I'm starting to research for a new film processor. It must be able to do
pans because I'm a good while away from doing digital pans! I just want
something reliable, simple...nothing real fancy. I'm replacing an ancient
DentX unit
--
I got teeth
W_B - 23 Aug 2005 21:05 GMT
>I'm starting to research for a new film processor. It must be able to do
>pans because I'm a good while away from doing digital pans! I just want
>something reliable, simple...nothing real fancy. I'm replacing an ancient
>DentX unit
Read an sales article recently...
The cheapest way to go digital pan is with phosphor plates.
YMMV
--
W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 23 Aug 2005 21:45 GMT
> I'm starting to research for a new film processor. It must be able to do
> pans because I'm a good while away from doing digital pans! I just want
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> I got teeth
Mancuso...paging Mancuso...
Steve

Signature
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
W_B - 23 Aug 2005 22:02 GMT
>> I'm starting to research for a new film processor. It must be able to do
>> pans because I'm a good while away from doing digital pans! I just want
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Steve
Sorry, Dr. SM is currently unavailable...
he is in the paperless WC <hehe>
--
W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
billkatz - 23 Aug 2005 22:51 GMT
A Scan-X system that'll retrofit your pano and all other x-rays (0's
1's 2's & 3's) will run you about 18k to 20k with software. That's
lot more than a processor but there are other considerations
The average practice takes 75 x-rays per day; the practice is usuall
open four days per week and is open 48 weeks per year. This is equal t
14,400 x-rays per year or 57,600 x-rays within four years.
Add the costs of the processor, chemicals, film, labor, etc and goin
digital might be an option
--
billkat
Dr. Steve - 25 Aug 2005 14:48 GMT
>I'm starting to research for a new film processor. It must be able to do
>pans because I'm a good while away from doing digital pans! I just want
>something reliable, simple...nothing real fancy. I'm replacing an ancient
>DentX unit
I suspect it would be far cheaper to invest in a phosphor plate system
now, rather than bother with film and chemicals. You just buy the
phosphor plate for your panX machine and keep running.
W_B - 25 Aug 2005 18:10 GMT
>>I'm starting to research for a new film processor. It must be able to do
>>pans because I'm a good while away from doing digital pans! I just want
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>now, rather than bother with film and chemicals. You just buy the
>phosphor plate for your panX machine and keep running.
Already beat you to that one.
You were stuck in the paperless WC at the time <G>
--
W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com