Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Talk about bad luck

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dave King - 06 May 2005 02:59 GMT
A patient came in for a consultation this week for jaw pain. He tells
me he was punched in the jaw about 10 days ago and the pain keeps
getting worse in the area of his left angle and his bite is off.

He had a mild swelling in the area and an open bite on the left side.
I am figuring atleast an angle fracture so I get the panorex expecting
maybe a subcondylar to go with it. Fortunately, its only broken on the
left side but it probably wouldnt have broken at all if a cyst
associated with #17 didnt go from the distal of #18 to half way up the
ramus! #17 is pushed down to the inferior border. A post-traumatic
pathologic fracture. He never had a problem nor knew he had something
growing until now.

So, Tuesday is his lucky day. I will post the films when I get the
chance.
Roy Brown - 06 May 2005 05:42 GMT
Look forward to seeing them. You should keep them on hand for the next "Why
should I get my wisdoms extracted if I'm not having a problem?" type question.

Signature

Roy
rem NADA to reply

| A patient came in for a consultation this week for jaw pain. He tells
| me he was punched in the jaw about 10 days ago and the pain keeps
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
| So, Tuesday is his lucky day. I will post the films when I get the
| chance.
Joel M. Eichen - 06 May 2005 10:22 GMT
> Look forward to seeing them. You should keep them on hand for the next "Why
> should I get my wisdoms extracted if I'm not having a problem?" type question.

REPLY

Or at least, "a panoramic film and two bite wings are the absolute minimum
REQUIRED to avoid lawsuits for failure to diagnose ......"

> --
> Roy
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> | So, Tuesday is his lucky day. I will post the films when I get the
> | chance.
Dr Steve - 06 May 2005 13:21 GMT
Keep us updated.

Another argument for getting rid of impacted third molars at an early age.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
> A patient came in for a consultation this week for jaw pain. He tells
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> So, Tuesday is his lucky day. I will post the films when I get the
> chance.
Dave King - 06 May 2005 18:33 GMT
>A patient came in for a consultation this week for jaw pain. He tells
>me he was punched in the jaw about 10 days ago and the pain keeps
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>So, Tuesday is his lucky day. I will post the films when I get the
>chance.

Here is the link
http://www.deomfs.com/cyst_fx.htm

I outlined the lingual fracture on the bottom image. This fracture is
minimally displaced but mobile clinically. The fun part is going to be
attempting rigid fixation after I remove the cyst and tooth.
Steven Bornfeld - 06 May 2005 21:45 GMT
>>A patient came in for a consultation this week for jaw pain. He tells
>>me he was punched in the jaw about 10 days ago and the pain keeps
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> minimally displaced but mobile clinically. The fun part is going to be
> attempting rigid fixation after I remove the cyst and tooth.

    Oh, man!  Has there been a biopsy yet?  Based on clinical signs, do you
suspect odontogenic tumor?

Steve

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

Dave King - 07 May 2005 06:50 GMT
>>>A patient came in for a consultation this week for jaw pain. He tells
>>>me he was punched in the jaw about 10 days ago and the pain keeps
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>Steve

I plan to address the cyst/tumor & fracture on Tuesday. I will send
the specimen to get a diagnosis. Tricky case. I dont expect much bone
on the cortices, which can compromise fixation. mainly because the
bigger the plate needed to get to areas of sound bone, the harder it
is to do intraorally. the screws ideally engage both the lingual and
buccal cortices.  He really doesnt want me to go through a skin crease
in his neck, which is the best and easier way to deal with that kind
of problem. Wider access to better bone stock.

That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
about being wired shut for 6 weeks if I dont place any plates (closed
reduction). Closed reduction may also be tricky if minimal bone is
there, leading to a non-union. My bet is on needing a big, honkin
plate.
StovePipe - 07 May 2005 19:03 GMT
>  That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
> infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
> about being wired shut for 6 weeks if I dont place any plates (closed
> reduction). Closed reduction may also be tricky if minimal bone is
> there, leading to a non-union. My bet is on needing a big, honkin
> plate.

I saw one of those extraoral fixation cases when I was in the year of
multidisciplinary rotation. IIRC, it was an ameloblastoma case. The
fixation worked out quite well, but the guy was a real philosopher, and
accepted it quite well. Don't remember what that extraoral bar was made
of, but it wasn't metal.
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Dave King - 09 May 2005 16:28 GMT
>>  That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
>> infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>of, but it wasn't metal.
>SP

I was referring more to an actual plate placed on the bone. Your
referring to a 'Joe Hall Morris' external fixator. These are actually
great options, especially in this case, if the patient is willing to
walk around with half a punters facemask on one side of their face. I
have placed many of these but not recently and this fella declined it.
The bar is made from cold-cure acrylic.

You place atleast two pins proximal and distal to the fracture. An
endotracheal tube is placed, connecting all the pins together. You
then fill er' up with the acrylic by injecting it into one end of the
breathing tube/matrix and let it harden. Works like a champ. Many
companies have newer designs, all metal, that look like erector sets.
The old fashion way is cheaper and works just as well.
StovePipe - 10 May 2005 04:36 GMT
> I was referring more to an actual plate placed on the bone. Your
> referring to a 'Joe Hall Morris' external fixator. These are actually
> great options, especially in this case, if the patient is willing to
> walk around with half a punters facemask on one side of their face.

Very good analogy...

> I have placed many of these but not recently and this fella declined
> it. The bar is made from cold-cure acrylic.

Too bad the guy can't see his way through to having the best treatment
and to hell with esthetics, temprorarily, at least.

> You place atleast two pins proximal and distal to the fracture. An
> endotracheal tube is placed, connecting all the pins together. You
> then fill er' up with the acrylic by injecting it into one end of the
> breathing tube/matrix and let it harden. Works like a champ. Many
> companies have newer designs, all metal, that look like erector sets.

Well, at least he could walk around sayin':

.... I'LL BE BACK......

in an Austrian robot's accent.

> The old fashion way is cheaper and works just as well.

Not to mention that you can start doing it THE MOMENT the patient
decides 'Yes'.

Thanks for the background.
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

W_B - 09 May 2005 15:54 GMT
> That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
>infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
>about being wired shut for 6 weeks if I dont place any plates (closed
>reduction). Closed reduction may also be tricky if minimal bone is
>there, leading to a non-union. My bet is on needing a big, honkin
>plate.

What about marsupializing the cyst ?

Just an idea.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 09 May 2005 16:25 GMT
> > That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
> >infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> What about marsupializing the cyst ?

REPLY

The Kangaroo did not agree..

Joel

> Just an idea.
> --
>
> W_B
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Dave King - 09 May 2005 18:04 GMT
>> That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
>>infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Just an idea.

Thats what I gotta do first followed by management of the fracture.
W_B - 09 May 2005 19:44 GMT
>>> That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
>>>infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Thats what I gotta do first followed by management of the fracture.

You would think that the patient would want the best outcome.
He's complaining already, before treatment has started ?

I don't envy your position on this case.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Dave King - 09 May 2005 21:09 GMT
>>>> That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
>>>>infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>I don't envy your position on this case.

Well, I seldom meet someone that didnt deserve that punch ;)

This is tricky and I hope the path report comes back saying
'dentigerous cyst' and not something else that warrants resection.
Dave King - 22 May 2005 03:41 GMT
>>>>> That intra/extraoral approach to this can lead to a higher rate of
>>>>>infection but I gotta do what I gotta do. he is already complaining
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>This is tricky and I hope the path report comes back saying
>'dentigerous cyst' and not something else that warrants resection.

Just a follow up....
Scooped out the tumor and the fracture reduced well. Simply wired him
together. Path report came back as OKC (odontogenic keratocyst). In
other words, he has a chance of recurrence but the fracture reduction
was perfect. I will post pics of post-op films next week. I am glad we
didnt need anything more.
W_B - 23 May 2005 17:40 GMT
>>This is tricky and I hope the path report comes back saying
>>'dentigerous cyst' and not something else that warrants resection.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>was perfect. I will post pics of post-op films next week. I am glad we
>didnt need anything more.

Good news indeed, looking forward to the pix.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 24 May 2005 01:40 GMT
> >>You would think that the patient would want the best outcome.
> >>He's complaining already, before treatment has started ?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> was perfect. I will post pics of post-op films next week. I am glad we
> didnt need anything more.

Good for him (I think); but from what you stated above, he will STILL
complain about the inconvenience.

I have only seen one keratocyst in my life (OMFS rotation in 4th year
Dental School). That was in an edentulous space occupying the place of
the lower left molars. The The Barbers biopsied it using a rather large
needle attached to a glass syringe. I think that needle was a 20 guage
or something like that. They just shoved it into the lesion and
aspirated. The stuff came out as brownish viscous fluid. They looked at
it: 'Keratocyst...' Visual confirmation made, they sent him up for an
appointment to remove it. Now, _that_ was impressive. The thing was,
there was no pain at all as the needle went in. So there was no
anesthesia. I wonder if they removed it under general or local
anesthesia, and what happened after that. But, of course, I was not
privy to all that; I was only there two weeks.

I don't think there is a Generalist alive who is not impressed by the
Barber's bag of tricks and what they do. One question: is the Mandibular
vascular bundle preserved here or does it get resected out as well?
Thanks
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Dave King - 24 May 2005 15:28 GMT
>> >>You would think that the patient would want the best outcome.
>> >>He's complaining already, before treatment has started ?
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>Thanks
>SP

Link for the post-op panorex. Like that right subcondylar fracture? I
found it on another film we took in the Wilmington Hospital OMFS
clinic prior to the OR that morning. Didnt see it too well on the
previous and he had no discomfort on that side. Oh well, better late
than never. A perfect example of why this is the most common
misdiagnosed facial injury.
http://www.deomfs.com/cyst_fx2.htm

When I enucleated the cyst, the nerve was laterally positioned, as
expected, but completely removed from any canal. I left it intact but
he is still tingling at the lip two weeks out. OKC lack the cytokines
for perineural invasion so even if he gets a large recurrence that
warrants resection, techniquely you can leave the nerve. Recurrence is
from leaving teeth behind or the trabeculation of the bone, hiding
cells for further growth and more common in multilocular OKC's. Lionel
Gold, a retired OMFS surgeon and pathologist in the Philly area has
argued that OKC's do in fact invade the perineurium. Robert Marx
disagrees. I am waiting for a recurrence.

Dave
Dr Steve - 24 May 2005 23:05 GMT
Surgical approach was buccal or lingual?

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>>> >>You would think that the patient would want the best outcome.
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>
> Dave
Dave King - 25 May 2005 03:31 GMT
>Surgical approach was buccal or lingual?

Long buccal incision from mid ramus, along retromolar area and into
the vestibule to around the first molar. The gingival sulcus wasnt
used. I started with wide access for easy visualization, easier
enucleation and just incase I placed a plate. Seeing is a luxury. The
third molar popped right out.
Dr. Steve - 25 May 2005 03:37 GMT
>>Surgical approach was buccal or lingual?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>enucleation and just incase I placed a plate. Seeing is a luxury. The
>third molar popped right out.

I was wondering about the long buccal nerve.  You just stayed below
it?
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Dave King - 25 May 2005 15:04 GMT
>>>Surgical approach was buccal or lingual?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>I was wondering about the long buccal nerve.  You just stayed below
>it?

Probably above it but a somewhat variable course means I dont get too
excited. That is a nerve that I have never seen not regain function.

>..
>Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
>Troy, Michigan, USA
>
>I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
StovePipe - 25 May 2005 15:23 GMT
> >I was wondering about the long buccal nerve.  You just stayed below
> >it?
>
> Probably above it but a somewhat variable course means I dont get too
> excited. That is a nerve that I have never seen not regain function.

If I may ask: how long does that take? 6 weeks? months? years?
Thanks
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Dave King - 26 May 2005 04:47 GMT
>> >I was wondering about the long buccal nerve.  You just stayed below
>> >it?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Thanks
>SP

That all depends. I cant remember the last time I had someone claiming
of a numb cheek, regardless of the procedure. Predictably not too much
to worry about.

Dave
StovePipe - 26 May 2005 22:45 GMT
> >> >I was wondering about the long buccal nerve.  You just stayed below
> >> >it?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Dave

Danke
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Dr Steve - 25 May 2005 16:03 GMT
Thanks Dave.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>>>>Surgical approach was buccal or lingual?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my
>>handwriting.
Dave King - 26 May 2005 04:49 GMT
>Thanks Dave.

Your welcome.
StovePipe - 25 May 2005 00:36 GMT
> Link for the post-op panorex. Like that right subcondylar fracture? I
> found it on another film we took in the Wilmington Hospital OMFS
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> misdiagnosed facial injury.
> http://www.deomfs.com/cyst_fx2.htm

Nice photo.

I also kinda seems like the condyle bone is rarified on that side.
Surprising that such a fracture didn't affect the neruovascular bundle
on that side, ' cause it sure seems to be interfering at the spine of
Spix.

> When I enucleated the cyst, the nerve was laterally positioned, as
> expected, but completely removed from any canal. I left it intact but
> he is still tingling at the lip two weeks out.

If he had asked me, I would have told him that this becomes less and
less noticable as time wears on.

>OKC lack the cytokines
> for perineural invasion so even if he gets a large recurrence that
> warrants resection, techniquely you can leave the nerve.

That is what I wanted to knwo; thanks

>Recurrence is
> from leaving teeth behind or the trabeculation of the bone, hiding
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Dave

Too bad you couldn't do a really high resolution CT scan and blow it up
to histopathological magnification. You could check your resection
margins and evaluate the site periodically.
Thanks for the info
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.