Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NICO

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
LadyLollipop - 17 Mar 2005 00:23 GMT
Another denial from *organized dentistry*

From the voice of experience, I've had one cavitations cleaned twice to
relieve the God awful pressure in the jaw bone, my dentist even found some
copper.

All insults will be ignored.

http://maxillofacialcenter.com/NICOhome.html

http://www.drshankland.com/nico.html

http://www.holisticmed.com/dental/root.html#cavitation

http://www.holisticmed.com/dental/cavitation1.html

http://www.tldp.com/issue/157-8/157rootc.htm

http://www.whale.to/d/cavitations.html

http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm#cavitations

LL
DrSteve - 17 Mar 2005 01:27 GMT
For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been diagnosed by
one biopsy lab in the entire United States.  No other lab has been able to
find it.  Be warned.  Make up your own mind.

> Another denial from *organized dentistry*
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> LL
W_B - 17 Mar 2005 04:01 GMT
>For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been diagnosed by
>one biopsy lab in the entire United States.  No other lab has been able to
>find it.  Be warned.  Make up your own mind.

From:  www.aae.org

The following statement was prepared by the AAE Research and
Scientific Affairs Committee to address
issues being raised by some endodontic patients. AAE members may
photocopy this statement for
distribution to patients or referring dentists.

AAE Position Statement
NICO Lesions
(Neuralgia-Inducing Cavitational Osteonecrosis)

The NICO lesion (Neuralgia-Inducing Cavitational Osteonecrosis, also
known as Ratner’s bone cavity) was first
described in the dental literature in 1920 by G.V. Black. The lesion
consists of ischemic osteonecrosis found in the
jaws of patients with symptoms of atypical facial pain or trigeminal
neuralgia. Research has shown the lesions to
be difficult to diagnose. The lesion will sometimes present very
subtle radiographic changes often detectable only
by a technetium scan or with multiple periapical radiographs. The
overlying soft tissues show no changes.
Many etiologies for NICO have been suggested, but none have been
substantiated through research. According
to noted oral pathologist Dr. J.E. Bouquot, the typical NICO case
occurs as facial pain many years after an
extraction or an infection in the area. Odontogenic infections and
minor trauma have been suggested as initiators,
and correlations to clotting or vascular abnormalities have been made
based on anecdotal associations. No
scientific studies have demonstrated a causative relationship between
endodontic therapy and the formation of
NICO.
The recommended treatment for NICO is decortication and curettage of
the bony tissues. While this practice
has produced relief of pain in some cases, NICO has a strong tendency
to recur and to develop in other jawbone
sites.
Most affected sites with a postoperative NICO diagnosis have been in
edentulous areas. However, some patients
with long, frustrating histories of pain associated with
endodontically treated teeth have been presented the
treatment option of tooth extraction followed by periapical curettage
in an attempt to alleviate pain. The
American Association of Endodontists cannot condone this practice when
NICO is suspected. Because of the lack
of clear etiological data, a NICO diagnosis should be considered only
as a last resort when all possible local
odontogenic causes for facial pain have been eliminated. If a NICO
lesion is suspected in relation to an
endodontically treated tooth, if possible, periradicular surgery and
curettage should be attempted, not extraction.
In addition, the practice of recommending the extraction of
endodontically treated teeth for the prevention of
NICO, or any other disease, is unethical and should be reported
immediately to the appropriate state board of
dentistry.

The following statement was prepared by the AAE Research and
Scientific Affairs Committee to address
issues being raised by some endodontic patients. AAE members may
photocopy this statement for
distribution to patients or referring dentists.
AAE Position Statement
NICO Lesions
(Neuralgia-Inducing Cavitational Osteonecrosis)
References References References References References
1. Bouquot JE. In review of NICO (neuralgia-inducing cavitational
osteonecrosis), GV Black’s
forgotten disease. 1995, 4th ed.
2. Bouquot JE, Christian J. Long-term effects of jawbone curettage on
the pain of facial neuralgia. J
Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:387–397.
3. Ratner EJ, Langer B, Evins ML. Alveolar cavitational osteopathosis.
Manifestations of an infectious
process and its implication in the causation of chronic pain. J
Periodont 1986; 58:593–603.
4. Segall RO, del Rio CE. Cavitational bone defect: a diagnostic
challenge. J Endodon 1991; 17:396–
400.
© 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, Association of Endodontists,

www.aae.org

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
LadyLollipop - 17 Mar 2005 06:36 GMT
>>For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been diagnosed
>>by
>>one biopsy lab in the entire United States.  No other lab has been able to
>>find it.  Be warned.  Make up your own mind.
>
> From:  www.aae.org

*organized dentistry liars, the ssame ones who deny the risks of amalgams.
LadyLollipop - 17 Mar 2005 06:30 GMT
> For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been diagnosed
> by one biopsy lab in the entire United States.  No other lab has been able
> to find it.  Be warned.  Make up your own mind.

Follow-up Studies

Published Literature

Research Papers

Research Abstracts

Medicine published research

>> Another denial from *organized dentistry*
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>
>> LL
Peter Bowditch - 17 Mar 2005 09:07 GMT
>> For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been diagnosed
>> by one biopsy lab in the entire United States.  No other lab has been able
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Medicine published research

All of them things which Jan rejects.

<snip repetition>

Signature

Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project
    http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud
    http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

clintonz@prodigy.net - 17 Mar 2005 09:44 GMT
> For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been diagnosed by
> one biopsy lab in the entire United States.  No other lab has been able to
> find it.  Be warned.  Make up your own mind.

Hmmm. What about this photo?

http://maxillofacialcenter.com/JOPM99/NICOjopm2a.html

What is that and what is it called?
Tony Bad - 17 Mar 2005 15:53 GMT
> > For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been
> diagnosed by
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> What is that and what is it called?

The photo is clearly labeled "Ischemic Osteonecrosis"...why the ??

Note that this photo is from what is apparently the only path lab in the
country that makes the NICO diagnosis.

T
clintonz@prodigy.net - 17 Mar 2005 21:05 GMT
> > > For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been
> > diagnosed by
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> The photo is clearly labeled "Ischemic Osteonecrosis"...why the ??

This question has come up in other lists. What is the difference
between osteomyletis and Osteonecrosis? Can osteomyletis cause
nerve pain?

Now if Osteonecrosis exists as shown in that photograph are
you saying that it can't cause neuralagia, therefore NICO
doesn't exist or that "cavitational osteonecrosis does not
exist"?

Also, given that a sample shows osteonecrosis as in the photograph,
how could a biopsy lab diagnose or not diagnose NICO since
you can't tell anything about the nervous system from a jaw sample,
unless you are saying that no nerve damage in the jaw from
osteonecrosis has ever been found?

Another point is, If pockets of bacterial infection exists
in the jawbone, couldn't they kill nearby surrounding bone
and therefore cause some kind of local necrosis or does
that not meet the definition of osteonecrosis?
W_B - 17 Mar 2005 21:44 GMT
>> The photo is clearly labeled "Ischemic Osteonecrosis"...why the ??
>
>This question has come up in other lists. What is the difference
>between osteomyletis and Osteonecrosis?

After Stedman's:

Osteomyelitis

Inflammation of the bone marrow and adjacent bone and
epiphysial cartilage.

Osteonecrosis

The death of bone in mass, as distinguished
from caries ("molecular death"), or relatively
small foci of necrosis in bone.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Tony Bad - 17 Mar 2005 22:36 GMT
> > > > For any casual readers of this post.  NICO has only [ever] been
> > > diagnosed by
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> between osteomyletis and Osteonecrosis? Can osteomyletis cause
> nerve pain?

Any inflammatory condition can and will cause "nerve pain". Is there another
kind of pain???

> Now if Osteonecrosis exists as shown in that photograph are
> you saying that it can't cause neuralagia, therefore NICO
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> unless you are saying that no nerve damage in the jaw from
> osteonecrosis has ever been found?

The issue here is not whether necrosis can occur in bone, it is more related
to the fact that the site you cite seems to be the only one that diagnoses
NICO. Doctor's that have been swept up in NICO mania are also claiming to be
able to cure many systemic conditions by treating these reported holes in
your jaw. There are further reports that endodontically treated teeth cause
these holes and therefore extracting teeth will also cure many systemic
conditions.

Your question of "how could a biopsy lab diagnose or not diagnose NICO since
you can't tell anything about the nervous system from a jaw sample" is a
good one, and one you may want to ask of the only lab that says they CAN
make this diagnosis. I'd certainly like to hear their response!

> Another point is, If pockets of bacterial infection exists
> in the jawbone, couldn't they kill nearby surrounding bone
> and therefore cause some kind of local necrosis or does
> that not meet the definition of osteonecrosis?

Necrosis usually (always?) refers more to breakdown associated with a loss
of blood supply rather than an infectious process. The presence of infection
associated with a tooth can cause destruction of bone, and this is commonly
seen and treated, but this process isn't really accurately described as
necrosis.
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 22:58 GMT
>> between osteomyletis and Osteonecrosis? Can osteomyletis cause
>> nerve pain?
>
>Any inflammatory condition can and will cause "nerve pain". Is there another
>kind of pain???

WoW!

Exactly what I said!

Joel
Tony Bad - 17 Mar 2005 23:05 GMT
> WoW!
>
> Exactly what I said!
>
> Joel

Great minds think alike...sometimes..(;^D)

T
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 22:57 GMT
>This question has come up in other lists. What is the difference
>between osteomyletis and Osteonecrosis? Can osteomyletis cause
>nerve pain?

Its a world of difference.

The usffix -itis means "inflammation of ...."

Necrosis means death.

As in necrotic tissue.

Relating to or affected by necrosis

Yes it can cause nerve pain, which is the only type of pain by the
way.

Joel
W_B - 18 Mar 2005 00:18 GMT
>nerve pain, which is the only type of pain by the
>way.
>
>Joel

Indeed.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 18 Mar 2005 13:44 GMT
>>nerve pain, which is the only type of pain by the
>>way.
>>
>>Joel
>
>Indeed.

Indeed and THANK GOD!

Nerve pain is bad enough ........
W_B - 17 Mar 2005 03:57 GMT
>Path: news.easynews.com!en206!core-easynews!newsfeed2.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s51.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
>From: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Another...

...spam.

Reported.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Tony Bad - 17 Mar 2005 04:04 GMT
> ...spam.
>
> Reported.
>
> --
> W_B

Thanks...wasn't Nico the lead singer of the Velvet Underground? I wonder if
she approves of her name being used to describe a phantom hole.

T
W_B - 17 Mar 2005 04:09 GMT
>> ...spam.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>T

Good one !

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
LadyLollipop - 17 Mar 2005 06:37 GMT
>>Path:
>>news.easynews.com!en206!core-easynews!newsfeed2.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s51.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE

ROTFLOL
clintonz@prodigy.net - 17 Mar 2005 04:32 GMT
> Another denial from *organized dentistry*
>
> From the voice of experience, I've had one cavitations cleaned twice to
> relieve the God awful pressure in the jaw bone, my dentist even found some
> copper.

Really, probably from the corroding amalgam! Non-gamma 2?
You should have the saved the amalgam. i had high Cu
in my blood before amalgam removal.

I also heard of another case where copper/amalgam residue
had gotten into the pulp.

The sick part is that they are so used to finding 100's
of times normal Hg near fillings and elevated Hg levels in blood that
even if you manange to track it and measure it properly you
still can't prove anything. If you show them copper residue or
high blood copper levels they'll say, well that doesn't prove
anything either.
Fawks - 17 Mar 2005 05:29 GMT
Tin hat.

Fawks
clintonz@prodigy.net - 17 Mar 2005 07:59 GMT
> Tin hat.
>
> Fawks

I swear you must be a plant by the ADA. Who else would defend
amalgam in the face of the known scientific evidence. And why do you
care anyway? If your trying to ease your conscience attacking
the victims of modern dentistry ultimately you will only bring yourself
more shame.

Unfortunately, the only concievably crazy person in my story is the
dentist who placed my filling and actually had to be locked out of the
office by his associate. His associate knew
he was crazy when I called him up to ask why my records were
missing. His phraseology was "We left on bad terms".

In fact according to US Search my dentist had 17 separate address from
the time he left the practice in 1993 to the time he died in 2003 after
"wandering" the country including:

9 addresses in San Fransico, CA
2 address in Lewes DE
5 addresses in Arlington, VA
1 Address in DC

Do a US search! Robert J Marko. You really want to know
who is crazy? It's all there on the web!

Now  he was probably consciously practicing with Aids and my records
where probably consciously removed too because only mine
out of 3 family members where missing! At least Two counts of crimminal
misconduct!

http://www.camprehoboth.com/issue05_16_03/we_remember.htm

He also may have lied about why he left the practice in 1993 telling
his associate he "hurt" his arm in an auto accident to go on
disability... another count of crimminal misconduct or fraud? Guess
I'll find out this year when I see the lawyer to determine
what really went on in that office.

Lets also not forget that some valiant Phd capsules are known
to be defective

http://www.brooks.af.mil/dis/HOT/valiantphd.htm

(Only the physical properties of the amalgam are changed? BS)

But, in spite of all that you "know" I'm crazy because you believe or
chose to participate in the propagation of the  systematic lies of the
ADA. And no matter the defective product, crazy dentist or well known
mechanisms of amalgam breakdown and high levels of copper in my blood
it "cannot be the filling".

Maybe at some point during your lifetime you will actually get
a clue, or choose not to participate professionally in the orchestrated
deception of the ADA. Now run along and go back into the crack in the
ground you crawled out of.
Steven Fawks - 17 Mar 2005 14:17 GMT
I'm not defending amalgam.  I am pointing out that you make very
little sense in your arguments against it.  I haven't used amalgam
for over 20 years and it wouldn't bother me if it were gone tomorrow.

You are delusional, your friend on here is a fruitcake (albeit a
mean spirited one).

Fawks

>>Tin hat.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> amalgam in the face of the known scientific evidence. And why do you
> care anyway?
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 14:29 GMT
>I'm not defending amalgam.  I am pointing out that you make very
>little sense in your arguments against it.  I haven't used amalgam
>for over 20 years and it wouldn't bother me if it were gone tomorrow.

You still drill out old amalgam, and therefore no one is safe from
Jan!

Joel

>You are delusional, your friend on here is a fruitcake (albeit a
>mean spirited one).
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> amalgam in the face of the known scientific evidence. And why do you
>> care anyway?
Dr Steve - 17 Mar 2005 15:17 GMT
Different heads of the same body.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
> I'm not defending amalgam.  I am pointing out that you make very
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> amalgam in the face of the known scientific evidence. And why do you
>> care anyway?
clintonz@prodigy.net - 17 Mar 2005 21:20 GMT
> Different heads of the same body.

i almost forgot about Jackass number2. Another dentist
who doesn't care about how much Hg crap they shovel into
the population.

You'd think you would have shut your mouth after attacking
me for lying about being in Mensa/ acusing me of being Jan
and I had to waste my time to post proof to the contrary.

Now your running your ADA asskissing mouth again.
Ever going to apologize or admit like a real man that you were even
wrong about the first repeatedly made accusation, or you just going to
keep the manure dripping from your mouth.
clintonz@prodigy.net - 17 Mar 2005 20:51 GMT
> I'm not defending amalgam.  I am pointing out that you make very
> little sense in your arguments against it.

I make perfect 100% sense. you just can't understand science.
That's also why you never reply specifically to any of the
points I make or attempt to describe the chemistry of amalgam
in any amount of detail, other than to say 'it's safe'.

I haven't used amalgam
> for over 20 years and it wouldn't bother me if it were gone tomorrow.
>
> your friend on here is a fruitcake (albeit a
> mean spirited one).

Jan is not my friend. I am an Hg poisoned athiest. That means
I was Hg POISONED AND I am going to HELL....bummer

> You are delusional

This is like arguing with a kindergartner. Accusing me of
what you are? Listen you Jackass. How am i delusional?

That my records are missing?
That valiant phd capsules are known defective?
That my dentist had to be locked out of the practice?
that among other indicators of toxicity such as below
normal/thyroid, higher kidney creatnine etc I also had elevated
copper (and even elevated Hg in my hair)
That one of my ex dentists assistants had to fired for incompentence?
That my ex-dentist wandered the country after leaving the
practice in some kind of a daze with 17 different address?
That my denist was practicing with Aids and Aids can cause
mental confusion in the early stages of the disease?
That research in the 90's shows gamma-two's to be unstable?
That published peer reviewed studies show people with enough
elemental Hg from amalgam to exceed the threshhold for
micromercurialsim?

and much more... all EASILY provable.

You are the stupidest kind of person there is, which is
you form a conclusion (that amalgam is safe) and let that
fit your intrepretation of the facts, no matter what the
evidence is to the contrary.

You dental types also seem to think you can screw somebody once
and then after you ruin their lives, screw them again by
labeling them as crazy....That going to dental school
gave you liscence to lie about the real properties of amalgam and
expose the entire population (including kids) to that crap and a
psychologists liscence to try to put them in the nuthouse if they have
a bad reaction to it.

In my opinion you are neither professionals, scientists or
psychologists, though a substantial number of dentists do
seem to be nutty and also have a very high chance of commiting suicide.
Another good reason to keep yourself and your family away from them and
Hg.
Jorge Bonilla - 18 Mar 2005 01:42 GMT
> > I'm not defending amalgam.  I am pointing out that you make very
> > little sense in your arguments against it.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> Another good reason to keep yourself and your family away from them and
> Hg.

This last paragraph explains a lot of the things you and others say on
this usenet group. I now have a better perspective of the things I read
here.
Dr. Bonilla
clintonz@prodigy.net - 18 Mar 2005 22:55 GMT
> This last paragraph explains a lot of the things you and others say on
> this usenet group. I now have a better perspective of the things I read
> here.
> Dr. Bonilla

By the way I do not mean to imply that dentistry is not a legitamite
profession. From what I have learned, correctly practiced it can be
as/or more demanding than any medical specialty. Only that the ADA's
behavior is not science based and therefore not professional in my
opinion.

Also I am very un-happy with the medical profession which is just
as much to blame for these issues IMO. (After all everyone who
goes to a dentist goes to a doctor for a yearly check up and doctors
are aware of the presence of Hg in amalgam).
Joel M. Eichen - 18 Mar 2005 23:33 GMT
>Also I am very un-happy with the medical profession which is just
>as much to blame for these issues IMO. (After all everyone who
>goes to a dentist goes to a doctor for a yearly check up and doctors
>are aware of the presence of Hg in amalgam).

Organized medicine?
Joel M. Eichen - 18 Mar 2005 23:33 GMT
>By the way I do not mean to imply that dentistry is not a legitamite
>profession. From what I have learned, correctly practiced it can be
>as/or more demanding than any medical specialty. Only that the ADA's
>behavior is not science based and therefore not professional in my
>opinion.

What is your opinion about mercury fillings.? Are they pizin?
StovePipe - 18 Mar 2005 03:14 GMT
> I'm not defending amalgam.  I am pointing out that you make very
> little sense in your arguments against it.  I haven't used amalgam
> for over 20 years and it wouldn't bother me if it were gone tomorrow.
> Fawks

SF, if you don't mind me asking (and I'm not asking for a course in
dentistry) what would you use in those deep boxes like the ones I posted
last week? We know that DrS would Am it for three weeks and then CEREC
it. W_B would put adrenalin in it until it stopped bleeding and then
probably Fuji 9 it and then composite over top, or he'd bash the lady's
head in for being so stoopid in letting her mouth get so far... and I'd
do what I did: Am; end of story. Jeff Brucia would Fuji II LC it and
then composite over top (he showed us some photos of those)... but that
is hard to do when it's that deep. Is there any other alternative?
Thanks
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH and pull in the 9's

W_B - 18 Mar 2005 16:39 GMT
>> I'm not defending amalgam.  I am pointing out that you make very
>> little sense in your arguments against it.  I haven't used amalgam
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Thanks
>SP

Extraction.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 19 Mar 2005 02:41 GMT
> Is there any other alternative?
> >Thanks
> >SP
>
> Extraction.
> --

Ummmm....... OK...
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.