Quoting snippets from the online abstract Aug 2005 edition of JPD .
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 112-117 (August 2005)
A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions
Material and methods
A total of 193 FPD impressions were evaluated, immediately after arrival at 11
dental laboratories, by 3 calibrated examiners
Results
Of the impressions, 89.1% had 1 or more observable errors. Significant
correlations were found between material type and voids or tears at the finish
line (Rv=0.17, P<.025) and between material type and polymerization problems
(Rv=0.223, P<.004).
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, impressions made with polyethers had the
most detectable errors, followed by condensation-type silicones. The high
frequency of detectable errors found in impressions sent for FPD fabrication is
of concern.
Reminds me of why I became a Denturist and possibly why Steve Mancuso is so fond
of his CEREC

Signature
Roy
rem NADA to reply
Joel344 - 11 Aug 2005 14:40 GMT
We also need to add that working with patients can be difficult. Most of
our impressions are quite adequate while some .... well, a disruptive
patient,
an overly active pain threshhold, well sometimes the impression that
goes
to the lab is the BEST THAT can be obtained.
This is why we never criticize others' work. We were not there and did
not observe under what condititons the work (or the impression)
was performed.
Joel

Signature
Joel344
Joel344 - 11 Aug 2005 14:40 GMT
Let's also add that these are BRIDGE impressions ...... two or mor
crowns
as abutments spanning an edentulous (missing tooth) space. The missing
tooth replacement is called the PONTIC, similar to the French word
"le pont.
--
Joel34
Joel344 - 11 Aug 2005 14:44 GMT
For those who want to know ......
THE TRICK to any clinical circumstance that defies obtaining an
excellent impression is ..... TA Da ...... an annealed copper band!
Joel

Signature
Joel344
Charlie - 11 Aug 2005 21:50 GMT
Good grief Joel, I haven't placed a copper band in 25 years!
But I have one local friend who still uses them and you're right about how
good they can be (in the right hands): literature has shown them to be
potentially the least traumatic and very precise.
My friend is veeeery OC. Good thing in a doc doing prostho .
Charlie - 11 Aug 2005 21:47 GMT
No surprises here. Two of my best friends are ceramometal techs - it's quite
an adventure to hang out and look in the lab pans.
I have noticed that the docs that do nice work always seem to do nice work.
And the reverse. When asked how to pick a new dentist by a friend who is
moving, I always say the same thing: check with a couple of dental labs.