Note To ALL Posters Here

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

LadyLollipop - 14 Sep 2005 19:24 GMT

ONE MORE TIME!!!!

DO NOT E-MAIL ME PRIVATELY!

This has been a long standing rule of mine. Every posters here should know
it by now.

ALL that is said, should be said, right here out in the open, NOT behind the
scenes

Please made a note of it and abide by it, please.

Thank you,

Jan

Reply to this Message

Robert Morien - 15 Sep 2005 03:56 GMT

> ONE MORE TIME!!!!
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Jan

so who is emailing you offline? I don't know about those three you've
shown with my headers, but they are just copies of on-line posts. Are
you getting harassed privately?

There is plenty of wisdom in using munged email addys or just fake ones.

Reply to this Message

LadyLollipop - 15 Sep 2005 04:26 GMT

>> ONE MORE TIME!!!!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> so who is emailing you offline?

Another poster here, he knows who he is.

I don't know about those three you've

> shown with my headers, but they are just copies of on-line posts.

Nevertheless were sent to me privately by YOU.

<snip>

Reply to this Message

Robert Morien - 15 Sep 2005 05:35 GMT

> >> ONE MORE TIME!!!!
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> <snip>

you received them, but I didnt send them. I don't email spammers. Told
yo that repeatedly.

Reply to this Message

LadyLollipop - 15 Sep 2005 06:40 GMT

>> >> ONE MORE TIME!!!!
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> you received them, but I didnt send them. I don't email spammers. Told
> yo that repeatedly.

I am not a spammer. You can repeat it til the cows come home. Headers don't
lie.

They in FACT came from YOU!!

I had deleted them, but had not deleted the folder, so here you go, all
three.

Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
id <20050913053025q9200k7407e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:30:25 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
Received: (qmail 5149 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:09:05 -0000
Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
(208.25.62.167)
by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
23:09:05 -0700
From: Robert Morien <PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com>
To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com>
Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
Newsgroups:
sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkcc...@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0...@dentalcom.net>
<bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftft...@4ax.com>
<1126473632.653316.47...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5dansh...@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
<fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlk...@4ax.com>
<qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
<PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<yEpVe.236179$5N3.189...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
Posted-And-Mailed: yes
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:30:21 -0700
Message-ID: <PhD_failure-5F0FE4.22302112092005@news.isp.giganews.com>

In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,

"LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:

> > "Robert Morien" <PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........

> >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
> >> anything.

> > There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
> > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are
> > a
> > few that deserve being ignored.

> > carabelli

> It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
> Dan
> like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore
> the
> *truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.

> The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.

I only harass spammers.

Do you feel harassed?

Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
id <20050913052949q9200k4hile>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:29:49 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
Received: (qmail 5138 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:08:29 -0000
Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
(208.25.62.167)
by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
23:08:29 -0700
From: Robert Morien <PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com>
To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com>
Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
Newsgroups:
sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkcc...@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0...@dentalcom.net>
<bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftft...@4ax.com>
<1126473632.653316.47...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5dansh...@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
<fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlk...@4ax.com>
<qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
<PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<yEpVe.236179$5N3.189...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
Posted-And-Mailed: yes
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:29:46 -0700
Message-ID: <PhD_failure-3E5E9C.22294612092...@news.isp.giganews.com>

In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,

"LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:

> > "Robert Morien" <PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........

> >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
> >> anything.

> > There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
> > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are
> > a
> > few that deserve being ignored.

> > carabelli

> The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.

And you don't call what you do harassing? Please define harassment so we
can all understand.

Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
by sccqmxc93.asp.att.net (sccqmxc93) with SMTP
id <20050913052644q930039800e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:26:44 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
Received: (qmail 5068 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:05:24 -0000
Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
(208.25.62.167)
by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
23:05:24 -0700
From: Robert Morien <PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com>
To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com>
Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
Newsgroups:
sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
References: <1h2dzeo.e8vq1f1ba96mjN%stove99p...@yahoo.ca>
<Sue.1ux...@dentalcom.net>
<1125992435.465797.94...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkcc...@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0...@dentalcom.net>
<bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftft...@4ax.com>
<1126473632.653316.47...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5dansh...@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
<PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>
<PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092...@news.isp.giganews.com>
<fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>
Posted-And-Mailed: yes
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:26:37 -0700
Message-ID: <PhD_failure-003C20.22263712092...@news.isp.giganews.com>

In article <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>,

"LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:

> > In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:

> >> > In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
> >> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:

> >> >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_fail...@nousefulinfo.com> wrote

> >> >> > The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
> >> >> > department of your local college/university and asking them this?

> >> >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety
> >> >> of
> >> >> amalgams?

> >> >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of
> >> >> typical
> >> >> dental
> >> >> amalgams?

> >> > I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.

> >> OOOPPPPPSSSSS.

> >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
> >> amalgams?

> >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
> >> dental
> >> amalgams?

> >> <snip>

> > Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...

> Afraid not.

> The fact is:

> You have no right to grill Keith over and over with questions, when you
> refuse to answer them.

Who are you to tell me this? Keith asks questions that Keith could
clearly answer yet chooses not to. That is worth questioning him about.

I take it that you support Keiths right to ask questions he could easily
answer, but you don't support my right to ask questions he could easily
answer. That makes you a terrorist.

> This is a dental newsgroup.

are you a dentist?

> You have run out of excuses for not answering.

I haven't made any excuses for not answering. You questions are
irrelevent and not worthy of an answer.

> You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.

You are here to harass, admit it.

> <snip>

Just what is your position on tampons

Reply to this Message

Robert Morien - 15 Sep 2005 09:39 GMT

> >> >> ONE MORE TIME!!!!
> >> >>
[quoted text clipped - 261 lines]
>
> Just what is your position on tampons

Doesn't change a thing. I repeat, I don't email spammers. I repeat I
have never addressed an email to you. Get someone to explain that to you.

Reply to this Message

Joel M. Eichen - 15 Sep 2005 11:28 GMT

Jan and Robert entertain us ...... with ......

>posts.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>you received them, but I didnt send them. I don't email spammers. Told
>yo that repeatedly.

REPLY

"Told yo" is actually the correct form ......

Joel

Reply to this Message

CWatters - 15 Sep 2005 09:02 GMT

> ALL that is said, should be said, right here out in the open, NOT behind the
> scenes

..but only if on-topic. Feel free to use other means of communication for OT
subjects.

Reply to this Message

Joel M. Eichen - 15 Sep 2005 11:30 GMT

>> ALL that is said, should be said, right here out in the open, NOT behind
>the
>> scenes
>
>..but only if on-topic. Feel free to use other means of communication for OT
>subjects.

We agree. They should take it to e-mail!

Joel

Reply to this Message

Ann - 19 Sep 2005 22:50 GMT

>ONE MORE TIME!!!!
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Thank you,

So why give your private email address....

Ann

Reply to this Message