>The way I read it, you're taking responsibility for knowing exactly what
>your dentist is going to do and why because you seem to be aware that if
>you can't prepare yourself in this way, you will suffer for not having
>done what it is you know you need to do for yourself.
You seem to just want to add the word responsibility to any action,
and it doesn't really work.
>The dentist's responsibility is to be certain that the patient is
>properly informed of any problems found and any treatment recommendations
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>know whether you feel as though you understand everything well enough in
>order to accept or refuse treatment.
Lots of people, many many people, will never understand what you are
telling them. Does that mean that they shirk their responsibilities?
I don't think so. You are expecting too much of your patients and it
is up to you to know which patients will understand and can make
informed decisions and which you must push into the right course of
action.
>And the patient may have a responsibility to oneself to seek additional
>opinions given certain circumstances and the patient may need to leave
>the care of a particular dentist if he/she does not have appropriate
>levels of confidence in a given dentist.
You expect too much of your patients. Many don't have the ability to
understand and many don't want to understand. Your responsibility
extends to these types of patient too.
Ann
The Webby - 01 Nov 2005 04:32 GMT
> >The way I read it, you're taking responsibility for knowing exactly what
> >your dentist is going to do and why because you seem to be aware that if
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> You seem to just want to add the word responsibility to any action,
> and it doesn't really work.
If you see it that way, that's okay. And I've shared my personal
opinion, for whatever that's worth to readers in general.
> >The dentist's responsibility is to be certain that the patient is
> >properly informed of any problems found and any treatment recommendations
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> informed decisions and which you must push into the right course of
> action.
If a person, a patient, does not understand the nature of problems
found, the reasons behind proposed treatment plans or the recommendation
of no treatment, then the dentist should not push the patient into
anything. The dentist needs to explain to the patient what he/she as
found and any recommendations. If the patient can not understand this
information, the patient can not give an informed consent for treatment
(including the option of no treatment). In such a case, someone else
who is designated as being responsible for making decisions for that
patient must be the recipient of all the information prior to deciding
what the patient should have. This person would be a legal guardian of
some sort.
(Note: These comments concern routine dentistry and not care for a
patient in an emergency with a life-threatening condition.)
> >And the patient may have a responsibility to oneself to seek additional
> >opinions given certain circumstances and the patient may need to leave
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Ann
It is the dentist's responsibility to be certain that the person making
an informed consent to a treatment option understands what the dentist
has asked the patient to agree to. In this respect, a patient who is
incapable of understanding the information provided is also not capable
of deciding whether to agree or refuse treatment. These patients
require special communication considerations.
It could be that we will need to agree to disagree about this. I find
the discussion quite interesting and I appreciate your willingness to
share your ideas about this with the newsgroup's readers.
Webby