Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Advice Please

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ken - 28 Mar 2005 01:37 GMT
I had #20 pulled.  It was the anchor of a 4 unit bridge.
Now I have nada on 18-20.  #17 was salvaged from the old bridge and now
stands alone as a crown (actually it is the remnant of the original 4 unit
bridge).
I like to chew on this side...it was always my favorite.
Options that have been presented to me are as follows:

1- implant on 18 and 20 with a 3 unit bridge across.
2- 5 unit bridge from 17-21
3- Partial denture for 18-20

I would appreciate any opinions.. I know the implants would probably be the
longest lasting but I don't know if I want to wait for almost a year.  I had
a socket graft on #20 at the time of the extraction.
Please include any downside for each option.  It seems that the partial
denture would be the quickest and easiest fix.  But how would it effect my
chewing.

Thank you, Ken
Happy Easter to All
NOYB - 28 Mar 2005 01:48 GMT
>I had #20 pulled.  It was the anchor of a 4 unit bridge.
> Now I have nada on 18-20.  #17 was salvaged from the old bridge and now
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Thank you, Ken
> Happy Easter to All

A bridge from 17-21 won't last very long.  It's a waste of money IMO.  I'd
go with option #1.  It's worth the wait (although the wait is usually 3-6
months...not one year).  If the idea of going without teeth on that side for
3-6 months is unbearable, then you could always get a partial denture to
wear in the interim.  That #3, followed by option #1.
ken - 28 Mar 2005 02:23 GMT
The reason I say one year is that the socket graft takes about 4 months
before he can do the implant.

Thanks, Ken

>>I had #20 pulled.  It was the anchor of a 4 unit bridge.
>> Now I have nada on 18-20.  #17 was salvaged from the old bridge and now
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> for 3-6 months is unbearable, then you could always get a partial denture
> to wear in the interim.  That #3, followed by option #1.
Steven Bornfeld - 28 Mar 2005 03:57 GMT
> The reason I say one year is that the socket graft takes about 4 months
> before he can do the implant.

    I agree with NOYB that relying on #17 as the only rear supporting tooth
for a long span bridge is a poor plan--and also places #21 at risk from
overloading.

Steve

> Thanks, Ken
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>for 3-6 months is unbearable, then you could always get a partial denture
>>to wear in the interim.  That #3, followed by option #1.

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

NOYB - 28 Mar 2005 17:21 GMT
> The reason I say one year is that the socket graft takes about 4 months
> before he can do the implant.

And 3 months for implant integration in the mandible...and 2 weeks for the
implant abutment and crown to be fabricated.  7 1/2 months total.

I still say do the implant.
Richard M. Geis - 28 Mar 2005 16:19 GMT
Ken
I have to agree that the 5 unit bridge won't last long. A partial
denture would be nice to have even if you decide on implants.

The problem I see is that if you are less than 45 or so, this may not be
the last of your problems. Also, typically, lower teeth fare better than
uppers. Would this be your first removeable appliance? How are your
uppers doing?

Good Luck

> I had #20 pulled.  It was the anchor of a 4 unit bridge.
> Now I have nada on 18-20.  #17 was salvaged from the old bridge and now
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Thank you, Ken
> Happy Easter to All
ken - 28 Mar 2005 17:03 GMT
I am 59.. uppers are fine on that side.  It would be my first removable
appliance.  How often would I need to remove and how would it effect my
chewing?
Should the partial be temporary pending implants or permanent?

thanks, Ken
> Ken
> I have to agree that the 5 unit bridge won't last long. A partial denture
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>> Thank you, Ken
>> Happy Easter to All
Richard M. Geis - 28 Mar 2005 22:35 GMT
There are two kinds of partials. The temporary kind (500-1000) and made
of plastic with wire clasps around existing teeth for stability. These
should not be used for more than a year because they tend to be harmful
to your residual areas that have no teeth (edentulous areas). The other
more permanent partials (800-1200) are made primarily of metal with
plastic areas with teeth in the edentulous areas. These also have clasps
around existing teeth, however they have rests so they are easier on the
edentulous areas.

Both types have a period of time that it takes you to get use to it. The
 temporary takes more time because it has around twice the size of the
more permanent (because the metal is stronger than plastic, you need
more plastic to keep it from breaking).

You need to take which ever you get out to brush your teeth. Also food
gets underneath them when you eat, so you probably have to remove them
after most meals.

I would recommend implants, if you can afford them. You should get a
partial as upper teeth may move into the space left from the lack of
lower teeth, causing a problem when making the bridge for the implants.
If you can afford the more permanent partial, get it because you will
hate the temporary.

Good Luck

> I am 59.. uppers are fine on that side.  It would be my first removable
> appliance.  How often would I need to remove and how would it effect my
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>>Thank you, Ken
>>>Happy Easter to All
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.