Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Case Study (optimal treatment plan)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dr.Nani - 15 Jul 2005 15:18 GMT
Hi everyone ...
any help with this case study

  A healthy 36-year-old male patient presents requesting treatment for
"broken back teeth". Examination shows a fully dentate mouth with
extensive amalgams in a number of posterior teeth and composite
restorations in most of anterior teeth.
There is gingival bleeding on gentle probing in all quadrants and PPD
of 3-5mm in posterior segments. There is plaque and supragingival
calculus detected in lower anterior and upper posterior segments.
Tooth 16 has been root filled and extensively restored with amalgam.
Mesio-buccal cusp has fractured. A periapical radiograph shows
well-defined periapical radiolucency apparently associated with the
palatal root.
Tooth 15 has been heavily restored with extensive MODPal pinned amalgam
restoring palatal cusp. The buccal cusp has fractured below the level
of the gingival attachment.
Tooth 14 has minimal mesial and distal proximal composite restorations
with early recurrent caries at the gingival margins.
Discuss the case assessment, possible treatment options with
advantages and disadvantages of every option.
Discuss optimal treatment plan addressing this patient clinical
problems.
Steven Bornfeld - 15 Jul 2005 15:47 GMT
> Hi everyone ...
> any help with this case study
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Discuss optimal treatment plan addressing this patient clinical
> problems.

    Are you a dentist or a student doing their homework?

Steve

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

W_B - 15 Jul 2005 17:23 GMT
>Hi everyone ...
>any help with this case study
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Discuss optimal treatment plan addressing this patient clinical
>problems.

That man needs some dental treatment.

Hope that helps.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
DentallyChallenged - 15 Jul 2005 21:03 GMT
I would start with surgical extraction of teeth 1-28
Stormin Mormon - 17 Jul 2005 22:07 GMT
Geez, leave 29-32 in? I think that's a bit radical.

Take all 32.

Signature

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
    www.lds.org
    www.mormons.com

I would start with surgical extraction of teeth 1-28
Dr. Steve - 15 Jul 2005 23:29 GMT
>Hi everyone ...
>any help with this case study
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Discuss optimal treatment plan addressing this patient clinical
>problems.

Where are you a student at?
..
Stephen
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Dr.Nani - 16 Jul 2005 04:17 GMT
Hello again ,
Actually I am dentist graduated recently from the uni , not student any
more  but still  I have dental council  clinical examinations . I need
to discuss some case studies with anyone who is interested to share
ideas .

I would suggest for this case :
1_ for the tooth 16
if symptoms of pathology present then RE do endo. therapy
if no symptoms associated then either restore the fractured cusp with
composite if the remaining amalgam satisfactory , or repeat the amalgam
if it is not satisfactory .
In both cases we have to keep the tooth under observation for 6-12 m
for assesment with further raidograph.
anfter cure we can restore the tooth with cast restoration
2_ for the tooth 15
we have to do crown lengthening procedure , if the remaining amalgam
satisfactory then restore the fractured cusp with composite and cast
restoration otherwise repeat it using amalgam and cast restoration.

3_ tooth 14
remove the composite and the caries then restore the tooth with
composite or amalgam .

4_ supragingival scaling to remove the plaque and calculus with OHI

Awaiting your Comments ....
Dr. Steve - 16 Jul 2005 17:04 GMT
>Hello again ,
>Actually I am dentist graduated recently from the uni , not student any
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>Awaiting your Comments ....

It is  not  proper to ask us to do your  homework  for you.
..
Stephen
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
W_B - 16 Jul 2005 21:20 GMT
>>4_ supragingival scaling to remove the plaque and calculus with OHI

Why would anyone leave subgingival calculus ?

>>Awaiting your Comments ....
>
>It is  not  proper to ask us to do your  homework  for you.
>..
>Stephen
>Troy

Looks like humamhuda is going to have to keep on waiting....and
waiting..... and waiting.....

"Endeavor to persevere"

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
W_B - 16 Jul 2005 21:03 GMT
First, most of the regs of SMD are US.

Second, we are familiar with the
"international tooth numbering system"

We don't like it, we don't use it.
Check out ada.org; search for the "tooth chart"

Thirdly

>Hello again ,
>Actually I am dentist graduated recently from the uni , not student any
>more  but still  I have dental council  clinical examinations .

What country ?
What university ?

>I need
>to discuss some case studies with anyone who is interested to share
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>Awaiting your Comments ....

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
DrSteve - 17 Jul 2005 12:05 GMT
If Dr. Nani has an assignment to discuss a proposed hypothetical patient
with other dentists to compare viewpoints, then I would not mind discussed
it.  If he needs the answers for a school assignment, I refuse to do his
work for him.  If he is casting for information to help in a law-suit, then
I will simply block his postings from my machines.

> First, most of the regs of SMD are US.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE
W_B - 17 Jul 2005 17:45 GMT
>If Dr. Nani has an assignment to discuss a proposed hypothetical patient
>with other dentists to compare viewpoints, then I would not mind discussed
>it.  If he needs the answers for a school assignment, I refuse to do his
>work for him.  If he is casting for information to help in a law-suit, then
>I will simply block his postings from my machines.

--or--
She

Agreed.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
George Chatzipetros - 19 Jul 2005 20:04 GMT
> First, most of the regs of SMD are US.
> >
> Second, we are familiar with the
> "international tooth numbering system"
>
> We don't like it, we don't use it.

Why don't you like it WB? It's simpler to memorise and use and
sometimes makes communication faster (eg patient has no 8s, please
extract all 4s etc). It's the same with imperial and metric: you
Yankees always choose the hard way to do something! :)

George
Dr Steve - 19 Jul 2005 20:09 GMT
Even if we wanted to change, the insurance carriers al use the US system, so
our notes have to be in that form.

I was hoping we would have converted to the metric system back in 1970.  I
am still waiting for that one.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> First, most of the regs of SMD are US.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> George
W_B - 19 Jul 2005 21:09 GMT
Besides what Dr. Steve said, your #18 is different from our #18
In the US system each tooth has a specific number, this
avoids confusion. The problem isn't with us 'yanks' it's with ya'll

>Even if we wanted to change, the insurance carriers al use the US system, so
>our notes have to be in that form.
>
>I was hoping we would have converted to the metric system back in 1970.  I
>am still waiting for that one.

>This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
>Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>> George

--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.