>Most intelligent human beings understand that most people are more
>receptive to respectful dialog than to attempts at belittlement and
>sarcasm.
I guess that rules out Lolly. Or was the above a sly way to suggest
that Lolly is a few fries short of being a Happy Meal?
>*************************************
>
>Sorry Jan, I had had it up to my eyeballs.
You ain't seen nothing yet.
>I had asked you nicely to please leave me alone. Instead you kept
>following me around and harrassing me. I tried to ignore you but I
>caved, hence the Halloween costume joke.
Best not to let Lollipop know that it bothers you. That will just
encourage this psychopath even more.
If you make posts with opinions that are at odds with hers she will
endlessly badger you by calling you liar and other names. Her
objective will be to drive you off. She has been at it for several
years. She is very good at it. Trust me.
Aloha,
Rich
> Most intelligent human beings understand that most people are more
> receptive to respectful dialog than to attempts at belittlement and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Sorry Jan, I had had it up to my eyeballs.
Oh you poor baby.
> I had asked you nicely to please leave me alone.
That's EACTLY what I did.
Instead you kept following me around and harrassing me.
WOW!
What a LIAR YOU ARE.
First of all, I did NOT know this was the same Sue.
How many names do you post under?
Secondly, I am NOT following NOR harrassing YOU..
The last thing, I said to you was:
Thank you, Sue,
Best to you,
Jan
I tried to ignore you but I
> caved, hence the Halloween costume joke.
To use you words, that's a flat out lie.
You posted the NOT Holloween joke ,but rather
your BELITTLING at 5:50 PM
You made this LYING post at 2:53 PM
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
From: "somebody" <chrlie...@yahoo.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: 31 Oct 2005 11:53:05 -0800
Local: Mon, Oct 31 2005 2:53 pm
Subject: Re: Dr. Kulancz
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
Thanks Dartos.
Most intelligent human beings understand that most people are more
receptive to respectful dialog than to attempts at belittlement and
sarcasm.
Oh yes, and I know there is Joel. We all know that when Joel is joking
around, he really does not care to get ANY point across. He does not
care if the other party os receptive or not. Rather, he is just having
fun.
However, if some of these people like Clinton, Dr. Kulacz, Chuck and
Lolly are serious in their "mission" and making themselves "heard" then
perhaps calling dentists "idiots," using sarcasm, jokes, and
exaggerations to make their "very serious" point(s) does not play well
to their advantage.
JMHO,
Sue
I did not know it was the same person.
I see you are a liar, and belittler.
You have some nerve, and that about all.
Dingy blonde comes to mind.
Huge mouth and no brains.
> Peace,
>
> Sue
Rich.@. - 01 Nov 2005 07:25 GMT
>Oh you poor baby.
>
>WOW!
>
>What a LIAR YOU ARE.
>I see you are a liar, and belittler.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Huge mouth and no brains.
>On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:57:03 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
><LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>only those filled with hate have a
>>need to belittle and call names.
>>Your words come back to bite you.
>>
>>Jan
Robert Morien - 01 Nov 2005 07:26 GMT
> Dingy blonde comes to mind.
>
> Huge mouth and no brains.
exactly how I imagined my lolly costume...or going as a big cavity
somebody - 01 Nov 2005 16:20 GMT
Robert,
I see what you mean. She is a complete psychopath.
Sue
LadyLollipop - 01 Nov 2005 20:03 GMT
> Robert,
>
> I see what you mean. She is a complete psychopath.
>
> Sue
>Peace,
>Sue
Sue - 01 Nov 2005 21:55 GMT
Question:
Why does a psychopath continuously post quotes of those whom s/he calls
liars?
Answer:
Because s/he is a psychopath
Robert Morien - 01 Nov 2005 23:23 GMT
> Question:
> Why does a psychopath continuously post quotes of those whom s/he calls
> liars?
>
> Answer:
> Because s/he is a psychopath
for her it's spammer rule number 3
Sue - 02 Nov 2005 17:21 GMT
Robert wrote:
for her it's spammer rule number 3
Reply:
That is funny. What are spammer rules #1 and #2? How many spammer
rules are there?
-Sue
Robert Morien - 03 Nov 2005 06:33 GMT
> Robert wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> -Sue
http://spamcanners.org/lies.htm
1. Spammers always lie
2. If a spammer says they aren't lying, see rule number 1
3. Spammers are stupid
4. Spammers are always trying to prove rule number 3.
Joel M. Eichen - 03 Nov 2005 23:41 GMT
>> Robert wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> -Sue
There is a course in spamology .......
>http://spamcanners.org/lies.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>4. Spammers are always trying to prove rule number 3.
LadyLollipop - 02 Nov 2005 00:03 GMT
>> Robert,
>>
>> I see what you mean. She is a complete psychopath.
>>
>> Sue
The dingy blonde with the huge mouth and no brains, makes a fool of herself.
Can't keep track of who said what.
Robert Morien - 02 Nov 2005 01:58 GMT
> >> Robert,
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Can't keep track of who said what.
just keep better notes and you won't get lost so often...and you'll
remind yourself to stop spamming
Peter Bowditch - 02 Nov 2005 05:05 GMT
>>> Robert,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Can't keep track of who said what.
A bit self-referential, aren't we?

Signature
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
LadyLollipop - 02 Nov 2005 05:34 GMT
>>>> Robert,
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> A bit self-referential, aren't we?
Not even.
Peter Bowditch - 02 Nov 2005 06:43 GMT
>>>>> Robert,
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Not even.
That's odd!

Signature
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
JanD - 03 Nov 2005 04:03 GMT
>>>>>> Robert,
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> That's odd!
=
-
+
LadyLollipop - 02 Nov 2005 05:39 GMT
>>>> Robert,
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> A bit self-referential, aren't we?
I'm not, are you?
I know you who said what, do you?
Do show us.