Impossible to advise you on an internet description of your mouth.

Signature
~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................
This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here. Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................
>I was just reading about Subperiosteal implants for my missing teeth
>(18-21). It appears they are much less expensive than an Endosteal implant.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Michael
Michael T - 12 Jul 2005 19:21 GMT
Dr. Steve,
Perhaps I should have left out my personal information as my intent
(apparently poorly conveyed) was to simply find out the pros and cons of
Subperiosteal implants.
Sorry for the confusion.
Michael
> Impossible to advise you on an internet description of your mouth.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
>> Michael
W_B - 13 Jul 2005 00:37 GMT
>Dr. Steve,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Michael
Subperiosteal implants have largely been supplanted by
endosteal.
Endosteal is the modern way to go.
>> Impossible to advise you on an internet description of your mouth.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>>
>>> Michael
--
W_B
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Michael T - 13 Jul 2005 02:30 GMT
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:21:02 GMT, "Michael T"
>>
> Subperiosteal implants have largely been supplanted by
> endosteal.
>
> Endosteal is the modern way to go.
Well that certainly simplifies my decision. Thank you so much.
Michael
subperiosteal implants: reflect big old flap, take impression of bone,
implant is made composed of a saddle mesh resting on top of bone, then
covered up soft tissue, left to heal. Bone resorbs, saddle no longer resting
intimately, becomes mobile, failure, obsolete. Special uses only nowadays.
endosteal implants: no flaps if enough bone, go right into bone, bone heals
around implants, hard as a rock, 6 months later voila crown time. Modern.
Cost: depends if you have enough bone or not
Question for doctors doing implants: what do you think of the fluoride
systems like AstraZeneca? Their claim is that it helps make bone
stronger...my thought was that fluoride release is good for teeth only.
Marketing gimmick? I haven't seen studies to back this claim up.
>I was just reading about Subperiosteal implants for my missing teeth
>(18-21). It appears they are much less expensive than an Endosteal implant.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Michael
W_B - 13 Jul 2005 00:40 GMT
>Question for doctors doing implants: what do you think of the fluoride
>systems like AstraZeneca? Their claim is that it helps make bone
>stronger...my thought was that fluoride release is good for teeth only.
>Marketing gimmick? I haven't seen studies to back this claim up.
Well fluor-apatite is fluor-apatite whether in teeth or bone.
Does it promote this in boney tissue ?
--
W_B
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
teethdood - 13 Jul 2005 06:19 GMT
> Well fluor-apatite is fluor-apatite whether in teeth or bone.
> Does it promote this in boney tissue ?
Well I suppose it does promote fluoroappatite in bone, but then that bone
isn't subjected to oral acid decalcification, so what's the point?
>>Question for doctors doing implants: what do you think of the fluoride
>>systems like AstraZeneca? Their claim is that it helps make bone
>>stronger...my thought was that fluoride release is good for teeth only.
>>Marketing gimmick? I haven't seen studies to back this claim up.
> --
> W_B
>
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE