Ok, I understand that most DDS' have high costs on supplies.
But why then do extractions cost hundreds each?
Obviously there's considerable overhead of running a business, but
would it be fair to say that standard (cosmetic, restorative) services
are at a discount or that extractions are at a premium?
It cost me over $300 each to have two wisdom teeth pulled.
While I understand these are the hardest to reach teeth, only a single
local hypo was applied in two places along with some cotton used.
That's it.
The supplies and time spent were minimal.
In fact, I waited considerably longer in the waiting room than I spent
actually in the chair.
Also, does it make sense to obtain insurance once the costs of a
procedure exceed a certain point?
My dentist charges *more* for cash payments than for insurance.
Does this make sense? It would seem that cashflow is important and
waiting for insurance reimbursement would cause a DDS to charge more
than if a payment was made in cash.
So, wouldn't it make more sense to put the cash into an insurance
policy instead of paying it directly to the dentist?
Steven Bornfeld - 20 Nov 2005 16:08 GMT
> Ok, I understand that most DDS' have high costs on supplies.
> But why then do extractions cost hundreds each?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> So, wouldn't it make more sense to put the cash into an insurance
> policy instead of paying it directly to the dentist?
Good questions.
While it seems that the overhead for extractions is low, you must
factor in the extra staffing usually necessary for these procedures.
Oral surgeons generally perform surgical implantology and can provide
general anesthesia. This vastly increases their malpractice premiums.
While you received neither implants nor general anesthesia, the
realities are that these extra costs must be spread across the entire
fee schedule, or these services become prohibitive.
Of course, OMFS get 3 or 4 years additional training than the average
general dentist, and understandibly feel they deserve a higher level of
compensation. I think they do--it would take me far longer than your
surgeon to accomplish the same extraction, and then my hourly
compensation would be less--even at the same fee. But I think that
extra fee is probably money well-spent, dontcha think?
Steve
W_B - 21 Nov 2005 17:58 GMT
>> Ok, I understand that most DDS' have high costs on supplies.
>> But why then do extractions cost hundreds each?
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
>Steve
Like I said, you pay for the skill, not the time.
--
W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 21 Nov 2005 17:33 GMT
>Ok, I understand that most DDS' have high costs on supplies.
>But why then do extractions cost hundreds each?
>Obviously there's considerable overhead of running a business, but
>would it be fair to say that standard (cosmetic, restorative) services
>are at a discount or that extractions are at a premium?
You pay for the skill of the operator, not the time.
>It cost me over $300 each to have two wisdom teeth pulled.
That's cheap.
Kwicher bitchin' .
--
W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Amatus Cremona - 21 Nov 2005 21:37 GMT
> That's cheap.
It really is cheap for wisdom teeth.

Signature
/
Amatus
/
>
>>Ok, I understand that most DDS' have high costs on supplies.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com