> Robert Morien wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Various sources indicate that the first use of metal amalgams made with
> mercury for restorative dentistry in Europe is dated around 1826.
> This use quickly became widespread and was exported to the USA in 1833.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Holocaust of the twentieth century would not have had the option at any
> point during their lives of having decayed teeth filled with amalgam.
And yet people still have gold teeth (caps) placed in their mouths to
this very day. Do they do it from cultural issues, style, health or do
they just like the idea of a gold tooth?
> The following is from:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> alloys of precious metal had been removed from 2,904 Auschwitz
> prisoners between May and December 1942."
Just want to be sure that amalgam is the preferred choice for dentures
at that time. Yes?
> That's an average of more than 5 gold(*) teeth per prisoner.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> (*) it appears that the precious metal platinum was also used, but to a
> lesser degree.
I'd say it was meaningless statistics. 2,904 prisoners does not
represent the general population of Europe any more than it represents
the general population of Jews.
I'd also say that if your case is that the gold was used for dental
practices of the Germans, then Gold teeth must have been common enough
to require the gold.
Joel M. Eichen - 08 Apr 2005 12:12 GMT
> I'd say it was meaningless statistics. 2,904 prisoners does not
> represent the general population of Europe any more than it represents
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> practices of the Germans, then Gold teeth must have been common enough
> to require the gold.
R E P L Y
Robert wrote,
> Gold teeth must have been common enough
> to require the gold.
MY COMMENT ~ I'd have to agree with Robert this time! The gold teeth were
made from gold.