>On 9 Dec 2005 12:36:18 -0800, "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>The Webby wrote:
>>> In article <1134154359.919274.289230@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
>>>  "Sue" <chrlie699@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [cut]
>>> >
>>> >  BTW, You needn't respond to junk if you think it is junk.
>>> >
>>> > -Sue
>>>
>>> This is the home of the regular smders.  We do not walk over the junk.
>>> We pick it up and put it in the trashcan.  If something of value is
>>> mistaken as a piece of junk, it is the owner's responsibility to pick it
>>> up and put it in a safe place.
>>>
>>> What you may not realize is that this newsgroup's regulars take pride in
>>> their newsgroup.  Junk is not something we just ignore.  We deal with
>>> it.  That is what you see happening.  Everyone is welcome to participate
>>> provided they don't junk the place up expecting no one cares.
>>>
>>> Webby
>>
>>What makes Claire's question junk?  Some do/did not think it is junk.
>>I certainly did not see it as junk. I wanted to hear what dentists
>>thought about this. Two of your regulars responded to this question.
>>I thought this was a forum to share information related to dentistry.
>>
>>One man's junk is another man's treasure.
>>
>>I guess your rules are your rules. BTW, I cannot pick up any littler as
>>I do not have the power to delete what has already been posted and
>>discussed.
>
>It's junk because no discussion can take place from it.  Nobody can
>ask the poster any questions or elicit further information.  It's like
>an exam question and it's boring to watch.  What brings the group
>alive is conversation and you can't have that with somebody else's
>problem.
>
>Ann