Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / July 2005
Mercury Amalgams
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Keith P Walsh - 18 Jun 2005 12:17 GMT It appears that some members of the dental profession are of the opinion that there is no such thing as a "mercury amalgam".
The "reasoning" is that since an amalgam is formed by mixing solid metals with liquid mercury, giving rise to "copper amalgams", "gold amalgams" etc. depending on the nature of the solid metal used in the mixture, then if one uses the term "mercury amalgam" this implies that one thinks that one can form an amalgam by mixing liquid mercury with liquid mercury.
But it doesn't imply any such thing.
If you do a search on "amalgam" you will find that there are lots of usages of the word other than those associated with mercury (for example you can have an "amalgam" of political ideologies).
So, if we wish to be precise in establishing that we are referring to the type of metallic material commonly used in restorative dentistry, we can describe it as "an amalgam of metals formed by mixing grains of a solid metal alloy with liquid mercury at room temperature and allowing the mixture to harden".
However, once we have established that this is what we are referring to we can quite logically abbreviate this discription to "mercury amalgam", and those amongst us of a rational disposition will understand perfectly well what is meant.
Indeed, since the liquid mercury is the essential component in forming materials of this nature, it is particularly apposite that the word "mercury" is included in any abbreviated term used in describing this class of material generally.
Members of the dental profession are not qualified to dictate the rules of language use. (Though it no longer surprises me that some of them have the arrogance to presume that they are.)
And there is a hint of cowardice in the tactic of diverting legitimate enquiries regarding the physical nature of dental materials by the irrelevant quibbling over terminologies.
I would encourage anyone concerned about the fillings in their teeth to have the confidence to call these materials what they are.
Mercury amalgams.
Keith P Walsh
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 18 Jun 2005 13:56 GMT > It appears that some members of the dental profession are of the > opinion that there is no such thing as a "mercury amalgam". [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > rules of language use. (Though it no longer surprises me that some of > them have the arrogance to presume that they are.) Mercury amalgam is a pleonasm, Keith. You do know what a pleonasm is, dontcha Keith? It's like saying AC current.
Steve
> And there is a hint of cowardice in the tactic of diverting legitimate > enquiries regarding the physical nature of dental materials by the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Keith P Walsh
 Signature Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001
Keith P Walsh - 18 Jun 2005 14:09 GMT > Mercury amalgam is a pleonasm, Keith. No it isn't.
On its own the word "amalgam" is insufficient in definition to distinguish between a political amalgam and a mercury amalgam.
Case proven, I think.
Keith P Walsh
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 18 Jun 2005 14:59 GMT >> Mercury amalgam is a pleonasm, Keith. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Keith P Walsh Well, Keith, context is everything. In a dental office, we could probably agree what amalgam is. I think it would be pretty tough to claim the term is confuscatory. To me the term dental amalgam is pretty clear--no more confusing (in fact considerably less so) than the term "composite". I'm sure you'd agree there are probably a few alternative ways to refer to quartz-filled bis-acryl resins that might be clearer. So when someone uses the term "mercury" amalgams, it tells ME considerably more about the person using it than it does about the material itself. AC DC could refer to electrical currents, or it could refer to an aged rock band whose lead singer has big lips. Steve Mancuso may be able to elaborate as to whether the average electrician would need to elaborate on which flavor of AC DC he is referring to in the normal course of a day's work.
Steve
 Signature Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001
clintonz@prodigy.net - 18 Jun 2005 17:04 GMT this issue is more serious than you may think. If I had known Hg was in fillings I am sure I would not be in the mess I am in today. However it is a good illustration of fate.
When studying for my SATS in Barrons I underlined the following words in the A's as unknown (even though I pretty much knew the first two):
Allude Allusion Alluvial Amble,
skipping over "amalgamate" - the definition given was, to combine;unite in one body.
Now with my false sense of what amalgam really meant from reading that and previous learning I actually read this in college chemistry (I checked the book I used):
"Another way of removing metallic gold and silver from their ores is to treat the mixture with metallic mercury-a liquid in which silver and gold dissolve to form an alloy called an amalgam...you are probably familiar with silver and gold amalgams as the material used by dentists to fill teeth."
Notice that the above passage wins first prize for a confusing definiton of amalgam and could be interpreted to mean that mercury dissolved with silver could be considered an amalgam but not necessarily that an amalgam always contains Hg.
A few years later I developed more serious symptoms of Hg from amalgam, but it never dawned on me then that the above passage absolutely meant that Hg is in dental amalgam, probably because it seemed impossible and because I thought they were using the term amalgam to mean a combination of a material containing silver. I suppose if I was a better reader I would have gotten the point, but I think it is also a poor commentary on dental terminlolgy that delibrately seems choosen to confuse the public and perpetuate this kind of confusion, to say the very least.
Keith P Walsh - 19 Jun 2005 10:15 GMT >this issue is more serious than you may think. clintonz,
Thank you for your contribution.
I hope that you haven't underestimated the seriousness with which I regard this issue.
I think that it is perfectly reasonable that the description of the class of materials which are formed by mixing grains of a solid metal with liquid mercury at room temperature and allowing the mixture to harden should be abbreviated to "mercury amalgams", and that the use of this term should neither imply nor induce any general misunderstanding in the minds of rational people as to how these materials are constituted.
Do you agree?
Keith P Walsh
clintonz@prodigy.net - 19 Jun 2005 16:10 GMT > >this issue is more serious than you may think. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I think that it is perfectly reasonable that the description of the I was not referring to you but Steve B. I agree with Jan that whatever you call fillings it should be clear that they contain Hg. Here are some more interesting definitions:
amalgam;
to unite combine or alloy. a combination or mixture of different elements
the dictionary uses the following sentences
an --- of peasants and businessmen an ---- of wisdom and nonsense mercury ---ing with an alloy
so the dictionary itself uses mercury with the term amalgamating.
Its clear that amalgam is used to denote combinations of physical objects or elements as well as abstract concepts
Steven Bornfeld - 19 Jun 2005 16:55 GMT >>this issue is more serious than you may think. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Keith P Walsh To be fair, shouldn't we be calling it mercury amalgam of silver, tin, and sometimes copper and/or zinc?
Steve
 Signature Cut the nonsense to reply
LadyLollipop - 19 Jun 2005 19:48 GMT >>>this issue is more serious than you may think. >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Steve LOL, that was nonsense.
Jan
carabelli - 19 Jun 2005 20:07 GMT "Steven Bornfeld" <dentaltwinnonsense@earthlink.net> wrote................
> To be fair, shouldn't we be calling it mercury amalgam of silver, tin, and > sometimes copper and/or zinc? > > Steve Yup, but the would be demagogues won't like it, simply because it's a truthful statement.
carabelli
Tony Bad - 19 Jun 2005 04:32 GMT > AC DC could refer to electrical currents, or it could refer to an aged > rock band whose lead singer has big lips. Steve Mancuso may be able to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Steve It is actually the guitar player who has the big lips...otherwise I'm with you!
(;^D)
T
Steven Bornfeld - 19 Jun 2005 16:48 GMT >>AC DC could refer to electrical currents, or it could refer to an aged >>rock band whose lead singer has big lips. Steve Mancuso may be able to [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > T I never examined Joe Perry's lips that closely--thought it was Steve Tyler.
Steve
 Signature Cut the nonsense to reply
Tony Bad - 20 Jun 2005 02:42 GMT > I never examined Joe Perry's lips that closely--thought it was Steve Tyler. > > Steve I am guessing there aren't any AC/DC albums in your collection!
Joe Perry and Steven Tyler are in Aerosmith, and both have very large lips...but Angus Young, the guitarist of AC/DC does have rather full lips as well. Am I straying off topic?
T
Steven Bornfeld - 20 Jun 2005 02:51 GMT >>I never examined Joe Perry's lips that closely--thought it was Steve > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > T Only slightly. We should be aware of lip size. But shut my mouth!! That's a lot of big lips.
Steve
 Signature Cut the nonsense to reply
Tony Bad - 20 Jun 2005 02:57 GMT > >>I never examined Joe Perry's lips that closely--thought it was Steve > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Steve LOL...who says you can't learn REAL important stuff here on SMD!.
Hope you had a happy father's day!
Tony
Keith P Walsh - 20 Jun 2005 08:14 GMT The glee with which you revel in your own ignorance has the air of pathetic desperation.
Enquiries concerning the electrical properties of dental amalgams can be found at:
book.boot.users.btopenworld.com\intro.htm
Keith P Walsh
Vaughn - 20 Jun 2005 11:22 GMT > The glee with which you revel in your own ignorance has the air of > pathetic desperation. Strong words from someone whom I dismissed as a pathetic troll years ago.
Vaughn
Tony Bad - 20 Jun 2005 14:41 GMT > The glee with which you revel in your own ignorance has the air of > pathetic desperation. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Keith P Walsh Since this seems to have been a reply to my post, I owe you a thank you for noticing my glee. I confess that I have often taken note of your ignorance, and now feel a bit embarrassed for never complimenting you.
T
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 17:46 GMT >The glee with which you revel in your own ignorance has the air of >pathetic desperation. That 'air' that you smell was emitted from Uranus.
Searching for Klingons ? --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Steven Bornfeld - 20 Jun 2005 13:50 GMT > LOL...who says you can't learn REAL important stuff here on SMD!. > > Hope you had a happy father's day! > > Tony Very nice, thanks. I don't even know if you're a dad, but hope you had a nice one in any case.
Steve
 Signature Cut the nonsense to reply
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 17:43 GMT >> I never examined Joe Perry's lips that closely--thought it was Steve >Tyler. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >T Sounds orally related to me.
Love them knickers.
Don't forget about Malcolm. --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 17:39 GMT >>>AC DC could refer to electrical currents, or it could refer to an aged >>>rock band whose lead singer has big lips. Steve Mancuso may be able to [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Steve That'd be Aerosmith.
--
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 17:25 GMT >> AC DC could refer to electrical currents, or it could refer to an aged >> rock band whose lead singer has big lips. Steve Mancuso may be able to [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >T Angus or Malcolm ? --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Keith P Walsh - 19 Jun 2005 09:56 GMT >Well, Keith, context is everything. In a dental office, we could >probably agree what amalgam is. I think it would be pretty tough to >claim the term is confuscatory. To me the term dental amalgam is pretty >clear- "Dental amalgam" is fine.
Of course, some mercury amalgams are used in applications other than dentistry.
For example, zinc-mercury amalgam is useful for the electrodes of electrical cells. See:
http://www.machinedesign.com/BDE/Electrical/bdeee7/bdeee7_10.html
I wonder if the particular electrical properties of this amalgam are shared by the mercury amalgams commonly used in dentistry.
Which reminds me, do you know if anyone has ever measured the electrical conductivity of a typical dental amalgam?
Keith P Walsh
PS, further enquiries concerning the electrical properties of dental amalgams can be found at:
http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/intro.htm
Steven Bornfeld - 19 Jun 2005 16:53 GMT > Of course, some mercury amalgams are used in applications other than > dentistry. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/intro.htm Oh, Keith--you're as constant as the sun! Nice to know there will always be things we can depend on! ;-)
Steve
 Signature Cut the nonsense to reply
Keith P Walsh - 19 Jun 2005 18:46 GMT >> Of course, some mercury amalgams are used in applications other than >> dentistry. [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > >Steve The electrical properties of a material are what determine its behavior when it is subjected to an electromagnetic field.
If you were a scientist then the fact that there doesn't appear to be anyone anywhere in the world who knows what the electrical properties of a typical dental amalgam are would make you feel ignorant and uncomfortable. (Remember that amalgam fillings are placed in children's teeth.)
And your confidence in your ability to give this material its correct name would offer you scant compensation.
Keith P Walsh
PS, an electromagnetic field is able to induce an electrical potential in an electrically conductive material without any "galvanic" activity taking place.
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 17:32 GMT >Which reminds me, do you know if anyone has ever measured the >electrical conductivity of a typical dental amalgam? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >>.................................................................................... http://billy.bong.users.openwound.cum/intro.htm 346 mV ? I knew it !
--
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 17:00 GMT >AC DC could refer to electrical currents, or it could refer to an aged >rock band whose lead singer has big lips. Steve Mancuso may be able to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Steve Have heard that AC/DC may also refer to a switch hitter. --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 16:59 GMT >> Mercury amalgam is a pleonasm, Keith. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Keith P Walsh You have yet to prove that you think.
347 mV ? --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 04 Jul 2005 15:58 GMT > > Mercury amalgam is a pleonasm, Keith. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Keith P Walsh The last time I placed a political amalgam in a tooth, it died of democratic apathy. SP
 Signature Finally: take out the TRASHH
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 16:58 GMT >> Members of the dental profession are not qualified to dictate the >> rules of language use. (Though it no longer surprises me that some of [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Steve The Department of Redundancy Department has approved your pleonasm accepted. --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
George Chatzipetros - 18 Jun 2005 20:38 GMT >From the Oxford Advanced Leanrners Dictionary 2000: amal·gam /{schwa}{mælg{schwa}m/ noun 1 [C, usually sing.] ~ (of sth) (formal) a mixture or combination of things: The film script is an amalgam of all three books. an amalgam of several companies and organizations 2 [U] (technical) a mixture of mercury and another metal, used especially to fill holes in teeth
>From Dictionary.com: a·mal·gam Audio pronunciation of "amalgam" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (-mlgm) n.
1. Any of various alloys of mercury with other metals, especially: 1. An alloy of mercury and silver used in dental fillings. 2. An alloy of mercury and tin used in silvering mirrors. 2. A combination of diverse elements; a mixture: an amalgam of strength, reputation, and commitment to ethical principles.
I could probably go on. What do we learn here? Simple English! Amalgam is a mixture of mercury and other metals. There can be no material called amalgam without mercury. When you want to refer to mixtures of metals not containing mercury, you can use the most common term ALLOY. So yes, mercury amalgam is too much, since there can't be a gold amalgam or a silver amalgam (it's gold alloy and silver alloy). Next time I suggest you check the facts about the English language before you go on to attack the dental profession. You don't even have to pay for a dictionary; it's all free in the web.
Vaughn - 18 Jun 2005 21:14 GMT >From the Oxford Advanced Leanrners Dictionary 2000: amal·gam /{schwa}{mælg{schwa}m/ noun 1 [C, usually sing.] ~ (of sth) (formal) a mixture or combination of things: The film script is an amalgam of all three books. an amalgam of several companies and organizations 2 [U] (technical) a mixture of mercury and another metal, used especially to fill holes in teeth
>From Dictionary.com: a·mal·gam Audio pronunciation of "amalgam" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (-mlgm) n.
1. Any of various alloys of mercury with other metals, especially: 1. An alloy of mercury and silver used in dental fillings. 2. An alloy of mercury and tin used in silvering mirrors. 2. A combination of diverse elements; a mixture: an amalgam of strength, reputation, and commitment to ethical principles.
>There can be no material called amalgam without mercury.
Wait a minute! Does not (1) from Oxford above and (2) from Dictionary.com both define a noun "amalgam" with no mention of mercury? Did I miss something here?
I am only responding to your comments on English usage. I am happy to leave the general amalgam discussion to others.
Vaughn
clintonz@prodigy.net - 18 Jun 2005 22:07 GMT > >There can be no material called amalgam without > mercury. > > Wait a minute! Does not (1) from Oxford above and (2) from Dictionary.com > both define a noun "amalgam" with no mention of mercury? Did I miss something Precisely! Amalgam has a general meaning which means a combining of dissimilar things. It also has more specific usage to mean a material comprised partly of Hg. I could define a play as an amalgam or combination of different kinds of humor, using meaning (1). Similarily if one uses mercury with the word amalgam one could also be using definition (1). It is not inconsistnent to , refer to a combination of materials which contains Hg as an Hg (containing) material combination or "Hg amalgam" using definition (1). Only if one conviently assumes that the (2) definition must be used if Hg is contained in the same sentence is the term Hg amalgam inconsistent.
> here? > > I am only responding to your comments on English usage. I am happy to > leave the general amalgam discussion to others. > > Vaughn George Chatzipetros - 19 Jun 2005 00:17 GMT Are you people for real??!!! When the world AMALGAM is used to describe a material, then that material has to have MERCURY in it. Period. Mixtures of other metals must be called as alloys. Describing a material as mercury amalgam is like going to a diner, asking for an egg omelette and the wondering why everybody's laughing at you. The world amalgam is occassionally used to define a mixture of ABSTRACT things, like an amalgam of cultures, an amalgam of qualities etc. When used to describe a material you use the technical definition, so it always defines a mercury + other elements compound. Just as when you say omelette, you mean eggs + other stuff (i like tomato, peppers and feta cheese).
George
Steven Bornfeld - 19 Jun 2005 04:08 GMT > Are you people for real??!!! > When the world AMALGAM is used to describe a material, then that [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > George George--
What do they call ricotta salada in Greece? I recently started buying Greek ricotta salada--the best I've ever tasted--far creamier and richer than what I'd had before. But it's marked ricotta salada!
Steve
 Signature Cut the nonsense to reply
George Chatzipetros - 19 Jun 2005 09:16 GMT Steve, I really don't know. I never cared much about salad, as long as it had tomato and some green stuff in it!.
George
clintonz@prodigy.net - 19 Jun 2005 07:11 GMT Mixtures of other metals
> must be called as alloys. > Describing a material as mercury amalgam is like going to a diner, > asking for an egg omelette and the wondering why everybody's laughing > at you. Not really, omelette means mixture of eggs. Nobody would ever refer to a play as an "omelette" of different kinds of humor or a jury as an "omelette" of citizens from different backgrounds. They would however refer to a jury say, as an "amalgam" of different backrounds.
People familar with materials may realize the technical meaning of amalgam, but most people are only familiar with the more general definition. Maybe that is a commentary on public education or changing usage, but ask yourself if you only knew definition (#1) and someone said this is a silver amalgam what conclusion would you draw?
> The world amalgam is occassionally used to define a mixture of ABSTRACT > things, like an amalgam of cultures, an amalgam of qualities etc. When > used to describe a material you use the technical definition, so it If you took a survey of people you would find that most are not familiar with the technical definition of amalgam, so they apply the same general definition even for materials by default. In fact after at least 4 years of chemistry and countless years of English in school I was unaware of that. However I always referred to tooth restorations as fillings. I suppose if people had always referred to "tooth amalgams" eventually I would have gotten irritated and asked why they kept calling it an amalgam.
George Chatzipetros - 19 Jun 2005 09:21 GMT I'm sorry if most people don't know the technical definition for an amalgam, but it is a common definition that can be found in a layman's dictionary; you don't need to open up any chemistry book. Naming a mixture of mercury with other metals, mercury amalgam just to cover those who don't know is idiotic. You could perhaps call it "mercury-based dental restorative" as a layman definition, but not mercury amalgam!
George
LadyLollipop - 19 Jun 2005 09:43 GMT > I'm sorry if most people don't know the technical definition for an > amalgam, but it is a common definition that can be found in a layman's [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > George They don't want to call them mercury amalgams. because they can NOT explain how they are dangerous BEFORE they go IN the mouth and dangerous the minute they come OUT, but the ONLY place they are safe is IN the teeth. They can't explain just where in *mid air* they suddenly became dangerous again.
Only a fool would believe such total nonsense.
Jan
StovePipe - 04 Jul 2005 15:58 GMT > world amalgam .....'world amalgam'..... Sounds like a really cool name for a rock group....
Hey George, do you play? We have at least three guitarists: W_B, SB and SP. We need a bassist and a drummer. SP
 Signature Finally: take out the TRASHH
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 16:21 GMT >If you do a search on "amalgam" you will find that there are lots of >usages of the word other than those associated with mercury (for >example you can have an "amalgam" of political ideologies). Incorrect usage is still incorrect.
>So, if we wish to be precise in establishing that we are referring to >the type of metallic material commonly used in restorative dentistry, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >amalgam", and those amongst us of a rational disposition will >understand perfectly well what is meant. Nope, only for dolts such as yourself.
Amalgam, by definition, contains Hg.
>Indeed, since the liquid mercury is the essential component in forming >materials of this nature, it is particularly apposite that the word >"mercury" is included in any abbreviated term used in describing this >class of material generally. Bullsh*t.
What about 348 mV ? --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Keith P Walsh - 20 Jun 2005 19:36 GMT >>If you do a search on "amalgam" you will find that there are lots of >>usages of the word other than those associated with mercury (for [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >Amalgam, by definition, contains Hg. You appear to be telling me that it is wrong to call mercury amalgams "mercury amalgams" because they've all got mercury in them.
I think you've been sold a lemon.
Steven Bornfield was right when when said "context is everything".
I appreciate that in any discussion where the identity of the solid metals mixed with mercury to form amalgams is contextually significant, then it should be either necessary or at least helpful to refer to each amalgam by the name(s) of its solid constituent(s), and that the use of the term "mercury amalgam" would be superfluous and should perhaps be avoided in order to prevent possible misunderstandings.
Nevertheless I think that to elevate these principles to the status of linguistic and/or scientific maxims which are to be strictly applied in all other contexts is arrogant, silly and wrong.
When a dentist is discussing the relative merits of "mercury amalgam" and "composit resin" fillings with a patient, then the use of the term "mercury amalgam" is a perfectly adequate unmisleading, logical and (dare I say it) honest abbreviation for "a material which is formed by mixing grains of a solid metal alloy with liquid mercury at room temperature and allowing the mixture to harden".
Or a materials scientist might discuss the advantages of using a "mercury amalgam" electrode in a battery, rather than a titanium alloy one.
I believe that in these contexts the use of the term "mercury amalgam" is valid.
And I think that the reason why you disagree is because you are not able to discern the difference between contexts.
As I said before, dentists are not qualified to dictate the rules of language use.
And the tactic of diverting legitimate enquiries regarding the physical properties of dental amalgams by the irrelevant quibbling over terminologies is both cowardly and dishonest.
Keith P Walsh
By the way, do you know if dental amalgams have similar electrical properties to the mercury amalgams which are used for the electrodes of some electric batteries?
W_B - 20 Jun 2005 19:38 GMT >then the use of the term >"mercury amalgam" is a perfectly adequate unmisleading, logical and >(dare I say it) honest abbreviation for "a material which is formed by >mixing grains of a solid metal alloy with liquid mercury at room >temperature and allowing the mixture to harden". Redundancy is redundant. --
W_B Take out the G'RBAGE wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Keith P Walsh - 22 Jun 2005 12:47 GMT > >then the use of the term > >"mercury amalgam" is a perfectly adequate unmisleading, logical and [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Redundancy is redundant. > -- So what if "redundacy is redundant"?
The use of "redundant" words in language is not erroneous "per se".
Sometimes it helps.
And it's not necessarily all that important.
No person of any rational disposition would ever seriously infer that if I use the term "mercury amalgam" then it must mean that I think that I can form an amalgam by mixing liquid mercury with liquid mercury.
I believe that the collective inability of people to either recognise or address their own ignorance is a tendency which has much more serious potential consequences.
For example, it has been demonstrated experimentally that metal amalgam dental fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to 350 millivolts.
See:
http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/dutch.htm
And the resting potential of the human neurological synapse is only 70 millivolts.
However, it appears that there isn't anyone anywhere in the world who knows whether or not the electrical potentials generated by amalgam fillings are able to dissipate electrical energy through the nerves in people's heads.
This is because it also appears that no-one has ever carried out the experimental investigations necessary to find out.
In this state of ignorance it is not possible to say how much influence the dissipation of electrical energy from fillings through the nerves in people's heads has in causing the so-called "psychiatric" disorders known as "depression", "stress", "schizophrenia", etc.
Many millions of dollars have been spent on research attempting to demonstrate that the root causes of disorders such as these are "genetic".
So far without success.
That amounts to many millions of dollars worth of evidence that the root causes of disorders such as these are NOT "genetic".
By comparison, it appears that nothing at all has been spent on attempting to demonstrate that the root cause of these disorders is not the dissipation of electrical energy through the nerves in people's heads as a result of the generation of electrical potentials by the mercury amalgam fillings in their teeth.
So there is no scientific evidence that this is not the cause (a "double negative" which I am confident linguistic experts will agree is perfectly valid).
And if you honestly believe that establishing a proper scientific understanding of the consequences of the electrical behavior of dental amalgams is less important than getting its name right, then all I can say is that it isn't me who's the dolt.
It's you.
Keith P Walsh
StovePipe - 04 Jul 2005 15:58 GMT > It appears that some members of the dental profession are of the > opinion that there is no such thing as a "mercury amalgam". That's just the way it is... Some things'll never change....
> I would encourage anyone concerned about the fillings in their teeth > to have the confidence to call these materials what they are. > > Mercury amalgams. The name amalgam implies mercury as the amalgamator. No necessity to repeat it repeatedly.
KPW, I'll tell you what _I_ call amalgams: good fillings for those patients and situations where they are indicated. JMO SP
 Signature Finally: take out the TRASHH
Keith P Walsh - 05 Jul 2005 19:52 GMT >KPW, I'll tell you what _I_ call amalgams: good fillings for those >patients and situations where they are indicated. It has been demonstrated experimentally that metal amalgam dental fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to 350 millivolts.
See:
http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/dutch.htm
And the resting potential of the human neurological synapse is only 70 millivolts.
However, it appears that experimental investigations to determine whether or not the electrical potentials generated by amalgam fillings are able to dissipate electrical energy through the nerves in people's heads have never been carried out.
The widespread adoption of metal amalgams for use in restorative dentistry was quickly followed by the rise to prominence of psychiatric "medicine" in our societies.
In recent years many millions of dollars have been spent on research attempting to demonstrate that the causes of so-called psychiatric disorders such as "stress", "depression", schizophrenia, etc., are "genetic".
So far without success.
That amounts to many millions of dollars worth of evidence that the causes of disorders such as these is not "genetic".
However at the same time it appears that nothing at all has been spent on attempting to demonstrate that "stress", "depression", "schizophrenia", etc., are not caused by the dissipation of electrical energy through the nerves in people's heads as a result of the electrical potentials generated by the amalgam fillings in their teeth.
So if anyone ever asks you if amalgam fillings are "safe", the only honest answer you can give is that you don't know.
Do you know if studies have ever been carried out in order to determine whether or not the victims of suicide have larger than average amounts of dental amalgam in their teeth?
Keith P Walsh
PS, enquiries concerning the electrical properties of dental amalgams can be found at:
http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/intro.htm
|
|
|