L et al., Comparitive in vitro cytogenetic studies in Mercury
exposed human lymphocytes Mutation Res., 1985:157; 221-226.
45 PelletierL et al., In -vivo self reactivity of mononuclear cells to T
cells and macrophages exposed to Hg Cl2 Eur. J Immun., 1985: 460-465
46 Veron et al Amalgam Dentaires et allergies J Biol Buccale., 1986 : 14;
83-100
47 Huggins H., Its All In You Head.1990
48 Stortebecker P. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam (Bioprob pub. 1985)
49 Amalgam Hazards - an assesment of research By Irwin Mandel DDS Assoc.
Dean for Research School of dental and Oral Surgery Columbia University New
York Published JADA Vol. 122 August 1991
50 Nylander et al. Fourth international symposium Epidemiology in
Occupational Health. Como Italy Sept 1985
51 Methylation of Mercury from dental amalgam and mercuric chloride by oral
Streptococci. Heintz, Edwardson, Derand, Birkhed Scan. J. Dent. Res. 1983,
91:150-152
52 Bacterial Growth on Dental Restorative Materials in Mucosal Contact.
Orstavic, Arneberg, Valderhaug Acta Odontol. Scand.1981, 39:267-274
53 The Methylation of Mercuric Chloride by Human Intestinal Bacteria.
Rowland, Grasso, Davies Experientia. Basel 1975 ,31: 1064-1065
54 Formation of methyl Mercury Compounds from inorganic Mercury . by
Chlostridium cochlearium Yamada, Tonomura J Ferment Technol1972 50:159-166
55 Hanson J Orthomolecular Psychiatry 1983, 12: 194-201
55a Amalgam Restorations and Mercury Toxicity. Dr P Sheridan, Masters
Thesis, University of Sydney 1991
56 MARXKORS, R.: Korrosionserscheinungen an Amalgamf llungen und Deren
Auswirkungen auf den Menschlichen Organismus. Das Deutsche Zahn rztebl. 24,
53, 117 and 170, 1970.
57 Campbel & M. Godfrey Research into provocation testing of DMPS - urine
samples of Mercury.
58 Summers AO, Wireman J., Vimy MJ., lORSCHEIDER FLy., MARSHAL B., EVY SB.,
Bennet S., Billard L. J. Of Anti-microbial Agents and Chemotherapy
37[4]:825-34 April 1993
59 BOYD, N. D., H. BENEDIKTSSON, M. J. VIMY, D. E. HOOPER, AND F. L.
LORSCHEIDER. Mercury from dental "Silver" tooth fillings impairs sheep
kidney function. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
30): R1010-R1014, 1991.--
60 Vera Stejskal, Sweden "MEMORY LYMPHOCYTE IMMUNO- STIMULATION ASSAY -
MLISA"
61 Dr Gustav Drasch, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Munich.
Public announcement 25 January 1994 Bio Probe March 1994
62 Dr W. Kostler., President of the Austrian Oncology Society. Paper
presented at the World Congress on Cancer. April 1994 Sydney Australia.
63 World Health Organisation Criteria 118 1991 Geneva Switzerland
64 Health damage due to exposure to mercury vapour (Mercury) Szkody
zdrowotne wywolane narazeniem na pary rteci (Mercury). Moszczynski-P Jr;
Moszczynski-P Czas-Stomatol. 1989 Apr; 42(4): 233-81989POLISH;POLAND
65 In vivo mercury and methyl mercury levels in patients at different
intervals after amalgam restorations. Fung-YK; Molvar-MP; Strom-A;
Schneider-NR; Carlson-MP College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Lincoln. Northwest-Dent. 1991 May-Jun; 70(3): 23-6
66 Regional brain trace-element studies in Alzheimer's disease. Thompson CM
Markesbery WR Ehmann WD Mao YX Vance In: Neurotoxicology (1988 Spring)
9(1):1-7
67 A search for longitudinal variations in trace element levels in nails of
Alzheimer's disease patients. Vance DE Ehmann WD Markesbery WR In: Biol
Trace Elem Res (1990 Jul-Dec) 26-27:461-70

Authorised by the Australasian Society of Oral Medicine and Toxicology.
Phone +64 2 867-1111
Mercury is Poisonous.
There is NO safe form of Mercury in living tissue.
Whole amalgam site: [ Amalgam homepage ][ Read the FAQ (Index) ][ Download
the FAQ ][ Extra reading ][ Symposiums /
eetings ][ Contact ][ Why? ][ Miscellaneous (thanks...) ][ Leif´s homepage ]
This site is maintained and copyrighted 1994-1997 by Leif Hedegard. However,
the article above is written and copyrighted by Dr Robert Gammal 1995,
forwarded here after permission. Updated 16 November 1996. The www-address
of this page is:
http://www.algonet.se/~leif/FUSCIFCT.html
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 20:53 GMT
Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
of someone undergoing chelation therapy.
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 21:04 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:0LFof.6259341$x96.248652@attbi_s72...

> [snip blatant lie]

Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
of someone undergoing chelation therapy.

You say this is a lie?
Robert  Morien - 17 Dec 2005 07:25 GMT
spam noted and reported
Bill - 16 Dec 2005 18:49 GMT
> Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
> of someone undergoing chelation therapy.
___________________________

. . . but it was an "alt." death . . . so that makes it O.K.

- dentaldoc
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 18:51 GMT
>> Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the
>> death
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> - dentaldoc

I'm sure thats true in the deep recess of her own mind...
Whamatus - 17 Dec 2005 00:30 GMT
>>> Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the
>>> death
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>I'm sure thats true in the deep recess of her own mind...

Assumes facts not in evidence;
i.e. "deep recess of her own mind"
/
--

Whamatus Bemoana
wubbabubbazG@RBAGE
at yahoo dot com
Tim Dixon - 17 Dec 2005 00:33 GMT
>>>> Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the
>>>> death
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Assumes facts not in evidence;
> i.e. "deep recess of her own mind"

Yes, the only fact in evidence is she claims every medical and dental
procedure to be quackery, but when *real* quackery (chelation for mercury)
kills "It happens, as with all procedures."
JanD - 16 Dec 2005 20:45 GMT
[snip diversion]

click on the link
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 20:53 GMT
Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
of someone undergoing chelation therapy.
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 21:05 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:VHFof.625938$2x96.548697@attbi_s72...

> [snip diversion]
>>
>> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>> news:D3Cof.632649$_o.2172499@attbi_s71...
>
> click on the link
Tim Dixon - 16 Dec 2005 21:46 GMT
"JanD" wrote in message news:D32Cof.632649$_o.217499@attbi_s71...
> *IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
> Scientifically Proven Facts
> About Mercury & Dental Amalgam

hogwwash all of it.
JanD - 17 Dec 2005 00:21 GMT
> "JanD" wrote in message news:D32Cof.632649$_o.217499@attbi_s71...
>> *IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>> Scientifically Proven Facts
>> About Mercury & Dental Amalgam
>
> hogwwash {sic) all of it.

Thanks for showing your ignorance.

Scientifically PROVEN FACTS

47 FACTS

67 References

Scientifically Proven Facts
About Mercury & Dental Amalgam

1. Dental Amalgam contains about 50% Mercury.
2. Mercury has been scientifically demonstrated to be more toxic than Lead,
Cadmium, or even Arsenic.
3. Mercury leaves dental amalgam continuously throughout the lifetime of the
filing.(7)
4. Mercury vapour is the main way that mercury comes out of amalgam.(31)
5. Mercury vapour is absorbed at a rate of 80% through the lungs into the
arterial blood. (31, 55)
6. Mercury is cytotoxic. Ie. It kills cells
7. There is NO harmless level of Mercury Vapour Exposure. (63)
8. Mercury from amalgam binds to -SH (sulphydryl) groups. These exist in
almost every enzymatic process in the body. Mercury from amalgam will thus
have the potential of disturbing all metabolic processes. ( 25, 33,60).
9. Mercury from amalgam is transported freely via the blood.(19,34,35,)
10. Mercury vapour is absorbed directly into the brain. (34, 55a)
11. Mercury from amalgam will result in a slow build up of mercury in body
tissues. (20,26, 34)
12. Mercury crosses the blood brain barrier. (34,55a)
13. Mercury is implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease.
(67,68)
14. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the foetus and infant before the
mother. (20,61)
15. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the breast milk and the foetus up to 8
times more than the mother's tissues. (18,19)
16. Mercury (Mercury Vapour / Methylmercury) crosses the placenta.(18, 31)
17. Mercury Crosses into breast milk.(18,31,61)
18. Mercury will severely reduce reproductive function.(2, 3, 4, 20, 22, 24,
31, 37,38, 39, 40, 41, 49)
19. Mercury rapidly depletes the immune
system.(27,34,35,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,60)
20. Mercury will induce a number of Auto Immune
Diseases.(27,34,35,42,43,44,60)
21. Mercury will cause an increase in number and severity of
allergies.(1,34,60)
22. Mercury from amalgam is stored principally in the kidneys, liver and
brain. (1,20,31)
23. Mercury from amalgam (shown in animal experiments) causes kidney
damage.(59)
24. Mercury from will cause a 50% reduction in Kidney filtration as shown in
a study of sheep after amalgam placement.(59)
25. Methyl Mercury is more toxic than elemental Mercury.
26. Mercury from amalgam is methylated in the mouth.(51,53,54,)
27. After chewing, Mercury Vapour levels will remain raised for at least
another 90 minutes. (1,15,16,18,47)
28. Mercury from amalgam will migrate through the tooth.(25,27,30)
29. This rate of migration is increased if a gold crown is placed over a
tooth filled with amalgam. (27,30)
30. Teeth are living tissue and are a part of our bodies.
31. Teeth have a massive communication via blood, lymph and nerves with the
rest of the body.(34)
32. Mercury from amalgam is absorbed into the body at a rate of 3 to 17 mcg
/ day. ( WHO 1991 Criteria 118)
33. Mercury release is increased by; increases in temperature, friction &
increase in electrical currents.(28,31,56)
34. Mercury from amalgam will enter the body as;
Elemental Mercury, Inorganic Mercury, Vapour, charged Mercury ions.
35. In the Brain, Mercury from amalgam is stored preferentially in the
Pituitary Gland and Hypothalamus. (20,34)
36. Micro-Mercurialism is principally characterised by Neurological
symptoms.(34)
37. Mercury is transported along the axons of nerve fibres.(33,34,50)
38. Mercury from amalgam may be stored in every other cell in the body. Each
area affected will produce its own set of symptoms.
39. Mercury binds to haemoglobin in the red blood cell thus reducing oxygen
carrying capacity.(1,16,17,21,26,35)
40. Mercury damages blood vessel reducing blood supply to the tissues
(micro-angiopathies).(34)
41. Amalgam fillings produce electrical currents which might be injurious to
health. These currents are measurable in Micro Amps. The Central Nervous
System (Brain) operates in the range of Nano-Amps this is One Thousand times
less than a Micro Amp.(28)
41A. Dissimilar metals in the mouth [eg Gold & Amalgam] will produce higher
electrical currents.(19,30)
42. Mercury from amalgam (shown in animal experiments) will induce
Antibiotic Resistance and Mercury resistance in bacteria in the mouth and
Gastrointestinal tract.(58)
43. Brain levels of mercury are in a direct linear proportion to the number
of Surfaces of amalgam fillings in the mouth.(1,19,25)
43A? The level of Mercury, in brain tissue of foetus's, new born, and young
children, is proportional to the number of amalgams in the mother's
mouth.(61)
44. Mercury will cause single strand breaks in DNA.(41,42)
45. Mercury levels in the body can not be assessed by either blood or urine
levels. (26)
46. Mercury from amalgam fillings is the single
greatest source of dietary mercury for the general population. (W.H.O.
Criteria 118., 1991).
47. Dental personnel are severely effected by exposure to mercury. (3,13,49)

References
1 Sandra Denton MD : Proceedings of the First International Conference on
Biocompatibility 1988
2 EPA Mercury Health Effects Update Health Issue Assessment. Final report
1984 EOA-600/8- 84f. USEPA, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
Washington DC 20460
3. Gordon - Pregnancy in Female Dentists- a Mercury hazard. Proceedings of
Intl conference on Mercury Hazards in Dental Practice Sept. 2-4 Glasgow 1981
4 Lee, L.P. and Dixon Effects of Mercury on Spermatogenisis J Pharmacol Exp
Thera 1975: 194(1); 171-181.
5 Anonymous . Mercury in Fish . Bull WHO 64(5) : 634 1986
6 Schulein,T.M.; Reinhardt, J.W. and Chan K.C. Survey of Des Moines area
dental offices for Mercury vapour. Iowa Dent. J. 70(1):35-36 1984
7 JonesDW, Sutton EJ, and Milner EL Survey of Mercury vapour in dental
offices in Atlantic Canada.Can. Dent. Assoc. J. 4906:378-395, 1983
8 Ochoa, R. and Miller RW. Report on independant survey taken of Austin
dental offices for Mercury contamination. Texas Dent. J. 100(1):6-9, 1983
9 Kantor,L. and Woodcock C, Mercury vapour in the dental office- does
carpeting make a difference? JADA103(9):402-407,1981
10 Skuba, A. Survey for Mercury vapour in Manitoba dental offices J Can.
Dent. Assoc. 50(7):517-522, 1984
11 Chop GF. and Kaufman EG. Mercury vapour related to manipulation of
amalgam and to floor surfaces.Oper. Dent. 8(1):23-27,1983
12 RoydhouseRH. FergMR . and Knox RP. Mercury in dental offices J Can Dent
Assoc 51(2):156-158, 1985
13 Butler J. Proceedings from the First International Conference of
Biocompatibility. 1988 14 Magnus Nylander, Mercury concentrations in the
human brain and kidneys in relaton to exposure from dental amalgam fillings.
ICBM 1988
15 Svare CW et.al. The effects of dental amalgam on Mercury levels in
expired air. J. Dent. Res.60(9):1668-1671,1981
16 Ott K et. al. Mercury burden due to amalgam fillings. Dtsch. Zahnarztl Z
39(9):199-205, 1984
17 Abraham J, Svare C , Frank C,. The effects of dental amalgam restorations
on Blood Mercury levels. J. Dent. Res. 63(1):71-73,1984
18 VimyMJ. LorscheiderFL. Intra oral Mercury released from dental amalgams.
J. Dent Res. 64(8):1069-1071.,1985
19 Matts Hanson. Amalgam hazards in your teeth,. Dept of Zoophysiology.,
University of Lund, Sweden.J. Orthomolecular Psychiatry Vo12 No 3 Sept 1983
20 VimyMJ, TakahashiY, LorscheiderFL Maternal -Fetal Distribution of Mercury
Released From Dental Amalgam Fillings. Dept of Medicine and Medical
Physiology , faculty of Medicine, Univ of Calgary, Calgary Alberta Cannada
1990 published in FASEB
21 Goyer RA Toxic effects of metals. Cassarett and Doull's toxicology--The
basic science of poisons , ed3, New York , MacMillan Publ.Co 1986, pp582-609
22 KuhnertP, Kunhert BRR and Erkard P COmparison of Mercury levels in
maternal blood fetal chord blood and placental tissue. Am. J. Obstet and
Gynecol.,139:209-212., 1981
23 Kuntz WD- Maternal and chord blood Mercury background levels;
Longitudinal surveilance. Am J Obstet and Gynecol. 143:440-443., 1982
24 BrodskyJB. Occupational exposure to Mercury in dentistry and pregnancy
outcome. JADA111(11):779- 780., 1985
25 Malmström C., Hansson M., Nylander M., Conference on Trace Elements in
Health and DIsease. Stockholm May 25-1992
26 Lorscheider & Vimy The Lancet Vol 337; may 4, 1991.
27 Matts Hanson. Why is Mercury toxic. Basic chemical and biochemical
properties of Mercury/amalgam in relation to biological effects. ICBM
conference Colorado 1988
28 Sheppard AR and EisenbudM., Biological effects of electric and magnetic
fields of extremely low frequency. New York university press. 1977
29 Mareck and Hockman. Simulated crevice corosion experiment for ph and
solution chemistry determinations. CORROSION 1974:23;1000-1006.
30 Till et al. Zahnarztl. Welt/reform 1978:87;1130-1134.
31 Langan,Fan,Hoos. The use of Mercury in dentistry: a critical review of
the literature. JADA Vol 115 December 1987., 867 Donated by The ADA
32 Jonnes, Suttow and Milner. Survey of Mercury vapour in dental offices in
Atlantic Canada., Canadian Dental Association Journal ., 49(6):378-395.,1983
33 Goyer Toxic effects of metals. Casaret and Doull's toxicology- the basic
science of poisons. ed3 New York. Macmillan Publishing. 1986 pp582-609
34 Patrick Störtebecker Formerly Associate Professor of Neurology,
Karolinska Institute , Stockholm.. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam- a
hazard to the human brain.
35 Hal Huggins. Observations From The Metabolic Fringe. ICBM conf. Collarado
1988
36 Sam Queen; Chronic Mercury Toxicity; New Hope Against an Endemic
Disease.000
37 Mohamed et al. Lazer Light Scatering Study of the Toxic Effects of
MethylMercury on sperm motility. J. Androl.,7(1):11-15.,1986.
38 Ziff S. and Ziff M. Infertility and birth defects.1987
39 Inouye M., Murao K., Kajiwara Y., Behavorial and neuropathological
effects of prenatal methyl Mercury exposure in mice.. Neurobeahv.Toxicol
Teratol. ,1985:7;227-232
40 Koos et al., Mercury toxicity in pregnant women, fetus and newborn
infant. Am J Obstet And Gynecol., 1976:126;390-409
41 Khera et al., Teratogenic and genetic effects of Mercury toxicity. The
biochemistry of Mercury in the environment. Nriagu, J.O.Ed Amsterdam
Elsevier, 503-18,1979
42 Babich et al ., The mediation of mutagenicity and clastogenicity of heavy
metals by physiochemical factors. Environ Res., 1985:37;253-286
43 Hansen K et al A survey of metal induced mutagenicity in vitro and in
vivo J Amer Coll Toxicol ., 1984:3;381-430
44 Verchaeve L et al., Comparitive in vitro cytogenetic studies in Mercury
exposed human lymphocytes Mutation Res., 1985:157; 221-226.
45 PelletierL et al., In -vivo self reactivity of mononuclear cells to T
cells and macrophages exposed to Hg Cl2 Eur. J Immun., 1985: 460-465
46 Veron et al Amalgam Dentaires et allergies J Biol Buccale., 1986 : 14;
83-100
47 Huggins H., Its All In You Head.1990
48 Stortebecker P. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam (Bioprob pub. 1985)
49 Amalgam Hazards - an assesment of research By Irwin Mandel DDS Assoc.
Dean for Research School of dental and Oral Surgery Columbia University New
York Published JADA Vol. 122 August 1991
50 Nylander et al. Fourth international symposium Epidemiology in
Occupational Health. Como Italy Sept 1985
51 Methylation of Mercury from dental amalgam and mercuric chloride by oral
Streptococci. Heintz, Edwardson, Derand, Birkhed Scan. J. Dent. Res. 1983,
91:150-152
52 Bacterial Growth on Dental Restorative Materials in Mucosal Contact.
Orstavic, Arneberg, Valderhaug Acta Odontol. Scand.1981, 39:267-274
53 The Methylation of Mercuric Chloride by Human Intestinal Bacteria.
Rowland, Grasso, Davies Experientia. Basel 1975 ,31: 1064-1065
54 Formation of methyl Mercury Compounds from inorganic Mercury . by
Chlostridium cochlearium Yamada, Tonomura J Ferment Technol1972 50:159-166
55 Hanson J Orthomolecular Psychiatry 1983, 12: 194-201
55a Amalgam Restorations and Mercury Toxicity. Dr P Sheridan, Masters
Thesis, University of Sydney 1991
56 MARXKORS, R.: Korrosionserscheinungen an Amalgamf llungen und Deren
Auswirkungen auf den Menschlichen Organismus. Das Deutsche Zahn rztebl. 24,
53, 117 and 170, 1970.
57 Campbel & M. Godfrey Research into provocation testing of DMPS - urine
samples of Mercury.
58 Summers AO, Wireman J., Vimy MJ., lORSCHEIDER FLy., MARSHAL B., EVY SB.,
Bennet S., Billard L. J. Of Anti-microbial Agents and Chemotherapy
37[4]:825-34 April 1993
59 BOYD, N. D., H. BENEDIKTSSON, M. J. VIMY, D. E. HOOPER, AND F. L.
LORSCHEIDER. Mercury from dental "Silver" tooth fillings impairs sheep
kidney function. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
30): R1010-R1014, 1991.--
60 Vera Stejskal, Sweden "MEMORY LYMPHOCYTE IMMUNO- STIMULATION ASSAY -
MLISA"
61 Dr Gustav Drasch, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Munich.
Public announcement 25 January 1994 Bio Probe March 1994
62 Dr W. Kostler., President of the Austrian Oncology Society. Paper
presented at the World Congress on Cancer. April 1994 Sydney Australia.
63 World Health Organisation Criteria 118 1991 Geneva Switzerland
64 Health damage due to exposure to mercury vapour (Mercury) Szkody
zdrowotne wywolane narazeniem na pary rteci (Mercury). Moszczynski-P Jr;
Moszczynski-P Czas-Stomatol. 1989 Apr; 42(4): 233-81989POLISH;POLAND
65 In vivo mercury and methyl mercury levels in patients at different
intervals after amalgam restorations. Fung-YK; Molvar-MP; Strom-A;
Schneider-NR; Carlson-MP College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Lincoln. Northwest-Dent. 1991 May-Jun; 70(3): 23-6
66 Regional brain trace-element studies in Alzheimer's disease. Thompson CM
Markesbery WR Ehmann WD Mao YX Vance In: Neurotoxicology (1988 Spring)
9(1):1-7
67 A search for longitudinal variations in trace element levels in nails of
Alzheimer's disease patients. Vance DE Ehmann WD Markesbery WR In: Biol
Trace Elem Res (1990 Jul-Dec) 26-27:461-70

Authorised by the Australasian Society of Oral Medicine and Toxicology.
Phone +64 2 867-1111
Mercury is Poisonous.
There is NO safe form of Mercury in living tissue.
Whole amalgam site: [ Amalgam homepage ][ Read the FAQ (Index) ][ Download
the FAQ ][ Extra reading ][ Symposiums /
eetings ][ Contact ][ Why? ][ Miscellaneous (thanks...) ][ Leif´s homepage ]
This site is maintained and copyrighted 1994-1997 by Leif Hedegard. However,
the article above is written and copyrighted by Dr Robert Gammal 1995,
forwarded here after permission. Updated 16 November 1996. The www-address
of this page is:
http://www.algonet.se/~leif/FUSCIFCT.html
Tim Dixon - 17 Dec 2005 00:26 GMT
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:sSIof.6323328$_o.395985@attbi_s71...

Jan Drew Quote: "It happens, as with all procedures." referring to the death
of someone undergoing chelation therapy.
Robert  Morien - 17 Dec 2005 07:26 GMT
spam noted and reported
Joel - 17 Dec 2005 22:19 GMT
Yup we agree .... avoid pizin.

Joel

> *IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>
[quoted text clipped - 279 lines]
> of this page is:
> http://www.algonet.se/~leif/FUSCIFCT.html
Rich.@. - 21 Dec 2005 02:49 GMT
>*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>
>NOT by a mainstream dentist, but an Alt. dentist who KNOWS the dangers of
>metal in the mouth and root canals, and follows correct protocol.
>
>I did, it saved my life

Jan Drew claims that she almost died of mercury poisoning from dental
amalgams. She stated that before she had her amalgams removed that she
was "bedfast and nonfunctional for several months".

Jan Drew had eight of twelve amalgams removed on June 17-18, 1999.
Within hours of having the amalgams removed she said she felt better
than she had in two years. A week later Jan reported that she was able
to go out line dancing and her feet did not hurt. (The pain soon
returned as placebo responses are short lived). Jan Drew said that the
reason that she felt so much better was because she was no longer
getting a daily dose of mercury and that the removal of the amalgams
made a difference.

It was explained to Jan Drew that a week after the amalgams were
removed that her mercury level would be higher and that her
improvement had nothing to do with the mercury level lowering.

So what does Jan Drew do?? She *deliberately* changes (read lies
about) her history to make it look like her improvement came AFTER her
mercury level dropped. I will let Jan tell (read LIE) in her own
words:

>>http://tinyurl.com/6n3ax
>>
>>>How do I know it was the metal? Because my mercury level was monitored by my
>>>MD, it was only AFTER the metal was removed that it started dropping and I
>>>started to regain my health.
>>>Jan

But Jan Drew knows that removing mercury adds mercury to your system.
I will let Jan tell you in her own words:

>>>>>>>There's never been any arguement about the fact that removing amalgams puts
>>>>>>>more mercury in the body.

And not only does Jan know that removing amalgams puts more mercury in
the body she ALSO knows that after removal of amalgams the mercury
level does not drop to pre-removal levels for a month. But I will let
Jan tell you in her own words:

>>>Subject: Mercury Levels Highest After Amalgam Removal
>>>From: Mark Thorson nos...@sonic.net
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>>>>Jan

So if Jan knows that removing amalgams puts more mercury in her body
AND she knows that mercury levels don't decline to pre-op levels for
about a month how does she explain having eight amalgams removed on
June 17-18, 1999 and then on June 26, 1999 being able to go line
dancing when she had been bedfast for SEVERAL MONTHS before the
removal?? And why did she say that she KNOWS it was the mercury
because she did not begin to regain her health until AFTER the mercury
level dropped. The truth is that she began to regain her health when
her mercury level was likely the highest in her life!!

http://tinyurl.com/ckgmo
>>>Can you tell us what your health was like before the amalgams were
>>>removed and then how your health improved after the amalgams were removed?
>>
>>I was bedfast and nonfunctional for several months, my bowels had nearly shut
>>down. I hurt all over and prayed to die.  
>Jan


>>> http://tinyurl.com/674oy
>>>On June 26, 1999 Jan Drew said:
>>> I am feeling much
>>>>>>>better, because I am not receiving a new dose of mercury each day. The
>>>>>>>elimination of 8 mercury amalgams has made a difference. Nothing psychosomatic
>>>>>>>about it.

By Jan's OWN WORDS the removal of eight amalgams resulted in mercury
being ADDED to her body and the level would not decrease to
pre-removal levels for a month. When Jan said the removal of eight
amalgams made a difference it had only been EIGHT DAYS!!

So Jan admits that eight days following the removal of amalgams that
her mercury level was HIGHER than before the removal. And yet not only
did she go from bedfast and nonfunctional to line dancing with no pain
but she claims that it was because the mercury level had declined.

Jan Drew lied when she said that the reason she knows it was the
mercury was because she did not begin to regain her health until after
the mercury level lowered. It is clearly a lie since Jan Drew admits
in her OWN WORDS that removing amalgams puts more mercury in the body
and it does not return to pre-op level for a month.

This has all been explained to Jan Drew.

What does she do?? She continues to lie about almost dying of mercury
poisoning.

Jan Drew says she is a Christian.

Jan Drew says Christians ALWAYS tell the truth.

Well there is just another lie from this psychopathic liar.

That's a wrap.

Aloha,

Rich

PS: Jan Drew will not dispute a single factual point that I have made
since I just reported what Jan said in her own words. If she replies
it will be to attack me, likely in a new thread, and likely by
stalking me by exposing what she believes to be my name and/or
business address and phone number. Just watch.
Tim Dixon - 21 Dec 2005 03:31 GMT
Well I for one am thankful you shared this with us. We all knew she was a
liar, among other things, but this really spells it out well.  Thanx.

>>*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 126 lines]
> stalking me by exposing what she believes to be my name and/or
> business address and phone number. Just watch.
Rich.@. - 21 Dec 2005 03:50 GMT
>Well I for one am thankful you shared this with us. We all knew she was a
>liar, among other things, but this really spells it out well.  Thanx.

My pleasure. Now that you have responded to my post there is a
99.9999999% chance that Jan Drew is going to make a personal attack
against me and more importantly she will not dispute a single FACT of
what I posted. Jan Drew knows that she is a liar, stalker, hypocrite
and bigot. All she can do is accuse others of same and prove that she
has lost all humanity.

Watch how she starts a new thread attacking me thereby creating a
diversion from her lies.

Aloha,

Rich

>>>*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 126 lines]
>> stalking me by exposing what she believes to be my name and/or
>> business address and phone number. Just watch.
Clinton - 21 Dec 2005 04:18 GMT
> Well I for one am thankful you shared this with us. We all knew she was a
> liar, among other things, but this really spells it out well.  Thanx.

It does not. NOT one dentist on this list has dared answer a simple
question which is what is the greatest % Hg being released by an
amalgam in the US today even though its been asked dozens of times, yet
Rich asserts that the Hg released from drilling is greater than an
undefined number.

rich also doesn't understand that Hg can be methylated from bacteria
near the filling making it 1000 times more toxic. The ADA has chosen
not to research this issue, even though other scienctific publications
have
printed articles calling more research into this area.

i also happen to know that Jan has had to have more surgery and
suffered
a lot of bone damage. Funny how much jaw bone damage Hg posioning
victims seem to suffer.

Bottom line  at least do some research otherwise the drumbeat of since
and reality might become deafening even for those who like to cover
their ears and act like know it alls.

Many a bad decision is generated from scienitifc ignorance. But how can
you be excpected to make rational statements when you don't even
understand the physics of amalgam. Indeed when it comes to amalgam you
don't  even comprehend  what you are dealing with.
JanD - 21 Dec 2005 04:39 GMT
>> Well I for one am thankful you shared this with us. We all knew she was a
>> liar, among other things, but this really spells it out well.  Thanx.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> understand the physics of amalgam. Indeed when it comes to amalgam you
> don't  even comprehend  what you are dealing with.

They aren't interested in anything but belittling, Clinton. If they were to
see my biopsy, as you have, since  I shared it with you because you and I
have a lot in common, they would find some thing to belittle.

They have not a clue and don't want to.

Richard H Jacobson is obsessed and Tim is just plain a flake.
Clinton - 21 Dec 2005 05:56 GMT
what you are dealing with.

> They aren't interested in anything but belittling, Clinton. If they were to

I understand but it sounds believable when someone says that removing
amalgam releases more Hg. that may be true in many cases but that is
by no means guaranteed to be true.
JanD - 21 Dec 2005 04:23 GMT
[snip]

     Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
     From: Rich Andrews <n0-s...@yah0o.com> - Find messages by this author
     Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 07:31:16 -0000
     Local: Fri, Aug 8 2003 2:31 am
     Subject: Re: Jan Drew Proves that She Lied in her own words ( Was Re:
Not that if matters,,But)
     Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse

Rich<,@.> wrote in news:are6jv4hg3lc9kqtsd307cof27pr8o75j9@4ax.com:

Wrote what, where?

Hmm.

Richard H Jacobson nuked all his posts.

Why?

> <Rich.@.> wrote in message

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.

This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Dec 27, 9:49 pm).

Poor Rich.

His pattern of cyberstalking and badgering is clear.

It started long before me.

Back in 1995, same accusations.

Probably the best way to debunk these claims is to demonstrate that the
person
making the claim is lying

http://tinyurl.com/39u2g

http://tinyurl.com/2vxcl

http://tinyurl.com/2nbzc

http://tinyurl.com/3gzhf
[snip wore out twisted version and lies]

FACT is:

Richard H Jacobson NEVER could answer Bubba's questions.

Rich <,@.> wrote in news:cfaedugogsokpianjg600s703prsefplaf@4ax.com:

> On Tue, 7 May 2002 10:11:19 +1000, "P Moran" <pjmo...@gil.com.au>
> wrote:
>>Who are you trying to convince, Jan? Yourself, to justify your own
>>excursion into amalgam removal,   apparently without any spectacular
>>success?

> Bingo!!! That is likely, IMO,  exactly the motivation behind Jan
> obsessively posting about the dangers of mercury amalgams. Despite the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> she had mercury poisoning but also believes (paranoically) that there
> is a vast conspiracy by the ADA to cover it all up.

Sure, Rich! You couldn't support your position in our debate, but instead
chose to run away not once, but twice. I suspect that there are many more
members of MHA other than Jan and myself whom you have NOT convinced.

Maybe you would like to take another shot at answering the questions that
you could NOT address a few months ago. Have you learned anything new in
that interval, Rich?

Here, again, is the last post I made in our debate:

Subject: Re: Psychologic factors influencing physical illness vs Amalgam
Related Illness in the case of Jan Drew From: Bubba
<bubbasthename...@doghotmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative

**************************************************************************
NOTE TO RICH:

If you respond to this post, please be sure to identify all sections which
you snip (preferably with "[...]"). Thanks!
**************************************************************************

Rich <k...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in
news:7ur05u86b0koq2fpdasnhuqcoqkoi3b469@4ax.com:

> I thought it would be useful for me to summarize my opinion with
> respect to the likelihood of Jan Drew having psychologic factors
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> actually may have been even higher due to the procedure to remove
> them.

> Here is the statement in its entirety followed by an analysis of it.

>>Jan Drew says:

>>Rich for the LAST time, I said I felt better than I had in two years.
>>That was very true. I had been very very ill and my health was
>>deteriorating fast. After much reading and research I was convinced it
>>was my teeth. I wasn't absolutely positivity 100% sure, but it all fit
>>together and I knew I had to do something. It wasn't easy, what if it
>>didn't work? That was very stressful.

>>Finally all the work was done, the metal was out, the bill was paid, I
>>didn't have to sit in the dentist chairs for hours with a rubber dam in
>>my mouth!!!!!!!!!! Of course I was very relieved. A big big burden was
>>lifted. That makes one FEEL BETTER.

>>What's so hard to understand?

>>I also reported I had only begun, now on to chelating the mercury from
>>my body. With mercury poisoning, it comes and goes, I had some pretty
>>bad spells. I'm still chelating Rich and will be for some time. I slowly
>>am regaining my health and my PN is much better. I don't have the
>>painful periods that I once had, and yes it was after I started taking
>>medication.

>>You added a few words to what I said which *implied* that I was
>>physicially free from pain..........as in BANG I'm home free. That is
>>NOT what I meant.............and you know it.

>>Now do you better understand? I hope so because I feel no need to
>>explain it AGAIN. Please respect that I didn't have to explain AGAIN
>>this time.

>>Jan

Rich, if you really believe that this post of Jan's provides "the most
compelling evidence that it is psychologic factors vs ARI or MP," then you
really don't have *much* to support your position.

I still don't understand why you believe that Jan's account that she
experienced some relief in the days immediately following her amalgam
removal is relevant to the issue of whether she does or does not have
"Amalgam-Related Illness" (ARI)?

> First let me say that I think that it important not to take everything
> that Jan says at face value.

Well, then you (or I) could always make claims such as

1) "although Jan said ______, she really meant ______," or

2) "when Jan said _____, she was making a false statement (or lying)."

You (and I) could make up any story we wanted and attribute it to Jan
(which I believe you have tried to do - see below).

> This is because she clearly has a
> vendetta against conventional medicine as reflected by her frequent
> kneejerk responses to most anyone who may endorse something that is
> also endorsed by conventional medicine invoking some kind of
> conspiracy using terms like "organized medicine". Jan will likely deny
> this but as I have said before, the proof is in the pudding.

Tangential point, irrelevant to the discussion.

> It is also important not to take what she says at face value due to
> the numerous inconsistencies that she has made over the years.

> The above statement made by Jan Drew is important because it is likely
> a truthful one. I say this because Jan clearly has a very negative
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> (as she did above) that psychologic factors were responsible for her
> feeling better, at least initially is both amazing and likely true.

So, Rich, it appears that you believe Jan *only* when her account supports
your position. Am I correct?
The explanation that Jan has provided (in the above statement) for her
sense of relief is NOT the same as your "psychological factors"
explanation. Therefore, her account does NOT support your claim!

Although you state above that this "statement made by Jan Drew is
important because it is likely a truthful one," you really don't even
believe *all* of this statement, because part of it does NOT support your
position (see below).

> So let us look at her statement more closely.

> In response to my question about how she could feel better than she
> had for two years so quickly after having the amalgams removed, Jan
> first admitted that she indeed did feel better than she had in two
> years.

> She then admits that after being told by Hulda Clark to check the
> teeth that she did some research which resulted in her being quite
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> major health problems. She even believed that she was going to die as
> a result of this.

What credible evidence do you have that either of these beliefs were
unfounded?
> It is perfectly understandable why Jan would feel a great sense of
> relief following the removal of the amalgams given her state of mind.
> And as a result of this relief Jan felt better than she had in two
> years.

> This alone, to me, is very convincing evidence that Jan's initial
> improvement was very likely psychological. Jan could not have given a
> much more convincing statement to make my point.

What evidence do you have to support *your opinion* that it is more likely
that the relief Jan experienced was due to the fact that Jan believed she
was no longer being exposed to the mercury from her amalgams rather than
*Jan's explanation* that she was relieved because the painful,
uncomfortable, and stressful amalgam removal procedure had been completed?
Even after the amalgam removal procedure, Jan still had a body burden of
mercury that would likely be responsible for continuing health problems
for years to come. Why should she have felt relief knowing that MOST of
the mercury was *still* in her body?

> A question was raised as to whether Jan's symptoms preceded her
> worrying about the amalgams. Certainly some of them did. After all she
> has peripheral neuropathy, a very painful and uncomfortable disease.

Please list all of Jan's signs and symptoms (and their severity - on a
scale of 1-10) ...

1) *before* she knew that dental amalgams might be responsible for her
health problems, and

2) *after* she knew that dental amalgams might be responsible for her
health problems.

> Fortunately for Jan the one treatment that even she admits is
> responsible for reducing much of her pain are the meds (Elavil and
> Neurontin) manufactured by those evil pharmaceutical companies that
> are part of organized medicine.

This is a tangential comment, completely unrelated to this discussion.

> However following Hulda telling Jan about the dangers of amalgams Jan
> began to believe that she was dying. Her health really deteriorated
> after Hulda told Jan about the dangers of amalgams and after Jan did
> her research.

Please provide the URL(s) to any post(s) in the Google archives where Jan
wrote THAT!

[...]

> There also has been a question about the characterization of her
> improvement as being psychosomatic or psych factors influencing a
> physical condition. Let me explain the difference between these two
> conditions and how it is not very relevant to the question of whether
> Jan's improvement was psychologic or due to the amalgams.

> Psychologic factors influencing physical illness is where psychologic
> factors are important in a preexisting physical condition.

You *still* have not defined what you mean by "psychologic factors." I
have asked you repeatedly to do so.
******************************************

Rich, PLEASE DEFINE "psychologic factors."

Rich, PLEASE DEFINE "psychologic factors."

Rich, PLEASE DEFINE "psychologic factors."

Rich, PLEASE DEFINE "psychologic factors."

******************************************

> This would
> be a more appropriate characterization for Jan's situation with
> respect to amalgams.

What were Jan's preexisting physical conditions with respect to amalgams?

> Psychosomatic disorder refers to a physical condition which arises to
> significant degree by psychologic factors such as anxiety, paranoia,
> etc.

FYI, the current DSM-IV-TR classification that has replaced "psychosomatic
disorder" is Somatoform Disorders.

"Psychosomatic disorder" is NOT a valid psychiatric diagnosis.

> I have expressed my opinion that Jan's problems are psychosomatic as
> well as due to psychologic factors influencing a physical condition.

Are you changing your position AGAIN?

> They are not mutually exclusive. I believe there is good evidence that
> she has BOTH.

Is it possible that Jan has *all* of the following conditions?:

1) ARI
2) "psychosomatic factors" (whatever they are)
3) one of Somatoform Disorders

Isn't the probability that an individual has all three "conditions" almost
the same as the probability that that same individual has only the last
two?

> In the case of the PN it is latter. Her belief that she
> was infested with multiple parasites was, for example, likely the
> latter. This is my opinion. I am not 100% sure of it.

Does Jan meet the criteria of any of the DSM-IV-TR Somatoform Disorders?

If she does NOT, then she does NOT have a Somatoform Disorder. (Please
use the correct terminology in the future.)

Jan does NOT have a "psychosomatic condition"! That is NO longer a valid
psychiatric diagnosis!

> Jan Drew's animosity toward conventional medicine is a matter of
> record that she will likely deny. I can only suggest that people read
> her posts to see what I mean. The proof is in the pudding as it were.

This statement of yours is completely tangential to this discussion.

> Jan has reported improvement with so many different unproven
> alternative methods over the years that makes it quite likely that her
> improvements are due to psychologic factors. The other explanation is
> that all these alt treatments were effective for her serious ailments.
> I will allow others to come to their own determination.

There are other equally likely explanations. Check out the following link
for some clues:

Why Bogus Therapies Seem to Work, by Barry L. Beyerstein

http://www.csicop.org/si/9709/beyer.html

Several of these explanations do NOT require a psychological mechanism.
What evidence do you have that your explanation is more likely than these
other non-psychological mechanisms?

> While I
> personally don't think that all alt treatments are complete quackery,
> I am doubtful that so many of them (as reported by Jan) can be helpful
> other than for psychologic reasons. This is just my opinion. I am not
> 100% certain of it.

Just because Jan has had some treatments that might have not have had
*any* efficacy in treating her conditions (but from which she believes she
has derived some benefit) does NOT mean that she does not have ARI and has
not had a significant improvement in her health as a result of the amalgam
removal.

> Another points raised was the Jan's comments should be taken at face
> value or else we will be shooting at a moving target. With all due
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> "lying" as most of you are quite aware by her numerous accusations
> while ridiculing OTHERS for calling people liars.

Well then, Rich, maybe I should just "reinterpret" Jan's comments, too,
to bolster *my* position. Right!!!

> Another point raised was my certainty of her having a particular
> psychiatric diagnosis.

You have NOT supported your claim with a valid psychiatric diagnosis.
Please do so.

> While I often weigh in with my opinion I ALSO
> specifically advise people to seek out qualified professional help to
> reach diagnoses and that no one should accept anyone's opinion
> (including mine) in this newsgroup. This is a discussion newsgroup for
> expressing opinions. I advise NO ONE to accept my diagnoses as
> definitive and have frequently stated this.

> And with respect to the question of how one can rule out amalgam
> related illness or mercury related illness in this case we cannot.

You have NOT answered these questions I posted previously:
So, you *do* agree that it is *possible* for Jan's health problems to be
the result of her mercury exposures from her amalgams?

1) How would someone rule out that possibility?

2) How would *you* rule out that possibility?

3) In what ways would Jan's account have to differ for you to find it
credible?

Do you know that one of the exclusionary criteria for the Somatoform
Disorders is that the patient's symptoms cannot be explained by the
"direct effects of a substance" (e.g, mercury)?

> Of
> course I cannot also rule out interplanetary alien influence either.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> IAI. How would you go about ruling out IAI?? Please be specific since
> you claimed that my analogy was a stupid skeptic trick.

Rich, in a previous post, you implied that the probability that Jan
experienced relief immediately following her amalgam removal was about the
same as the probability that her relief was due to some "interplanetary
influence." Is that your position? If so, it is a claim, which you have
the responsibility to support. I have made NO claim!

> Btw, I know of several individuals who thought that they had
> electronic devices planted in their amalgams by interplanetary aliens
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> point. That point is that one cannot rule out with 100% certainty
> anything.

Irrelevant, tangential, self-serving, smug statement.

[...]

> Another point is that I asked for a scenario that would indicate that
> Jan's problem was likely psychologic and was told that if she had
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> believing in a psychologic etiology or exacerbation from psych
> problems it is very difficult to have a meaningful discussion.

No, it isn't! If you were confident enough in your opinion to make a
number of posts that Jan's account (i.e., that she believed that mercury
exposures had an adverse physiological effect on her health, and NOT just
through some purely psychological mechanism) was a "bogus claim," then you
should have *plenty* of evidence to convince even the most die-hard
skeptic that you are right!

Rich, this debate should be a slam-dunk for you!

I don't have to prove a thing! You are trying to deflect this discussion
from the claims you have made, which you have the responsibility to
support with credible evidence! I have made NO claims!

> I hope that I have been clear in my opinion and reasons for my
> opinion. I elected to make all these comments in a single post rather
> than to answer specific questions in another post so my reasoning and
> rationale for my opinions would be clear. I hope that I have answered
> all questions that are *relevant* to the issue at hand. I prefer not
> to get side tracked with tangential issues.

You have *not* answered all of the relevant questions.

> I would be happy to answer any substantive questions related to this
> discussion but will likely decline to answer any tangential or
> irrelevant questions that are designed to deflect from the issue at
> hand realizing that that may trigger someone to impulsively kill file
> me again.

> I also hope that this discussion can be continued without the hurling
> of insults. I am trying my best to raise the level of discussion here,
> recognizing that I am not always successful in achieving that goal.

Why don't we both agree NOT to engage in *any* sidebar discussions on MHA
regarding anything discussed in this thread or anything concerning this
thread (e.g., who made the best point in the most recent post)?
And how would you characterize what you have written in the preceding two
paragraph, if not an insult?

> Another point is that this is an open discussion group and NOT for one
> on one discussion. It is not appropriate in my opinion to discourage
> others from participating in the discussion. If people want to have a
> one on one discussion it would be better handled through e-mail.

Fine. I'm still not going to respond to any posts about this topic (in a
substantive manner) other than yours.

> Rich

Signature

Bubba

FACT is

Richard H Jacobson  Has NO proof.

http://tinyurl.com/9mc7b

FACT is Richard H Jacobson is a PROVEN LIAR.

>Are you sure my name is Richard Jacobson??
ilena>Is it or isn't it?
>>Negative. Does this mean that I don't have to agree to Jan's request to
cease and desist??  Of course her request presumes that I have been stalking
and harassing her.

>I am grateful for one thing; that Richard Jacobson is not my real name.

Unfortunately the Richard Jacobson that DOES live in Hawaii may not be too
happy with my assuming his name for purposes of the internet especially
given
the recent events.  He happens to live on a different island from me. I do
plan
to contact him to let him know that someone may try to harass him since he
is
listed in the phone book.
===============================
Hiking The Kalalau Trail

Richard Jacobson (richj@cris.com)
Sat, 16 Mar 1996 00:27:34 -0500 (EST)

>Hawaii's premier backpacking trail, the Kalalau Trail on the island of
Kauai still remains closed past Hanakoa due to the reconstruction of
the trail near "crawler's ridge". Estimated date of completion is Mid May.
Until then, camping will only be permitted in Hanakapiai and Hanakoa
Valleys. I for one am anxious to have Kalalau open again. It has to
be one of the finest trails in the world.

Aloha,
Rich
------------------------
------------------------
Richard H. Jacobson
Always remember to put Horace before Descarte
.

>>>*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>>>
>>>NOT by a mainstream dentist, but an Alt. dentist who KNOWS the dangers of
>>>metal in the mouth and root canals, and follows correct protocol.
>>>
>>>I did, it saved my life
Rich.@. - 21 Dec 2005 06:21 GMT
>My pleasure. Now that you have responded to my post there is a
>99.9999999% chance that Jan Drew is going to make a personal attack
>against me and more importantly she will not dispute a single FACT of
>what I posted.