 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2005Ping "Sue" you asked about Iatrogenic disease
So tell us, Sue. Did you find out what "iatrogenic disease" is? (Notice, no copying and pasting. Just a legitimate question based upon something I read in another forum.) The Webby > So tell us, Sue. Did you find out what "iatrogenic disease" is? > (Notice, no copying and pasting. Just a legitimate question based upon > something I read in another forum.) > > The Webby Yes. I looked it up. In the context of that discussion, I interpret "iatragenic" to mean this problem (or "disease") was caused by the profession. Therefore the "profession" should be responsible for fixing the problem. The internet is a wonderful resource. -Sue > > So tell us, Sue. Did you find out what "iatrogenic disease" is? > > (Notice, no copying and pasting. Just a legitimate question based upon [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > -Sue Are you certain you have that entirely correct? (Spelling is a little off, but that isn't what I'm referring to.) The Webby > > > So tell us, Sue. Did you find out what "iatrogenic disease" is? > > > (Notice, no copying and pasting. Just a legitimate question based upon [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Are you certain you have that entirely correct? (Spelling is a little > off, but that isn't what I'm referring to.) > The Webby Excuse me. "Iatrogenic" That is how I interpreted Joel's comment. You ask am I certain? Am I ever certain about completely understanding someone else's communications? No. Are you? Nothing is 100% certain, IMHO ....except death. That is why I asked Joel to explain. Now please excuse me, I really need to do some stuff here. Have a great Sunday. Sincerely, -Sue [cut] > Am I ever certain about completely understanding someone else's > communications? > > No. Are you? I prefer to look at communications differently and I prefer to limit the scope to usenet communications *only*. It takes a lot of work between people, one on one or within a group large or small, to arrive at a point of mutual understanding in order to come to a point of accepting others for who they are. As far as our communications are concerned here in sci.med.dentistry (a specific Usenet newsgroup), I don't think you are willing to go the distance required in order to understand the ways of this group of posters as a group or as individuals. I have my own style and I can recognize a careless and lazy copycat when I see one. Am I pointing my cyber-finger at you? You tell me. The Webby In article <tmjiatroepidemic-F68BA4.12330611122005@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com>, > [cut] > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > The Webby Once upon a time in sci.med.dentistry, "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote: "I work for a medical device company (mainly implantables)." ... and "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote: "I have written many scientific abstracts and co-authored many scientific manuscripts." And in reply to my question, Did you find out what "iatrogenic disease" is?, "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote: "In the context of that discussion, I interpret "iatragenic" to mean this problem (or "disease") was caused by the profession. Therefore the "profession" should be responsible for fixing the problem. The internet is a wonderful resource." ___________ end of quoting ______________ This is enough for me to rest my case. The Webby > In article > <tmjiatroepidemic-F68BA4.12330611122005@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com>, [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > "I have written many scientific abstracts and co-authored many > scientific manuscripts." Perhaps sue or chrlie or claire or whoever the person is would cite just one abstract or scientific manuscript.. otherwise i say you are full of sheep dip, that is what you do right? or did you forget about that too? > > In article > > <tmjiatroepidemic-F68BA4.12330611122005@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com>, [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > abstract or scientific manuscript.. otherwise i say you are full of sheep > dip, that is what you do right? or did you forget about that too? Ummm...ok.... but titles only. I really do not want to get any threatening emails or crap from a bunch of cyber nutcases. I am running off to orchestra hall right now. My husband and I will be listening to Hendel's Messiah. Oh and Amatus, he is not wearing a tux...... We go there for the music, not to show off our digs. Ta ta ta -Sue PS You may lower your arms now,,,,,, And please wear some deodorant next time you raise them...PHE-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-W-ey! >> > "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote: >> > "I have written many scientific abstracts and co-authored many [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Ummm...ok.... but titles only. I really do not want to get any > threatening emails or crap from a bunch of cyber nutcases. Post authors, dates, publication they appear in, etc. Or I say you are a liar. > >> > "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > "I have written many scientific abstracts and co-authored many [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Post authors, dates, publication they appear in, etc. Or I say you are a > liar. I forgot about this request (demand?) These were the quickest ones for me to pull up from my files: "Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha in Heart Failure Patients and Influence of B-receptor Blockers" Presented NASPE 2003 (Heart Rhythm Society) "Plasma Neurohormonal Changes in Response to Caridac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure" Presented ACC 2003 "Plasma Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Reductions WIth Resyncronization Therapy and Reverse Ventricular Remodeling" Presented S&T 2004 Whatever. I really don't care what you think anymore Tim. Get a life that does not include verbal abuse directed at me. Thank you, -Sue > Ummm...ok.... cyber nutcases. "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1127322420.607032.93190@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > To all: Sorry I have been so touchy. A lot of my stuff was deleted at > DT and I was never sure why. The only thing I can think of is that they [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Sue > I am running off to orchestra hall right now. My husband and I will be > listening to Handel's Messiah. Oh and Amatus, he is not wearing a > tux...... We go there for the music, not to show off our digs. Opening night of the Opera is a formal night. You are expected to wear a tux (formal gown for the ladies) to sit in the Director's Circle and attend the pre-performance benefit dinner. Symphonic concerts only require a coat and tie (except for the first concert of the season). Now, the musicians all wear a tuxedo (or black dress). The Messiah piece is very nice if the Choral group is large enough and very talented. I still prefer Carmina Burana.  Signature/ Amatus / > >> > In article [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > PS You may lower your arms now,,,,,, And please wear some deodorant > next time you raise them...PHE-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-W-ey! > In article > <tmjiatroepidemic-F68BA4.12330611122005@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com>, [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > ___________ end of quoting ______________ > This is enough for me to rest my case. > > The Webby Webby, Excuse me but you never had a case. -Sue > > In article > > <tmjiatroepidemic-F68BA4.12330611122005@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com>, [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > -Sue You are entitled to your opinion. The Webby >Nothing is 100% certain, IMHO ....except death. What about taxes ? -- Whamatus Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com > >Nothing is 100% certain, IMHO ....except death. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Take out the G'RBAGE > wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com I guess you might include taxes...but that is less certain in my mind. -Sue |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.