| > | On Wed, 11 May 2005 12:53:54 GMT, Steven Fawks
| > <tuthjockey@earthlink.net>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
| >
| Already knew
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=583&e=2&u=/nm/20050511/od_nm/can
ada_beer_dc
| "Police said the beer-soaked sand would be scooped into bins and returned to
| the supplier for destruction."
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
|
| carabelli
Has more to do with taxes and cleanup costs. Hefty taxes are charged by the # of
gallons or litres that leave the brewery. The taxes are probably worth more than
the lost beer. By destroying the entire load the taxes are not collected. The
glass and cardboard are recycled, skids recovered.
If you think about it, sand is not a good absorbent, it was used to divert flow
to the sewers and decrease slipperiness. That news piece is a little off base.
Molson's being it's own shipper was responsible for cleanup. The faster they got
it cleaned up the less likely they would be facing fines/charges for keeping the
highway shut down. Some actuary has actually figured out the cost of having the
highway closed to the economy. Extended delays with just in time shipping for
the auto industry for example are horrendous.
The accident happened at 6:20 AM just as our 3 hour, rush hour is starting. I
caught a glimpse of the tractor trailer being towed past my window at about
lunch time.
FWIW
--
Roy
carabelli - 12 May 2005 06:01 GMT
> | > | On Wed, 11 May 2005 12:53:54 GMT, Steven Fawks
> | > <tuthjockey@earthlink.net>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> --
> Roy
I figured as much, I'm sure the ATF would have been all over it here. Still,
all that beer, I won't sleep well tonight.
Dan