Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

cola, sweets etc + damage done

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
coolpiper - 05 May 2005 11:26 GMT
even if you do brush 3 times a day on a consistent basis can you still
indulge in the cola and sweet stuff....without doing much damage ?
Joel M. Eichen - 05 May 2005 11:31 GMT
> even if you do brush 3 times a day on a consistent basis can you still
> indulge in the cola and sweet stuff....without doing much damage ?

Many people can. It has more to do with how you drink it.
Some people swoosh it around (bad) while others drink
and kind of suck the film from their mouths ....... this is true
of all foods by the way.

Another neat trick is to drink some water after a
candy bar and swoosh out the sugary but tasty gunk.

Joel
Dr Steve - 05 May 2005 13:16 GMT
I would rather see teeth bathed in sugar than bathed in soda pop.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

> even if you do brush 3 times a day on a consistent basis can you still
> indulge in the cola and sweet stuff....without doing much damage ?
The Real Paul - 05 May 2005 18:15 GMT
You can eat and drink those things without fear of decay if you go clean
your teeth shortly thereafter...  Its not the sugar that is the problem, it
is the bacteria in the mouth that convert the sugar into acids that make
holes in the teeth

> even if you do brush 3 times a day on a consistent basis can you still
> indulge in the cola and sweet stuff....without doing much damage ?
Peter Meiers - 05 May 2005 20:26 GMT
> You can eat and drink those things without fear of decay if you go clean
> your teeth shortly thereafter...  Its not the sugar that is the problem, it
> is the bacteria in the mouth that convert the sugar into acids that make
> holes in the teeth

What would the acid-producing bacteria be without their special food
(sugar)?

What was first - the egg or the hen?

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://www.fluoride-history.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

W_B - 05 May 2005 20:51 GMT
>> You can eat and drink those things without fear of decay if you go clean
>> your teeth shortly thereafter...  Its not the sugar that is the problem, it
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>What was first - the egg or the hen?

The hen.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
kureforcrohns@sbcglobal.net - 05 May 2005 21:07 GMT
Well, possibly trying to determine which came first, the egg or the hen may
never be determined.    But I have determined what comes first, right or
wrong,  the main meal or the dessert.   Eating the dessert first allows for
the main meal (assuming it is not a surgary one), to do away with the sugary
contents of the dessert, then followed by a fresh fruit as a second more
sensible dessert.   Not as satisfying as the guey dessert last, but perhaps
easier on the teeth.    For sweet lovers, a lasting taste of sweets is
preferred, but not desirable.   How about alcohol.   Does a person need a
lingering taste of alcohol to be satisfied, or is just the drink itself that
is complete.
Would be interesting to know, what is the best lingering taste for different
individuals.  Maybe toothpaste or flouride would satisfy some?   or the
inhaling of tobacco?  Pepsi cola or in combination with cigarettes as many
seem to need the combination.
Just sort of interested, maybe a person can adjust their taste if some of
the choices are known.        Don't rack your brain on this one.

Gail

> >> You can eat and drink those things without fear of decay if you go clean
> >> your teeth shortly thereafter...  Its not the sugar that is the problem, it
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 05 May 2005 21:21 GMT
>Well, possibly trying to determine which came first, the egg or the hen may
>never be determined.

The hen came first.

Genesis Chapter 1
20 And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the
earth across the firmament of the heavens."
21 So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters
swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it
was good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let
birds multiply on the earth."
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Peter Meiers - 05 May 2005 21:36 GMT
> >Well, possibly trying to determine which came first, the egg or the hen may
> >never be determined.
>
> The hen came first.

The egg. For:

> Genesis Chapter 1
> 20 And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the
> earth across the firmament of the heavens."

I.e.: He made a plan, first.

> 21 So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters
> swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it
> was good.

He created them in the form of their eggs, first, because otherwise they
had killed each other before they had been able to lay eggs.

> 22 And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let
> birds multiply on the earth."
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://www.fluoride-history.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

W_B - 05 May 2005 21:48 GMT
>He created them in the form of their eggs, first, because otherwise they
>had killed each other before they had been able to lay eggs.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>> W_B

Nope, eggs are a for of reproduction.

> 20 And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the
> earth across the firmament of the heavens."

Eggs can't fly.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Peter Meiers - 05 May 2005 22:15 GMT
> >He created them in the form of their eggs, first, because otherwise they
> >had killed each other before they had been able to lay eggs.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > 20 And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the
> > earth across the firmament of the heavens."

First came the plan (20), then the action (21) which created the eggs
first for safety reasons.

> Eggs can't fly.

Of course they can ;-)

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://www.fluoride-history.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

letsconnect - 06 May 2005 00:46 GMT
It's about the frequency at which you consume them rather than
quantity. Try and consume them at mealtimes.
W_B - 06 May 2005 17:00 GMT
>> > 20 And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the
>> > earth across the firmament of the heavens."
>
>First came the plan (20), then the action (21) which created the eggs
>first for safety reasons.

That's just silly.
Eggs are more dangerous, salmonella and all that...

>> Eggs can't fly.
>
>Of course they can ;-)

when heaved gently from ones hand ? <hehe>
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 06 May 2005 02:13 GMT
> >He created them in the form of their eggs, first, because otherwise they
> >had killed each other before they had been able to lay eggs.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Eggs can't fly.

REPLY

True, cows cannot fly either thank goodness.

Joel

> --
>
> W_B
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 06 May 2005 02:12 GMT
What is the first palindrome expressed in the Bible?

REPLY

Its in Genesis.

"Madam I'm Adam."

> > >Well, possibly trying to determine which came first, the egg or the hen may
> > >never be determined.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> --- http://www.fluoride-history.de/index.htm ---
> ----------------------------------------------------
Joel M. Eichen - 06 May 2005 02:11 GMT
> Well, possibly trying to determine which came first, the egg or the hen may
> never be determined.

Reptile egg.

>But I have determined what comes first, right or
> wrong,  the main meal or the dessert.   Eating the dessert first allows for
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> > Take out the G'RBAGE
> > wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 05 May 2005 19:35 GMT
>even if you do brush 3 times a day on a consistent basis can you still
>indulge in the cola and sweet stuff....without doing much damage ?

Probably, especially if you brush right after sweets.
But in the long run sugar will likely get ya.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Charlie - 06 May 2005 11:11 GMT
"even if you do brush 3 times a day on a consistent basis can you still
indulge in the cola and sweet stuff....without doing much damage ?"

Brushing after every, single episode of sugar/carbohydrate intake might do
it, or rinsing with a Fluoride mouthwash thoroughly.   But what're you
gonna do, follow each swallow of Coke with a shot of Act?  Or baking soda?

W_B nailed it: for the most part, for most people, the answer to your
question is no. Suck on Sucrose-based breath mints all day and brush all
you want, I'll be making you dentures in a couple years.  On the other
hand, a couple cans of pop consumed over one hour total/day, probably no
problem.

The pathogenesis of tooth decay is more complicated than you'd think (check
out http://crobm.iadrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/13/2/126  for a
discussion by a dude I work with) and the fact is that every sugar episode
drops the pH in your mouth for periods of time that will vary depending on
what the intake is and your own oral microecology.   Like Joel said, it
depends a lot on the character of your intake.  Frequent, minor sugar/other
carbohydrate intake - like a bank teller who keeps a Pepsi on the counter
all day - will slaughter your teeth.  On the other hand, you can eat an
entire wedding cake in 5 minutes and it won't matter.  It ain't the amount,
it's the frequency.

Your saliva contains natural buffers and the pH in your mouth will
eventually climb back up even without assistance from toothpaste or other
tactics.  But if you drop that "Stephan Curve" often enough, the bacteria
are gonna have a party, and your teeth are gonna be the main course.
Steven Fawks - 06 May 2005 14:20 GMT
> even if you do brush 3 times a day on a consistent basis can you still
> indulge in the cola and sweet stuff....without doing much damage ?

NO.

If you sip on soda and nibble throughout the day, you will not be able
to brush enough to stop decay.  Every sip and nibble is good for 20
minutes of decay activity.

Drinks and desserts with meals, followed by brushing, will not be a
problem.

sip & nibble = drill & fill

Fawks
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.