Well it may feel so to you.
This is more so for dentists here in India! A very few of them really
know whether such groups do exist; of the very few who search on
internet.
This is a sincere try to let them come together & share their
experiences.
> This is a sincere try to let them come together & share their
> experiences.
PANKAJ, I am not trying to be beligerent, but why not just TELL them
that the SMD, IDF, DT, etc exist?. If they are on the 'net, they must be
able to international groups. I think you risk having a group that is
too local and too narrow in its focus.
This is just my own opinion, but, contrary to what you may think, I wish
you good luck.
SP

Signature
Take out the TRAASH to reply
The Webby - 09 Dec 2005 17:54 GMT
> > This is a sincere try to let them come together & share their
> > experiences.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> SP
Duplicated efforts often dilute the progress that could be made if the
interested parties would join together. This promotes their abilities
to broaden their interests and interactions. I don't think IDF and DT
serve the same needs as smd which is intended to be a public group.
I'll paste a copy of the Charter in case Pankaj hasn't seen it elsewhere.
Pankaj, is communicating in English a problem for anyone you are
presently working with in your group?
>original Charter as presented by Alec Ellsworth, a dental student at
the time.
>from Feb. 15, 1993
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> users (dentists, dental students, researchers, and patients) the
>> opportunity to discuss Dentistry and any dental related issues.
Included
>> in this forum would be the issues of dental research, patient/dentist
>> interaction, new technology in dentistry, infection control
>> discussion/answers, legislation issues in dentistry, question
>> and answers, medico-legal issues, and any other related dentistry
>> discussion.
Webby