 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2005What Sue does
Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How about you Amatus? Ready to be questioned by some lawyer? The way I read this everyone here agrees, because those that did and didn't are not listed by name, or anything else to define who is who. _____________________ Old 12-08-2005, 02:41 PM Sue is Offline: Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 3,039 Dentists on Sci med Dentistry Hi Claire, Dentists on Sci med dentistry forum think this is the definitely the dentist's responsibilty. Good luck, Sue > Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are > you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How about [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Good luck, > Sue Tim. I gave Claire no names. You neglected to add the part where I direct Claire to this forum for more information. Sci med is a forum where patient questions are answered all the time. If Claire had posted this question here herself, she would have gotten the same responses, with names attached. Your paranoia makes no sense. BTW, you are cross-posting right now and breaking your own rules. And rather than cutting and pasting the entire post, you pick only the part you wish. Here is the full post: Hi Claire, Dentists on Sci med dentistry forum think this is the definitely the dentist's responsibilty. Good luck, Sue Please follow this link for more info! http://groups.google.com/group/sci....28817?scoring=d& >> Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are >> you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci....28817?scoring=d& WRONG! I am only reposting what has already been posted in this group. Listen are you so thick that you don't understand the difference between a privately owned and operated forum and Usenet? Funny thing I noticed was you opted to not include any of the actual responders text, only your paraphrase of what *YOU* think someone said. Again YOU lose! > >> Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are > >> you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > Again YOU lose! Tim, I am not here to play "win and lose" games. Please kill file me and leave me alone. -Sue > I am not here to play "win and lose" games. Please kill file me and > leave me alone. > > -Sue Sorry Groupie-Sue I never kill-file anyone. [cut] > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci....28817?scoring=d& [cut] > I am not here to play "win and lose" games. Please kill file me and > leave me alone. > > -Sue "Sue", bottom line is this: You have to get up pretty early in the morning around here if you want to "play" in this newsgroup. You snooze, you lose. It's that simple. You may think this group of people is just a bunch of nuts, fruitcakes and thugs (has a nice ring, doesn't it) ... but that's just our collective disguise. You don't want to see what we really are. Sort of like you, "Sue". You don't want us to see what you really are. The door is right behind you and up three. The Webby > I gave Claire no names. You neglected to add the part where I direct > Claire to this forum for more information. Sci med is a forum where > patient questions are answered all the time. If Claire had posted this > question here herself, she would have gotten the same responses, with > names attached. Your paranoia makes no sense. And another thing, since Claire chose not to post her own subject here, she isn't entitled to any benefot of this group, and either are you. Hey your posts are being deleted, getting paranoid yet? > http://groups.google.com/group/sci....28817?scoring=d& That's true. But do you know what that link gets a person trying to use it? Here ya go .. There is no group named sci....28817. € The link you followed may be broken or misspelled. € Search for sci....28817 € If you got to this page by clicking a search result, please report the problem to Google Groups Support. The Webby > > Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are > > you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How about [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci....28817?scoring=d& Your link is useless, "Sue". Try it yourself. Here's what I got: There is no group named sci....28817. € The link you followed may be broken or misspelled. € Search for sci....28817 € If you got to this page by clicking a search result, please report the problem to Google Groups Support. So ... tell me why "Claire" didn't know how to get "here"? As a navigator of the internet, you could use some education. The Webby >> > Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B >> > are [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > > The Webby Thats because Sue didn't want Claire to come here, that way she could remain the true "dental savior". [cut] > >> Sue > >> > >> Please follow this link for more info! > >> > >> http://groups.google.com/group/sci....28817?scoring=d& Yes, the link tells us that "Sue" is an amazing resource to the people with inquiring minds but lacking the skills to navigate the "net". > > Your link is useless, "Sue". Try it yourself. Here's what I got: > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Thats because Sue didn't want Claire to come here, that way she could remain > the true "dental savior". The road to get here is so .... it's so .... well, let's face it! No one knows how to get here. --where are we???? Oh ... I remember. How'd we get here??? Oh! Shhhhh.... it's highly secretive!! The Webby > [cut] >> >> Sue [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > The Webby We're three sites down to the right.. remember? [cut] > > The road to get here is so .... it's so .... well, let's face it! No > > one knows how to get here. --where are we???? Oh ... I remember. How'd [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > We're three sites down to the right.. remember? We moved? I thought we were three sites down to the right and up one. It's really a tricky map out here. Thanks -- I could get lost and never find my way back! (Now there's an idea....) TW > [cut] >> > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > TW Maybe Sue will get lost on her way.. now if we just don't tell anyone else.. something I read somewhere once said something like this: "they do not like to waste time answering questions if the author of the question is not present" > > [cut] > >> > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > to waste time answering questions if the author of the question is not > present" Yes, I read that too ... and at least three of us know where we read it and who wrote it. Shhhhhh. TW >> > [cut] >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Yes, I read that too ... and at least three of us know where we read it > and who wrote it. Shhhhhh. I have read many other things as well, and i'm certain you have too... > >> > [cut] > >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > I have read many other things as well, and i'm certain you have too... Shhhhhhh.... >> >> > [cut] >> >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > Shhhhhhh.... yeah we don't want you know who to know what we know..(yet) >[cut] >> >> Sue [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Yes, the link tells us that "Sue" is an amazing resource to the people >with inquiring minds but lacking the skills to navigate the "net". No it doesn't. It tells us that cutting and pasting links from a web based forum to usenet breaks the link. It also tells us that your own net knowledge is somewhat lacking. Ann >> > Your link is useless, "Sue". Try it yourself. Here's what I got: >> > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > >The Webby > >[cut] > >> >> Sue [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Ann There is no question my net knowledge is somewhat lacking. Why does that happen? [cut] > >[cut] > >> >> Sue [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > > >The Webby Ann, Sorry. Try this one address: http://www.dentalcom.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2967 Thanks, -Sue >> >[cut] >> >> >> Sue [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > Sorry. Try this one address: sorry we're not interested. > Thanks, > -Sue Sue" "Groupie" "Claire" "Chrlie" "ETC"<chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1127322420.607032.93190@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > To all: Sorry I have been so touchy. A lot of my stuff was deleted at > DT and I was never sure why. The only thing I can think of is that they [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Sue A lot of my stuff was deleted and it really wierded me out and as i was getting paranoid it made me feel crazy. I was really dense but i was never sure why. I have been so touchy not to figure out what i was saying. It made me feel crazy and i was getting paranoid. My stuff was deleted and it really weirded me out. The only thing i can think of is making me paranoid. I am really weirded out. > > >[cut] > > >> >> Sue [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > Thanks, > -Sue http://www.dentalcom.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2967 The link I have pasted directly above this line is one that I copied from that place and pasted it right here in usenet. I'm going to run a test by posting this link within this reply and then see how it looks once it's out. (I'm leaving the entire post intact.) TW In article <tmjiatroepidemic-260DD8.14483912122005@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com>, > > > >[cut] > > > >> >> Sue [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > > TW What am I missing? I cut and pasted the URL into usenet and it didn't break. My guess is that this is a Google Groups issue and not an issue of the entire web (www). TW >In article ><tmjiatroepidemic-260DD8.14483912122005@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com>, [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] >break. My guess is that this is a Google Groups issue and not an issue >of the entire web (www). It's not the same link. The original link that was pasted was too long on the original forum and some of it was hidden behind the scenes. So cutting and pasting it meant the behind the scenes bit was lost and so it didn't work. The link you were originally talking about was this one: http://groups.google.com/group/sci....28817?scoring=d& On the web group where it was originally written if you hover over it you will see that it is actually this: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.dentistry/browse_frm/thread/db0a9c2873b28 817?scoring=d [cut] > >What am I missing? I cut and pasted the URL into usenet and it didn't > >break. My guess is that this is a Google Groups issue and not an issue [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.dentistry/browse_frm/thread/db0a9c2873b > 28817?scoring=d Oh... you're saying it *truncates*. Of course... I understand that fully; no problem. I actually thought you were explaining something else to me. We had a little glitch in communications. Webby >[cut] >> > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >fully; no problem. I actually thought you were explaining something >else to me. We had a little glitch in communications. No. It doesn't simply truncate. Truncate means to cut the end off.. and that is not what it does. Ann It is just another Joelism to cross-post as much as possible in the hopes of getting conversation going in more places. Has nothing to do with helping others.  Signature/ Amatus / > [cut] >> >> Sue [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > The Webby > Tim. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > question here herself, she would have gotten the same responses, with > names attached. Your paranoia makes no sense. And do you think for one minute that any of us here believe that what you gave her "Dentists on Sci med dentistry forum think this is the definitely the dentist's responsibilty." was valuable, useable information. Why didn't you include their actual comments? WHY SUE WHY? You see, we see right through you, as if you were water. So she not only brings other people's questions here, but then takes our comments back and spreads them out to other places? Doesn't seem quite right. Why quote fruitcakes, nuts, and thugs anyway? Dartos > Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are > you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How about [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Good luck, > Sue Thats exactly what she does, and she doesn't even have the decency to quote the original writer(s), and instead chooses to paraphrase her own interpretation of what someone else said as meaning *all* of you dentists here agree with her. "Why quote fruitcakes, nuts, and thugs anyway?" Thats the million dollar question. > So she not only brings other people's questions here, but then takes > our comments back and spreads them out to other places? [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >> Good luck, >> Sue > Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are > you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How about [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Good luck, > Sue I will attempt to show why this message from "Sue" is a useless and therefore probably harmless message to "Claire". At the same time, readers can decide how they feel about it. Is it harmless or is it dangerous because it masquerades as something "helpful". The word "Dentists" is merely a plural word; not necessarily all encompassing as in "all the dentists" (still too vague to be useful and too broad to be harmless). It could be the simple plural, as in two which is one more than one. Without some specific modifier, the message carries little value if it is meant to reflect a majority opinion of a large group of dentists. Next, take "Sci med dentistry forum" for what it says. This is not that place; in fact, I have no idea what or where "Sci med dentistry forum" is. It does tell me that the person writing it has no idea about the matter of where she went to gather her data. And last but not least, there is the word "dentist's". Is this news to anyone? If a dentist extracts a tooth (example only), who would say that the procedure was someone else's responsibility? This is not a legal opinion. To address ongoing liability for poor quality work, substandard work, or outright negligent work -- that would have required additional comments. There were no additional comments. Anyway, in summary, you see that our "helpful poster" has actually delivered a non-message message to "Claire". It is, IMO, neutral in value and inflammatory at the same time. Readers' ideas may be substantially different. Webby >> Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are >> you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > Webby My comment is that of course it is useless. Her comprehension of where she is, where she goes, and what she does, is something to be pondered but has little value in the final analysis. [cut] > > Anyway, in summary, you see that our "helpful poster" has actually > > delivered a non-message message to "Claire". It is, IMO, neutral in [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > is, where she goes, and what she does, is something to be pondered but has > little value in the final analysis. The value *seems* to be that "Sue" knows not what "Sue" is doing. But I don't trust "Sue"; in fact, I don't trust "Sue" at all. It's difficult to be as "in the dark" as "Sue" wants people to think "she" is. TW > Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are > you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How about [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > _____________________ SPAM. noted and reported. >> Here is what she does with the information she gathers here. Hey W_B are >> you included in that list? Ready to be subpoenaed as a witness? How [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > SPAM. noted and reported. hahahaah |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.