Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Loupes or no loupes?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
letsconnect - 26 Jul 2005 00:40 GMT
In a book by Mac Lee, I read a while back that one of the defining
characteristics (for consumers) of a good dentist is the use of loupes.
I'd forgotten all about it, until I came across the following thread on
www.dentistry.com today:

--------------------
Darius
posted 07-25-2005 01:04 AM

Hello,

I need a few cavities filled. I have seen some doctors who use
magnifiers/microscopes for all dental procedures. I am embarrassed to
insist that my doctor should use them if he is going to fill my
cavities--I would feel much better if he did. Is this reasonable?

Thanks
----------

Jeffrey L. Wissot, DDS
posted 07-25-2005 07:21 PM

Interesting question. I practiced 30 years without using loops. Some
dentists prefer them. I think it's really a matter of personal
preference.

-------------------

What is your take on this topic? What percentage of dentists use loupes
for all procedures? Is it one of the surefire characteristics of a good
dentist? How necessary are loupes? And for what procedures? Any
comments would be appreciated - cheers :-) !
Steven Bornfeld - 26 Jul 2005 03:35 GMT
> In a book by Mac Lee, I read a while back that one of the defining
> characteristics (for consumers) of a good dentist is the use of loupes.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> dentist? How necessary are loupes? And for what procedures? Any
> comments would be appreciated - cheers :-) !

    This is definitely procedure-specific.  A dentist with normal corrected
vision hardly needs magnification for denture procedures.  However, for
most operative procedures they are a definite advantage.  For some
procedures operating microscopes are becoming the standard of care.

Steve

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

letsconnect - 26 Jul 2005 12:52 GMT
>     This is definitely procedure-specific.  A dentist with normal corrected
> vision hardly needs magnification for denture procedures.  However, for
> most operative procedures they are a definite advantage.  For some
> procedures operating microscopes are becoming the standard of care.
>
> Steve

Thanks for this :-) (did you mean "dental" rather than "denture"
procedures? and how are "operative" as opposed to non-operative
procedures defined in dentistry?).

I actually found the extract from the book I mentioned above:

"Here are a few guidelines to follow and questions to ask when you are
looking for the right dental professional for you and/or your family:

Does the dentist wear special magnification lenses? This is essential
for doing quality work because dental procedures are precise and the
dentist is working in a small, dark area on a small object. Most
up-to-date dentists will tell you that they would not want to get their
dental work done by a dentist who is not using high-tech, high-powered
lenses."
Steven Fawks - 26 Jul 2005 14:05 GMT
Now, you should know that a "Steve" rarely makes mistakes <G>.

"Denture" procedures refer to constructing dentures (false teeth).
Impression taking, tooth selection, try-ins, etc.  Not very much
in the way of minute detail to be seen.

"Operative" is a term we use refering to treating cavities by
removing the decay and placing a restoration (filling, inlay,
etc.)  Magnification helps to ensure complete decay removal as
well as restoration placement and finishing.

I worked for quite a few years with no magnification (heck, when
I started practice, dentists didn't even wear gloves!).  I still
see a lot of my old work that is doing quite well, so I would say
magnification might not always be mandatory.

As I've gotten older, I can't get a 'better look' by getting closer
to an object.  It just gets blurry.  So, magnification is an absolute
necessity for me so that I can see what I'm doing.

If a dentist is careful and skilled, magnification will make
treatment easier and it will help ensure that nothing goes
unseen.  If the dentist is sloppy or less skilled, magnification
isn't going to have much of an impact.

JME,
Fawks

> Thanks for this :-) (did you mean "dental" rather than "denture"
> procedures? and how are "operative" as opposed to non-operative
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> dental work done by a dentist who is not using high-tech, high-powered
> lenses."
Dr Steve - 26 Jul 2005 14:36 GMT
I will add that I initially went with loupes to increase the focal distance
so I could sit with my back and neck straight.  I was starting to get some
significant neck pains.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
> Now, you should know that a "Steve" rarely makes mistakes <G>.
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>> dental work done by a dentist who is not using high-tech, high-powered
>> lenses."
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 26 Jul 2005 15:10 GMT
> Now, you should know that a "Steve" rarely makes mistakes <G>.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> unseen.  If the dentist is sloppy or less skilled, magnification
> isn't going to have much of an impact.

Word!

Steve

> JME,
> Fawks
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> dental work done by a dentist who is not using high-tech, high-powered
>> lenses."

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

letsconnect - 26 Jul 2005 15:26 GMT
> Now, you should know that a "Steve" rarely makes mistakes <G>.

*grin* - of course not :-) (it seems to be quite a popular name around
here...)
Thanks for the detailed explanation!

> "Denture" procedures refer to constructing dentures (false teeth).
> Impression taking, tooth selection, try-ins, etc.  Not very much
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> > dental work done by a dentist who is not using high-tech, high-powered
> > lenses."
Dr Steve - 26 Jul 2005 14:34 GMT
Absolutely right,  Nobody touches my teeth without loupes on.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> This is definitely procedure-specific.  A dentist with normal corrected
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> dental work done by a dentist who is not using high-tech, high-powered
> lenses."
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 26 Jul 2005 15:09 GMT
>>    This is definitely procedure-specific.  A dentist with normal corrected
>>vision hardly needs magnification for denture procedures.  However, for
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> procedures? and how are "operative" as opposed to non-operative
> procedures defined in dentistry?).

    I meant denture procedures.  IMO while I suppose magnification could
possibly see minute voids in impressions, defects in partial frames etc.
generally I don't see much utility.  It is also useful to do try-ins and
other procedures involving esthetics using wide unobstructed
vision--seeing things as others would.
    OTOH, most operative (drilling, restoring), endodontic, and periodontal
procedures benefit from magnification.
    I'm a relatively recent convert to using loupes.  First I tried the
Oroscoptic 2.5X, but found them very difficult to use mounted on a
bifocal lens (in my civilian life I use progressive bifocals).  They
were also rather uncomfortable on my nose due to their weight.  I now
use Designs for Vision 2X, which are less uncomfortable.  They are
mounted on a monovision lens halfway between the upper and lower of my
bifocal prescription.  My brother who started with the Designs for
Vision 2X has moved onto these ridiculous-looking 4.5X, which in order
to have a usable depth of field are very, very long.  It took him a
while, but he has gotten used to them.
    Most endodontists around here are now using operating microscopes,
which have adjustable magnifications usually in the 6-30X range.  These
have helped detect small canals which previously might have been missed.
    A few years ago there was a dentist whose name (IIRC) was Glen Van As,
from Vancouver.  He was advocating operating microscopes for all
operative dental procedures.  Personally I think this is overkill, but
I'm sure there are times when it would be very nice to have.

Steve

> I actually found the extract from the book I mentioned above:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> dental work done by a dentist who is not using high-tech, high-powered
> lenses."

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

letsconnect - 26 Jul 2005 15:23 GMT
>     I meant denture procedures.

Thanks for clarifying - I wasn't quite sure (you must forgive me - but
after reading all about "loops" ;-) - see my first post - I thought it
might have been a typo). Obviously, I should have known better (with
the answer coming from a "Steve" :-)). And thanks for the explanation
below!

> IMO while I suppose magnification could
> possibly see minute voids in impressions, defects in partial frames etc.
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> Brooklyn, NY
> 718-258-5001
Dr Steve - 26 Jul 2005 14:34 GMT
I still remember the first week I used loupes and I thought to myself, "Wow,
I have not been as accurate as I could have been!"  Loupes makes the dentist
much more accurate.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> In a book by Mac Lee, I read a while back that one of the defining
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Steve
The Real Paul - 26 Jul 2005 13:17 GMT
After using them (Designs for Vision 3.5X - super nerd frames) for 11 years,
it would be tough to do dentistry without them. I'm definitely hooked!

> In a book by Mac Lee, I read a while back that one of the defining
> characteristics (for consumers) of a good dentist is the use of loupes.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> dentist? How necessary are loupes? And for what procedures? Any
> comments would be appreciated - cheers :-) !
NOYB - 26 Jul 2005 13:52 GMT
I like Orascoptics' TTL (through the lens) loupes.  They're very light, and
unlike the Designs for Vision ones, they're fully submersible in water for
cleaning.

> After using them (Designs for Vision 3.5X - super nerd frames) for 11
> years,
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>> dentist? How necessary are loupes? And for what procedures? Any
>> comments would be appreciated - cheers :-) !
Steven Fawks - 26 Jul 2005 14:12 GMT
> After using them (Designs for Vision 3.5X - super nerd frames) for 11 years,
> it would be tough to do dentistry without them. I'm definitely hooked!

I agree.

I bought a second pair just in case I broke my main ones.  I am so
dependent upon them that I wouldn't practice without them.

Fawks
W_B - 26 Jul 2005 16:08 GMT
>> After using them (Designs for Vision 3.5X - super nerd frames) for 11 years,
>> it would be tough to do dentistry without them. I'm definitely hooked!
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Fawks

That's a good idea, a back-up pair.
I wouldn't practice without magnification either.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Dr Steve - 26 Jul 2005 18:51 GMT
Each time I upgrade to higher magnification, I keep the last pair as a
"spare".  The first pair I bought are now in the garage-shop for when I need
to work on something tiny at home.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>>> After using them (Designs for Vision 3.5X - super nerd frames) for 11
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 26 Jul 2005 20:01 GMT
>Each time I upgrade to higher magnification, I keep the last pair as a
>"spare".  The first pair I bought are now in the garage-shop for when I need
>to work on something tiny at home.

"Ten-Foot Pole" Alert...  <G>
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 26 Jul 2005 20:06 GMT
>>Each time I upgrade to higher magnification, I keep the last pair as a
>>"spare".  The first pair I bought are now in the garage-shop for when I need
>>to work on something tiny at home.
>
> "Ten-Foot Pole" Alert...  <G>

    That's just WRONG!!  (tee hee)

Steve
> --
>
> W_B
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Steven Fawks - 26 Jul 2005 20:52 GMT
Too funny!

Fawks

 The first pair I bought are now in the garage-shop for when I need
>>to work on something tiny at home.

>>Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
>
> "Ten-Foot Pole" Alert...  <G>
> --
>
> W_B
Dr Steve - 26 Jul 2005 21:46 GMT
Hey,,,,,,, quit picking on me!

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................
......................

>
> Too funny!
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> W_B
Steven Fawks - 26 Jul 2005 22:39 GMT
OK, I guess you have enough troubles already.
Before W_B chimed in, I was going to agree that
working with magnification at the office, led
me to occasionally use them at home for certain
projects.

His comment just kind of changed the whole thread.

Sorry.

<G>
Fawks

> Hey,,,,,,, quit picking on me!
Dr Steve - 27 Jul 2005 13:36 GMT
<vbg>

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................
......................

>
> OK, I guess you have enough troubles already.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>> Hey,,,,,,, quit picking on me!
W_B - 27 Jul 2005 15:47 GMT
>OK, I guess you have enough troubles already.
>Before W_B chimed in, I was going to agree that
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>> Hey,,,,,,, quit picking on me!

I use them for working on computers, on the hardware that is.
Sometimes hard to read those litte letters on the jumper settings.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.