Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / November 2005
How does one find a good dentist? (yes, this one again!)
|
|
Thread rating:  |
JimSocal - 20 Nov 2005 10:36 GMT I know this has been asked a million times, and I've read a few of the answers, but I'm still confused.
For example, it seems almost ALL Dentists accept "dental insurance" these days, and yet it seems, from what I read here, that any dentist who accepts dental insurance is likely to be a con artist. What do I do, call around until I find one that does not accept insurance? But does that mean he is a good denist? Maybe the insurance plan won't even accept him, he's had so many complaints.
I've asked for recommendations from friends and most people go to the dentist so seldom, no one can really recommend their dentist. Or else they recommend one but he's an hour or two away where they used to live...
It seems to me that finding a good dentist is much harder than finding a good doctor, and believe me, that also is no piece of cake. Add to that fact, that 3 of the 4 last dentists my wife and/or I went to here in West L.A. (before this one we are going to now) gave us reason to believe they are lousy dentists, one with a bad root canal leading to an apicoectomy and one with a bad root canal leading to the loss of a tooth, and one with bad bridge work that had to be re-done by another dentist who also did bad bridge work (okay, so that's 4 out of 5).
(My wife and I both brush after every meal and floss daily, and don't eat/drink a lot of sugar, so I think our part in these problems is minimal.)
Two other dentists we have been to, pulled the bait and switch scam on us so obviously that we quit going to them after one visit because we could see we were being sold procedures (deep cleaning) we did not need (and that was confirmed by the next dentist, who seemed honest, even though he obviously does not know how to do root canals).
So here we are back to looking for a good general practitioner dentist again.
And along those lines: How much should I expect to pay a good dentist for the following?: full mouth xrays regular semi-annual cleaning amalgam filling root canal (endodontist, please)
Vaughn - 20 Nov 2005 15:14 GMT >I know this has been asked a million times, and I've read a few of the > answers, but I'm still confused. It is a tough problem!
> Two other dentists we have been to, pulled the bait and switch scam on > us so obviously that we quit going to them after one visit because we > could see we were being sold procedures (deep cleaning) we did not > need (and that was confirmed by the next dentist, who seemed honest, > even though he obviously does not know how to do root canals). Don't hold that against him. Just go to a Endodontist for those few occasions. (That said, my GP seems to know which ones to tackle himself and which ones to refer)
> So here we are back to looking for a good general practitioner dentist > again. The short answer is that you find a good dentist in exactly the same fashion that you find a good plumber.
A longer answer is: If you can find a friend, or a friend-of-a-friend who works in the dental lab biz and is willing to give you an honest answer, you will have a good chance of finding the dentist you are looking for. My dentist is only fee-for-service and I am convinced that is the cheapest and best route over the long haul. If you can't find that person, then try anyone else who has been in the dental biz in your local area for at least a few years. Catch them away from their job; such as church, supermarket, PTA meeting, somewhere where they can talk freely. Everybody has a reputation, you just need to find the friendly person who is in a position to know them.
Vaughn
Bill - 20 Nov 2005 16:16 GMT > I know this has been asked a million times, and I've read a few of the > answers, but I'm still confused. > > For example, it seems almost ALL Dentists accept "dental insurance" > these days, and yet it seems, from what I read here, that any dentist > who accepts dental insurance is likely to be a con artist. The vast majority of dentists I have met for over 30 years are NOT "con artists." They expect to work hard and provide decent care for a decent fee.
We need to clarify what is meant by "accepting" dental "insurance."
There are at least three types of "dental insurance," depending on definitions. Others may have their own preferences, but I divide dental "insurance" products into three main categories: UCR insurance, PPO insurance, and capitation plans (which like to call themselves HMO's).
UCR and PPO insurance plans are fee-for-service. Capitation plans are mostly NOT fee-for-service, though they may contain some co-payments for various services.
The majority of dentists, but not all, accept fee-for-service dental insurance. So it's not hard to find a dentist who takes most dental insurance.
The majority of dentists do NOT accept capitation dental plans, because such plans do not pay the dentist for the actual work he performs. Most people want to be paid for their work and dentists are no different.
These capitation plans pay a dentist a small amount each month for a predetermined 'list" of captive patients. The dentist accepts this small fee, which is ENTIRELY INADEQUATE for the treatment he agrees to provide these captive patients.
So, you may ask, if the fee is inadequate, WHY do dentist sign up for these "plans?"
There are several answers. First, a dentist may just not understand how these plans work. The salesmen are pretty good at telling dentists they will have plenty of cash flow and plenty of patients. But if a young, naive dentist takes these plans and delivers normal treatment with normal expenses with this inadequate compensation, his office soon will go broke. A few dentists learned this the hard way and went bankrupt, losing their offices and their livelihoods.
I have even been told by some HMO plan salesmen (who sell the plan to dentists, not to patients) that their particular plans prohibit their dentists from taking more than 40% of their patients in HMO plans! That's because those plans recognize that the dental office LOSES so much money treating their patients, because the monthly capitation paid to the dentist is so grossly inadequate, that the dentists run the danger of bankruptcy, and the HMO plan then would have to scurry around to find a replacement dental office.
So those capitation plans I checked out are guilty of hypocrisy. They tell the dentist that he can make a living but their actions prove otherwise.
Second, some dentists join an HMO plan because they think that most of the patients won't actually make appointments to be seen. If the dentist gets a captive list of 100 patients, and only 50 of those show up each year, that has the effect of doubling the paltry HMO monthly payment made for 100 patients. Even then, the dentist eventually discovers that the fee won't even cover the cost of treating 50 patients!
Thirdly, a few dentists may figure they can beat the system. This can be done by "bait-and-switch" or by "pacing."
"Pacing" is the practice of postponing the appointments of HMO-plan patients by as many weeks as possible. The dental office paces itself in how many appointments are given to HMO patients and how many to profitable patients. The dental office calculates how much money it can afford to lose, then "paces" the flow of any more money-losing HMO patients by postponing them into the future. This, in effect, means the dental office actually sees far fewer patients than the number for which it receives monthly payments. In some cases it makes the difference between profitability and a dead loss.
Pacing is less prevalent than it was 20 years ago, as most HMO's now prohibit the practice. And most contract dentists realize that pacing does not increase office income by a single dime, it just means fewer patients seen for the same small monthly compensation.
"Bait-and-switch," on the other hand, has the potential of solving the capitation dentist's problem of inadequate compensation by selling the patient on services that will actually provide a living income. It places the patient in the difficult position of trying to determine whether the proposed services are needed or not -- and that decision usually takes a great deal of dental education and expertise.
Most dentists are not so bereft of business sense as to sign up with HMO plans. They recognize that REAL insurance (UCR and PPO) pays according to the work done. UCR insurance pays part of the fee for each procedure done, and the patient pays the rest. That is simple and straightforward, though the paperwork can sometimes be something of an impediment, depending on the case.
Most PPO insurance also covers some treatment even if the dentist is not a member of the PPO. For this reason a dentist can view a PPO policy as a UCR policy that just pays less. The patient still pays the portion of the fee that the insurance doesn't cover.
In a nutshell that's why most dentists accept insurance. It doesn't matter to most dentists who pays the bill, as long as the bill is properly paid. If the insurance doesn't cover much, the dentist is still paid properly by the patient for the difference.
PPO plans generally pay a higher percentage of the fee if the dentist is a PPO member. However, the PPO also sets the fee, which is always somewhat lower than the going rate. If the PPO fee is near to the dentist's normal fee, then many dentists become members. They believe the PPO plan will steer patients to that dental office, without much loss of income for the dentist.
If the PPO fees are too low, then the dentist does not join the plan. He can still see PPO patients but the insurance just pays less, and the patient pays the rest.
If a dentist considers joining a PPO, he must make an individual decision as to whether that PPO's fees will cover his own fees or not. If not, he just doesn't join. He can still see the PPO patients, but the patient pays the difference up to the normal fees.
What do I
> do, call around until I find one that does not accept insurance? But > does that mean he is a good denist? Maybe the insurance plan won't > even accept him, he's had so many complaints. I would not advise choosing a dentist simply on his unwillingness to file insurance claims. If you have real insurance, not a capitation plan, you should be able to find thousands of good dentists in California who would be happy to see you.
There are very good dentists who take insurance, and there are some very good dentists who do not take insurance. So you can't judge dental skills on the basis of whether he "accepts insurance."
Please remember that capitation plans are not insurance, they are captive-patient dental plans, so anything I say about insurance does not apply to such plans.
> I've asked for recommendations from friends and most people go to the > dentist so seldom, no one can really recommend their dentist. Or else > they recommend one but he's an hour or two away where they used to > live... I don't know why your friends go to the dentist so seldom. Nationwide statistics say that people are actually going MORE often for dental visits than ever before.
It may also be that your friends are full participants in our modern "mobile society." Perhaps they move so often that they don't say in one place long enough to be a part of the local community. This is a real problem in establishing a long-lasting relationship with a dentist.
In years past, people lived for a long time in their communities, and everybody knew which dentists had which reputation. If people no longer reside in the same place for more than a few months, it's difficult for them to establish the time-honored rapport that used to be common between dentist and patient. It is also difficult to form a feeling of community with neighbors who are essentially transients.
Unfortunately some dentists may also lose motivation to establish a long-lasting rapport when the patient is just going to move in a few months anyway. It would be best to look for a dentist who is known for good relations with his patients.
> It seems to me that finding a good dentist is much harder than finding > a good doctor, and believe me, that also is no piece of cake. Add to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > eat/drink a lot of sugar, so I think our part in these problems is > minimal.) If you restrict your choice of dentists to those who have been signed up by one of those capitation plans, you may be eliminating any possibility of ever meeting the majority of fine dentists in your community.
Of the better dentists I have known in my own Southern California community for over thirty years, not a single one of them would ever sign up with a capitation plan.
> Two other dentists we have been to, pulled the bait and switch scam on > us so obviously that we quit going to them after one visit because we [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > So here we are back to looking for a good general practitioner dentist > again. Look outside that small list of HMO-captured dentists. Consider the vast majority of dentists who work for the patient, not for the dental plan.
> And along those lines: > How much should I expect to pay a good dentist for the following?: > full mouth xrays > regular semi-annual cleaning > amalgam filling > root canal (endodontist, please) These costs vary enormously from one dentist to another. As it has been stated by others on this forum before: you don't always get what you pay for. Sometimes you get less. But does anyone really think they will get MORE than what they pay for, as these HMO plans seem to hint?
Best regards, - dentaldoc
JimSocal - 21 Nov 2005 06:21 GMT >The vast majority of dentists I have met for over 30 years are NOT "con >artists." They expect to work hard and provide decent care for a decent [quoted text clipped - 207 lines] >Best regards, >- dentaldoc Thanks for the analysis and education re the different types of dental plans.
Mine is a PPO (Delta) and yet still I have found that they want to pull the bait and switch and charge me for things I don't need.
I will never join an "hmo" dental plan again, that's for sure. It seems to me the Delta PPO can be economically beneficial if you use it right and get a good dentist; but that seems nearly impossible, and also it seems that there may be a lot of bait and switch going on with it which makes it NOT a good plan.
Vaughn - 21 Nov 2005 11:22 GMT > I will never join an "hmo" dental plan again, that's for sure. It > seems to me the Delta PPO can be economically beneficial if you use it > right and get a good dentist; It does not seem that way to me. My employer gives me a DHMO plan for "free". In this case, I feel that "free" is way too expensive. I also tried that same company's extra-cost PPO plan, and find that it is way to aggravating dealing with a company that does not want to pay claims. A pox on all of them!
>but that seems nearly impossible, Here we agree.
Jim, notice above that I have only reposted the relevant parts of your former post and snipped out all of the stuff that I was not directly responding to. Now you can read the post without having to hunt through a bunch of old stuff to find my comments. Your posts would have a lot more impact if you would do the same.
Vaughn
Bill - 22 Nov 2005 02:03 GMT .>
> Thanks for the analysis and education re the different types of dental > plans. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > also it seems that there may be a lot of bait and switch going on with > it which makes it NOT a good plan. _______________________________________
JimSocal, which form of Delta do you have? 1. Delta Premier 2. Delta DPO
Delta in California has changed its terminology lately, and this has led to a lot of confusion. The traditional names were Delta Premier, and the Delta DPO.
They might be calling these two plans something different today, but they still have these two basically different Delta plans.
If the type of "PPO" that you have is the same as Delta DPO, that particular plan has a very low fee schedule. A dentist with a very low office expense level can work with that fee schedule, but it's lower than just about every other insurance company's PPO fee level.
Unlike the Delta DPO, the Delta Premier plan lets you get a high percentage of the fee covered at ANY Delta member dentist's office. Delta Premier gets much closer to a living income. About 90% of the dentists in California are Delta members, so this is Delta's best insurance product. But remember that most of those Delta member dentists do NOT subscribe to the alternative DPO low fees, they subscribe only to the higher, normal Delta-accepted fees.
So it makes a big difference which Delta you have.
It really comes down to the skills and character of the dentist. It is better to choose a dentist on his reputation for these qualities, instead of choosing him on the basis of whether the insurance company thinks he's cheap enough for them. Sometimes you get lucky and find a good dentist with low cost structure so he can charge less, but that is difficult to find in today's urban climate. Many of the low-cost dentists might just be delivering a low-value product. Since each dentist is different, I really can't say without knowing the individual situation.
Satisfied, long-term patients are your best bet for decent recommendations.
If most of your acquaintances haven't formed a long-term relationship with a dentist, either because they don't bother with normal health maintenance, or they purposely choose cheap dental clinics that don't form long-term relationships with patients, they those acquaintances won't be much help. You would have to ask folks who enjoy dental health and highly value their dental treatment.
Best regards, - dentaldoc
JimSocal - 22 Nov 2005 07:13 GMT >JimSocal, which form of Delta do you have? >1. Delta Premier >2. Delta DPO I don't think it is either; it is Delta Care, PMI (of California) They charge for most procedures, but less than most private non-insuarnce dental procedures. 2 free cleanings per year, 2 sets of bitewings per year, and free xrays. "Free", I mean. I think this was what they called the PPO plan, before, but not any more. Not sure. I have had both plans and both of them have led us to bad dentists. This dentist I have now might be a good one, but he's very much into charging for non-covered procedures.
>Satisfied, long-term patients are your best bet for decent >recommendations. Agreed. If only I could determine who that is.
>If most of your acquaintances haven't formed a long-term relationship >with a dentist, either because they don't bother with normal health >maintenance, or they purposely choose cheap dental clinics that don't >form long-term relationships with patients, Combination of the above.
> they those acquaintances >won't be much help. You would have to ask folks who enjoy dental health >and highly value their dental treatment. Just difficult to find. But I'm looking.
Bill - 22 Nov 2005 17:55 GMT > >JimSocal, which form of Delta do you have? > >1. Delta Premier > >2. Delta DPO > > > I don't think it is either; it is Delta Care, PMI (of California) That explains it. PMI is not regular fee-for-service dental insurance. It's just another capitation plan.
PMI used to be a separate company that had nothing to do with Delta insurance. Back in those days, Delta was proud to offer real insurance, and the Delta people went out of their way to show that their "real" insurance was a superior product to all those capitation plans. And they were right.
The corporate honchos at Delta were always looking for ways to make more money. They decided to use Delta's good name to cram more bucks into their bank account. Delta simply bought the entire PMI company, and started calling it Delta PMI.
Delta then sold the PMI plan to unsuspecting employers as a "Delta" product, even though it was just the same old capitation plan, and PMI was still run almost as a separate company. It was just owned by Delta, that's all.
By attaching Delta's name to the same old PMI company, Delta could sell the capitation plan of PMI more easily. I suspect that the executives at Delta are still laughing all the way to the bank.
And patients who got PMI thought they were getting "real" Delta insurance. But it isn't the same thing at all.
> They charge for most procedures, but less than most private > non-insuarnce dental procedures. 2 free cleanings per year, 2 sets of > bitewings per year, and free xrays. "Free", I mean. But if the services are "free," then how does the dentist make a living?
Think about that for a minute.
The dentist has to buy food for his family and gas for his car. He also has to pay the salaries and wages for his employees in the dental office.
If he works for free, how does he pay for all of that?
The obvious answer is that he CAN'T work for free. If he is doing "free" work for you, he HAS to find a way to charge you. Somehow, some way, he HAS to get the money to pay the rent and pay the bills. In my other posts, I've covered some of the ways that the dentist can actually be paid for working.
It's a shame that people aren't told the truth when they sign up for a capitation plan. Such dental plans aren't going to tell you how the finances really operate, because they have good reason to believe that nobody who really understands the plans would ever buy them.
> I think this was what they called the PPO plan, before, but not any > more. Not sure. I have had both plans and both of them have led us to > bad dentists. This dentist I have now might be a good one, but he's > very much into charging for non-covered procedures. If you had the Delta DPO plan as your "PPO" plan before, remember that it is one of the lowest-paying PPO plans in existence. Most dentists, even those who take many other PPO plans, would have more difficulty making a living with the lower DPO rates.
In effect, the low DPO rates aren't much better than capitation rates.
That creates an incentive to make up for the unrealistically-low rates by finding something else to charge you for.
Like anything else in life, when low costs for dental treatment SEEM too good to be true -- they usually are!
> Just difficult to find. But I'm looking. Don't give up! Good luck to you. - dentaldoc
JimSocal - 23 Nov 2005 06:47 GMT >That explains it. PMI is not regular fee-for-service dental insurance. >It's just another capitation plan. >And patients who got PMI thought they were getting "real" Delta >insurance. But it isn't the same thing at all. Oh. Who knew?
>> They charge for most procedures, but less than most private >> non-insuarnce dental procedures. 2 free cleanings per year, 2 sets of >> bitewings per year, and free xrays. "Free", I mean. > >But if the services are "free," then how does the dentist make a >living? That's why I put "Free" in quotes. But you see, people who sign up for these types of plans assume that the money we pay in each month pretty much covers the "free" cleanings and xrays.
>If he works for free, how does he pay for all of that? I assumed they make money off the people who pay in and don't use theier services, much like how you pay in for car insurance but only a few people file a claim against it... I know, now, this isn't how it works; but when I joined, I assumed that... I also assumed maybe my employer was subsidizing it to some degree.
>It's a shame that people aren't told the truth when they sign up for a >capitation plan. Such dental plans aren't going to tell you how the >finances really operate, because they have good reason to believe that >nobody who really understands the plans would ever buy them. AMEN! You said a mouthful, there, brother!
Stovepipe - 20 Nov 2005 16:22 GMT > So here we are back to looking for a good general practitioner dentist > again. Have you tried the local dental school? They usually have residency programs, and you'd get good treatment there. SP
 Signature Take out the TRAASH to reply
W_B - 21 Nov 2005 18:01 GMT >> So here we are back to looking for a good general practitioner dentist >> again. > >Have you tried the local dental school? They usually have residency >programs, and you'd get good treatment there. >SP Except in Kaanaadaa... --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Stovepipe - 22 Nov 2005 06:01 GMT > >Have you tried the local dental school? They usually have residency > >programs, and you'd get good treatment there. > >SP > > Except in Kaanaadaa... > -- There are only 32 teeth in all of Kanadia... 's why Roy is so rich.... SP
 Signature Take out the TRAASH to reply
Tony Bad - 22 Nov 2005 16:31 GMT > > >Have you tried the local dental school? They usually have residency > > >programs, and you'd get good treatment there. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > There are only 32 teeth in all of Kanadia... 's why Roy is so rich.... > SP This is not true...a dental friend in Ottawa sent me some notes on a patient we were discussing and this guy had teeth numbered up to 48!...so it appears you Canadians have at least 16 more teeth per mouth than us lower evolved Americans...oh...and better beer.
T
Stovepipe - 23 Nov 2005 06:39 GMT > > > >Have you tried the local dental school? They usually have residency > > > >programs, and you'd get good treatment there. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > T Now _that_ is weird..... 'specially since not even Kaannaadians _chew_ their beer....
These must be micro teeth.... if not, the guy is a WEREWOLF, with a real snout.... SP
 Signature Take out the TRAASH to reply
kureforcrohns@sbcglobal.net - 23 Nov 2005 16:09 GMT Most people here can take a joke, but this is absolutely crazy. Bring this guy out of the hills and put him on display and show him to me. Skip the beer part. I will then admit my theory on crohns is as false or as true as the 48 teeth. I'm in a lousy mood and you are the target.
Gail
> "Stovepipe" <stove99TRA@ASHyahoo.ca> wrote in message
> > There are only 32 teeth in all of Kanadia... 's why Roy is so rich.... > > SP [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > T Tony Bad - 23 Nov 2005 16:55 GMT I am not sure what you mean...but why I was referring to is that in Canada they use a different system of tooth numbering....here in the US the "highest" tooth # is 32...in Canadian numbering system, the highest # is 48. Not including mutants on either side of the border...we all have the same # of teeth. Perhaps some beer would help your mood problems...or at least make you forget why you were in a bad mood. I am visiting the in-laws, and will need something stronger than beer!
T
> Most people here can take a joke, but this is absolutely crazy. Bring > this guy out of the hills and put him on display and show him to me. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > > > T kureforcrohns@sbcglobal.net - 23 Nov 2005 18:13 GMT Okay, sorry about everything. You just happened to be around to catch the misplaced ire. I am sure the different numbering systems of many things confuses others in the US. Beer would not work for me, nor would that or any other similar beverage be welcome. I am sure your inlaws probably have as much to put up with as you. Getting a little nasty here, so that should remedy the anger, and I really do not mean a word I said. Regards Gail Sometimes considered a dork as at present.
> I am not sure what you mean...but why I was referring to is that in Canada > they use a different system of tooth numbering....here in the US the [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > > > > > T
|
|
|