Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Keith P Walsh - 25 Aug 2005 06:50 GMT
A Google search for "mercury-free dentist" gets a lot of hits these
days.

Two professional looking websites from the UK are one for a dentist in
Leeds, West Yorkshire:

http://www.advancedentist.co.uk/mercury.html

- and another in Carnaby Street, once the epi-centre of 1960s'
"swinging" London:

http://www.advancedentist.co.uk/mercury.html

What's interesting about these two dentists is that not only do they
offer strictly "mercury-free" restorative treatments, but they also
promote the removal of existing amalgam fillings on health grounds.

And it appears that their national dental association is powerless to
discredit them for it.

Is the end in sight for amalgam fillings?

Keith P Walsh
Robert  Morien - 25 Aug 2005 09:10 GMT
> A Google search for "mercury-free dentist" gets a lot of hits these
> days.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Keith P Walsh

wow, that's a freakin ground swell...although to my untrained eye those
urls look remarkably the same.
Keith P Walsh - 25 Aug 2005 12:13 GMT
Robert Morien wrote:

> wow, that's a freakin ground swell...although to my untrained eye those
> urls look remarkably the same.

I think that you may have missed the important point.

Dentists are promoting and carrying out the replacement of amalgam
fillings on health grounds without any threat of censure from their
national dental associations.

Do the dental associations approve of the practice?

Do they disapprove of it?

And if they disapprove of it why can't they do anything about it?

If the national dental association can't regulate its own profession
then what authority does it have?

None.

Perhaps our national dental associations have recognised that they may
have been making a mistake for a long time and are just a little shy
about admitting it.

Or perhaps they're planning to take some action against the
"mercury-free" crowd.

I suppose we'll just have to wait and see.

Keith P Walsh
Robert  Morien - 25 Aug 2005 13:14 GMT
> Robert Morien wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> fillings on health grounds without any threat of censure from their
> national dental associations.

In the states we'd call that boutique dentistry and the dentists doing
nothing except finding another creative way to get money from patients.

IE, doing it for the money not the "science"

> Do the dental associations approve of the practice?
>
> Do they disapprove of it?
>
> And if they disapprove of it why can't they do anything about it?

And if they do approve of it why should they do anything about it?

> If the national dental association can't regulate its own profession
> then what authority does it have?

Apparently enough to put you in a tizzy.

> None.
>
> Perhaps our national dental associations have recognised that they may
> have been making a mistake for a long time and are just a little shy
> about admitting it.

Or perhaps they just don't give a sh.t.

> Or perhaps they're planning to take some action against the
> "mercury-free" crowd.
>
> I suppose we'll just have to wait and see.
>
> Keith P Walsh
Keith P Walsh - 25 Aug 2005 18:45 GMT
>> Dentists are promoting and carrying out the replacement of amalgam
>> fillings on health grounds without any threat of censure from their
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>IE, doing it for the money not the "science"

"Science"?

I'll give you some "science".

It has been demonstrated experimentally that metal amalgam dental
fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to 350
millivolts. See:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/dutch.htm

And the resting potential of the human neurological synapse is only 70
millivolts.

Experimental investigations to determine whether or not the electrical
potentials generated by amalgam fillings are able to dissipate
electrical energy through the nerves in people's heads should
therefore have been carried out.

And the results should be available.

That's science.

The widespread adoption of metal amalgams for use in restorative
dentistry was quickly followed by the rise to prominence in our
societies of psychiatric "medicine".

In recent years many millions of dollars have been spent on research
attempting to prove that the causes of so-called "psychiatric"
conditions such as "schizophrenia", "paranoia", "stress",
"depression", etc., are "genetic".

So far without success.

That amounts to many millions of dollars worth of evidence that the
causes of these conditions are not "genetic".

However, at the same time it appears that nothing at all has been
spent on attempting to demonstrate that a principal cause of the many
millions of cases of such conditions diagnosed over the last 150 years
is not the dissipation of electrical energy through the nerves in
people's heads as a result of the electrical potentials generated by
the amalgam fillings in their teeth.

So no-one can say with any degree of certainty that it is not.

That's science too.

And it might explain why dental associations are not so quick these
days to condemn dentists for removing amalgam fillings from their
patients' teeth on the grounds of health.

Keith P Walsh
W_B - 25 Aug 2005 19:07 GMT
>"Science"?
>
>I'll give you some "science".

> up to 350 millivolts.

Forgot to wear your Faraday suit again ?
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
carabelli - 26 Aug 2005 03:13 GMT
>>"Science"?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Forgot to wear your Faraday suit again ?
> --
Never - ever after Labor Day

carabelli
billkatz - 25 Aug 2005 23:12 GMT
Keith P Walsh Wrote:

> "Science"?
>
> I'll give you some "science".

Whoa right there.

I’m not a dentist. My business services high tech needs fo
dentist’s offices but I do have a degree in electrical engineering
This article discusses the potentials of amalgam restorations, which b
all means are insignificant in comparison to the amounts of stati
electricity one is exposed to on a daily basis. These are not batterie
of psychosis, they’re not capable of any significant level o
capacitance and chances are that they won’t make anyone any mor
crazy than they were to begin with… The electrostatic discharge fro
the monitor a computer user sits in front of is far, far greater tha
that of the study you cite. Making a correlation between dementia an
the potential for electrical discharge from amalgams, gold crowns, et
is at the very least off the deep end.

FWIW, what slays me about this kind of mentality is that people take
small and somewhat insignificant report and blow it up into some hug
conspiracy theory. Keith, I don’t know you, I don’t want t
stereotype you into a particular group but you risk the possibility o
putting yourself in with the Hulda Clarke crowd. Hulda’s mentality i
to rip out all amalgams and root canals. This same person claims in he
book ‘Cure for all Cancers’ claims that a device called a zappe
will kill liver flukes, which of course, according to her, caus
cancer. In her mindset… Wouldn’t those discharging amalgams kil
the nasty little liver flukes? I mean… Those little fellows don’
have a chance.

BTW, I took interest in this ‘zapper’ subject years ago.
understand the rationalization she’s purporting. I’ve read he
claims about this little black box and frequency generation (which, b
the way, would get a first year student an F in lab). I know how t
build these zappers and I know what they really do… which i
nothing.

I’m sorry but this just doesn’t add up and calling it scienc
doesn’t help matters in the least.

OTOH, the human mind is a wonderful thing and one’s mind can hel
make them well again. If you feel sick and you believe that replacin
amalgams with composite will make you well… Go for it!

-Bil

--
billkat
Keith P Walsh - 26 Aug 2005 06:34 GMT
>Keith P Walsh Wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
>-Bill

Bill,

Thank you for your contribution.

Do you think that it should be possible using modern instrumentation
to establish that neurolgical function in the vicinity of teeth with
amalgam restorations is not significantly different to neurological
function in the vicinity of teeth without amalgam restorations?

Keith P Walsh

PS,  enquiries regarding the electrical properties of dental amalgams
can be found at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/intro.htm
billkatz - 26 Aug 2005 11:56 GMT
Keith P Walsh Wrote:

> Do you think that it should be possible using modern instrumentation
> to establish that neurolgical function in the vicinity of teeth with
> amalgam restorations is not significantly different to neurological
> function in the vicinity of teeth without amalgam restorations?

If electromagnetic impulses affected the nervous system as some clai
they do, I’d be very concerned about braces, titanium implants
artificial joints, amalgam, glasses, jewelry, etc. I don’t believ
that electromagnet forces damage the nervous system in the way som
describe it. If they did then chances are that an MRI woul
be…well…lethal.

As far as the electrolytic response or galvanic effect between iner
compounds like silver mercury amalgam goes, I don’t think the trac
amounts of mercury are anything in comparison to what we’re expose
to on a daily basis. Foods like fish are loaded with it and there’
nothing we can do. Chances are that eating a couple of fish dinner
will expose you to more mercury than all the fillings in one’s mout
ever will. I do believe that driving in traffic, sitting in the sun
eating, drinking and breathing constantly exposes us to a barrage o
toxic substances. That’s just a part of life and the human body i
very resilient.

Amalgam serves a very important role in dentistry. Not going to th
dentist because one is afraid of toxic chemicals is IMO myopic and sel
defeating

--
billkat
clintonz@prodigy.net - 26 Aug 2005 12:48 GMT
> As far as the electrolytic response or galvanic effect between inert
> compounds like silver mercury amalgam goes, I don't think the trace
> amounts of mercury are anything in comparison to what we're exposed
> to on a daily basis.

YOur assuming its trace amounts, but published papers already show
that is not  the case. Your false assumption drives your conclusion.

Foods like fish are loaded with it and there's
> nothing we can do. Chances are that eating a couple of fish dinners
> will expose you to more mercury than all the fillings in one's mouth
> ever will.

Amalgam is already on average the largest source of elemental
Hg, not counting corrosion. This was recently published in the NEJM.
Your lack of research in the area shows. Furthermore, now we are
getting in the realm of solid state a far , cry from circuit theory.
It's actually very clear that amalgam is not a stable substance at all,
nor is it even well understood. When you can set an upper limit on
amalgam corrosion under all conditions or even write an equation for
basic processes like Hg vapor emission or spontaneous surface Hg
droplet formation on the newer high copper fillings or even
characterise the internal phase changes in amalgam over a long  period
of time  let me know.

Until then I would  "can" the uniformed ADA tuna analogies.

(
billkatz - 26 Aug 2005 14:12 GMT
Huh?

October issue of the NEJM [NEJM, 349(19):1731-1737, Oct 2003]. Th
article is entitled “The Toxicology of Mercury - Current Exposure
and Clinical Manifestations.”

(Pages 1732-1733), “Patients who have questions about the potentia
relation between mercury and degenerative diseases can be assured tha
the available evidence shows no connection.”

You mean *that* report?

Mercury is toxic, no doubt. Uninformed is a different matter

--
billkat
clintonz@prodigy.net - 27 Aug 2005 00:17 GMT
> Huh?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> relation between mercury and degenerative diseases can be assured that
> the available evidence shows no connection."

I said that the NEJM had reported "finally" that amalgam was the
largest exposure of elemental Hg in the population, probably in that
article, though it could be a different recent one.

Yes that (probably)same article was pretty brutally criticized for then
concluding that exposure to Hg was really no big deal afterall.
did you read the entire article to see if what i said was true or
just take irrelevent snippet to deflect my main point?

It was basically a defensive, biased "summary of the literature", not
a research piece, by pro-Hg (and nearly senile) 60's throwback
toxicologist and dental industry gun Clarkson IIRC.

You might think it illogical that Clarkson or the NEJM could admit
that amalgam was the largest source of elemental Hg (do they have any
choice?) then turn around and say but look "no problem". A lot of other
people felt that way too! On the other hand what are the dentists and
doctors supposed  to do, publish an article which says, look we've been
exposing people to high levels of Hg and endangering their health all
these years?
billkatz - 27 Aug 2005 03:08 GMT
clintonz@prodigy.net Wrote:

> Yes that (probably)same article was pretty brutally criticized for
> then
> concluding that exposure to Hg was really no big deal afterall.
> did you read the entire article to see if what i said was true or
> just take irrelevent snippet to deflect my main point?

Noop!

No snippets or sound bytes. Mercury is toxic, so is diesel and gas.
Remember that the next time you're in traffic. A mountain out of
molehills is the point. ;-)

-Bill

Signature

billkatz

clintonz@prodigy.net - 27 Aug 2005 10:38 GMT
> clintonz@prodigy.net Wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> -Bill

And at least I can smell gas so I know how much I'm getting!

Once I had an interesting conversation with a lady who works at a
company
which makes Hg detectors. Turns out the employees's got bored so
for fun sometimes they would take gum and chew it, then stick a
straw in their mouth, take the hg sensor next to the straw and see how
high they could get the hg to  read on the detector. After doing this
herself and seeing the readings that employee then did go ahead and
have her amalgams removed. I believe she still does drive a car
however!
billkatz - 27 Aug 2005 17:16 GMT
clintonz@prodigy.net Wrote:

> And at least I can smell gas so I know how much I'm getting!
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> have her amalgams removed. I believe she still does drive a car
> however!

I wouldn’t consider somebody chewing gum and blowing through a stra
worthy of a citation, but what the heck. I do sometimes wonder just ho
smart it is to vaporize a chemically stable compound like amalgam b
“drilling it out”. Amalgam will corrode under certain conditions s
going to the dentist regularly is a good idea (and gargling with sodiu
chlorine is strictly ‘verboten’!) ;-)

As you probably know, there are several kinds of mercury
Elemental/metallic mercury (Hg) like in fillings is poorly absorbe
orally (0.01%) but well absorbed via inhalation when vaporized (>80%)
Inorganic mercury like what you find in batteries is poorly absorbe
orally (7-15%). Organic mercury (methyl mercury, phenyl mercury, ethy
mercury) is well absorbed orally (90%). The organic compound, methy
mercury, is the type we worry about when it comes to eating mercur
contaminated fish and seafood. Organic mercury compounds tend t
bio-accumulate in humans and animals because it takes the body muc
longer to expel these organic compounds. Methyl mercury (MeHg) is th
form of mercury most commonly associated with central nervous syste
disorders

--
billkat
clintonz@prodigy.net - 27 Aug 2005 20:17 GMT
> clintonz@prodigy.net Wrote:

Amalgam will corrode under certain conditions so
> going to the dentist regularly is a good idea (and gargling with sodium
> chlorine is strictly 'verboten'!) ;-)

Actually it can corrode on the tooth side and not on the visible side
with the protective oxidized layer so going to the dentist isn't
necessarily any help, unless you get all your fillings replaced every
5 years.

> As you probably know, there are several kinds of mercury.
> Elemental/metallic mercury (Hg) like in fillings is poorly absorbed
> orally (0.01%) but well absorbed via inhalation when vaporized (>80%).

I have to warn you, when Dr. Steve M tried to argue that people didn't
have to worry about amalgam (elemental) Hg on SMD  because most people
were
nose breathers he was nearly tarred and feathered!

> Inorganic mercury like what you find in batteries is poorly absorbed
> orally (7-15%). Organic mercury (methyl mercury, phenyl mercury, ethyl
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> form of mercury most commonly associated with central nervous system
> disorders.

Actually virtually no research has been done to determine how much
Methyl Hg can result from amalgam fillings. This has been discussed
before on SMD. Why? turns out its really hard to measure amalgam
derived methyl Hg absorption into tissue but many common oral bacteria
including S mutans can convert the Hg from crushed amalgam in test
tube. Also significant levels of amalgam derived methyl Hg have been
measured in an extremely small study on crowns and veneers. Sooooo,
contrary to what you have been led to believe (probably by the ADA) a
corroding filling packed with bacteria on top CAN be a large source of
Hg. it can also be methylated in the gut. (You might want to see Bernie
Windhams page were he actually claims amalgam is also on average the
largest source of organic Hg. That's right you heard correct!)

Of course all things being equal i would much prefer a filling leaking
a little more elemental Hg than one corroding with methylizing
bacteria around the filling! Too bad you can't brush into between
the filling and the tooth!
Robert  Morien - 27 Aug 2005 03:09 GMT
> > Huh?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> exposing people to high levels of Hg and endangering their health all
> these years?

So are you Pro NEJM?
LadyLollipop - 27 Aug 2005 03:19 GMT
>> > Huh?
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> So are you Pro NEJM?

Are you, Robert?

Just what is your interest here?
Robert  Morien - 27 Aug 2005 07:15 GMT
> >> > Huh?
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Just what is your interest here?

To bash spammers and correct mistakes.
clintonz@prodigy.net - 27 Aug 2005 10:50 GMT
Robert Morien wrote:
> In article <p4QPe.69386$084.30730@attbi_s22>,
> > >
> > > So are you Pro NEJM?

I'm not sure what you mean. I am supposed to fall apart because some
authoritative sounding journal said amalgam is safe and all wise people
worship the ground the ADA/ AMA and doctors walk on. Pal, I come from
an FDA family. I give doctors EXACTLY the amount of respect they
deserve:)
LadyLollipop - 27 Aug 2005 19:56 GMT
>> >> > Huh?
>> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> To bash spammers and correct mistakes.

I suggest you get lost.

To error is human.

Perhaps this will direct you as to where you will should go:

     Web  Results 1 - 10 of about 190,000 for bash newsgroups. (0.24
seconds)
Robert  Morien - 28 Aug 2005 00:17 GMT
> >> >> > Huh?
> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> I suggest you get lost.

Have I hurt the spammers feelings?

> To error is human.

But to admit the error is divine

> Perhaps this will direct you as to where you will should go:
>
>       Web  Results 1 - 10 of about 190,000 for bash newsgroups. (0.24
> seconds)

I'm curious as to what you think that means.

You should search news.admin.net-abuse.sightings for all your spam
sightings
Peter Bowditch - 28 Aug 2005 05:02 GMT
>"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message

<snip>

>>> Just what is your interest here?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>      Web  Results 1 - 10 of about 190,000 for bash newsgroups. (0.24
>seconds)

Learn to use Google, Jan.

Results 1 - 10 of about 113,000 for jan drew is a good f.ck. (0.33
seconds)

See how popular you are?
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

LadyLollipop - 28 Aug 2005 07:00 GMT
> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Learn to use Google, Jan.

This thread in not about Jan.

It is sad there are such despicable stalkers.

<snip>
Robert  Morien - 28 Aug 2005 07:40 GMT
> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> It is sad there are such despicable stalkers.

The thread has been hijacked and it is about spammers...so it is about
you.

But remember, you never bash
LadyLollipop - 28 Aug 2005 08:09 GMT
>> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>
> The thread has been hijacked

YES, sadly a stalker hijacked it second, after YOU deverted with your usual.

<snip>

The thread WAS actually about:

http://www.advancedentist.co.uk/mercury.html

REMOVAL OF AMALGAM/MERCURY (SILVER) FILLINGS

Priority Order for Amalgam Removal

 a.. Root canal-treated teeth with pins or screw-posts of non-precious
metals and metal crowns with amalgam cores should be treated first.

 b.. Next are amalgams in direct constant contact with gold. Often the
amalgam can be removed while the gold inlays, the crown or the bridge, can
be left. What to do with the fold can be decided later.

 c.. Where there is direct intermittent biting contact between amalgam and
gold in opposing teeth.

 d.. Where there is direct contact between amalgam and other metals like
partial chromium-cobalt dentures.

 e.. Most patients have several different types of amalgam fillings, and
the ones containing the newer types of amalgam high in copper (non-gamma-2
amalgam) should be removed first. The priority order between different
filings can be based on the patient's own opinions or visible signs of
corrosion and discoloration.

 f.. Amalgam fillings in contact with gum tissue. It might be necessary to
remove metal-impregnated gum tissue surgically.
Protection of the patient during amalgam removal
The surgery should have good ventilation and an efficient filtration system.
Where possible, rubber dam should be used in conjunction with efficient
high-volume evacuation to protect the patient from the aerosol of
water-coolant spray used with the high-speed cutting. When drilling, the
filling should be sectioned into chunks and elevated where possible. If any
metal has been used as a restorative material, then all amalgams should be
removed first. Patients should wear clothes covering as much skin as
possible.

For sensitive patients, when drilling out amalgam cover the eyes with
wrap-around goggles and use a Relative Analgesia nosepiece with tubing
attached to extend out of operating area to protect against nose inhalation
of mercury vapour. Some practitioners use oxygen flow.

Scheduling of appointments depends very much on the reaction of the patient
after the first treatment. Patients should be monitored and supplementation
varied as necessary.

Post-treatment protocols
Removal of body mercury after removal of fillings is crucial, but often
neglected. A reservoir of mercury has accumulated in the body over the years
and needs to be flushed out. Methods depend on presenting symptoms, vitamin
and mineral supplements such as vitamins A, C, E, B12, folic acid, selenium,
zinc, manganese, magnesium, amino acids, glutathione peroxidase, reduced
gluthathione, glutathione complex and glutamine, digestive enzymes,
essential fatty acids and acidopholous.

Warm baths, low-heat saunas, acupuncture, massage, counselling and healing
have all proved useful. Any remaining Candida, food allergies and digestive
disorders usually become more amenable to treatment.

Most patients who do not feel better retain hardened faecal matter
containing trapped particles of mercury/amalgam and other combination of
corroded metals. Treat with high-fibre diets, added fibre, food-combining
techniques where appropriate (Hay diet) and possible colonic irrigation.
Green food supplements such as spirolina, chlorella, blue green algae and
chlorophyll are rich in vitamins and minerals and bind to heavy metals, but
provided that digestion and absorption are sound, the best source of
nutrients is a good diet. Exercise and reduction of stress play their part
in restoration of health.

Conclusion
Mercury is continuously released from amalgam fillings, and numerous
research investigations have clearly shown that mercury from this source
provides the major contribution to body burden of mercury. The vapour has a
direct pathway to the brain. It is inhaled into the lungs, oxidized to ionic
mercury and binds to cell proteins.

Mercury is the only cumulative vaporizing poison permanently implanted in
the human body.

and it is about spammers

NO, it was NEVER about spammers.

...so it is about
you.

And so YOU are LYING again.

> But remember, you never bash

Remember That is YOU.

What's more you are nothing but a trouble maker and L I A R here.

*In the states we'd call that boutique dentistry and the dentists doing
nothing except finding another creative way to get money from patients.

IE, doing it for the money not the "science"

The We'd must be you and a talking mouse in your pocket.

Basher, liar.
Robert  Morien - 28 Aug 2005 21:01 GMT
> >> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> YES, sadly a stalker hijacked it second, after YOU deverted with your usual.

You have a stalker? You should report her to the police immediately. Me,
I'm just a spammer abuser...are you feeling abused?

> <snip>
>
> The thread WAS actually about:

<spam snipped>

spamming again I see. It shall be reported.

>  and it is about spammers
>
> NO, it was NEVER about spammers.

in the sense that you use plural you are correct. but you are a spammer
and it was about you.

> ...so it is about
> you.
>
> And so YOU are LYING again.

lolly never bashes

> > But remember, you never bash
>
> Remember That is YOU.

you mean that was me suggesting a web search for bash newsgroups?

> What's more you are nothing but a trouble maker and L I A R here.

Post one single lie that I've posted here. Can't do it.

> *In the states we'd call that boutique dentistry and the dentists doing
> nothing except finding another creative way to get money from patients.
>
> IE, doing it for the money not the "science"
>
> The We'd must be you and a talking mouse in your pocket.

Cute, no cigar, but cute none-the-less. I imagine that since there are
so many web results for "jan drew loves to f.ck"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jan+drew+loves+to+fuck&btnG=Google+S
earch that it is you that carries mice in your "pocket"

> Basher, liar.

Is the spammer feeling abused again?

just admit you spammed and apologise and you'll be left alone until the
next time you spam.

and I'm still waiting for the prove of that unsubstantiated survey/poll
that you tried to use to further your agenda. Can't do it can you?
LadyLollipop - 29 Aug 2005 00:26 GMT
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote

<snip>

>> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message

<snip>

>> >> >>"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
>> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>> YES, sadly a stalker hijacked it second, after YOU deverted with your
>> usual.

<snip stupid question>

Please read for comprehension.

<snip>

> I'm just a spammer abuser...

Get help.

>> <snip>
>>
>> The thread WAS actually about:
>
> <spam snipped>

URL restored:

http://www.advancedentist.co.uk/mercury.html

> spamming again I see. It shall be reported.

Report away.

Good luck, just remember to tell them to remove their coffee cups first.

>>  and it is about spammers
>>
>> NO, it was NEVER about spammers.
>
> in the sense that you use plural you are correct. but you are a spammer
> and it was about you.

222222222 funny.

18 posts before I entered the deicussion.

YOU made # 2.

Your *only* interest was in belittling.

>> ...so it is about you.
>>
>> And so YOU are LYING again.

> lolly never bashes
>
>> > But remember, you never bash
>>
>> Remember That is YOU.

> you mean that was me suggesting a web search for bash newsgroups?

I mean EXACTLY what I said.

>> What's more you are nothing but a trouble maker and L I A R here.
>
> Post one single lie that I've posted here. Can't do it.

Yes, I can.

and it is about spammers...so it is about you.

>> *In the states we'd call that boutique dentistry and the dentists doing
>> nothing except finding another creative way to get money from patients.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jan+drew+loves+to+fuck&btnG=Google+S
> earch that it is you that carries mice in your "pocket"

How nice.

You complain about spamming, but you think the above is OK.

Get help, Robert.

<snip>
Robert  Morien - 29 Aug 2005 08:45 GMT
> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Please read for comprehension.

Better yet please post for comprehension.

> <snip>
>
> > I'm just a spammer abuser...
>
> Get help.

Don't need it. It's really easy to report your spam

> >> <snip>
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> <URL snipped>

Makes it seem like I snipped the url in the first place. NOT.

> > spamming again I see. It shall be reported.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> 18 posts before I entered the deicussion.

So you can count. I was having a discussion with the OP and then you
tried to hijack the thread

> YOU made # 2.
>
> Your *only* interest was in belittling.

I just asked some questions. Thinking may be belittling for you.

> >> ...so it is about you.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I mean EXACTLY what I said.

Trouble is nobody else knows what you meant. I fail to see the relevence
of linux to your spamming

> >> What's more you are nothing but a trouble maker and L I A R here.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> and it is about spammers...so it is about you.

That makes as much sense as "bash newsgrops". You spammed, that's no lie.

I didn't spam so it's not about me. Unless you have a crush for me.

> >> *In the states we'd call that boutique dentistry and the dentists doing
> >> nothing except finding another creative way to get money from patients.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> How nice.

Thank you.

> You complain about spamming, but you think the above is OK.

It was your idea to post the meaningless "bash newsgroups" search, I
thought I'd join that other poster and show you how stupid your thought
was. But then again spammers really are stupid

> Get help, Robert.
>
> <snip>

Get detoxed, lolly
Robert  Morien - 25 Aug 2005 23:47 GMT
> >> Dentists are promoting and carrying out the replacement of amalgam
> >> fillings on health grounds without any threat of censure from their
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> "Science"?

Nice try, but doesn't prove a thing in regards to the motives of these
two dentists. My claim that they are doing it for the money is just as
valid if not more so than your claim that they are doing it for
humanities sake.

Unless of course they are doing it for free.
carabelli - 25 Aug 2005 13:16 GMT
Amazing, and this even more so,  19,500 hits for 350mV.

carabelli
George Chatzipetros - 25 Aug 2005 17:35 GMT
Keith, you don't know what you're talking about. You're telling me that
in the middle of the largest NHS dentistry shake-up in the history of
the UK, with the new draft contract released for implementation in
April, the BDA will attempt to deal with TWO dentists??!!

Second, who told you that the BDA regulates the profession? The BDA is
a trade union promoting the interests of the profession. It has no
other power over British dentists - in fact if you don't want to nobody
can force you to be a member.
Only the General Dental Council regulates the profession and they can
only act when a complaint is lodged by a patient.

Meanwhile the NHS will continue to be the kingdom of amalgam.

George
Keith P Walsh - 25 Aug 2005 20:17 GMT
>Keith, you don't know what you're talking about. You're telling me that
>in the middle of the largest NHS dentistry shake-up in the history of
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Meanwhile the NHS will continue to be the kingdom of amalgam.

Are you saying that the British Dental Association defers all
responsibility for the use of dental amalgam in Britain to someone
else?

How feckless is that?

"You keep telling us it's OK,and we'll keep sticking 'em in."

Who has responsibility for checking that amalgam is a suitable
material for this purpose in the first place?

Do they (whoever they are) realise that in order to understand the
electromagnetic behavior of an electrically conductive material they
have to carry out experimental investigations to measure it?

And would they tell the British Dental Association what the results
were if they had?

This isn't conspiracy theory.

It's science.

Amalgam is placed in children's teeth.

ITS ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES SHOULD THEREFORE BE KNOWN.

Keith P Walsh
StovePipe - 27 Aug 2005 22:27 GMT
> This isn't conspiracy theory.
>
> It's science.
>
> Amalgam is placed in children's teeth.

On this, I'm in agreement: I HATE having to place it into kids' teeth.
But I HATE to extract teeth before their time either.

> ITS ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES SHOULD THEREFORE BE KNOWN.
>
> Keith P Walsh

'K, Keith: You gonna volunteer to have small holes drilled into your jaw
bones, so's I can place some glass pipette electrodes into your tooth
nerves and record individual potentials? And once that's in place, we
drill out your tooth and place amalgam or gold fillings and then record
again? And do it again in  3, 6 months and a year's time to see how the
system changes? And then for statistical validity, we'd better get a
couple hundred volunteers to have the same procedures done?

All because a few people would like a scientific confirmation that
metals in the mouth purturb the system in a slight way?

Who is gonna volunteer; who is gonna fund that; who is gonna interpret
the results???. Would you even believe it when the reports came in?

SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Robert  Morien - 28 Aug 2005 00:18 GMT
> > This isn't conspiracy theory.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> SP

I'll take "no" in the pool
W_B - 29 Aug 2005 16:59 GMT
>> Who is gonna volunteer; who is gonna fund that; who is gonna interpret
>> the results???. Would you even believe it when the reports came in?
>>
>> SP
>
>I'll take "no" in the pool

Better than taking a oui... ? <g>
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Vaughn - 25 Aug 2005 11:15 GMT
    Hmmm, something seems to have changed.  I plonked you when you started with
the nazi sh.t and here you are back again.  Oh well, I know what to do.

Bye
Vaughn
george1234 - 25 Aug 2005 17:38 GMT
>A Google search for "mercury-free dentist" gets a lot of hits these
>days.
>
>Two professional looking websites from the UK are one for a dentist in
>Leeds, West Yorkshire:

Short question... how'd the Brits get fillings in the first place;)
Fawks - 27 Aug 2005 03:43 GMT
Hmmm.........

I haven't used amalgam since 1985, yet I do not advertise
as being 'mercury free'.  I wonder how many of your idols
are just marketing? (selling snake oil)

99%?

Fawks
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.