Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Subperiosteal implants

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael T - 12 Jul 2005 18:11 GMT
I was just reading about Subperiosteal implants for my missing teeth
(18-21). It appears they are much less expensive than an Endosteal implant.

FYI, tooth #17 is missing and tooth #22 is the outside tooth of a cantilever
bridge.

Please advise as to how these two types of implants compare as to cost,
efficacy and permanence.

Thank you so much.

Michael
Dr Steve - 12 Jul 2005 19:15 GMT
Impossible to advise you on an internet description of your mouth.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>I was just reading about Subperiosteal implants for my missing teeth
>(18-21). It appears they are much less expensive than an Endosteal implant.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Michael
Michael T - 12 Jul 2005 19:21 GMT
Dr. Steve,

Perhaps I should have left out my personal information as my intent
(apparently poorly conveyed) was to simply find out the pros and cons of
Subperiosteal implants.

Sorry for the confusion.

Michael

> Impossible to advise you on an internet description of your mouth.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
>> Michael
W_B - 13 Jul 2005 00:37 GMT
>Dr. Steve,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Michael

Subperiosteal implants have largely been supplanted by
endosteal.

Endosteal is the modern way to go.

>> Impossible to advise you on an internet description of your mouth.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>>
>>> Michael

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Michael T - 13 Jul 2005 02:30 GMT
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:21:02 GMT, "Michael T"
>>
> Subperiosteal implants have largely been supplanted by
> endosteal.
>
> Endosteal is the modern way to go.

Well that certainly simplifies my decision. Thank you so much.

Michael
teethdood - 12 Jul 2005 19:23 GMT
subperiosteal implants: reflect big old flap, take impression of bone,
implant is made composed of a saddle mesh resting on top of bone, then
covered up soft tissue, left to heal. Bone resorbs, saddle no longer resting
intimately, becomes mobile, failure, obsolete. Special uses only nowadays.
endosteal implants: no flaps if enough bone, go right into bone, bone heals
around implants, hard as a rock, 6 months later voila crown time. Modern.
Cost: depends if you have enough bone or not

Question for doctors doing implants: what do you think of the fluoride
systems like AstraZeneca? Their claim is that it helps make bone
stronger...my thought was that fluoride release is good for teeth only.
Marketing gimmick? I haven't seen studies to back this claim up.

>I was just reading about Subperiosteal implants for my missing teeth
>(18-21). It appears they are much less expensive than an Endosteal implant.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Michael
W_B - 13 Jul 2005 00:40 GMT
>Question for doctors doing implants: what do you think of the fluoride
>systems like AstraZeneca? Their claim is that it helps make bone
>stronger...my thought was that fluoride release is good for teeth only.
>Marketing gimmick? I haven't seen studies to back this claim up.

Well fluor-apatite is fluor-apatite whether in teeth or bone.
Does it promote this in boney tissue ?

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
teethdood - 13 Jul 2005 06:19 GMT
> Well fluor-apatite is fluor-apatite whether in teeth or bone.
> Does it promote this in boney tissue ?

Well I suppose it does promote fluoroappatite in bone, but then that bone
isn't subjected to oral acid decalcification, so what's the point?

>>Question for doctors doing implants: what do you think of the fluoride
>>systems like AstraZeneca? Their claim is that it helps make bone
>>stronger...my thought was that fluoride release is good for teeth only.
>>Marketing gimmick? I haven't seen studies to back this claim up.

> --
> W_B
>
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.