Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Do I really need full mouth X-Rays?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TLS - 27 Sep 2005 03:47 GMT
My new dentist wants to do full mouth x-rays (I think he said 17 of
them!). Is this really necessary? I have healthy teeth, am young, 28 and
have no history of teeth problems. I think I had fully mouth xrays done
several years ago but I'm wanting to limit my exposure to radiation at
this juncture.

Any thoughts?
Joel M. Eichen - 27 Sep 2005 11:12 GMT
>My new dentist wants to do full mouth x-rays (I think he said 17 of
>them!). Is this really necessary? I have healthy teeth, am young, 28 and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Any thoughts?

Yup, one panorex plus 2 bite-wings will do.
Amatus Cremona - 27 Sep 2005 12:47 GMT
> Yup, one panorex plus 2 bite-wings will do.

Yes, you should be able to count how many teeth you have from the average
Panorex film.

My full mouth series is 20 pictures.  If your dentist has digital x-ray
devices, the radiation from 20 exposures is about what you would get with
4-8 exposures on film.

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>
>>My new dentist wants to do full mouth x-rays (I think he said 17 of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Yup, one panorex plus 2 bite-wings will do.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 27 Sep 2005 17:26 GMT
> My new dentist wants to do full mouth x-rays (I think he said 17 of
> them!). Is this really necessary? I have healthy teeth, am young, 28 and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Any thoughts?

    I have learned to my sorrow (and patient's) that just because someone
hasn't had decay or other problems for a very long time does not mean
they will never have decay or other problems.
    I tend to be conservative with x-rays, esp. full series of x-rays.  I
have occasionally found that this attitude can lead to delay in picking
up problems.
    My advice--get the full series.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Dartos - 27 Sep 2005 21:34 GMT
Been there, done that myself!  Not a pleasant situation
to explain the need for a root canal soon after a check-up
(due to undetected interproximal decay).

:-(

Dartos

>     I have learned to my sorrow (and patient's) that just because
> someone hasn't had decay or other problems for a very long time does not
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Steve
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.