Comments in text below.
Hello Roy,
I am very grateful for your detailed comments. Here are some further
remarks.
> Don't know what your original partial looks like
Metal framework - covers about half my palate. An open part of the
framework rests against the lingual side of my incisors and there are
clasps conmecting it to each of my lateral incisors. The clasp on the
side of my denture that has just had a canine tooth added to it is made
of very thin wire and looks as if it could easily become detached after
a while by slipping out of the acrylic area. The partial is very
retentive indeed, and actually needs a bit of effort to remove, and
some manipulation (rotation while inserting) to replace in my mouth.
, but if you have or switch to
> full palatal coverage, there is more denture support and retention provided from
> the roof of the mouth which puts less of a load on the remaining teeth which
> extends their life.
You mean I should have my present partial replaced by an acrylic
partial that covers all of my palate like a full denture, but is still
connected o my incisors with clasps? This will help prolong the
transition to a full denture? Roughly how long can I expect to be able
to stay with my front teeth if I keep my present partial, and how long
could this be extended by migrating to a full-palate partial?
>You want to keep the teeth to prevent bone resorption that
> will occur when you lose them.
I realize that bone resorption will take place once the incisors come
out, but is this more of a problem than with the rest of my teeth that
I have lost? Doesn't it just mean that I will need to have my full
denture relined or rebased from time to time? If I am going to need a
full denture within a few years (is this a correct guess) anyway, then
will it make a big difference to postpone it for that length of time?
(a) Continuing with the same partial,
> | which has had the canine tooth added,
>
> Good option for 6 months or so while the initial rapid stage of bone resorption
> occurs. Then have a new partial made that gives full palatal coverage
An acrylic one? Sounds like a good idea as it will get me used to
having my palate completely covered ready for a complete denture.
> I assume by splinting you mean having crowns made.
Yes, like with the lateral incisor and central incisor on the other
side.
> Not a good option since the
> teeth are "virgin" and healthy. If one was concerned about the lateral incisor
> taking too much of a load, it could be "splinted" or tied to the central using a
> fine wire or mesh ribbon type material and some composite material without
> cutting into the teeth. One could even bond a set of "Maryland" type wings to
> the lingual surface.
OK. Interesting why I've always had root canals and connected crowns
rather than the method you recommend, which sounds so simple and avoids
grinding teeth and taking out the central core, which must make them
weaker (and these ARE the teeth that have always had problems, and end
up cracking or developing caries under the crowns.
> |(c) full denture, or some other treatment?
> Full denture, not recommended.
Why not a full denture? You keep telling me not to be unduly worried
and that I shouldn't expect to have any problems with a full denture.
So why is it not recommended? Especially, if I'm nearly there one way
or the other? If I could delay the process by, say, ten years, then it
makes sense to me, but if it's going to be a year or so anyway, then
what difference does it make.
> You might get away with 2 implants in the canine
> region and some attachments but 4 or more implants are usually recommended on
> the upper. The latter most likely being the recommended treatment of choice for
> someone in your situation. That is because you will have decreased bone loss
> using implants and less of a load on the remaining teeth.
I understand, but I can see that the cost would be very high.
> |How long could any of these
> | treatments delay the need for a full denture? Also, will I find a full
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Most people that tolerate a partial are accepting of a full denture. You are
> worrying unduly.
I'm not unduly worried as I have been told quite a few times that it's
not so different from my partial. I worry that my speech will be
strange for a few weeks and that my lips will jut out or whatever for a
few weeks and give the game away, which does concern me as I'm a bit
embarrassed about people finding out or asking questions. I suppose I
will no longer be able to bite with my front teeth, so uncut apples and
the like are out. But I guess I can get used to that.
> "Face aging" is usually due to a lack of maintenance. Reline or rebase the
> denture when loose (usually about every 3-4 yearsfor an upper). Replace when
> teeth are showing wear.
Good.
> If you could tolerate the impressions for the partial or already wear a it is
> highly unlikely you will gag. A well made, well maintained complete denture is
> less likely to come loose than the partial you will wear.
I agree about gagging not being a problem. It's good to hear that a
complete denture won't keep falling out.
> You are worrying unduly. Unless you live in a remote area. One could add a
> tooth, clasp and convert a partial to a full palate in the same day, sometimes
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> alterations to the denture and have it ready to wear when the tooth is extracted
> at the end of the day. How long did it take to add the canine you just lost?
I got the canine added to my denture within just a few hours. You mean
if I lose one of the four remaining teeth, I could still have it added
to my partial and have only three incisors left without having to go to
a full denture? You also mean that if I have an acrylic partial that
covers my palate completely, this can just as quickly be converted to a
temporary complete denture as adding one tooth? Am I right in believing
that my present metal-framework partial could not be so converted if I
needed a complete denture, so that this is an advantage of switching to
a full-palate acrylic partial?
> | I should mention that I have been perfectly satisfied with my partial
> | and can eat and speak without any problems. I don't know if this is any
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> via the NHS, the generally accepted dental principles I've provided may not
> necessarily apply.
OK. Actually I am from the UK but currently living in a country where
the dental services are good (no NHS-like service for dental
treatments, only private), but quite expensive. I have dental insurance
which covers quite a lot, but not exotic treatments like attachments,
Valplast and the like, and not of course implants.
Thank you again for taking the time to give me such detailed answers,
which have been quite reassuring. Knowing what to expect takes the
worry out of the whole thing. I think my greatest worry is having
people ask me why I'm not speaking normally during the initial period
of wearing a complete denture. Apart from that, I am not very
concerned.
Roy
Dr. Steve - 08 Apr 2005 20:51 GMT
>Hello Roy,
>
>I am very grateful for your detailed comments. Here are some further
>remarks.
Roy is a great guy and a terrific denturist. I have been to his
clinic and he bas been to mine.
>You mean I should have my present partial replaced by an acrylic
>partial that covers all of my palate like a full denture, but is still
>connected o my incisors with clasps? This will help prolong the
>transition to a full denture? Roughly how long can I expect to be able
>to stay with my front teeth if I keep my present partial, and how long
>could this be extended by migrating to a full-palate partial?
That design would provide wore bracing to the denture and result in
less "wiggling.
>I realize that bone resorption will take place once the incisors come
>out, but is this more of a problem than with the rest of my teeth that
>I have lost? Doesn't it just mean that I will need to have my full
>denture relined or rebased from time to time? If I am going to need a
>full denture within a few years (is this a correct guess) anyway, then
>will it make a big difference to postpone it for that length of time?
the more bone you have the more retention and resistance the denture
has.
>Why not a full denture? You keep telling me not to be unduly worried
>and that I shouldn't expect to have any problems with a full denture.
>So why is it not recommended? Especially, if I'm nearly there one way
>or the other? If I could delay the process by, say, ten years, then it
>makes sense to me, but if it's going to be a year or so anyway, then
>what difference does it make.
Full denture is seldom as comfortable as a partial denture.
>I got the canine added to my denture within just a few hours. You mean
>if I lose one of the four remaining teeth, I could still have it added
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>needed a complete denture, so that this is an advantage of switching to
>a full-palate acrylic partial?
You can easily add a tooth to the acrylic transitional denture until
if becomes a full denture.
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
StovePipe - 09 Apr 2005 00:32 GMT
> >I got the canine added to my denture within just a few hours. You mean
> >if I lose one of the four remaining teeth, I could still have it added
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> You can easily add a tooth to the acrylic transitional denture until
> if becomes a full denture.
Why can't he get the present denture extended with arcylic in the
post-dam area and to give adequate vestibular support. He could thus
have modes ready for the articulator if the 4 remaining uppers go kaput,
and he would have better support of the existing dentition, assuming
that the existing partial can be extended as a full palatal coverage
partial.
This would be a logical transition, in my humble opinion.
Jest my scratchin's
SP

Signature
Finally: take out the TRASHH
Dr. Steve - 09 Apr 2005 01:09 GMT
>> >I got the canine added to my denture within just a few hours. You mean
>> >if I lose one of the four remaining teeth, I could still have it added
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Jest my scratchin's
>SP
Perhaps. Depends on the shape of the metal.
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Roy Brown - 09 Apr 2005 05:34 GMT
| >> >I got the canine added to my denture within just a few hours. You mean
| >> >if I lose one of the four remaining teeth, I could still have it added
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
|
| I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
I'll agree with both. Stove Pipes got a good idea with the mounted models that
I'll carry 1 step further . There is no reason why one could not take
preliminary impressions and a bite. Set up the missing teeth on an acrylic base
plate. Try it in and wait if everything is OK. Once Roy knows he is going to
lose more teeth, all one has to do is do a reline impression in the
prefabricated try in and an overall alginate impression to pick up the remaining
teeth and the final denture could be finished in a day or two.
--
Roy
rem NADA to reply
StovePipe - 09 Apr 2005 21:50 GMT
> I'll agree with both. Stove Pipes got a good idea with the mounted models
> that I'll carry 1 step further . There is no reason why one could not take
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the prefabricated try in and an overall alginate impression to pick up the
> remaining teeth and the final denture could be finished in a day or two.
There ya go... Sounds reasonable to me...
SP

Signature
Finally: take out the TRASHH
Joel M. Eichen - 09 Apr 2005 12:50 GMT
Remember this:
The lateral incisor and the central incisor do not have sufficient curvature
to create the undercut area required for a decent metal clasp locking in
many cases. That is where Valplast the the flexible clasps come in.
Joel
> >> >I got the canine added to my denture within just a few hours. You mean
> >> >if I lose one of the four remaining teeth, I could still have it added
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Roy Brown - 09 Apr 2005 05:21 GMT
Roy,
You are welcome, more comments in text below
| Hello Roy,
|
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
| connected o my incisors with clasps? This will help prolong the
| transition to a full denture?
With 1/2 palate coverage you should be OK for a while. Remember a partial is
only meant to last 5-8 years. When are you due for a replacement? When replacing
you can have a full metal palate (The new titanim ones are light and fit well) .
Properly designed with the future in mind to add questionable teeth and relines
for where the bone will shrink you could have this ready to convert to a metal
based full denture. Getting the best of both worlds and extending the
anticipated life span.
| Roughly how long can I expect to be able
| to stay with my front teeth if I keep my present partial, and how long
| could this be extended by migrating to a full-palate partial?
I can't say to the first question, but usually longer to the second one. I'm not
being evasive, it is like asking a mechanic how long will your brakes last and
how much longer will they last if you use heavy duty pads. The answer depends on
what you drive and how you drive it.
| >You want to keep the teeth to prevent bone resorption that
| > will occur when you lose them.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
| I have lost? Doesn't it just mean that I will need to have my full
| denture relined or rebased from time to time?
Bone loss occurs can be described using the graph below:
http://www.necc.mass.edu/mrvis/mr2_14/figure2.gif
Where you can substitute the amount of bone (at approx 1/10 mm per value) on the
vertical axis, substituting time in months on the horizontal using the scale to
get an approximate idea of the rate of loss.
The more recent the extraction them more rapid the loss.
If you don't reline to compensate for the areas of rapid resorption you put a
greater load on the areas that have already been through this phase. The greater
load increases the rate of resorption for those areas under pressure. Using the
same graph, load is on the vertical and bone loss on the horizontal. Hence the
recommondation for full palatal coverage.
| If I am going to need a
| full denture within a few years (is this a correct guess) anyway, then
| will it make a big difference to postpone it for that length of time?
Not if you reline when needed.
| (a) Continuing with the same partial,
| > | which has had the canine tooth added,
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
| weaker (and these ARE the teeth that have always had problems, and end
| up cracking or developing caries under the crowns.
My guess is that you got crowns because you needed root canals on compromised
teeth.
| > |(c) full denture, or some other treatment?
| > Full denture, not recommended.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
| makes sense to me, but if it's going to be a year or so anyway, then
| what difference does it make.
See the graphs. You will have 10 more years of bone. You will have 10 more years
of proprioreception through the periodontal ligament. Proprioreception tells you
how hard you are biting, which better controls the amount of load you are
putting on your bone. The teeth and bone help stabilize the denture. Much like a
boat tied to a dock. Lose the teeth and the bone and your denture will be free
floating like a boat in the middle of a lake without an anchor.
| > You might get away with 2 implants in the canine
| > region and some attachments but 4 or more implants are usually
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
| will no longer be able to bite with my front teeth, so uncut apples and
| the like are out. But I guess I can get used to that.
Here are some tricks.
1. Get your hair done the day you get the denture. People will see something
different and think it is your hair.
2. Learn to hold up the back end of your denture with your tongue when biting
with your front teeth. Better yet learn to bite with your eye teeth that are
usually better positioned to handle this.
| > "Face aging" is usually due to a lack of maintenance. Reline or
| rebase the
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
| to my partial and have only three incisors left without having to go to
| a full denture?
There is a pretty good chance of that. Got a digital camera? With a picture of
your partial we could better tell.
| You also mean that if I have an acrylic partial that
| covers my palate completely, this can just as quickly be converted to a
| temporary complete denture as adding one tooth?
As above, possibly yes.
| Am I right in believing
| that my present metal-framework partial could not be so converted if I
| needed a complete denture, so that this is an advantage of switching to
| a full-palate acrylic partial?
There is a good chance it could be on a temporary basis for the 1st year. The
weak link is where the new acrylic meets the metal. This can be helped by using
an acrylic/metal bonding system or welding/soldering some retentive loops onto
the metal.
| > | I should mention that I have been perfectly satisfied with my
| partial
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
| of wearing a complete denture. Apart from that, I am not very
| concerned.
The quickest way to get your speach up to par is to sit down and read out loud
to yourself. Most people normally adapt within the first week or two without
reading. If you are having troubles with certain letters after that, then there
are modifications that can be done to the denture that will help.
--
Roy
rem NADA to reply
Charlie Oster - 09 Apr 2005 13:10 GMT
Wonderful advice. Keep the teeth!
Another option might be a complete overdenture. They are fraught with
potential pitfalls, but could give you a nice result if conditions are
right.
If your teeth already have root canals it would eliminate this major cost.
Biggest problems with complete overdentures are 1. Esthetics (esp. with
uppers) - with retained anterior roots, patients (esp. skeletal class II)
often - not always but often - look much too protrusive. 2. Fracture - but
not difficult to prevent with strong resins and/or metal reinforcement. 3.
Maintenance of abutments - any propensity for decay or perio disease will
be exacerbated by covering the roots. 4. Inadequate construction - a well-
made overdenture will be as retentive as a conventional complete denture
(no better unless you're using attachments). If improperly executed and
adjusted, however, it will rock on the abutments and retain very poorly.
Gotta see a dentist or denturist who knows what they're doing. Most of the
dentists I know don't know how to make one.
The biggest advantages vs. conventional complete denture are maintenance of
bone and proprioception. Also eliminates lateral forces on the abutments,
although in a healthy periodontal environment (no gingivitis or perio
disease) you don't have to worry about bone loss from "jiggling" forces
although there might be some concerns about unplanned/undesired orthodontic
movement.
You're only 52 (younger than me….). If you were 90 and had good ridge
form, a conventional complete denture wouldn't be a bad choice. But you
might live another - what - 30 or 40 years? That's a long time and bone
loss could easily become extensive and disabling at some point, especially
if you have lower natural teeth. I have a lot of older patients who wore
complete dentures successfully for decades but then - due to extensive bone
resorption - have major problems with comfort and function. Getting old is
tough enough without adding that to the pile.
Yankke fan - 25 Aug 2006 00:10 GMT
Yankee Fan writes
I'm a 52 year old male who ha dpoor teeth as a young man with little , or no
preventive medicine. Subsequently, I had most of my teeth removed in my 30's
and have had a full upper denture and an almost complete lower denture ( one
tooth one the left side , and two teeth on the right side as anchors, for the
past twenty yerars. I haven't been to a dentist in 15 + years. I loast the
top of the left anchor tooth several years ago. Basically, I've worn down the
dentures and need ot replace them. I'm reading that implants could cost $20,
000.00 pls. I don't even know if I'm a candidate, but i was hoping for some
input or an opinion. New dentures, or implants . Thoughts, please ! Thank
you very much !r Oster wrote:
>Wonderful advice. Keep the teeth!
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>resorption - have major problems with comfort and function. Getting old is
>tough enough without adding that to the pile.