Note to Robert Morien

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

LadyLollipop - 14 Sep 2005 01:08 GMT

I had deleted them, but had not deleted the folder, so here you go, all
three.

Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
id <20050913053025q9200k7407e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:30:25 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
Received: (qmail 5149 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:09:05 -0000
Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
(208.25.62.167)
by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
23:09:05 -0700
From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com>
To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com>
Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
Newsgroups:
sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@dentalcom.net>
<bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@4ax.com>
<1126473632.653316.47500@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
<fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@4ax.com>
<qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
<PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
Posted-And-Mailed: yes
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:30:21 -0700
Message-ID: <PhD_failure-5F0FE4.22302112092005@news.isp.giganews.com>

In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:

> "carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >
> > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........
> >
> >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
> >> anything.
> >
> > There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
> > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are
> > a
> > few that deserve being ignored.
> >
> > carabelli
>
> It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
> Dan
> like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore
> the
> *truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
>
> The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.

I only harass spammers.

Do you feel harassed?

Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
id <20050913052949q9200k4hile>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:29:49 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
Received: (qmail 5138 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:08:29 -0000
Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
(208.25.62.167)
by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
23:08:29 -0700
From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com>
To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com>
Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
Newsgroups:
sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@dentalcom.net>
<bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@4ax.com>
<1126473632.653316.47500@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
<fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@4ax.com>
<qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
<PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
Posted-And-Mailed: yes
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:29:46 -0700
Message-ID: <PhD_failure-3E5E9C.22294612092005@news.isp.giganews.com>

In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:

And you don't call what you do harassing? Please define harassment so we
can all understand.

Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
by sccqmxc93.asp.att.net (sccqmxc93) with SMTP
id <20050913052644q930039800e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:26:44 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
Received: (qmail 5068 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:05:24 -0000
Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
(208.25.62.167)
by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
23:05:24 -0700
From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com>
To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com>
Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
Newsgroups:
sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
References: <1h2dzeo.e8vq1f1ba96mjN%stove99pipe@yahoo.ca>
<Sue.1ux0oo@dentalcom.net>
<1125992435.465797.94100@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@dentalcom.net>
<bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@4ax.com>
<1126473632.653316.47500@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@4ax.com>
<PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
<PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>
<PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@news.isp.giganews.com>
<fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>
Posted-And-Mailed: yes
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:26:37 -0700
Message-ID: <PhD_failure-003C20.22263712092005@news.isp.giganews.com>

In article <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:

> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
> news:PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
> > In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
> >> > In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
> >> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
> >> >> > department of your local college/university and asking them this?
> >> >>
> >> >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety
> >> >> of
> >> >> amalgams?
> >> >>
> >> >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of
> >> >> typical
> >> >> dental
> >> >> amalgams?
> >> >
> >> > I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
> >>
> >> OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
> >>
> >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
> >> amalgams?
> >>
> >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
> >> dental
> >> amalgams?
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >
> > Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...
>
> Afraid not.
>
> The fact is:
>
> You have no right to grill Keith over and over with questions, when you
> refuse to answer them.

Who are you to tell me this? Keith asks questions that Keith could
clearly answer yet chooses not to. That is worth questioning him about.

I take it that you support Keiths right to ask questions he could easily
answer, but you don't support my right to ask questions he could easily
answer. That makes you a terrorist.

> This is a dental newsgroup.

are you a dentist?

> You have run out of excuses for not answering.

I haven't made any excuses for not answering. You questions are
irrelevent and not worthy of an answer.

> You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.

You are here to harass, admit it.

> <snip>

Just what is your position on tampons

Reply to this Message

Robert Morien - 14 Sep 2005 07:00 GMT

> I had deleted them, but had not deleted the folder, so here you go, all
> three.
[quoted text clipped - 221 lines]
>
> Just what is your position on tampons

I never sent those to you. OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
might have gone to you that way.

Reply to this Message

LadyLollipop - 14 Sep 2005 17:21 GMT

*I never sent those to you*.

So, you say, it appears you did!

*OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
might have gone to you that way*.

WOW!!!!!!!

The reply to would have went to YOU, not me!!!!!

>> I had deleted them, but had not deleted the folder, so here you go, all
>> three.
[quoted text clipped - 233 lines]
> I never sent those to you. OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
> might have gone to you that way.

Reply to this Message

Robert Morien - 15 Sep 2005 03:54 GMT

Wrong as usual. If YOU use the reply-to field when posting, it will
automatically send an email copy of the post to you (when someone
replies to the post). I never use the reply-to field, for obvious
reasons.

And I have never, ever put your name in the to: cc: or bcc: field of any
emails that I have sent or posts that I have posted.

> *I never sent those to you*.
>
[quoted text clipped - 244 lines]
> > I never sent those to you. OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
> > might have gone to you that way.

Reply to this Message

LadyLollipop - 15 Sep 2005 04:35 GMT

> Wrong as usual. If YOU use the reply-to field when posting, it will
> automatically send an email copy of the post to you (when someone
> replies to the post). I never use the reply-to field, for obvious
> reasons.

I have no reply to field on outlook express, just a reply group and a reply
which goes to the poster.

> And I have never, ever put your name in the to: cc: or bcc: field of any
> emails that I have sent or posts that I have posted.

The e-mails you sent to me did not have a cc, they were sent directly to me
and anyone can clearly see.

You seem to be weaseling, Robert.

It is clear the e-mails came from you, they were posted both here and sent
to me, privately.

>> *I never sent those to you*.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 265 lines]
>> > I never sent those to you. OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
>> > might have gone to you that way.

Reply to this Message

Robert Morien - 15 Sep 2005 05:40 GMT

> > Wrong as usual. If YOU use the reply-to field when posting, it will
> > automatically send an email copy of the post to you (when someone
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> It is clear the e-mails came from you, they were posted both here and sent
> to me, privately.

as I've said repeatedly, I don't email spammers...waste of time. as I've
also said I have never put your email addy in the to: cc: or bcc: field
of any email or post I"ve ever made.

I have never purposefully, willingly or even willfully sent you an
email. Nor would I. ever.

Live with it. munge your email so this doesn't happen...that's what
pings are for.

Reply to this Message

LadyLollipop - 15 Sep 2005 06:32 GMT

>> > Wrong as usual. If YOU use the reply-to field when posting, it will
>> > automatically send an email copy of the post to you (when someone
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> I have never purposefully, willingly or even willfully sent you an
> email. Nor would I. ever.

Weasel all you want, willingly or whatever, the the FACT is you did.

> Live with it. munge your email so this doesn't happen...that's what
> pings are for.

You have that backwards, it is YOUR responsibility NOT to e-mail me, NOT
mine to munge my e-mail.

Reply to this Message

Robert Morien - 15 Sep 2005 09:36 GMT

> >> > Wrong as usual. If YOU use the reply-to field when posting, it will
> >> > automatically send an email copy of the post to you (when someone
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> You have that backwards, it is YOUR responsibility NOT to e-mail me, NOT
> mine to munge my e-mail.

I cannot make it any clearer to you than I have been trying. I have not
in anyway addressed an email to you. Period. Not in the to: field. Not
in the cc: field. Not in the bcc: field. Not in anyway. Not at any time.
Get someone to explain that to you if you are having trouble with it.

I don't email spammers.

And I don't care what you do with your email addy. The fact that you use
a real one shows how little you care about yourself.

Again: I don't email spammers, so stop harassing me.

Reply to this Message