Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Holocaust Dental Gold: The Fast Track to the Gas Chamber

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Keith P Walsh - 26 Mar 2005 10:40 GMT
Several sources indicate that prisoners of the Nazi death camps were
graded according to the amount of gold dental work they had in their
teeth.

e.g.

"An informant stationed in the dental station at Mauthausen
concentration camp stated that incoming camp prisoners were separated
based on the amount of dental gold, and some of those with more gold
were sent to more intensive labor camps in order to expedite their
death:"

http://www.courttv.com/archive/legaldocs/misc/naziswiss.html

The cursory "medical" examinations which were carried out on death
camp prisoners to select batches of victims (see Spielberg's depiction
of camp officers yanking open prisoners' mouths in order to look
inside), are sometimes interpreted by the more romantic of holocaust
commentators as "the exercise of the power of life or death by the
oppressor over his victim".

Is it possible that the real point of these examinations was often
much more mundane than this?

Is it possible that the primary importance of these examinations was
in maximising the efficiency of the process of dental gold
reclamation?

And is it possible that some prisoners survived because they had
looked after their teeth better than others?

Keith P Walsh

PS, I am aware that some people prefer to play down the dental gold
aspect of the holocaust, to the point of ignoring or even attempting
to refute eye-witness testimonies and documentary evidence. I call
such people "holocaust deniers".

The following source:

http://isurvived.org/Lustig_Oliver-CCDictionary/CCD-09_L.html

says:

"It has been estimated that from Birkenau-Auschwitz alone 6.000
kilograms of dental gold were sent to Berlin."

At today's prices six thousand kilograms of gold is worth around 80
million US dollars.

The article Holocaust Dental Gold Underestimated? can be found at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
Keith P Walsh - 27 Mar 2005 15:01 GMT
"When patients arrived at one of the six killing centers, they were
unloaded via a covered wooden corridor ....... Their identities were
checked and they were closely observed by a physician, who attempted
to match the size and appearance of the patient with a sham cause of
death that was shortly to follow ..... Those who possessed gold dental
work were further marked with an X on their backs."

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HDF/is_3_36/ai_93974004/pg_7

>Several sources indicate that prisoners of the Nazi death camps were
>graded according to the amount of gold dental work they had in their
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
>http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
Keith P Walsh - 28 Mar 2005 19:06 GMT
"Q.  How much gold from teeth was sent out of Treblinka each week?

A.  Each week two suitcases were sent off, each of them containing
about eight to ten kilograms.

Q.  Where were they sent to?

A.  They were delivered again to this Matthias, who was the chief of
our camp in fact, the chief of our barracks, of the building where we
lived and he told us that they were dispatching them to Berlin. "

http://www.ukar.org/eichma02.html

At today's prices 16 to 20 kilograms of gold is worth around a quarter
of a million US dollars.

>"When patients arrived at one of the six killing centers, they were
>unloaded via a covered wooden corridor ....... Their identities were
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>>
>>http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
Keith P Walsh - 30 Mar 2005 19:05 GMT
"Next, a three-doctor panel gave each new prisoner a medical and
dental examination. Anyone who had gold in his mouth had his number
added to a list."

http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Wiesel/Reis1.html

>"Q.  How much gold from teeth was sent out of Treblinka each week?
>
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>>>
>>>http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
Keith P Walsh - 31 Mar 2005 19:05 GMT
The website of the USS Washington offers the following:

"In two weeks, 50 kilograms of dental gold thus accumulated goes to
the SS for its own dental needs. SS officers commence to build
numbered Swiss bank accounts and open safety  deposit boxes filled
with gold, as a hedge against the day of reckoning."

See:

http://www.usswashington.com/dl20se42.htm#top

At today's prices 50 kilograms of gold is worth more than half a
million US dollars.

Does anyone know if this amount of dental gold was accumulated in such
a short space of time from a broad cross-section of holocaust victims?

Or would it have been necessary to "fast track" those prisoners with
conspicuously large amounts of gold dental work in their mouths in
order to achieve such a rapid yield?

Keith P Walsh

>"Next, a three-doctor panel gave each new prisoner a medical and
>dental examination. Anyone who had gold in his mouth had his number
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
>>>>
>>>>http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
Robert  Morien - 31 Mar 2005 23:46 GMT
> The website of the USS Washington offers the following:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://www.usswashington.com/dl20se42.htm#top

And there is absolutely no attribution to this statement at this site.

> At today's prices 50 kilograms of gold is worth more than half a
> million US dollars.
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
> >>>>
> >>>>http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
Keith P Walsh - 01 Apr 2005 06:14 GMT
>> The website of the USS Washington offers the following:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>And there is absolutely no attribution to this statement at this site.

The above quote is taken from an article which is presented at the
given URL under the name of David H Lippman.

Are you saying that Mr Lippman's information is inaccurate?

>> At today's prices 50 kilograms of gold is worth more than half a
>> million US dollars.
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
Robert  Morien - 01 Apr 2005 07:12 GMT
> >> The website of the USS Washington offers the following:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> The above quote is taken from an article which is presented at the
> given URL under the name of David H Lippman.

And who is David H Lippman, what are his credentials? What is his
relationship to a battleship that never got closer to Europe than San
Francisco? Why is that "info" presented in the method it is and what is
it's relevence to all of the other statements on that page?

> Are you saying that Mr Lippman's information is inaccurate?

I am saying that Mr Lippman has no attribution to the statement, so how
would anyone confirm that his information is accurate?

> >> At today's prices 50 kilograms of gold is worth more than half a
> >> million US dollars.
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
carabelli - 01 Apr 2005 02:30 GMT
Keith, when did you change medications?  We're curious, what did you stop
taking and what did you replace it with?

carabelli
Keith P Walsh - 01 Apr 2005 06:03 GMT
>Keith, when did you change medications?  We're curious, what did you stop
>taking and what did you replace it with?
>
>carabelli

I am trying to establish how it came about that the victims of the
Nazi holocaust had so much gold in their teeth.

Do you have anything intelligent to contribute?

Keith P Walsh

PS, The article Holocaust "Dental Gold Underestimated?" can be found
at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
Robert  Morien - 01 Apr 2005 07:16 GMT
> >Keith, when did you change medications?  We're curious, what did you stop
> >taking and what did you replace it with?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I am trying to establish how it came about that the victims of the
> Nazi holocaust had so much gold in their teeth.

How much gold was in the teeth of other Europeans at this time? How much
gold had been used for dentistry in the previous 60-80 years in
Europeans. How many gold teeth did Himmler have? Borman? Hess? Eva
Braun? Goebbels? Stalin? Truman? MacArthur?

> Do you have anything intelligent to contribute?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm
StovePipe - 03 Apr 2005 03:50 GMT
Robert Morien <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote:

> > I am trying to establish how it came about that the victims of the
> > Nazi holocaust had so much gold in their teeth.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Europeans. How many gold teeth did Himmler have? Borman? Hess? Eva
> Braun? Goebbels? Stalin? Truman? MacArthur?

Bugs Bunny? Whinnie the Pooh?
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

W_B - 04 Apr 2005 17:31 GMT
>Bugs Bunny? Whinnie the Pooh?
>SP

Sponge Bob ?
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Keith P Walsh - 07 Apr 2005 19:20 GMT
>> I am trying to establish how it came about that the victims of the
>> Nazi holocaust had so much gold in their teeth.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Europeans. How many gold teeth did Himmler have? Borman? Hess? Eva
>Braun? Goebbels? Stalin? Truman? MacArthur?

Various sources indicate that the first use of metal amalgams made
with mercury in restorative dentistry in Europe is dated around 1826.

This use quickly became widespread and was exported to the USA in
1833.

Prominent dental associations today acknowledge the widespread use of
amalgams in dentistry for "more than 150 years".

It is highly improbable therefore that anyone killed in the Nazi
Holocaust of the twentieth century would not have had the option of
having decayed teeth filled with amalgam.

The following is from:

http://www.holocaust-history.org/johannesburg-citizen/

"A post-war study by the Main Commission for the Investigation of
German Crimes in Poland, which surveyed over 2,900 reports on the
removal of false teeth, concluded that 16,325 teeth made of gold and
alloys of precious metal had been removed from 2,904 Auschwitz
prisoners between May and December 1942."

That's an average of more than 5 gold(*) teeth per prisoner.

Do you think that in this respect these prisoners would have been
representative of the general population of Europe at that time?

Or would you say that you don't know?

Keith P Walsh

PS, The article Holocaust "Dental Gold Underestimated?" can be found
at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm

(*) it appears that the precious metal platinum was also used, but to
a lesser degree.
Joel M. Eichen - 08 Apr 2005 12:10 GMT
> >> I am trying to establish how it came about that the victims of the
> >> Nazi holocaust had so much gold in their teeth.

R E P L Y

Pretty simple. At that point in history, all bridgework and all crowns were
fabricated from gold. Many restorations (fillings) were of gold as well.

Joel

> >How much gold was in the teeth of other Europeans at this time? How much
> >gold had been used for dentistry in the previous 60-80 years in
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> (*) it appears that the precious metal platinum was also used, but to
> a lesser degree.
Keith P Walsh - 08 Apr 2005 05:30 GMT
Robert Morien wrote:

> > I am trying to establish how it came about that the victims of the
> > Nazi holocaust had so much gold in their teeth.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Europeans. How many gold teeth did Himmler have? Borman? Hess? Eva
> Braun? Goebbels? Stalin? Truman? MacArthur?

Various sources indicate that the first use of metal amalgams made with
mercury for restorative dentistry in Europe is dated around 1826.

This use quickly became widespread and was exported to the USA in 1833.

Prominent dental associations today acknowledge the widespread use of
amalgams in dentistry for "more than 150 years".

It is highly improbable therefore that anyone killed in the Nazi
Holocaust of the twentieth century would not have had the option at any
point during their lives of having decayed teeth filled with amalgam.

The following is from:

http://www.holocaust-history.org/johannesburg-citizen/

"A post-war study by the Main Commission for the Investigation of
German Crimes in Poland, which surveyed over 2,900 reports on the
removal of false teeth, concluded that 16,325 teeth made of gold and
alloys of precious metal had been removed from 2,904 Auschwitz
prisoners between May and December 1942."

That's an average of more than 5 gold(*) teeth per prisoner.

Do you think that in this respect these prisoners would have been
representative of the general population of Europe at that time?

Or would you say that you don't know?

Keith P Walsh

PS, The article Holocaust "Dental Gold Underestimated?" can be found
at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/underestimated.htm

(*) it appears that the precious metal platinum was also used, but to a
lesser degree.
Robert  Morien - 08 Apr 2005 06:48 GMT
> Robert Morien wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Various sources indicate that the first use of metal amalgams made with
> mercury for restorative dentistry in Europe is dated around 1826.

> This use quickly became widespread and was exported to the USA in 1833.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Holocaust of the twentieth century would not have had the option at any
> point during their lives of having decayed teeth filled with amalgam.

And yet people still have gold teeth (caps) placed in their mouths to
this very day. Do they do it from cultural issues, style, health or do
they just like the idea of a gold tooth?

> The following is from:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> alloys of precious metal had been removed from 2,904 Auschwitz
> prisoners between May and December 1942."

Just want to be sure that amalgam is the preferred choice for dentures
at that time. Yes?

> That's an average of more than 5 gold(*) teeth per prisoner.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> (*) it appears that the precious metal platinum was also used, but to a
> lesser degree.

I'd say it was meaningless statistics. 2,904 prisoners does not
represent the general population of Europe any more than it represents
the general population of Jews.

I'd also say that if your case is that the gold was used for dental
practices of the Germans, then Gold teeth must have been common enough
to require the gold.
Joel M. Eichen - 08 Apr 2005 12:12 GMT
> I'd say it was meaningless statistics. 2,904 prisoners does not
> represent the general population of Europe any more than it represents
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> practices of the Germans, then Gold teeth must have been common enough
> to require the gold.

R E P L Y

Robert wrote,

> Gold teeth must have been common enough
> to require the gold.

MY COMMENT ~ I'd have to agree with Robert this time! The gold teeth were
made from gold.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.