Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lack of responses to LL, used to be Jan Drew - who is she trying to fool??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
carabelli - 24 Mar 2005 06:32 GMT
FYI  for the new poster and/or lurker.  Why don't dentists challenge Lady
Lollipop ( who used to post as Jan Drew but doesn't use her real name
anymore)?

1. It is a waste of our time. Simply because she is uneducated, and judging
by the contents of her usenet posts, an intellectual incompetent.  Rationale
debate or discussion is impossible.

2. Did I mention it is a waste of time?

3. Responses encourage her to continue posting here and that, my friends,
leaves the dentally uninformed easy prey for the charlatans out there who
are ready to take your money, give you false hope, or worse.

4. God is on her side, and her side only, according to her, unless you agree
with her.

5. In case you forgot, it is a fruitless endeavour and suprisingly a waste
of your time.
---------------
She has however, mastered the art of manipulating those who choose to
respond on SMD.  Why on earth would one continue?  For a time, I did love
giving her smartass responses that nailed her as the pompous loudmouth idiot
that she is.  Those posts went over her head so many times that there is
talk of windfarm electric generators in Kansas from all the wooshes.  But,
it became pointless, she/he/it simply feeds on it.  I do not read her posts
anymore except when responders include some of her original post.

Best wishes

carabelli
Joel M. Eichen - 24 Mar 2005 10:31 GMT
>FYI  for the new poster and/or lurker.  Why don't dentists challenge Lady
>Lollipop ( who used to post as Jan Drew but doesn't use her real name
>anymore)?

Darn!

You sure?

I thought there were two of them ......

joke.

Joel
Joel M. Eichen - 24 Mar 2005 10:32 GMT
>4. God is on her side, and her side only, according to her, unless you agree
>with her.

True, every time I crack open a new bottle of amalgam, thunder and
lightning strike.

Joel
carabelli - 31 Mar 2005 05:34 GMT
FYI  for the new poster and/or lurker.  Why don't dentists challenge Lady
Lollipop ( who used to post as Jan Drew but using AOL was too confusing for
her)

1. It is a waste of our time. Simply because she is uneducated, and judging
by the contents of her usenet posts, also a bigoted, intellectual
incompetent.  Rationale
debate or discussion is impossible.

2. Did I mention it is a waste of time?

3. Responses encourage her to continue posting here and that, my friends,
leaves the dentally uninformed easy prey for the charlatans out there who
are ready to take your money, give you false hope, or worse.

4. God is on her side, and her side only, according to her, unless you agree
with her.  One has to suppose she hears voices daily.  Which presents a
conundrum because I'm fairly certain that at one point she had God killfiled
along with everyone else posting to usenet.

5. See # 1

6. See # 2

7. I hear there is a book coming out.  "The 32 Cures To All That Ails You"
---------------
Do you enjoy watching a cow regurgitating its' cud?

Cheers

carabelli
W_B - 31 Mar 2005 05:42 GMT
>Do you enjoy watching a cow regurgitating its' cud?
>
>carabelli

It's about as much fun as watching paint dry.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Joel M. Eichen - 31 Mar 2005 11:22 GMT
>FYI  for the new poster and/or lurker.  Why don't dentists challenge Lady
>Lollipop ( who used to post as Jan Drew but using AOL was too confusing for
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>2. Did I mention it is a waste of time?

Besides we are all in de-NILE.

Joel

>3. Responses encourage her to continue posting here and that, my friends,
>leaves the dentally uninformed easy prey for the charlatans out there who
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>carabelli
LadyLollipop - 31 Mar 2005 21:29 GMT
Improvements in health from removal of amalgams

http://www.heart-disease-bypass-surgery.com/data/articles/63.htm

Studies have demonstrated that the removal of dental mercury amalgam
fillings
can result in definitive and significant improvements in overall health
status.The Foundation for Toxic-Free Dentistry compiled data on 1,569
patients
from six different sources. Of particular interest in the FTFD analysis
report
isthe fact that 14% of patients experienced some form of allergic
symptomology
and that 89% reported that their condition had improved or was entirely
eliminated after removal of their silver/mercury dental amalgam
fillings.Systemic mercury toxicity appears to have a direct causal
relationship
to the development of allergic sensitivity to foods, chemicals and other
environmental factors.

Extrapolating the FTFD data to the approximately 140 million individuals
with
mercury dental amalgams in the U.S, there would be about 19.6million people
(14%) with mercury amalgam-related allergies, and, 89% or about17.4 million
people would experience the amelioration or disappearance of theirallergies
by
simply having their silver/ mercury dental amalgam fillings replaced with
non-mercury, hypoallergenic composite dental fillings.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_
uids=12534597&dopt=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_
uids=11460087&dopt=AbstractAbstract:

We present a case of exercise-induced anaphylaxis with improvement following
the removal of dental amalgam. Although her symptoms were unresponsive to
various kinds of therapy until removal of the amalgam, her symptoms related
to
exercise improved remarkably after the removal. The increase in plasma
histamine levels for exercise provocation test also improved. This suggests
that sensitivity to metals might cause exercise-induced asthma in some
patients.

Headache and backache responded best to treatment, but> >>all symptoms
showed
considerable improvement on average. Of the respondents, 78% reported that
they
were either satisfied or very satisfied with the results of treatment, and
9.5%
reported that they were disappointed.

http://www.home.earthlink.net/~berniew1/index.html

I. DENTAL AMALGAM FILLINGS PAGE- documents high common mercury exposure
levels
from dental amalgam fillings; and common adverse health effects on people
and
dental staff; plus results of 60,000 clinical cases of significant
improvements
to chronic conditions after amalgam replacement and treatment- as followed
and
documented by doctors; plus environmental effects of amalgam that affect
everyone.
(over 1500 peer-reviewed medical study or Gov't Agency references
documenting
mechanisms by which mercury from amalgam causes over 30
chronic health conditions)

http://www.lichtenberg.dk/experience_after_amalgam_removal.htm

http://www.lichtenberg.dk/symptoms_before_and_after_proper.htm

http://www.rmdentalcentre.com/article.cfm?artid=4&catid=1

http://www.notdoctors.com/mercfill.html

http://www.geocities.com/toothk/bernieref1.html

http://www.web-light.nl/AMALGAM/EN/frame_r.html#V

http://www.positivehealth.com/permit/Articles/Dentist/crawford76.htm

http://www.web-light.nl/AMALGAM/EN/frame_r.html#V

http://www.testfoundation.org/amalgremove.htm

http://tinyurl.com/5ddzt

Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Jul;6(4):49-55.    Related Articles, Links

Results of dental amalgam removal and mercury detoxification using DMPS and
neural therapy.

Kidd RF.

Sixty consecutive patients who had undergone replacement of dental amalgam
fillings and a protocol of nutritional support and heavy metal
detoxification using dimercapto-propanyl-sulfate and neural therapy were
surveyed. A questionnaire was mailed to the patients and 42 responded,
resulting in a response rate of 70%. The reasons for undergoing treatment
were many, ranging from a patient's desire to avoid potential health
problems in the future to treatment of serious current disease. Although
medical diagnoses were made when possible before treatment, this survey
studied only the patients' estimations of their most distressing symptoms
and their evaluations of response to treatment. The most common complaints
were problems with memory and/or concentration; muscle and/or joint pain;
anxiety and insomnia; stomach, bowel, and bladder complaints; depression;
food or chemical sensitivities; numbness or tingling; and eye symptoms, in
descending order of frequency. The most distressing symptoms were headache
and backache, fatigue, and memory and concentration problems. Headache and
backache responded best to treatment, but all symptoms showed considerable
improvement on average. Of the respondents, 78% reported that they were
either satisfied or very satisfied with the results of treatment, and 9.5%
reported that they were disappointed.

PMID: 10895513 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://www.earthtym.net/merc-recover2.htm
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.