Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Stuff About Dinosaurs I Never Knew .....

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joel344 - 14 Aug 2005 00:16 GMT
I had no idea that dinosaurs were around five thousand years ago.
What is scary is that in a recent poll, 42% of Americans believe
the earth is less than 10,000 years old.

That's something else I never learned.

Joel

**

http://www.moeh.org/main/discover.htm

discover: Were Dinosaurs on the Ark of Noah?

Yes. From a biblical standpoint, it is extremely clear that God create
all land animals on day six of the creation week (dinosaurs are lan
animals), and that He gathered two (male and female) of each kind o
land animal into the ark.

Therefore, dinosaurs were included in this group. This is reinforced b
statements in Genesis 7, which say that all animals with the breath o
life came by pairs into the ark.

**

http://www.moeh.org/main/learn_c.htm

[Learn More]

In 1380, John Wycliffe produced the first complete English translatio
of the Bible, while the more notable King James Translation (Authorize
Version) appeared in 1611. At this point, the translators of Hebrew di
not have an English word equal to tanniym (meaning “great lizard”)
so they typically used the word dragon. Tanniym is found 25 times in th
Old Testament, including in Genesis 1:21. In this context, the word i
used to describe the creation of great ocean-dwelling creatures
Various translations treat this word differently:“And God create
great whales”

--King James Version “And God created the great Sea monsters”
--New American Standard Version “So God created the great [sea
creatures”
--New International Version and The Living Bible

Of the other 24 uses of the same word, the King James Version use
dragon 22 times. Other translations use words such as sea serpent
reptile, ravening monster, and crocodile. Over five and a hal
centuries after the first English translation of the Bible, Richar
Owen, aware of several dinosaur fossils unearthed in southern England
gave these massive creatures the name dinosauria, from Latin, meanin
“terrible lizard.” This name first appeared in a paper that h
presented to the British Association for the Advancement of Science
published in 1842

--
Joel34
Bill - 14 Aug 2005 00:26 GMT
Joel wrote:

"What is scary is that in a recent poll, 42% of Americans believe
the earth is less than 10,000 years old.

That's something else I never learned."

Well, the guy that Joel quoted is quite sure of when the dinosaurs got
started:

"From a biblical standpoint, it is extremely clear that God created
all land animals on day six of the creation week (dinosaurs are land
animals), and that He gathered two (male and female) of each kind of
land animal into the ark."

So where do alligators and crocodiles fall -- on day five? Five and a
half? Are they land or water creatures?

Perhaps in the rock strata there is a clear line between day five and
day six. A geologist could help.  ;-)

- dentaldoc
StovePipe - 14 Aug 2005 02:48 GMT
> So where do alligators and crocodiles fall -- on day five? Five and a
> half? Are they land or water creatures?

'Guess they must've had a committee meeting: The Father the Son, the
Holy Ghost, Krishna, Vishnu, Allah, Odin, Bob....

.... and chewed over what to do with the misfits. What we really need is
to find the minutes of that meeting. 'Bet it was written up by Loki...
so all you pointy-heads: look for an ancient secretarial book written in
godly short hand with Loki's signature on it....

Cheers, Amen
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

StovePipe - 14 Aug 2005 00:38 GMT
> dinosauria, from Latin, meaning
> “terrible lizard.” This name first appeared in a paper that he
> presented to the British Association for the Advancement of Science,
> published in 1842.

D'you think they bleached their fangs using nine percent volcanoe lava?

Interestingly, Mammouths (sp) are about 5000 years old as well aren't
they?

.... Or was that 500 years....?... I think so, as we can eat frozen
mammouth steaks today...

... Never Mind...
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Steven Bornfeld - 14 Aug 2005 03:11 GMT
>>dinosauria, from Latin, meaning
>>“terrible lizard.” This name first appeared in a paper that he
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> ... Never Mind...
> SP

    A hot item of discussion on the guitar newsgroups the past couple of
years:  Fossilized wooly mammoth ivory is being used for guitar nut and
bridge saddle blanks and bridge pins:

http://www.fossilivory.com/

Steve

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

StovePipe - 14 Aug 2005 03:21 GMT
>       A hot item of discussion on the guitar newsgroups the past couple of
> years:  Fossilized wooly mammoth ivory is being used for guitar nut and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Steve

Bloody Hell.... is it really worth it? Every Fender I've ever owned had
plastic in those postions and the sound  was fine. If you wanted to file
the nut down (as I did twice) it was easy to do using an emery board.

Thanks for the info
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

kureforcrohns@sbcglobal.net - 14 Aug 2005 09:54 GMT
There would be nothing to laugh about this crazy hour of the morning if not
for the dinosaurs  discussion.    Gotta be thankful for the humor.   Even
guitars are welcome.
Gail
Joel344 - 14 Aug 2005 11:49 GMT
In fact, there is lots of fascination about the scientific aspects of
this. One of the current buzzwords in paleontology is cladistics.

DEF.

A system of biological taxonomy based on the quantitative analysis
of comparative data and used to reconstruct trees summarizing the
(assumed) phylogenetic relations and evolutionary history of groups
of organisms

This replaces the older Linnean taxonomy.

As example, turtles are anapsids, dinosaurs are diapsids, while
humans are synapsids.

ANAPSIDS .. Primitive reptile having no opening in the temporal
region of the skull; all extinct except turtles

DIAPSIDS .. Reptile having a pair of openings in the skull behind
each eye

SYNAPSIDS .. Extinct reptile having a single pair of lateral
temporal openings in the skull

..or humans ..This definition is incomplete.

CONNECTION WITH DENTISTRY .. is of course how our orofacial
structures have evolved and developed.

This was a small portion of a paleontology course I took in the sprin

of 2005. On a larger scale, when discussing whether dinosaurs were
on Noah's Ark, there is lots to discuss. Beliefs are great, but mainl
in
the area of cosmology, religion, and the like. What prompted thi
discussion?
The rise to prominence of Pennsylvania's U.S. Senatro, Rick Santorum

a very dangerous man.

This points to discussions about stem cell research, and delving int
how
to reverse spinal cord damage. To my way of thinking, if there is
God,
he is saying,

"Yeah guys, go for it!"

That is my BELIEF anyway.

Joe

--
Joel34
StovePipe - 14 Aug 2005 17:44 GMT
> This points to discussions about stem cell research, and delving into
> how
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> "Yeah guys, go for it!"

The Religious Right is stangling your country. The stem cell thing and
the religious opposition even made it into the August issue of National
Geographic.

If there is a god s/he must be saying: what a.sholes they are being...

JMO
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Bill - 14 Aug 2005 22:02 GMT
"The Religious Right is stangling your country. The stem cell thing and

the religious opposition even made it into the August issue of National

Geographic."

___________

Here in California, the home of Ronald Reagan's widow ( a strong
proponent of stem cell research), we recently passed a bond issue to
support stem cell research in the state. So regardless of what the
Federal government may do, we will have non-federal funds to support
research within the state.

You have lots of good universities in Canada. This may be an
opportunity for them to recruit researchers if the U.S. starts lagging
behind.

- dentaldoc
StovePipe - 15 Aug 2005 02:11 GMT
> Here in California, the home of Ronald Reagan's widow ( a strong
> proponent of stem cell research), we recently passed a bond issue to
> support stem cell research in the state. So regardless of what the
> Federal government may do, we will have non-federal funds to support
> research within the state.

That's excellent. Hope you can become world contenders, but...

> You have lots of good universities in Canada. This may be an
> opportunity for them to recruit researchers if the U.S. starts lagging
> behind.
>
> - dentaldoc

I see your point Bill, but I think neither youse nor us are going to
break much new ground in stem cell research; it's gonna be the Brits,
Sigapore, China and a few others. Sigapore has already lured big wig
researchers from the 'States. They've  built a whole University around
stem cell research. That is both regenerative and cloning. Why all these
countries? Except for Great Britain, there are no ethics committees. The
Brits obviously _do_ have ethical stops in place, but it is nothing
compared to what GWB did to control research in the US of A.

Cheers
SP

Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

StovePipe - 14 Aug 2005 17:44 GMT
> SYNAPSIDS .. Extinct reptile having a single pair of lateral
> temporal openings in the skull
>
> ..or humans ..This definition is incomplete.

I thought I was a Kaannnadian...
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Steven Bornfeld - 14 Aug 2005 17:05 GMT
>>      A hot item of discussion on the guitar newsgroups the past couple of
>>years:  Fossilized wooly mammoth ivory is being used for guitar nut and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks for the info
> SP

    I'm not the one to ask about Strats--George is.  But I'm sure this is
more of an issue with acoustics, and maybe esp. classical guitars, where
sustain is a bigger problem.
    Andrew Schulman, who is a gigging guitarist in New York, both solo and
with his Abaca string band, is a big proponent of this.
    He's also very knowledgeable about issues related to lutherie and stuff
like saddle compensation that make my eyes glaze over.
    I'm sure he'd be happy to sing the praises of fossil mammoth ivory if
you contact him:

http://www.abacaproductions.com/

Steve

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

StovePipe - 14 Aug 2005 17:44 GMT
>       I'm not the one to ask about Strats--George is.  

These were mostly Jaguars and Telecasters. Strats were too $$$.

>But I'm sure this is
> more of an issue with acoustics, and maybe esp. classical guitars, where
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://www.abacaproductions.com/

Thanks for this. I've saved it.

SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

clintonz@prodigy.net - 14 Aug 2005 22:23 GMT
Speaking of dinosaurs and acoustics

http://www.sandia.gov/media/dinosaur.htm
Steven Bornfeld - 14 Aug 2005 23:11 GMT
> Speaking of dinosaurs and acoustics
>
> http://www.sandia.gov/media/dinosaur.htm

    Wow--is it possible these guys have too much time on their hands?

Steve

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

W_B - 15 Aug 2005 19:23 GMT
>> Speaking of dinosaurs and acoustics
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Steve

Millions and millions of years, right ?
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 15 Aug 2005 17:58 GMT
>>       A hot item of discussion on the guitar newsgroups the past couple of
>> years:  Fossilized wooly mammoth ivory is being used for guitar nut and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Thanks for the info
>SP

Think two of my Strats have a bone nut, the Tele too.
Changed the nut on the '62 to graphite, it wouldn't stay
tuned with the old nut.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 16 Aug 2005 05:57 GMT
> >Bloody Hell.... is it really worth it? Every Fender I've ever owned had
> >plastic in those postions and the sound  was fine. If you wanted to file
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

They told me at the guitar shop that the stuff they sold me was 'bone
nut'... it wasn't. It was plain old blonde colored plastic, shaped to
fit.

SP

Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

W_B - 16 Aug 2005 15:28 GMT
>> >Bloody Hell.... is it really worth it? Every Fender I've ever owned had
>> >plastic in those postions and the sound  was fine. If you wanted to file
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>SP

You still can get bone nut blanks, you may have to carve them yourself.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 17 Aug 2005 04:38 GMT
> You still can get bone nut blanks, you may have to carve them yourself.
> --
>
> W_B
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

You know.... if I dragged out my Mexican Strat and found that it needed
a new nut, I'd take an impression of the slot in polysiloxane, make a
negative of that in polysiloxane again (after coating the first with
Polmolive dishwashing soap), and fill it with a hard composite. That
would be sculptible with dental drills, and then I'd treat the underside
with (what else?) the Danville MicroEtcher Mark IIA. Then I'd use a weak
wood glue to place it in. I don't remember what we used as glue when we
changed the nut on  my old beat-up Telecaster. I wonder seriously if we
just didn't glue it at all...

Thanks
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

W_B - 17 Aug 2005 15:27 GMT
>> You still can get bone nut blanks, you may have to carve them yourself.
>> --
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>Thanks
>SP

Interesting idea.

Glue is not necessary to place a new guitar nut if the fit is good.
a little Elmer's if you want to secure it from shifting would be ok.

Do you still have the Tele ? what year model ?
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 17 Aug 2005 16:34 GMT
>>>You still can get bone nut blanks, you may have to carve them yourself.
>>>--
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

    I may have mentioned I cut a bottleneck with my high-speed.  Works very
nicely.  I wouldn't do this for a living, the silica dust I'm sure is no
good.
    I was also contacted by a well-known lute scholar in Boston, and I sent
him some finishing strips to widen nut slots.
    I'm not an expert on bridges--I particularly don't understand
compensation (I assume it has something to do with temperament).
    Don't know if you have any archtops--I know some of the bridge
technology used in some jazz boxes is pretty different.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

W_B - 17 Aug 2005 17:55 GMT
>>>>You still can get bone nut blanks, you may have to carve them yourself.
>>>>--
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>nicely.  I wouldn't do this for a living, the silica dust I'm sure is no
>good.

I got a local stained glass window shop to cut some wine bottles for slides.
(about 6 or so)
All he wanted in return was a nice bottle of whiskey.

>    I was also contacted by a well-known lute scholar in Boston, and I sent
>him some finishing strips to widen nut slots.
>    I'm not an expert on bridges--I particularly don't understand
>compensation (I assume it has something to do with temperament).

Believe it has to do with the thicker strings don't vibrate all the way to the
bridge saddle, has to do with intonation IMO.

>    Don't know if you have any archtops--I know some of the bridge
>technology used in some jazz boxes is pretty different.

No archtops, but the Les Paul actually has a top reminicent of a full arch top.
The good ole 'tune-o-matic'...

>Steve

--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 20 Aug 2005 15:42 GMT
>       I may have mentioned I cut a bottleneck with my high-speed.  Works very
> nicely.  I wouldn't do this for a living, the silica dust I'm sure is no
> good.

W_B is right: take 'em to a glassworks place and have do them there.
They have circle cutters made especially for bottles of all sizes. They
will heat up the cut edges with the acetylane torch to smooth them.
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

StovePipe - 17 Aug 2005 16:56 GMT
> Interesting idea.
>
> Glue is not necessary to place a new guitar nut if the fit is good.
> a little Elmer's if you want to secure it from shifting would be ok.

Yes... if you're usind Super Slinkys like I was at that time, you
couldn't stretch them enough so the nut would slip.
> Do you still have the Tele ? what year model ?

Never knew the year. It was a Tele that was converted into an Esquire
(God knows why; maybe the front pickup was broken). It was painted black
(ugly, but nice effect when you played at night in low lighting). I
don't have it anymore, and I regret it. I let it go because of the
sound: it just didn't give that Fender clean back pickup sound. Some of
the frets buzzed even after I worked on them. and as you must know, you
can't change the height of the older Tele bridges. So it was probably
quite old.

I regret it because of the TOUCH. If I had it today, I'd send it to you
and say: FIX IT.

Cheers
SP

> --
>
> W_B
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

W_B - 17 Aug 2005 18:14 GMT
>> Interesting idea.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Cheers
>SP

If you ever run across it again and procure it, you have a deal.

Pickups can be changed, and there are adjustable replacement
bridges that drop right into the old mount.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 18 Aug 2005 04:00 GMT
first the pipe wrote:

> >I regret it because of the TOUCH. If I had it today, I'd send it to you
> >and say: FIX IT.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> W_B
> Take out the G'RBAGE

Great! Thanks for the offer. Who knows what will come down the pike. I
pass in front of a local pawn shop often, and look it. Maybe one day...
Cheers
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Joel344 - 18 Aug 2005 10:46 GMT
> I was also contacted by a well-known lute scholar in Boston, and
sent
>him some finishing strips to widen nut slots.
> I'm not an expert on bridges--I particularly don't understand
>compensation (I assume it has something to do with temperament).

REPLY

We had one of those conventions for those guys recently. I wa
surprised. They had mebbe 30,000 or 40,000 lute scholars all packed i
there together. It is a much more popular instrument than peopl
realize.

Joe

--
Joel34
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 18 Aug 2005 15:56 GMT
>>I was also contacted by a well-known lute scholar in Boston, and I
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Joel

    It's funny--I do not play lute.  Classical guitarists are a very small
niche in classical music.  Many well-known lutenists come from a guitar
background, and are a small niche within those who know classical
guitar.  Some lute players like to dress up in funky renaissance outfits.
    It really is a beautiful instrument.

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute/lute.html

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Amatus Cremona - 18 Aug 2005 13:07 GMT
> You know.... if I dragged out my Mexican Strat and found that it needed
> a new nut, I'd take an impression of the slot in polysiloxane, make a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> changed the nut on  my old beat-up Telecaster. I wonder seriously if we
> just didn't glue it at all...

No ebony nuts?

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>
>> You still can get bone nut blanks, you may have to carve them yourself.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Thanks
> SP
W_B - 18 Aug 2005 15:57 GMT
>> You know.... if I dragged out my Mexican Strat and found that it needed
>> a new nut, I'd take an impression of the slot in polysiloxane, make a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>No ebony nuts?

Have yet to see one on a guitar.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 18 Aug 2005 15:59 GMT
>>>You know.... if I dragged out my Mexican Strat and found that it needed
>>>a new nut, I'd take an impression of the slot in polysiloxane, make a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Have yet to see one on a guitar.

    Hard for a wood, still too soft for a nut.

Steve
> --
>
> W_B
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Joel344 - 18 Aug 2005 16:10 GMT
REPLY

They used to give people tests during WWII to make sure they were no
actually German spies and merely dressed up as Americans .....

SOLDIER: "Name?"

OTHER GUY: "John Smith"

SOLDIER: "Profession?"

OTHER GUY: "Dental technician."

SOLDIER: "Okay wiseguy, what's a lutenist?"

Joel

QUOTED BELOW

It's funny--I do not play lute. Classical guitarists are a very small
niche in classical music. Many well-known lutenists come from a guitar
background, and are a small niche within those who know classical
guitar. Some lute players like to dress up in funky renaissanc
outfits.
It really is a beautiful instrument.

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute/lute.html

Stev

--
Joel34
Amatus Cremona - 18 Aug 2005 16:12 GMT
> Have yet to see one on a guitar.

What is the rationale behind the various choices of material for a guitar
nut and bridge?  The bridge is so short, does material changes effect sound
transmission to the belly of the instrument very much?

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>
>>> You know.... if I dragged out my Mexican Strat and found that it needed
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 18 Aug 2005 16:38 GMT
>> Have yet to see one on a guitar.
>
>What is the rationale behind the various choices of material for a guitar
>nut and bridge?  The bridge is so short, does material changes effect sound
>transmission to the belly of the instrument very much?

Alot depends on wether we are discussing electric v. acoustic.

The bridge on guitars is ~3 -3½ inches. It provides two distinct
functions, first is to create a 'stop' that determines the length
of the string, the other is to transmit vibration to the body of the
guitar. A semi dense material provides the best transmission.
Hence, ivory, bone, etc... because it vibrates easily,

Most electrics have metal bridges and the pickups (sensors)
pick up the vibrations.
On acoustics the bridge is part of the bridge assembly that transmits
the vibration to the top of the guitar.

Metal nuts were once popular (esp. brass) but these have
largely fallen out of favor.

The short answer to your question is yes.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Amatus Cremona - 18 Aug 2005 18:12 GMT
> The short answer to your question is yes.

Thank you for educating me

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>
>>> Have yet to see one on a guitar.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 18 Aug 2005 17:04 GMT
>>Have yet to see one on a guitar.
>
> What is the rationale behind the various choices of material for a guitar
> nut and bridge?  The bridge is so short, does material changes effect sound
> transmission to the belly of the instrument very much?

    The guitarist I referenced (Andrew Schulman) claims that a fossil ivory
nut makes a big difference.  He's kind of a techno-geek on guitars
(though a player, not a luthier) and is fond of cutting his own nut and
saddle blanks.  He's also an expert on nut compensation, which is pretty
arcane stuff to me.
    I can vouch that bridge saddle material makes a difference.  I'm a bit
more skeptical about nut material.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

W_B - 18 Aug 2005 17:14 GMT
>    I can vouch that bridge saddle material makes a difference.  I'm a bit
>more skeptical about nut material.
>
>Steve

Agreed.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Amatus Cremona - 18 Aug 2005 18:14 GMT
> The guitarist I referenced (Andrew Schulman) claims that a fossil ivory
> nut makes a big difference.  He's kind of a techno-geek on guitars (though
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I can vouch that bridge saddle material makes a difference.  I'm a bit
> more skeptical about nut material.

Do some guitars have a separate bridge, or is it always incorporated into
the saddle?

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>
>>>Have yet to see one on a guitar.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Steve
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 18 Aug 2005 19:14 GMT
>>The guitarist I referenced (Andrew Schulman) claims that a fossil ivory
>>nut makes a big difference.  He's kind of a techno-geek on guitars (though
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Do some guitars have a separate bridge, or is it always incorporated into
> the saddle?

    The saddle is part of the bridge; some are attached to the top, some
float.  I'm most familiar with acoustic flattop bridges.  Even there,
many saddles are glued in, but some are held in by pressure from the
strings.
    Many archtops have some unusual and varied designs.
    Now I just learned something; there are wood compensated bridges on
this page:

http://www.stewmac.com/shop/Bridges,_tailpieces/Archtop_guitar_bridges.html

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Amatus Cremona - 18 Aug 2005 19:44 GMT
> http://www.stewmac.com/shop/Bridges,_tailpieces/Archtop_guitar_bridges.html

thanks

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>
>>>The guitarist I referenced (Andrew Schulman) claims that a fossil ivory
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Steve
MartyCollinsRDH - 19 Aug 2005 16:14 GMT
This is a warning not to get Joel stated. He used to post his homewor
here with the pictures too.

Hugs,

Mart

--
MartyCollinsRD
Amatus Cremona - 19 Aug 2005 17:53 GMT
> This is a warning not to get Joel stated. He used to post his homework
> here with the pictures too.

No binaries on a newsgroup, so we don't mind.

Joel is a nice guy, I am sure that if you ask him nicely he will listen to
what you have to say.

Signature

.

Amatus

.

>
> This is a warning not to get Joel stated. He used to post his homework
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Marty
StovePipe - 20 Aug 2005 15:42 GMT
> No ebony nuts?

I'm predudiced, 'gainst them types, ya know.
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

W_B - 15 Aug 2005 17:59 GMT
> I think so, as we can eat frozen
>> mammouth steaks today...
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Steve

Kewl, thanks for the link.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Stormin Mormon - 16 Aug 2005 01:36 GMT
61.4% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

Signature

Christopher A. Young
 Do good work.
 It's longer in the short run
 but shorter in the long run.
.
.

I had no idea that dinosaurs were around five thousand years ago.
What is scary is that in a recent poll, 42% of Americans believe
the earth is less than 10,000 years old.

That's something else I never learned.

Joel

**

http://www.moeh.org/main/discover.htm

discover: Were Dinosaurs on the Ark of Noah?

Yes. From a biblical standpoint, it is extremely clear that God created
all land animals on day six of the creation week (dinosaurs are land
animals), and that He gathered two (male and female) of each kind of
land animal into the ark.

Therefore, dinosaurs were included in this group. This is reinforced by
statements in Genesis 7, which say that all animals with the breath of
life came by pairs into the ark.

**

http://www.moeh.org/main/learn_c.htm

[Learn More]

In 1380, John Wycliffe produced the first complete English translation
of the Bible, while the more notable King James Translation (Authorized
Version) appeared in 1611. At this point, the translators of Hebrew did
not have an English word equal to tanniym (meaning “great lizard”),
so they typically used the word dragon. Tanniym is found 25 times in the
Old Testament, including in Genesis 1:21. In this context, the word is
used to describe the creation of great ocean-dwelling creatures.
Various translations treat this word differently:“And God created
great whales”

--King James Version “And God created the great Sea monsters”
--New American Standard Version “So God created the great [sea]
creatures”
--New International Version and The Living Bible

Of the other 24 uses of the same word, the King James Version uses
dragon 22 times. Other translations use words such as sea serpent,
reptile, ravening monster, and crocodile. Over five and a half
centuries after the first English translation of the Bible, Richard
Owen, aware of several dinosaur fossils unearthed in southern England,
gave these massive creatures the name dinosauria, from Latin, meaning
“terrible lizard.” This name first appeared in a paper that he
presented to the British Association for the Advancement of Science,
published in 1842.

Signature

Joel344

pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 16 Aug 2005 04:02 GMT
Joel wrote:

> I had no idea that dinosaurs were around five thousand years ago.

'Course! Dinchoo ever watch the TV show "It's About Time"?
Joel344 - 16 Aug 2005 04:13 GMT
I am still wondering how Noah got the big ones
onto his Ark. You know, head sticking out through the sunroof, etc.

Signature

Joel344

StovePipe - 16 Aug 2005 05:57 GMT
> I am still wondering how Noah got the big ones onto his Ark. You know,
> head sticking out through the sunroof, etc.--
> Joel344-------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Joel344's Profile:
> http://dentalcom.net/forum/member.php?userid=12View this thread:
> http://dentalcom.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2670

Jeezuz... Velociraptors and pigs on the same boat....

SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Joel344 - 16 Aug 2005 12:01 GMT
Stove Pipe Wrote:

> Jeezuz... Velociraptors and pigs on the same boat....

NOAH TO FAMILY:

"We won't starve. At least the Velociraptors are Kosher.

--
Joel34
StovePipe - 16 Aug 2005 05:57 GMT
> I had no idea that dinosaurs were around five thousand years ago.
> What is scary is that in a recent poll, 42% of Americans believe
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> **

Regarding Noah and his Yacht, here is a not insignificant segment of the
population that believes that Noah's wife was....

... Joan of Arc.

That is really true. Saw it on the weekend on the Radio.
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.