Robert Morien's Full Of MORE Hot Air

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

LadyLollipop - 27 Oct 2005 05:27 GMT

From: Robert Morien <PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:36:49 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 26 2005 8:36 pm
Subject: Re: Robert Morien's Full of Hot Air

Robert blathered:

LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:

> Robert Morien PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:32:20 -0700
> Local: Wed, Oct 26 2005 2:32 pm

> In article <Y0G7f.477248$_o.210536@attbi_s71>,

> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps Robert could cite exactly what he rule he thinks I am breaking,
> > when he *claims* he continually reports to a...@asp.att.net

> > It is noted he can NOT answer this question.

> When will you ever understand the difference between can and won't?

> He can NOT and will NOT!

> That's because there is NO rule.

[ snip] Robert's made up rule.

> > Furthermore he KNOWS nothing about what spam is.

[snip] more of Robert's made up rules.

> I know you are a spammer. I know that you demonstrate all of the
> characteristics including strict adherence to rules 1 thru 3.

> You KNOW, no such thing.

[snip] Robert blowing hot air

> There is NO rule 1 or 3 from att. net.

[ snip lie + diversion ]

> Studies and abstracts are NOT spam!

> > Http websites are NOT spam

> > Information about health issues is NOT spam

> > He is INDEED wrong with his claims

[ snip more of Robert's made up rules]

Such as:

> > Posting something repetitively makes it spam.

> posting something repetively does make it spam:

> http://www.stopspam.org/usenet/mmf/breidbart.html

> Poor Robert!

> Seth Breidbart is a lot like Robert.

> Breidbart's hidden agenda

> http://tinyurl.com/dojru

> Seth Breidbart, a few years back, in his soc.singles days, became well
> known for a particular style of arguing

[ snip diversion, of above tactics]

> [snip]

> since you are abusing the BI,

> BI?

You well may be, but that's an issue best left to other newsgroups.

Robert accuses, then says I may well be.

It appears Robert is blowing more hot air.

I (and others) find this an interference

> with my internet service.

>What does *your* internet service* have anything to do with the subject?

No answer, why am I not surprised.

http://www.att.net/general-info/terms.html

> states:

> Act responsibly

> a. Don't use the Service to interfere with others' use of the Service or
> of the Internet in general, to conduct illegal or abusive activity, or
> to submit materials that violate the rights of others. Specifically:

> * don't send messages, data, images and programs that are libelous,
> defamatory, obscene, pornographic, threatening, abusive, or hateful;
> * don't send materials that contain viruses, worms, or any other
> destructive elements; and
> * don't interfere with or infringe the copyrights, trademarks,
> logos, service marks, or confidential information of others.

> In particular I find your ABUSE of dentists and others who don't agree
> with you to be hateful

> LOL, not interested in what YOU find.

Duh! you're not intereset in what anyone finds.

Poor Robert, needs to learn to read for comprehension, after all, I
capitalized the word for him, still he didn't get it.

D U H!

One more time, Robert.

Slowly now, ready.

1.

2'

3.

L O L , not interested in what *Y O U* find.

Get it now?

> > Neither is it against the TOS of att.net

> ah, but it is

> Poor Robert, now uses a diversion.

[ snip more insults + more of Robert's made up rules ]

> I repeat:

> Neither is it against the TOS of att.net

[ ditto of last snip ]

Robert Morien's Full of MORE Hot Air

Reply to this Message

Robert Morien - 27 Oct 2005 06:13 GMT

> From: Robert Morien <PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:36:49 -0700
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> [ snip] Robert's made up rule.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22rules+of+spammers%22&btnG=Google+
Search

> > > Furthermore he KNOWS nothing about what spam is.
>
> [snip] more of Robert's made up rules.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22rules+of+spammers%22&btnG=Google+
Search

> > I know you are a spammer. I know that you demonstrate all of the
> > characteristics including strict adherence to rules 1 thru 3.
>
> > You KNOW, no such thing.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22rules+of+spammers%22&btnG=Google+
Search

> [snip] Robert blowing hot air
>
> > There is NO rule 1 or 3 from att. net

Then there must by your own logic be a rule number 2, which means see
rule number 1. Rule #3

.

> [ snip lie + diversion ]
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> [ snip more of Robert's made up rules]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22rules+of+spammers%22&btnG=Google+
Search

> Such as:
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Robert accuses, then says I may well be.

I see you aren't denying that you are BI

> It appears Robert is blowing more hot air.
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Poor Robert, needs to learn to read for comprehension, after all, I
> capitalized the word for him, still he didn't get it.

Poor lolly, so unable to recognize the truth. YOU are not interested in
what anyone finds. Read it for comprehension.

> D U H!
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> L O L , not interested in what *Y O U* find.

S-l-o-w-l-y for you...YOU are not interested in what anyone finds. Read
it for comprehension.

> Get it now?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> [ snip more insults + more of Robert's made up rules ]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22rules+of+spammers%22&btnG=Google+
Search

> > I repeat:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Robert Morien's Full of MORE Hot Air

At least I can breathe what I'm full of. The best you can do with what
you are full of is to fertilize a field.

Reply to this Message