> That's what I though.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I think you can figure it out from here.
So let me see if I understood this from the beginning - I am after all
only a computer engineer, and not a Dentist (the air of pomposity flows
freely from you).
The statement "The patient may have as many diseases, as he or she
pleases" was the statement I referred to. As my original reply
indicated, I believe this to be an insult directed at me (is there
another way to take that?). With that in mind, my next comment "My
original post was phrased in the form a question" was meant to show
that I did not know whether it was a TMJ related dysfunction - hence
the QUESTION.
In response to your comment "If you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not
zebras". Let's review: I had 4 wisdom teeth extracted 4 weeks ago,
developed an infection, had it drained and cleaned, then developed pain
IN THE AREA OF THE TMJ and that is somehow supposed to be a foolish
conclusion to believe the two (extraction & pain) are related?
I called my OS to ask his opinion after I posted here and he said
"sounds like it could be related, setup an appointment and we'll check
it out". I went to the MD (again, scheduled for different reasons) told
him about it and when he did some "pressing, squeezing, etc." said
"Yeah, the pain seems to be localized in your TMJ area". Then he said,
"let's look in the ear just in case..." well, I already mentioned the
rest of that conversation. Finally, someone (whom I assume is a fellow
member of your profession) also believed the two were related.
It's unfortunate that those 3 people didn't have access to the vast
array of wisdom which comes by way of clever axioms. Next time perhaps
I can save a load of time and contact your pathology professor
directly, I'm sure (s)he can lead me towards the horses, and away from
the zebras.
W_B - 11 Aug 2005 21:21 GMT
>> That's what I though.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>indicated, I believe this to be an insult directed at me (is there
>another way to take that?).
It was not an insult, the statement is a reminder for practitioners
to realize that more than one pathological process can be going
on at the same time.
You just took it wrong. I tend to be terse, but most of the regs
usually know what I mean.
>With that in mind, my next comment "My
>original post was phrased in the form a question" was meant to show
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>rest of that conversation. Finally, someone (whom I assume is a fellow
>member of your profession) also believed the two were related.
It can be, but not necessarily so.
Hence, "The patient may have as many diseases,
as he or she pleases"
>It's unfortunate that those 3 people didn't have access to the vast
>array of wisdom which comes by way of clever axioms. Next time perhaps
>I can save a load of time and contact your pathology professor
>directly, I'm sure (s)he can lead me towards the horses, and away from
>the zebras.
You have a direct line to the afterlife ?
Interesting.
--
W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com