Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why am I getting so many cavities?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Femme - 07 May 2005 19:05 GMT
I'm 18 years old.  Up until last year, I'd always been told I had great
teeth--then I went to a new dentist who found 14 cavities at my first
visit (as well as 4 and 5mm periodontal pockets and receeding gums).
This new place has a lot of fancy equipment and is much more high-tech
than my old dentist, so I'm inclined to trust them.

I've been going every three months for a cleaning, and every time,
they've found new cavities.  I can even see little black lines forming
in my molars, and I think I see some on the back side of my front
teeth.

I brush two or three times a day and floss twice a day--always.  I
don't eat refined sugar, drink soda, eat candy, etc.  I do eat a lot of
fruit though.  If I ever snack between meals it's on something like
vegetables.

I can't figure out why my teeth are in such bad shape, especially at my
age.  Most of my family has good teeth.  No matter how well I take care
of my teeth, it seems like they just keep getting worse and more
cavities keep forming.

Any ideas on why this might be happening?  Or what I can do to prevent
the cavities?
Bill - 07 May 2005 20:25 GMT
> I'm 18 years old.  Up until last year, I'd always been told I had great
> teeth--then I went to a new dentist who found 14 cavities at my first
> visit (as well as 4 and 5mm periodontal pockets and receeding gums).

How frequently did you have dental checkups before seeing this new
dentist? If it had been years, rather than months, then you may be
addressing many years' worth of problems.

> This new place has a lot of fancy equipment and is much more high-tech
> than my old dentist, so I'm inclined to trust them.

All it takes to get fancy equipment is money, not skill or expertise.
And the money can even be borrowed. Skill can't be borrowed.

You may well have had 14 cavities -- I can't tell from here. But when
your new dentist suggests a massive plan of treatment, it could be a
good idea to seek a second opinion, preferably from an experienced
dentist with a good reputation.

It is unusual for a teenager to have actual 5mm periodontal pockets,
involving the bone loss of periodontitis. Most often, a 5mm measurement
at age 18 is due to incomplete eruption, or to gingivitis caused by
poor oral hygiene.

If these 5mm measurements are merely due to gingivitis, then a
professional cleaning and a reliable program of home care (flossing and
careful brushing daily) should quickly reduce them. If not, it would be
wise to consult a periodontist to determine why this condition exists
and persists.

> I've been going every three months for a cleaning, and every time,
> they've found new cavities.  I can even see little black lines forming
> in my molars, and I think I see some on the back side of my front
> teeth.

It is highly unusual for brand new cavities to develop every three
months in a person with good diet and oral hygiene. It would be
interesting to learn what a second opinion might find.

> I brush two or three times a day and floss twice a day--always.  I
> don't eat refined sugar, drink soda, eat candy, etc.  I do eat a lot of
> fruit though.  If I ever snack between meals it's on something like
> vegetables.

So far, so good.

> I can't figure out why my teeth are in such bad shape, especially at my
> age.  Most of my family has good teeth.  No matter how well I take care
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Any ideas on why this might be happening?  Or what I can do to prevent
> the cavities?

It is impossible to make a determination over the Internet. A second
opinion would be very helpful, as a dentist could then examine your
teeth and gums in detail.

What has your present dentist said about these unusual conditions?

- dentaldoc
Femme - 08 May 2005 04:13 GMT
> How frequently did you have dental checkups before seeing this new
> dentist? If it had been years, rather than months, then you may be
> addressing many years' worth of problems.

I went every six months to my old dentist.  I think it was about eight
months after my last visit to the old dentist that I saw the new one.

> You may well have had 14 cavities -- I can't tell from here. But when
> your new dentist suggests a massive plan of treatment, it could be a
> good idea to seek a second opinion, preferably from an experienced
> dentist with a good reputation.

That's a good point.  What do you think about going to the dental
clinic at a local university?  They have no financial bias, but I'm not
sure how skilled the people there are.

> It is unusual for a teenager to have actual 5mm periodontal pockets,
> involving the bone loss of periodontitis. Most often, a 5mm measurement
> at age 18 is due to incomplete eruption, or to gingivitis caused by
> poor oral hygiene.

The dentist insisted that I have bruxism, and fitted me with a
nightguard ($600...sigh).  He speculated that the night grinding was
causing the pockets--he agreed that it's very unusual for someone my
age to have them so deep.  Especially because my gum tissue is
otherwise healthy (very little bleeding or puffiness).

> What has your present dentist said about these unusual conditions?

He said that my old dentist did a shoddy job, not recognizing my
bruxism and not acting quick enough on the cavities that were forming.
He said a lot of this could have been prevented if I had been coming to
their office years before.  The new dentist uses some type of laser
that gives decay readings, so that cavities are caught before they even
show up on X-ray--so some of those 14 cavities were just in the
beginning stages.

The new dentist also says some of my periodontal problems are from a
bad occlusal, and that I'll eventually need braces.  (I'm a little
weary of this, though, since my teeth are extremely straight.  The only
problem I've had with my bite came after I got those 14 cavities
filled--a lot of the fillings were high and only a few teeth touched
when I bit down.  Got that fixed, though.)

Thanks for your help!
Joel M. Eichen - 08 May 2005 15:23 GMT
> > How frequently did you have dental checkups before seeing this new
> > dentist? If it had been years, rather than months, then you may be
> > addressing many years' worth of problems.
>
> I went every six months to my old dentist.  I think it was about eight
> months after my last visit to the old dentist that I saw the new one.

REPLY

Why did you deep-six the old dentist?

LEAVE the old dentist?

Joel

> > You may well have had 14 cavities -- I can't tell from here. But when
> > your new dentist suggests a massive plan of treatment, it could be a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> clinic at a local university?  They have no financial bias, but I'm not
> sure how skilled the people there are.

HAH!

The dental schools?

They will convince you to get all poreclain veneers on your teeth!
Those guys are into learning and gaining experience, never into
considerate patient care.

> > It is unusual for a teenager to have actual 5mm periodontal pockets,
> > involving the bone loss of periodontitis. Most often, a 5mm
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> He said a lot of this could have been prevented if I had been coming to
> their office years before.

Ahahhhhh. Unethical comments by Mr. NewDentist.

> The new dentist uses some type of laser
> that gives decay readings, so that cavities are caught before they even
> show up on X-ray--so some of those 14 cavities were just in the
> beginning stages.

Its called Diagnodent, and is valuable if used in
conjunction with other diagnostic procedures.

> The new dentist also says some of my periodontal problems are from a
> bad occlusal, and that I'll eventually need braces.  (I'm a little
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks for your help!
Femme - 09 May 2005 02:55 GMT
> Why did you deep-six the old dentist?

I moved 1500 miles away.
Joel M. Eichen - 09 May 2005 11:27 GMT
> > Why did you deep-six the old dentist?
>
> I moved 1500 miles away.

That's a good reason ....... dentists cannot be
stuffed into the trunk of a car without complaining too much.

Joel
W_B - 09 May 2005 16:46 GMT
>He said that my old dentist did a shoddy job, not recognizing my
>bruxism

You need an NTI
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Bill - 07 May 2005 20:25 GMT
> I'm 18 years old.  Up until last year, I'd always been told I had great
> teeth--then I went to a new dentist who found 14 cavities at my first
> visit (as well as 4 and 5mm periodontal pockets and receeding gums).

How frequently did you have dental checkups before seeing this new
dentist? If it had been years, rather than months, then you may be
addressing many years' worth of problems.

> This new place has a lot of fancy equipment and is much more high-tech
> than my old dentist, so I'm inclined to trust them.

All it takes to get fancy equipment is money, not skill or expertise.
And the money can even be borrowed. Skill can't be borrowed.

You may well have had 14 cavities -- I can't tell from here. But when
your new dentist suggests a massive plan of treatment, it could be a
good idea to seek a second opinion, preferably from an experienced
dentist with a good reputation.

It is unusual for a teenager to have actual 5mm periodontal pockets,
involving the bone loss of periodontitis. Most often, a 5mm measurement
at age 18 is due to incomplete eruption, or to gingivitis caused by
poor oral hygiene.

If these 5mm measurements are merely due to gingivitis, then a
professional cleaning and a reliable program of home care (flossing and
careful brushing daily) should quickly reduce them. If not, it would be
wise to consult a periodontist to determine why this condition exists
and persists.

> I've been going every three months for a cleaning, and every time,
> they've found new cavities.  I can even see little black lines forming
> in my molars, and I think I see some on the back side of my front
> teeth.

It is highly unusual for brand new cavities to develop every three
months in a person with good diet and oral hygiene. It would be
interesting to learn what a second opinion might find.

> I brush two or three times a day and floss twice a day--always.  I
> don't eat refined sugar, drink soda, eat candy, etc.  I do eat a lot of
> fruit though.  If I ever snack between meals it's on something like
> vegetables.

So far, so good.

> I can't figure out why my teeth are in such bad shape, especially at my
> age.  Most of my family has good teeth.  No matter how well I take care
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Any ideas on why this might be happening?  Or what I can do to prevent
> the cavities?

It is impossible to make a determination over the Internet. A second
opinion would be very helpful, as a dentist could then examine your
teeth and gums in detail.

What has your present dentist said about these unusual conditions?

- dentaldoc
StovePipe - 08 May 2005 02:25 GMT
> It is unusual for a teenager to have actual 5mm periodontal pockets,
> involving the bone loss of periodontitis. Most often, a 5mm measurement
> at age 18 is due to incomplete eruption, or to gingivitis caused by
> poor oral hygiene.

Maybe they found Undiagnosed and untreated Juvenile Periodontitis? This
would be evident around the first molars and perhaps around the
anteriors. It doesn't go away, and only gets worse. If I was femme, I'd
want to get this ruled out by a competent periodontist.
Just my suggestion
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Joel M. Eichen - 07 May 2005 21:30 GMT
> I'm 18 years old.  Up until last year, I'd always been told I had great
> teeth--then I went to a new dentist who found 14 cavities at my first
> visit (as well as 4 and 5mm periodontal pockets and receeding gums).

I just bet it was a new dnetist, right?

Joel

> This new place has a lot of fancy equipment and is much more high-tech
> than my old dentist, so I'm inclined to trust them.

HUH?????

So owning fancy gizmos ensures ethics?

> I've been going every three months for a cleaning, and every time,
> they've found new cavities.  I can even see little black lines forming
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Any ideas on why this might be happening?  Or what I can do to prevent
> the cavities?
Joel M. Eichen - 07 May 2005 22:31 GMT
DNETIST, dentist, whatever ....... I still bet he is new to you!

Joel

> > I'm 18 years old.  Up until last year, I'd always been told I had great
> > teeth--then I went to a new dentist who found 14 cavities at my first
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > Any ideas on why this might be happening?  Or what I can do to prevent
> > the cavities?
Femme - 08 May 2005 04:16 GMT
> I just bet it was a new dnetist, right?

He was new to me, but not new as a dentist (he has 25 years of
experience, I believe).
Joel M. Eichen - 08 May 2005 15:24 GMT
> > I just bet it was a new dnetist, right?
>
> He was new to me, but not new as a dentist (he has 25 years of
> experience, I believe).

YUP, new TO YOU ,,,, and you were new to him.

Joel
ares - 12 May 2005 17:18 GMT
I vote for, get a second opinion at the school dental clinic.
ares

> > I just bet it was a new dnetist, right?
>
> He was new to me, but not new as a dentist (he has 25 years of
> experience, I believe).
letsconnect - 08 May 2005 01:31 GMT
> This new place has a lot of fancy equipment and is much more high-tech
> than my old dentist, so I'm inclined to trust them.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Any ideas on why this might be happening?

That explains how they finance the fancy equipment, anyway...
Dr Steve - 09 May 2005 19:19 GMT
Bah!

Much of the new technology ends up being free to the dental office as it
merely displaces other costs.  Digital radiography turns out to be cheaper
than running film, so *no cost*.  CEREC machine is cheaper than the lab bill
plus second appointment so *no cost*.  Digital records is cheaper than
running paper so *no cost*.  Lasers and intra oral cameras don't displace
other costs, so have to be figured into higher costs, but the average I/O
camera today is less than $5K and you can get a portable laser for $12K.
Operating microscopes are "relatively" cheap now-a-days.  I don't think you
can classify a high tech office as having higher costs.  It is simply the
type of tools chosen to work with.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> This new place has a lot of fancy equipment and is much more
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> That explains how they finance the fancy equipment, anyway...
Vaughn Simon - 09 May 2005 19:45 GMT
> Bah!
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> can classify a high tech office as having higher costs.  It is simply the
> type of tools chosen to work with.

    Even if you are correct that the above items are "no cost", (and I
doubt that you will receive universal agreement from your peers) that does
not mean "no investment"; so there is surely a cash flow impact that will be
hard for many to manage.  Also, (Business 101) if you do not have adequate
volume in your practice, you will never be able to realize the efficiency
improvments possible with these goodies and they will not turn out to be "no
cost".

Vaughn
Dr Steve - 09 May 2005 20:05 GMT
Digital radiography for instance.  In 1998 with no RDH it cost me $4K a year
to run film  The digital system was $16K regardless of how much I use it and
has no ongoing cost associated with it.  If I never increased volume and
there was zero inflation, It would have been free after the 4th year.
Bringing in the RDH in 1999, increasing the amount of images made (due to
normal use between myself and RDH) plus inflation, meant it was free
slightly into the 3rd year.  That was January 1999 I installed it.  I now
have a few years of a few thousand dollars saved each year.

CEREC technology, you do need a certain volume of work to make it "free".
It works out to 6-8 units a month. Depends on your hourly overhead.

Digital records requires an initial expenditure of cash and time to get it
up and running, but it saves you one entire staff person's salary per year
(again I am comparing to 1998 costs here).  You don't just factor in paper,
pen, pencils, forms, custom printing, etc.  You also figure in the time that
you no longer spend handling paper.  I found it was virtually 50% of my
staffs day.  Payroll savings paid for the system in less than 2 years.  Save
a few thousand every year for 5 years, then upgrade hardware for half the
cost of one staff person's salary for the year.  Still saved money that 5th
year, just not as much.

I would go so far as to say the above technology will actually put money in
your pocket after a couple of years.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> Bah!
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Vaughn
StovePipe - 11 May 2005 05:26 GMT
>      Even if you are correct that the above items are "no cost", (and I
> doubt that you will receive universal agreement from your peers) that does
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> improvments possible with these goodies and they will not turn out to be "no
> cost".

Vaughn has said succinctly and in more objective terms what is was I was
trying to say.

<Actually, the Pipe held his tongue on purpose, to let Vaughn look
smart...>
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

StovePipe - 11 May 2005 05:26 GMT
> Bah!
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> other costs, so have to be figured into higher costs, but the average I/O
> camera today is less than $5K and you can get a portable laser for $12K.

Portable laser burns are free... To learn to avoid them, and to give
your patients the best chances of never getting them, you need a laser
that spits water as an integral part of its functioning. These lasers
are a 'tad' more $$$ than that little 12K thing that is being pushed
like crazy in the throw-away literature.

You are right that they don't displace other costs, hence one must
charge the fair market value and market like crazy to attract the kind
of... <ahem> (im)paitents that want and seek those treatments.

> Operating microscopes are "relatively" cheap now-a-days.  I don't think you
> can classify a high tech office as having higher costs.  It is simply the
> type of tools chosen to work with.

That depends on the amount of working capital the dentist has to start
with to offset the costs and give him/her a hand in establishing
payments.

Just my chicken scratchin's
SP

Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.