Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What's better?  Amalgam or compostie?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
firethorn707@yahoo.com - 23 Aug 2005 00:26 GMT
Hi all.

My dentist told me composite (plastic white stuff) bonds to teeth
prevening preventing decay around or under the cavity.  The place
where i got x-rays said this was not true - but was true for amalgam.
So - which is it?
tbone8 - 23 Aug 2005 02:55 GMT
Amalgam all the way!

Signature

tbone8

George Chatzipetros - 23 Aug 2005 08:03 GMT
Well they're both wrong. What will prevent recurrent decay is the skill
of the dentist placing the restoration as well as how well you'll take
care of your teeth afterwards. Both materials can accomplish this very
well and amalgam can be bonded to the tooth if so desired.

George
Joel344 - 23 Aug 2005 11:15 GMT
Hey George!

Good reply. In dentistry, its always the skill and the judgement of th
doc that makes the difference. Composite is ALWAYS bonded, while amalga
probably should be bonded as well. The biggest pproblem with al
restorations is that a space can develop due to mechanical forces
Biting on the restoration tends to tip it, or rotate it out of th
tooth cavity. That minute space under a restoration is a sure-fir
tunnel to the softer, meatier, pulp. This description is from the poin
of view of bacteria of course. The bacteria go there and when they do
the result is an abscessed tooth.

Joe

--
Joel34
StovePipe - 25 Aug 2005 02:30 GMT
Without wanting to belabor the point, the reality is that most people
old enough to post here have had a heavy past with
caries/restorations/extractons and so there are multiple areas in the
mouth where excess stress on a tooth or teeth can lead to redecay or
fracture.

So what can we do? We can admonish them to stop grinding their teeth
at night to save their dentition. We can do this with JME's commercial
tape that plays all night: "Hey Mister, stop grinding yer teeth like
that!!!!"; or we can have a dentist at every street corner with a big
plackard saying: "Mey Mister, stop grinding yer teeth like that!!!!;
or, we as patients can request that our dentist educate him or herself
as to the benefits of anti cleching devices such as ( but not limited
to) the NTI-tss device. And then said him or her dentist may even
become so bold as to want to try fabricating the NTI device for him or
herself, his or her staff and even (God forbid...) some of his or her
own patients. Then some of those big honkin' MODBL's and huge Cl  IV's
on the anteriors may just last a couple of more years. And then.....
maybe, just maybe, some of those teeth will need one or two less preps
and material changes over the course of their lifetimes.... and maybe
the dentist can feel good about providing a service that could
accordingly perhaps (just PERHAPS) save some of said teeth from a few
root canals or extractions or crowns for needlessly cracked teeth.....

heh... heh... heh....

Naaaaaahhhh!......... let's  just stick to what we're doin' now.

Rat own bruthas n' sistahs...

SP
firethorn707@yahoo.com - 29 Aug 2005 09:51 GMT
>Hey George!
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Joel

Well I noticed a ridge or seam right after leaving the office with my
new composite tooth.  Now there is of course a cavity there.  I've
also had parts of reapaired teeth he has fised break off shortly after
they were fixed.  I was told it was the nature of the material and the
extensive restoration.  Should dentists gaurentee their work?  How
long after the restoration should the failure be to reasonably assume
it was poor work?
W_B - 29 Aug 2005 20:02 GMT
> I've
>also had parts of reapaired teeth he has fised break off shortly after
>they were fixed.  I was told it was the nature of the material and the
>extensive restoration.  

Likely correct.

>Should dentists gaurentee their work?  

Illegal to do so.

>How
>long after the restoration should the failure be to reasonably assume
>it was poor work?

Each restoration of each tooth in every individual is unique.
Impossible to say.

As a rule of thumb, I replace any restoration that fails within a year
at no cost.

If a tooth fractures that is another matter.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
clintonz@prodigy.net - 29 Aug 2005 21:29 GMT
> >Should dentists gaurentee their work?
>
> Illegal to do so.

Really? and who made that rule?
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 29 Aug 2005 21:39 GMT
>>>Should dentists gaurentee their work?
>>
>>Illegal to do so.
>
> Really? and who made that rule?

    I'm not certain that it is illegal.  It certainly is unprofessional and
considered unethical to do so.
    I've only seen warrantees offered by pretty much fly-by-night
operators.  Lawyers have been know to posit the concept of "implied
warranty" however.  Certainly if there is something written, the dentist
can be held to it.  But the whole idea is so silly as a formal concept
that I would avoid any dentist that made formal warranties.
    It's just not done.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

W_B - 29 Aug 2005 21:51 GMT
>> >Should dentists gaurentee their work?
>>
>> Illegal to do so.
>
>Really? and who made that rule?

State Board of Dental Examiners.

It may surprise you to find that cardiovascular surgeons
don't guarantee their work either.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
clintonz@prodigy.net - 29 Aug 2005 22:14 GMT
> >> >Should dentists gaurentee their work?
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> State Board of Dental Examiners.

So it was a rule made by dentists! Doesn't it seem a bit biased
to have dentists making their own rules?

> It may surprise you to find that cardiovascular surgeons
> don't guarantee their work either.
> --

You think dentists have it tough!
How about artifical heart makers? Remember, when the batteries go dead,
so does the patient, but something tells me they may at least
have a six month guarantee!
carabelli - 29 Aug 2005 22:17 GMT
<clintonz@prodigy.net> wrote ............

> > State Board of Dental Examiners.
>
> So it was a rule made by dentists! Doesn't it seem a bit biased
> to have dentists making their own rules?

State Board may recommend, enforce and interpret, but the state legislature
makes the laws.
And yes it just makes me feel wonderful to have politicians deciding dental
issues.

carabelli
W_B - 29 Aug 2005 22:46 GMT
>> >> >Should dentists gaurentee their work?
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>So it was a rule made by dentists! Doesn't it seem a bit biased
>to have dentists making their own rules?

State Senators and Representatives write the law.
You may again be surprised to learn that many State
Boards have non-dentist members.

>> It may surprise you to find that cardiovascular surgeons
>> don't guarantee their work either.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>so does the patient, but something tells me they may at least
>have a six month guarantee!

Very doubtful.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Peter Bowditch - 30 Aug 2005 13:12 GMT
>> >> >Should dentists gaurentee their work?
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>so does the patient, but something tells me they may at least
>have a six month guarantee!

Alex Chiu's Immortality Rings have a three-month warranty. Apparently,
if you die within three months your estate can get the money back.
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

clintonz@prodigy.net - 23 Aug 2005 15:55 GMT
> Well they're both wrong. What will prevent recurrent decay is the skill
> of the dentist placing the restoration as well as how well you'll take
> care of your teeth afterwards. Both materials can accomplish this very
> well and amalgam can be bonded to the tooth if so desired.
>
> George

Hey, I'm looking at an x-ray of an amalgam. Where it is
placed in the tooth (its pretty big) there are a lot of
edges and it looks jagged (almost like somebody scribbled
it in the tooth). now I see another amalgam (done by a
different dentist) and it looks almost perfectly square.
why the difference?
Jacob - 23 Aug 2005 17:16 GMT
Were both teeth identical?  Did they both have identical cavities?  Were
both fillings the first that were placed in these teeth or were they
replacing other fillings?  How was the x-ray taken -- what was the
angulation of the x-ray beam?  There are numerous factors that can influence
a filling; it could be that one was done better than the other, or it could
be that there were other factors involved.  It's impossible to say without
examining your mouth.

> > Well they're both wrong. What will prevent recurrent decay is the skill
> > of the dentist placing the restoration as well as how well you'll take
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> different dentist) and it looks almost perfectly square.
> why the difference?
Clinton - 10 Sep 2005 05:15 GMT
> Were both teeth identical?  Did they both have identical cavities?

Okay, I missplaced that x-ray but here is another.

http://tinypic.com/dlssh4.jpg

I actually
sketched what it looked like on what i assume is the bitwing x-ray
since I had trouble getting good detail on the scan. #4 is
actually on another tooth not in this x-ray but this is what
it would look like. Both were original.

1,4 - done by new dentist
2,3 - done by old dentist (actually passed away)

Is it my imagination or is 2,3 just garbage?
How can there be so many edges if the work was done properly?
Clinton - 10 Sep 2005 05:20 GMT
> 1,4 - done by new dentist
> 2,3 - done by old dentist (actually passed away)

I mean 1 and 3 done by the same dentist. (The square and the
round one).
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Sep 2005 10:55 GMT
>> 1,4 - done by new dentist
>> 2,3 - done by old dentist (actually passed away)
>
>I mean 1 and 3 done by the same dentist. (The square and the
>round one).

Sorry, I thought there were two dentists .... one is the square one
and the other one is eating too many Big Macs.

Joel
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Sep 2005 10:54 GMT
Fascinating x-ray. Thanks.

Joel

>> Were both teeth identical?  Did they both have identical cavities?
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>Is it my imagination or is 2,3 just garbage?
>How can there be so many edges if the work was done properly?
Clinton - 11 Sep 2005 09:15 GMT
> Fascinating x-ray. Thanks.
>
> Joel

What do you think could cause a filling to look jagged like
that? I can't even believe it comes out of the capsule like
that.
StovePipe - 25 Aug 2005 01:55 GMT
I would add local oral conditions again as an important factor in the
choice as well. If you have a big honkin'  amalgam (black) filling that
is failing or having decay around it, I for one would hesitiate to fill
up that moon-sized crater with composite and hope that it will last the
same amount of time the original Am did. I would rather see another Am
or a  more resistant material. I still try to employ the old rule of: '
not more than one third of the tooth prepaired'  in a bu-li direction
to be comfortable with a composite.

That said, I know we all do those big honkin' MODBL composites, because
of patient preference, or because (as in my own case) I just don't
want to risk putting three and four pins into an already uninjured
tooth.

Blorf

SP
Amatus Cremona - 25 Aug 2005 13:00 GMT
> That said, I know we all do those big honking MODBL composites, because
> of patient preference, or because (as in my own case) I just don't
> want to risk putting three and four pins into an already uninjured
> tooth.

If you stop making amalgam cores (which replace entire cusps), you don't
need to stock pins in your office anymore.  I have not placed a pin in
years.

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>I would add local oral conditions again as an important factor in the
> choice as well. If you have a big honkin'  amalgam (black) filling that
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> SP
StovePipe - 26 Aug 2005 04:27 GMT
> That said, I know we all do those big honking MODBL composites, because
> of patient preference, or because (as in my own case) I just don't
> want to risk putting three and four pins into an already uninjured
> tooth.

If you stop making amalgam cores (which replace entire cusps), you
don't
need to stock pins in your office anymore.  I have not placed a pin in
years.

--
/

Amatus

Have to say I don't understand what you mean here: I meant to say into
an already injured tooth, meaning vital but pulpally challenged.

Thanks
SP
Sue - 26 Aug 2005 05:08 GMT
To Gail.  Thanks for your comment. I am very happy to meet another
nondentist posting on dental related issues. I look forward to further
interaction. Sincerely,  Sue  :-)

Signature

Sue

Amatus Cremona - 26 Aug 2005 13:08 GMT
> Have to say I don't understand what you mean here: I meant to say into
> an already injured tooth, meaning vital but pulpally challenged.

Pins account for many dentin fractures and further destruction of tooth.
With amalgam, you sometimes have no choice.  If you do more onlays and fewer
crowns, your need to place pins goes away.

Signature

.

Amatus

.

>> That said, I know we all do those big honking MODBL composites, because
>> of patient preference, or because (as in my own case) I just don't
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Thanks
> SP
StovePipe - 27 Aug 2005 15:46 GMT
> > Have to say I don't understand what you mean here: I meant to say into
> > an already injured tooth, meaning vital but pulpally challenged.
>
> Pins account for many dentin fractures and further destruction of tooth.
> With amalgam, you sometimes have no choice.  If you do more onlays and fewer
> crowns, your need to place pins goes away.

Agreed. Now to convince (or abandon) my patient base...
Thanks
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Amatus Cremona - 23 Aug 2005 12:53 GMT
> My dentist told me composite (plastic white stuff) bonds to teeth
> preventing decay around or under the cavity.  The place
> where i got x-rays said this was not true - but was true for amalgam.
> So - which is it?

Neither.  Both materials fills holes, that is all they do.  IF you eat too
much sugar and acidy drinks without cleaning well enough, you will get more
decay.

Signature

/

Amatus

/

> Hi all.
>
> My dentist told me composite (plastic white stuff) bonds to teeth
> prevening preventing decay around or under the cavity.  The place
> where i got x-rays said this was not true - but was true for amalgam.
> So - which is it?
Charlie - 23 Aug 2005 21:35 GMT
A good dentist employs restoration protocols that minimize microleakage
although, for the most part, all dental restorations leak to some extent.  If
the microecology of your oral cavity favors decay (and we all know what
causes that) then restorations with high leakage will exacerbate the
development of recurrent decay.  If your diet and hygiene habits are such
that your caries rate is minimal or null, then you'd have little to worry
about regardless of the integrity of the restoration.   I was practicing
before it was standard to bond composite restorations and they lasted for
decades in patients with the right habits.

The bond of restorations to tooth enamel (the outer layer) is generally
strong, intact and long-lasting.  The bond to the other tooth tissues -
dentin and cementum - is initially good but tends to deteriorate over time.
Composites are universally bonded.  Amalgam does not bond to tooth tissues
unless a bonding protocol is employed-the jury is still out on whether this
is a good idea.  Amalgams minimize leakage via corrosion products which form
a seal between the tooth and the filling and this one of the reasons it is
such a successful material.

Soooo, they're both good materials.  Y'know?  It's the artist, not the paint.
StovePipe - 25 Aug 2005 01:45 GMT
I would also add that in some mouths, local conditions make for a
better fit of one or the other material. Also, there comes a limit,
IMO, where neither should be used, and ond should go to a piece of
bonded or cemented  solid material; be that cooked composite,
porcelaine, porcelaine fused to metal or gold.

Do remember that we still don't have a composite material that resists
residual caries activity at the joint between tooth and material like
amalgam does. This means that you have to take extra care of the white
stuff, be it in the front or the back of the mouth.

Rat  own bruthah.....

SP
budgenator - 24 Aug 2005 13:27 GMT
all other things being equal, a Dentist is going to remove less good
tooth to place a composite, and be more carefull bonding it to the
tooth. Amalgam can be bonded, but the technic is more demanding, so
most Dentists just lock them in mechanicaly like they did years ago.

Amalgam contains mercury, and while there is no proof that it is
harmfull to you in the amalgam; the OSHA reg's on handeling it are very
expensive and often ignored, and the EPA is targeting dental amalgam in
it's program to reduce mercury  contamination of our waterways. We just
got a visit from our waste water reclaimation dept; they were trying to
get a feel about how dentists are complying with the reg's and the ADA
Best Practices for mercury, my guess is that 5 years from now you will
not seee a dentist placing amalgam and ten years from now if the
amalgam filling needs replacing, you be sent to a specialist.

for the little difference in price, go with composite.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 24 Aug 2005 19:26 GMT
> all other things being equal, a Dentist is going to remove less good
> tooth to place a composite, and be more carefull bonding it to the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> for the little difference in price, go with composite.

    What is a "waste water reclaimation dept."?

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

billkatz - 25 Aug 2005 01:32 GMT
Mark & Steven Bornfeld Wrote:

> What is a "waste water reclaimation dept."

OHHHHH NOOOO! You had to ask ;-

--
billkat
StovePipe - 25 Aug 2005 02:46 GMT
Those are the guys who want you to buy the latest Am filter and put it
on the down stream end of your suction machine, I would think. Up here,
they will become mandatory after Xmas some time.

Bloodle...
SP
W_B - 25 Aug 2005 15:53 GMT
>    What is a "waste water reclaimation dept."?
>
>Steve

It's like The Department of Redundancy Department.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Sue - 25 Aug 2005 16:59 GMT
Well,  both are probably better than using Core Paste.

I think amalgam is a viable and safe option for the majority o
people.  In the same token,  *elemental* mercury is a poison
This alone should raise a red flag. I belive there is cause for
concern that the mercury in amalgam *_may_* pose a danger to
a *_minute_* portion of the population.

Yet I don't think there  is a huge conspiracy to hide evidence
that may result in banning amalgam (as Jan and other activists
are claiming). Until there is sufficient scientific evidence t
support the proposed risks, I believe amalgam should remain
as an option for dentists

Until then individual dentists and patients can make up their own
minds. If patients are in a situation where they are not allowed
an option (due to inability to pay or lack of awareness) then they
are just "out of luck."  Sorry.

To Jan and other acitvists.  Perhaps this sounds harsh to you. I
believe that spreading awareness about this controversy is a
good thing and I admore you for your tenacity and convictions.

Yet changes will not be made until there is sufficient and definitive
scientific evidence that proves that mercury *_alloy_* pose
significant
health risks for a large majority of the population. (Unfortunately)

Just my 2 cents. Su

--
Su
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 25 Aug 2005 17:49 GMT
> Well,  both are probably better than using Core Paste.  
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Just my 2 cents. Sue

    It's pretty clear that amalgam use is declining.  It may well be
legislated out of existance, but it seems far more likely to be as a
result of environmental concerns than clinical toxicity.
    I keep waiting for this "Doxa" material that Hans said was going to be
manna from heaven.
    My personal feeling is that composite has enough clinical liabilities
(let alone the medical issues) that it will never achieve the
stand-alone reliability that amalgam claimed for so long.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Sue - 26 Aug 2005 17:16 GMT
Mark & Steven Bornfeld Wrote:

> It's pretty clear that amalgam use is declining. It may well b
> legislated out of existance, but it seems far more likely to be as
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Brooklyn, N
> 718-258-5001
Dr. Steve, I have not heard of the Doxa material. It makes grea
sense to be researching and developing alternative materials t
replace amalgam.  Even though composite may not be as reliable,
at least it is considered safe... no controversy about that I hope.

BTW, who is Hans?  There is/was a very bright, Dutch gentleman on D
named Hans.  He gave a lot of technical input that others seemed t
appreciate. Maybe it is the same Hans? -Su

--
Su
LadyLollipop - 26 Aug 2005 20:18 GMT
> Mark & Steven Bornfeld Wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> named Hans.  He gave a lot of technical input that others seemed to
> appreciate. Maybe it is the same Hans? -Sue

Yes, indeed, Hans had much to share, was honest and indeed a gentleman.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sue's Profile: http://dentalcom.net/forum/member.php?userid=15
> View this thread: http://dentalcom.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2721
Sue - 26 Aug 2005 22:00 GMT
LadyLollipop Wrote:

> LL (Jan?) wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > Sue's Profile: http://dentalcom.net/forum/member.php?userid=15
> > View this thread: http://dentalcom.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2721

So is Hans a SMDer or do you mean Hans on DT.. or are they the same
person? Thanks -Sue -PS Joely just likes to give you a hard time. He
doesn't mean any of that stuff personally I don't think. Even though
this is as serious issue and your message is very serious, the way you
guys banter is extremely funny and entertaining!  (sshhhh ... & don't
tell anyone I said that....) -

Signature

Sue

LadyLollipop - 27 Aug 2005 00:58 GMT
> LadyLollipop Wrote:
>>
>> LL (Jan?) wrote:

Yes, this is Jan, I've never made it s secret.

>> Yes, indeed, Hans had much to share, was honest and indeed a gentleman.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> So is Hans a SMDer or do you mean Hans on DT.. or are they the same
> person? Thanks -Sue -

I was speaking of SMD, I only posted on DT for a short time, so I don't know
if Hans is there?

PS Joely just likes to give you a hard time. He
> doesn't mean any of that stuff personally I don't think.

Evidently, you aren't aware. Joel posted over 20,000 posts using my name
telling lie after lie, even impersonating me. He had three accounts closed.
However that's all in the past, looks like he FINALLY learned his lesson and
has moved on.
That's great.

Even though
> this is as serious issue and your message is very serious, the way you
> guys banter is extremely funny and entertaining!  (sshhhh ... & don't
> tell anyone I said that....) -

I doubt if you would have found it fuuny if he had lied about you and
impersonated you, using titles such as Jan Brewski on Anal Sex. That's
crossing the line and beyond funny.

Jan
billkatz - 27 Aug 2005 03:28 GMT
LadyLollipop
Evidently, you aren't aware. Joel posted over 20,000 posts using my name
telling lie after lie, even impersonating me. He had three accounts closed.
However that's all in the past, looks like he FINALLY learned his lesson and
has moved on.
That's great.
[/QUOTE Wrote:

> WoW!
> That was Joel's evil twin. The one that lives in your imagination.

Signature

billkatz

Sue - 27 Aug 2005 14:08 GMT
To Jan.  I did not see all of the really bad stuff Joel wrote.
I only saw a few of his milder comments

Joel has a thick skin himself and he may not know how
"mud slinging" can REALLY hurt a person.  He may not agree
with your message, but crossing the line and attacking you
like that is not behavior that I like.  I don't think many others
like to witness it either... well maybe those who like watching show
like Jerry Springer may..

Anyway, I know that I cannot make excuses for Joel. He ha
to own up to his own behaviors.  He should have some awareness
for other's feelings and know when he is crossing the line betwee
good natured banter and malicious attack. These are not just
"cyber-characters."  These are real people

I think we all can get carried away sometimes becaus
we can forget that we are talking to real people (at least that i
what happens to me sometimes....when we star
chatting.. which is what we have done on Dcom sometimes)

We are not always serious here and we can get some "off the wall"
senseless sort of talk  going on at times (just for fun)

I hope that we can make this gateway work because Joel did
not act the way you describe on  Dentalcom!  I did not see that
in Joel.. only good natured, mild  cynicism at times

My apologies Jan. -Su

--
Su
Steven Bornfeld - 27 Aug 2005 00:12 GMT
> Mark & Steven Bornfeld Wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>>Steve

    Hans Lenros is a Swede who posted regularly to smd until maybe 2 years
ago.  Very knowledgeable.  Left-leaning, anti-amalgam streak.
    We occasionally disagreed strongly, without being disagreeable.  He
touted Doxa as a non-metalic restorative that was going to make all
other posterior direct restoratives obsolete.  I'd love to see it, but
I've heard nothing lately.

Steve

>>--
>>Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> named Hans.  He gave a lot of technical input that others seemed to
> appreciate. Maybe it is the same Hans? -Sue

Signature

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0
Arial;}}
{\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 Remove
"nospam" to reply\par
}

StovePipe - 27 Aug 2005 15:46 GMT
>       Hans Lenros is a Swede who posted regularly to smd until maybe 2 years
> ago.  Very knowledgeable.  Left-leaning, anti-amalgam streak.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Steve

Personally, I have NEVER heard of it. It sure wasn't at the ODQ congress
in Mtl yesterday.
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Dr. Steve - 28 Aug 2005 12:13 GMT
>>       Hans Lenros is a Swede who posted regularly to smd until maybe 2 years
>> ago.  Very knowledgeable.  Left-leaning, anti-amalgam streak.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>in Mtl yesterday.
>SP

Judging by the last time Hans discussed it with me, I don't think we
shall ever see it marketed further.
..
Stephen
USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Stove99pipe - 28 Aug 2005 18:55 GMT
>>>SB suggested:
>>> ....Doxa as a non-metalic restorative that was going to make all
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> ..
> Stephen

OK. Thanks. So how was the short vacation?
SP
Signature

Take out the TRASH to reply

Dr. Steve - 29 Aug 2005 12:56 GMT
>>>>SB suggested:
>>>> ....Doxa as a non-metalic restorative that was going to make all
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>OK. Thanks. So how was the short vacation?
>SP

It was very nice.  Molly was the perfect lady.  Never causing any
fuss.  Roy and Mrs. Roy were super as always.  Good weather, nice food
great company.
```````````````````````
Stephen (What's a temporary?)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stovepipe - 29 Aug 2005 15:12 GMT
> >OK. Thanks. So how was the short vacation?
> >SP
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Stephen (What's a temporary?)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That sounds like the perfect vacation.
SP
Signature

Take out the TRASH to reply

jayachatur@gmail.com - 30 Aug 2005 14:34 GMT
I've heard abt mercury-free amalgams available. R they good? and
doesn't it affect any of the physical properties??
I'm still a dental student, not a dentist yet:-)
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 30 Aug 2005 15:07 GMT
> I've heard abt mercury-free amalgams available. R they good? and
> doesn't it affect any of the physical properties??
> I'm still a dental student, not a dentist yet:-)

    What's a mercury-free amalgam?
    (sorry Steve!)

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

W_B - 30 Aug 2005 19:31 GMT
>I've heard abt mercury-free amalgams available. R they good? and
>doesn't it affect any of the physical properties??
>I'm still a dental student, not a dentist yet:-)

 amalgam \a*mal"gam\ ([.a]*m[a^]l"gam), n. [F. amalgame, prob.
    fr. L. malagma, Gr. ma`lagma, emollient, plaster, poultice,
    fr. mala`ssein to make soft, fr. malako`s soft.]
    1. An alloy of mercury with another metal or metals; as, an
       amalgam of tin, bismuth, etc.
       [1913 Webster]

Hence, there is no such thing.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
cozyhomelife - 31 Aug 2005 22:06 GMT
Hi, I wonder if this is related to a question I've been wondering about.
I'm supposed to get a crown tomorrow, and I was glad to be getting rid of my
old silver fillings as I tend to be one of those who think they might be
leaking mercury into my system.    I have 2 choices of crown types, as this
is what I think I know.   If I have anything wrong, please tell me(!):

1.   with the metal on the inside crown, they have to shave off a whole lot
less teeth, and the crowns are stronger against breaking.    I then began to
worry about that metal inside, if it wasn't the same thing as the old
fillings in my tooth.   The office worker said it wasn't, even though the
sample looked black like old silver, it was really a gold alloy and had no
mercury.    Is this a "what she don't know won't hurt her" statement, or the
truth?
2.   Complete porcelain crowns would contain no metal and if I was stupid
enough to bite hard things like hard candy, jawbreakers, ice, I might get
into trouble, or there could be a 'fluke' accident in my future, anyway.
A whole lot more tooth has to be ground down, as they are thicker.
    -the teeth I'm having capped on the bottom, will not show the metal
ring that I hear will line up with the gumline.    But some 2 on the top,
would show, when I smile.   All these 5 crowns that I will get over time,
are in the same area, about 5-6 teeth back when counting from the midline.
I had thought about getting them done all at once, and began to think if
anything went wrong, I might end up with a whole mouthful of mad teeth or
gums.   Also, I've never been to this dentist before, but naturally, hope
his work really fantastic, so am taking it slow.

> >I've heard abt mercury-free amalgams available. R they good? and
> >doesn't it affect any of the physical properties??
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel344 - 01 Sep 2005 00:13 GMT
Mercury free amalgams, of course is an oxymoron. However Miracle Mix i
a product that could loosely be called that. It is composite with al
the benefits of composite, and with silver mixed in for strength. The
look lousy though!

CROWNS:

The all-porcelain crowns if they are molars sometimes split. This ma
be due to improper bonding to the tooth structure. They cannot b
cemented as they are much too weak as stand-alone cement jobs.

That said, I made a lower premolar for my sister around 35 years ago
without the benefits of reinforced porcelain (wasn't invented yet). I
lasted until one year ago!

Joel

NOW DOES THIS appear better if I unquote the quotes?

It may .....

unQUOTing=cozyhomelife

Hi, I wonder if this is related to a question I've been wonderin
about.
I'm supposed to get a crown tomorrow, and I was glad to be getting ri
of my
old silver fillings as I tend to be one of those who think they migh
be
leaking mercury into my system.    I have 2 choices of crown types, a
this
is what I think I know.   If I have anything wrong, please tell me(!):

1.   with the metal on the inside crown, they have to shave off a whol
lot
less teeth, and the crowns are stronger against breaking.    I the
began to
worry about that metal inside, if it wasn't the same thing as the old
fillings in my tooth.   The office worker said it wasn't, even thoug
the
sample looked black like old silver, it was really a gold alloy and ha
no
mercury.    Is this a "what she don't know won't hurt her" statement
or the
truth?
2.   Complete porcelain crowns would contain no metal and if I wa
stupid
enough to bite hard things like hard candy, jawbreakers, ice, I migh
get
into trouble, or there could be a 'fluke' accident in my future
anyway.
A whole lot more tooth has to be ground down, as they are thicker.
-the teeth I'm having capped on the bottom, will not show the metal
ring that I hear will line up with the gumline.    But some 2 on th
top,
would show, when I smile.   All these 5 crowns that I will get ove
time,
are in the same area, about 5-6 teeth back when counting from th
midline.
I had thought about getting them done all at once, and began to thin
if
anything went wrong, I might end up with a whole mouthful of mad teet
or
gums.   Also, I've never been to this dentist before, but naturally
hope
his work really fantastic, so am taking it slow.

> >I've heard abt mercury-free amalgams available. R they good? and
> >doesn't it affect any of the physical properties??
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

un/QUOT

--
Joel34
W_B - 01 Sep 2005 17:10 GMT
>Hi, I wonder if this is related to a question I've been wondering about.
>I'm supposed to get a crown tomorrow, and I was glad to be getting rid of my
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>mercury.    Is this a "what she don't know won't hurt her" statement, or the
>truth?

You can have porcelain fused to gold or non-precious metal.
There is a porcelain to 'white' gold.

Hard to know without seeing it.

>2.   Complete porcelain crowns would contain no metal and if I was stupid
>enough to bite hard things like hard candy, jawbreakers, ice, I might get
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>gums.   Also, I've never been to this dentist before, but naturally, hope
>his work really fantastic, so am taking it slow.

Complete pocelain restorations have come a long way in the last few
years. These are *bonded' to the tooth and acutally make the tooth
stronger. The preparation can be very minimal.
I routinely use these for anteriors and bicuspids. For a molar this can
be done also.

There is also the Cerec option which others here know more about than me.

>> >I've heard abt mercury-free amalgams available. R they good? and
>> >doesn't it affect any of the physical properties??
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> Take out the G'RBAGE
>> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Stovepipe - 04 Sep 2005 07:07 GMT
> There is also the Cerec option which others here know more about than me.

FWIW, the Shein machine was out and available for inspecting at the ODQ
convention in Montreal last week. I did't stop at the Shein booth to see
it work, but I did see it parked there. I don't know if they've actually
sold any to anybody, but there you have it.

SP
Signature

Take out the TRASH to reply

Joel M. Eichen - 04 Sep 2005 11:08 GMT
>> There is also the Cerec option which others here know more about than me.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>SP

With many forms of advertising, name recognition is more important
that actual sales. When practices reach the level of being able to use
the technology, then the equipment sells itself.

It needs to be added that Patterson is also a huge distributor of
Sirona Cerec. Dr. Steve (Mancuso), do I have this right?

Joel
Stovepipe - 04 Sep 2005 17:58 GMT
> It needs to be added that Patterson is also a huge distributor of
> Sirona Cerec. Dr. Steve (Mancuso), do I have this right?

AFAIK, they are the exclusive distributor. So the battle lines between
them and Shein will be drawn quite clearly.
SP
Signature

Take out the TRASH to reply

W_B - 06 Sep 2005 17:24 GMT
>>> There is also the Cerec option which others here know more about than me.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>It needs to be added that Patterson is also a huge distributor of
>Sirona Cerec. Dr. Steve (Mancuso), do I have this right?

>Joel

I think that PDCO may be the *only* distributor of Cerec in the US.

--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 06 Sep 2005 22:34 GMT
>I think that PDCO may be the *only* distributor of Cerec in the US.

REPLY

Yup, from what I hear that is so.

Joel
billkatz - 05 Sep 2005 13:15 GMT
Stovepipe Wrote:

> FWIW, the Shein machine was out and available for inspecting at the ODQ
> convention in Montreal last week. I did't stop at the Shein booth to see
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> --
> Take out the TRASH to reply

The Evolution4D machine is interesting. They're claiming that their
milling center can form precious and non precious metals in addition to
ceramics and composites. They also claim that their system "eliminates
the need for messy powders or sprays".

Who knows? They may have a better mousetrap. They're also a very young
company with only one product at this time.

http://www.d4dtech.com/technology.htm

Signature

billkatz

Stovepipe - 05 Sep 2005 17:49 GMT
> The Evolution4D machine is interesting. They're claiming that theirmilling
> center can form precious and non >precious metals in addition toceramics
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Who knows? They may have a better mousetrap. They're also a very
> youngcompany with only one product at this time.

Funny no one was looking at it. You'd have thought that there would have
been a lot of interest.
Thanks
SP
Signature

Take out the TRASH to reply

billkatz - 05 Sep 2005 20:11 GMT
Stovepipe Wrote:

> Funny no one was looking at it. You'd have thought that there woul
> have
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> Take out the TRASH to reply

There's also the Cynovad system, the 3M ESPE and KaVo's Everest bu
these units cost $$ big $$ bucks $$ and are usually geared for hig
volume labs

--
billkat
Dr. Steve - 06 Sep 2005 20:13 GMT
>Stovepipe Wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>http://www.d4dtech.com/technology.htm

So far,,,,,,,,,,,,, they have yet to display a working model anywhere
where a dentist can try it out.  Every dental meeting or show has only
had an empty case on display.  It might be a much better device than
the CEREC, but so far, no one gets to try it out.  
```````````````````````
Stephen (What's a temporary?)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kureforcrohns@sbcglobal.net - 25 Aug 2005 17:56 GMT
Sue,

I wholeheartedly agree with your post.      Your 2 cents worth can be worth
a million to some.
Gail    Not a dentist   Just my 2   cents.

> Well,  both are probably better than using Core Paste.
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> Sue's Profile: http://dentalcom.net/forum/member.php?userid=15
> View this thread: http://dentalcom.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2721
clintonz@prodigy.net - 28 Aug 2005 12:44 GMT
> Well,  both are probably better than using Core Paste.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> concern that the mercury in amalgam *_may_* pose a danger to
> a *_minute_* portion of the population.

Sue, many people have gotten badly hurt from "leaky" amalgam.
This is not an issue about allergy at all. The FDA dental
has also received numerous adverse event reports. They simply
ignore them because a dentist there throws them in the garbage.

> Yet I don't think there  is a huge conspiracy to hide evidence
> that may result in banning amalgam (as Jan and other activists
> are claiming).

It's no fantasy the NIDCR according to congressional testimony
was funded for over 500 studies and in the last decade only
published one. there are virtually no statistically significant
large studies on amalgam using accurate methods to measure Hg
accumulation (body burden).

Until there is sufficient scientific evidence to
> support the proposed risks, I believe amalgam should remain
> as an option for dentists.
>
> Until then individual dentists and patients can make up their own
> minds.

Exactly, except that the ADA has refused to inform patients of
both the contents and the risks.

> To Jan and other acitvists.  Perhaps this sounds harsh to you. I
> believe that spreading awareness about this controversy is a
> good thing and I admore you for your tenacity and convictions.

It's obvious that you have not researched the issue yet you seem
to be open minded. I would suggest taking a look at this study.
It's a real eye opener if you are interested in looking into the
issue further.
(And its by far the largest study ever done using one of the more
accurate
testing methods, saliva Hg testing). Don't expect the NIDCR to
even attempt a study like this until the end of the century! how easy
to cite a lack of evidence when you don't do or publish the research!

http://www.altcorp.com/DentalInformation/salivahg.htm
budgenator - 31 Aug 2005 23:58 GMT
They used to be called sewage treatment plants; waste water reclamation
dept. is what I meant to spell :)
LadyLollipop - 24 Aug 2005 22:54 GMT
> all other things being equal, a Dentist is going to remove less good
> tooth to place a composite, and be more carefull bonding it to the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Amalgam contains mercury, and while there is no proof that it is
> harmfull to you in the amalgam;

Wrong, there are ALL kinds of proof and studies.

http://www.amalgam.org./

http://www.altcorp.com/DentalInformation/amalgampage.htm

http://www.algonet.se/~leif/FU­SCIFCT.html

http://www.asomat.com/mercury/­Relevant-facts-about-amalgam.h­tm

http://www.bioprobe.com/review­s.asp?review_id=11

http://www.yourhealthbase.com/­amalgams.html

http://www.holisticdental.org/­index.html

http://www.cfsn.com/ADArebut.h­tml

http://www.toxicteeth.net

http://www.lichtenberg.dk/symp­toms_before_and_after_proper.h­tm

http://bcn.net/~stoll/archives­/mercury/15063.html

http://www.web-light.nl/AMALGA­M/amalgam.html

http://www.lef.org/magazine/ma­g2001/may2001_report_mercury_1­.html

http://www.web-light.nl/AMALGA­M/EN/enmframe.html

http://www.zipworld.com.au/~rg­ammal/AmalgamFrameSet.htm

http://tinyurl.com/65wv5

http://www.heart-disease-bypas­s-surgery.com/data/articles/63­.htm

http://www.lichtenberg.dk/expe­rience_after_amalgam_removal.h­tm

http://www.notdoctors.com/merc­fill.html

http://www.holisticmed.com/dental/amalgam/

http://www.talkinternational.c­om

http://www.mercury-free.com/

http://www.home.earthlink.net/­~berniew1/periodon.html

http://www.zipworld.com.au/~rg­ammal/Are_Dentist_Really_Healt­hy.html

http://www.medicallibrary.net/­specialties/framer.html?/speci­alties/_b...
ree_dentistry.html

http://www.home.earthlink.net/­~berniew1/indexa.html

http://www.lichtenberg.dk/mercury_vapour_in_the_oral_cavit.htm

http://www.dentalmaterial.gov.se/Mercury.pdf

==

Amalgam dental fillings are a health hazard
NEW YORK, NY. Dr. Gary Null, PhD and Dr. Martin Feldman, MD have just
released a major report concerning the health hazards of dental amalgam
(silver) fillings. They point to incontrovertible evidence that mercury
continually leaches from amalgam fillings at a rate of about 10-50 times the
safe limit (0.28 microgram/day) set by the US Public Health Service. Mercury
has been linked to birth defects, multiple sclerosis, fatigue, Alzheimer's
disease, depression, anxiety, reduced immune function, antibiotic
resistance, and impaired kidney function. Researchers have found that
mercury is a potent killer of white blood cells and that proper removal of
amalgam fillings will restore white blood cell counts to healthy levels.
There is also evidence that the number of T-cells (an important part of
immune defenses) decreases substantially when amalgam fillings are placed in
the mouth, but increases again once the fillings are removed.
The American Dental Association (ADA) maintains that amalgam fillings are
safe - a position made completely untenable by the fact that the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has declared amalgam to be a hazardous
material. It is interesting that the ADA, when confronted by a lawsuit
regarding the use of amalgam fillings, made the following statement in its
defense, "The ADA owes no legal duty of care to protect the public from
allegedly dangerous products used by dentists."
Several studies have found that chewing markedly increases the amount of
mercury released from amalgam fillings into the mouth and that these mercury
vapours easily find their way into the pituitary gland and the brain.
Autopsies performed at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden revealed that
people with amalgam fillings had three times more mercury in the brain and
nine times more in the kidneys than did people with no amalgam fillings.
Common bacteria found in the mouth and intestines can convert mercury to
methylmercury, a compound that is 100 times more toxic than is elemental
mercury. Methylmercury passes both the blood-brain and placental barriers
and following a large exposure can remain in the brain for 10 years or more.
Considering that dentists still place about one million amalgam fillings in
the mouths of American citizens every day it is clear that disorders caused
by amalgam toxicity is a horrendous problem. Not everyone is sensitive to
mercury, but various studies estimate the percentage that are to be
somewhere between 10 and 44 per cent. Fortunately, a few governments are
beginning to wake up to the dangers and are passing laws restricting or
outright banning the use of amalgam fillings. The German, Norwegian,
Swedish, Canadian and British governments have advised dentists not to
install or remove amalgam fillings in pregnant women. Since November 2000
the following sign has been posted in all dental offices in California,
"WARNING - Amalgam fillings contain a chemical element known to the State of
California to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm". The
California Dental Association apparently lobbied successfully to ensure that
the word mercury did not appear in the warning.
The Australian Society of Oral Medicine and Toxicology has concluded that
mercury in amalgam fillings is continuously released from the fillings and
accumulates in tissues throughout the body where it interferes with many
physiological functions.
Null, Gary and Feldman, Martin. Mercury dental amalgams: the controversy
continues. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2nd Quarter
2002, pp. 85-110 [180 references]
Editor's comment: There is no question in my mind that amalgam fillings pose
a serious health risk to everyone whether or not they actually exhibit
symptoms of mercury toxicity at this time. New amalgam fillings should be
avoided and old ones replaced with composite fillings

Trigeminal neuralgia linked to amalgam fillings
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA. Dr. William Cheshire, a physician at the Mayo Clinic,
reports on a case where a woman's trigeminal neuralgia (tic douloureux) was
traced to a galvanic reaction between an amalgam filling and an adjacent
gold-alloy crown. Consumption of tomatoes and other acidic foods produced
intense jolts described as being like those of an "electrical battery". The
jolts in turn resulted in excruciating pain in the trigeminal nerve.
Replacing the amalgam filling with a composite resolved the problem. Dr.
Cheshire points out that dissimilar metals in contact with saliva can form a
galvanic cell which can generate electrical currents with several hundred
millivolts of potential. He points out that many patients with trigeminal
neuralgia describe their pain in terms of "electrical" jolts and concludes
that his patient's neuralgia may well have been triggered by the galvanic
reaction between the amalgam filling and the gold crown.
Cheshire, William P., Jr. The shocking tooth about trigeminal neuralgia. New
England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 342, June 29, 2000, p. 2003
(correspondence)

Dental alloys affect cellular energy production
NOTE: We usually do not report test tube or animal experiments, but thought
we would make an exception in this case. The findings that commonly used
dental alloys may interrupt the normal function of human cells is a first
and could have wide-ranging effects.

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA. Although nickel is known to be carcinogenic in humans
it is still widely used in certain dental alloys. Researchers at the
University of Alabama now report that other components of dental alloys
(beryllium, chromium, and molybdenum) as well as nickel affect the very
basic function of human cells - the production of energy (ATP). ATP is
produced in the mitochondria of cells and involves highly oxidative
processes. It is becoming increasingly clear that abnormalities in the
mitochondrial processes are important causes of human disease. Some
researchers believe that a slowing down of these processes actually heralds
the very first stage in the proliferation of abnormal cells and cancer.
The Alabama researchers exposed cultures of human gingival (gum) cells to
solutions of nickel, beryllium, chromium (tri- and hexavalent) and
molybdenum (hexavalent) for periods of 24 and 72 hours. They then measured
the energy production and oxygen consumption of the cells' mitochondria in
the various solutions. Cells in contact with nickel or hexavalent chromium
were most affected and showed decreased ATP (energy) production as well as a
decrease in oxygen consumption. The effects of beryllium, molybdenum, and
trivalent chromium were similar, but less pronounced. The researchers
conclude that their findings may be the first indication that some
components of common dental alloys may be detrimental to human health. They
urge further research to establish possible synergisms between mixtures of
these different metals on mitochondrial energy production. [54 references]
Messer, R.L.W., et al. An investigation of fibroblast mitochondria enzyme
activity and respiration in response to metallic ions released from dental
alloys. J Biomed Mater Res, Vol. 50, 2000, pp. 598- 604

TAURANGA, NEW ZEALAND. The New Zealand Ministry of Health is reviewing its
policy on the use of mercury-containing amalgams for tooth fillings. This
review comes hard on the heels of a precautionary advice from the UK
Department of Health which warns pregnant women not to have amalgam fillings
installed. Dr. Mike Godfrey, a leading environmental physician, points out
that several major amalgam manufacturers have issued Material Safety Data
Sheets and Directions for Use which clearly warns of the many dangers of
amalgam fillings. Among the restrictions - amalgam fillings should not be
used next to fillings or crowns containing other metals, they should not be
used under crowns, they should not be used in patients with kidney disease,
in pregnant women or in children aged six years or younger. The
manufacturers also warn that mercury vapours from amalgam fillings can
induce psychiatric symptoms in extremely low concentrations. Depression,
mental deterioration, and irritability are among the symptoms listed.
Amalagam fillings are banned in Sweden and Health Canada has proposed a
limit of one (two surfaces) amalgam fillings in a child and four (eight
surfaces) in an adult. Dr. Godfrey points out that his chronic fatigue
syndrome patients have an average of 15 amalgam fillings each and exhibit
many of the symptoms that the amalgam manufacturers are warning against.
Godfrey, M.E. and Feek, Colin. Dental amalgam. New Zealand Medical Journal,
Vol. 111, August 28, 1998, p. 326 (letters to the editor)

Depression and amalgam fillings
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO. There is some evidence that people with dental
amalgam fillings are more likely to suffer from depression than are people
without such fillings. Now researchers at the Rocky Mountain Research
Institute report that removal of amalgam fillings can markedly improve the
symptoms of manic-depressive illness (bipolar disorder). Their study
involved 20 patients who had been diagnosed with manic-depressive illness.
All the patients had amalgam fillings (an average of 10 fillings each). The
concentration of mercury in the mouth was measured at the start of the study
and was found to increase almost 300 per cent after chewing gum for 10
minutes. Other research has shown that 75 per cent or more of the mercury
vapor released by chewing is inhaled into the lungs where it enters the
blood stream and subsequently passes into the brain. Eleven of the patients
were assigned to have all their mercury fillings removed and were also given
multi-vitamins and antioxidants to help chelate and remove the mercury
released during the dental work. The remaining nine patients had a sealant
placed over their fillings and were told that this sealant would prevent
mercury from being released from their fillings. In actual fact there was no
evidence that it would do so. The control group patients were given a
supplemental vitamin and mineral tablet. The patients all completed various
questionnaires designed to evaluate their mental health before and six to
eight months after treatment. It was very clear that the patients who had
had their amalgam fillings removed had improved very significantly in such
important parameters as anxiety, depression, paranoia, hostility, and
obsessive compulsive behaviour. Some of the patients were able to
discontinue their lithium medication after amalgam removal. The researchers
caution that their study was relatively small and urge large scale clinical
trials to validate their findings.
Siblerud, Robert L., et al. Psychometric evidence that dental amalgam
mercury may be an etiological factor in manic depression. Journal of
Orthomolecular Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 1, First Quarter 1998, pp. 31- 40

Amalgam fillings may damage kidneys.
NEWSBRIEF. Amalgam fillings and skin-lightening creams both contain
significant amounts of mercury. Researchers at the King Faisal Hospital in
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia have just completed a study aimed at determining
whether the mercury actually gets into the blood stream. The study involved
225 women (aged 17 to 58 years) who had their urine measured for mercury,
creatinine, urea, uric acid, phosphorus, magnesium, calcium, and glucose.
The urinary mercury level varied between 0 and 204.8 micrograms per liter
and was directly related to the number of dental amalgam fillings present in
the women's mouths. The researchers conclude that chronic exposure to
mercury may be associated with deterioration of renal (kidney) function.
Biometals, Vol. 10, October 1997, pp. 315-23

Amalgam fillings and hearing loss
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO. The leaching of toxic mercury from amalgam fillings
has been implicated in hearing loss. Mercury toxicity has also been linked
to multiple sclerosis (MS). It is believed that the toxic effects of mercury
cause damage to the blood brain barrier, demyelination (damage to the
nerves' myelin sheaths) and slowing of the nerve conduction velocity. Now
researchers at the Rocky Mountain Research Institute provide convincing
proof that dental amalgam fillings may be responsible for the hearing loss
often experienced by multiple sclerosis patients. Their experiment involved
seven women aged 32-46 years who had been diagnosed with MS. The women
underwent a standard hearing test in a sound booth and then had all their
amalgam fillings replaced with composites. Six to eight months later they
were again given the hearing test. Six of the seven patients had
significantly improved hearing in the right ear and five of the seven showed
improvement in the left ear. Overall, hearing improved an average of eight
decibels. The researchers conclude that amalgam fillings may be a
significant factor in hearing loss experienced by MS patients and could be a
factor in hearing loss in other people as well.
Siblerud, Robert L. and Kienholz, Eldon. Evidence that mercury from dental
amalgam may cause hearing loss in multiple sclerosis patients. Journal of
Orthomolecular Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 4, Fourth Quarter, 1997, pp. 240-44

Chronic mercury poisoning is widespread
HILLEROED, DENMARK. A Danish dentist, Dr. H. Lichtenberg, reports that most
of his patients with amalgam fillings suffer from chronic mercury poisoning.
Dr. Lichtenberg measured the actual concentration of mercury vapour in the
mouths of his patients and found that it varied between 3 micrograms of
mercury vapour per cubic meter of air and 329 mcg/m3 with an average of 54.6
mcg/m3. This compares to a maximum permitted level in the workplace of 50
mcg/m3 for people working eight hours a day five days a week. NOTE: This
level applies to Denmark; the maximum level permitted in Switzerland is 10
mcg/m3 and in the USA it is 100 mcg/m3. A recent conference in Canada
proposed a Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for mercury vapour of 0.014 mcg/kg
of body weight per day; this corresponds to a maximum tolerable daily intake
of 1.0 mcg for a person weighing 70 kilograms. Most of Dr. Lichtenberg's
patients were thus exposed to 50 times the TDI. More than half of Dr.
Lichtenberg's patients exhibited one or more of the following symptoms of
chronic mercury poisoning - fatigue, poor concentration, poor memory,
bloating, joint pain, muscle fatigue, cold hands and feet, irritability, and
headache. Mercury poisoning from dental fillings has also been implicated in
Alzheimer's disease and heart disease.
Lichtenberg, H. Mercury vapour in the oral cavity in relation to number of
amalgam surfaces and the classic symptoms of chronic mercury poisoning.
Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 2, Second Quarter 1996, pp.
87-94

http://www.algonet.se/~leif/yfFRE88a.html

http://www.holisticmed.com/dental/amalgam/child.html

http://www.vimy-dentistry.com/nhanesstudy.htm

Summary Brief Abstract Citation MEDLINE ASN.1 XML/SGML LinkOut Related

>Articles
>>Protein Links Nucleotide Links Popset Links Structure Links GenomeLinks
>OMIM
>>Links Structure Domains Links

>>   1: Stomatologiia (Mosk) 1997;76(4):9-11 Related Articles, Books
>[Patterns
>>of mercury release from amalgam fillings into the oral cavity].[Article in
>>Russian]Motorkina AV, Barer GM, Volozhin AI.

>>Seventy-five subjects aged 20 to 57 with 1 to 15 fillings of silver
>amalgam
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>vapors in the oral cavity increased with the number of fillings. The
>>concentration of mercury in the oral cavity depends largely on the number

>>ofsilver amalgam fillings and less so on these fillings' length of
>service.Adv
>>Dent Res 1992 Sep;6:110-3

>>Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Side-effects: mercury contribution to
>body
>>burden from dental amalgam.Reinhardt JW.Department of Operative Dentistry,
>>University of Iowa College of Dentistry,Iowa City 52242.

>>The purpose of this paper is to examine and report on studies that relate
>>mercury levels in human tissues to the presence of dental amalgams, giving
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>humantissues makes any and all exposure to that element of scientific
>interest.

>>Dental amalgams have long been believed to be of little significance as
>>contributors to the overall body burden of mercury, because the elemental
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>from
>>dental amalgams have raised renewed concern about amalgam safety.

>>Mercury vapor absorption occurs through the lungs, with about 80% of the
>>inhaled vapor being absorbed by the lungs and rapidly entering the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>nervous
>>system and kidneys.

>>Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 1292449 [PubMed - indexed
>for
>>MEDLINE] 1: FASEB J 1990 Nov;4(14):3256-60 Related Articles, Books,
>LinkOut

>>Comment in: FASEB J. 1991 Feb;5(2):236.

>>Whole-body imaging of the distribution of mercury released from dental
>fillings
>>into monkey tissues.Hahn LJ, Kloiber R, Leininger RW, Vimy MJ, Lorscheider
>>FL.Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine,
>>Alberta,Canada.

>>The fate of mercury (Hg) released from dental "silver" amalgam tooth
>fillings
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>resemble
>>those of humans.

>>When amalgam fillings, which normally contain 50% Hg, are made with a
>tracer of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>of the monkey revealed that the highest levels of Hg werel ocated in the
>>kidney, gastrointestinal tract, and jaw.

the OSHA reg's on handeling it are very
> expensive and often ignored, and the EPA is targeting dental amalgam in
> it's program to reduce mercury  contamination of our waterways. We just
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> for the little difference in price, go with composite.
letsconnect - 25 Aug 2005 00:37 GMT
> Wrong, there are ALL kinds of proof and studies.
>
> http://www.amalgam.org./

yap yap yap etc.etc. Hope that's a sugar-free lollipop :-).

Amalgams are less technique-sensitive than composites for posterior
fillings on the biting surfaces, and they can last a very long time. If
your dentist suggests amalgams over composites on rear teeth and
implies that composites aren't durable, personally I'd probably go with
amalgam (cos it's likely that their technique isn't great). Or else you
could look for another dentist. The benefit of composites is that less
tooth structure needs to be removed because they don't rely on
mechanical retention.

A small proportion of the population has a sensitivity to certain
metals and reacts badly to amalgams. But they can work extremely well.
The best argument against their use is the environmental aspect, but in
certain situations, they may be a good option.
StovePipe - 25 Aug 2005 02:40 GMT
But, I would argue that "other things" are seldom equal in the mouth.
Though I would much rather place composites almost any day in almost
any tooth, there are situations where this is just not possible (sub-g
with unhealthy periodontium, lone second molar taking all the force of
the posterior segments,,,,,,,,,, etc.). A fixed-income or welfare
patient cannot often afford to have composites placed in these
circumstaces, and  almost certainly cannot afford to have those
composites 'resealed' every two years or so as the high-stress areas
often warrant.

Jes' muh ewn opinon, heah, y'all unnerstan'...

SP
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.